Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui praktik edukasi perpajakan yang dilakukan terhadap Wajib Pajak badan asing yang terdaftar di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing dan kesesuaiannya dengan pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan kajian pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga penelitian dapat memberikan gambaran terkait praktik edukasi perpajakan terhadap Wajib Pajak badan asing yang terdaftar di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing. Objek penelitian adalah praktik edukasi perpajakan di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing yangdilakukan selama tahun 2019. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa praktik edukasi perpajakan terhadap Wajib Pajak Kantor Perwakilan Perusahaan Asing danBentuk Usaha Tetap, baik dari segi metode edukasi, teknik edukasi, materi edukasi, pemberi materi edukasi, maupun sarana pendukung, secara umum telah sesuai dengan pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Sedikit perbedaan yang ditemukan pada praktik edukasi perpajakan adalah bentuk upaya penyesuaian yangdilakukan KPP Badan dan Orang Asing dalam menghadapi tantangan berupa uniknya karakteristik Wajib Pajak badan asing yang merupakan Subjek Pajak Luar Negeri yang perlakuan perpajakannya dipersamakan dengan subjek pajak badan serta beban kerja tambahan dalam bentuk penyelesaian administrasi pembebasan dan restitusi PPNdan/atau PPnBM bagi Perwakilan Negara Asing dan Organisasi Internasional.

---

This study was conducted to determine the practice of tax education implemented on

foreign corporate taxpayers registered in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service

Office and their compliance with the rules and regulations. This study uses a qualitative

approach by collecting data through interviews and reviewing the guidelines and

provisions of the laws and regulations so that the research can provide an overview

related to the practice of tax education for foreign corporate taxpayers who are

registered in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office. The object of the

research is the practice of taxation education in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office conducted during 2019. The results of this study indicate that the practice of taxation education for Taxpayers of Representative Office of Foreign Companies and Permanent Establishments, whether in terms of educational methods, educational techniques, educational materials, providers of educational material, and supporting facilities, are generally in accordance with the guidelines and provisions of the legislation. The slight difference found in the practice of taxation education is a form of adjustment efforts made by Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office for overcoming challenges faced in the form of the matchless characteristics of foreign

corporate taxpayers who are Foreign Tax Subjects whose tax treatment is equivalent to corporate tax subject and additional workload in the form of settling the administration of exemption and refund of VAT and/or Sales Tax on Luxury Goods which are granted

for Representatives of Foreign Countries and determined International Organizations."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui praktik edukasi perpajakan yang dilakukan terhadap Wajib Pajak badan asing yang terdaftar di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing dan kesesuaiannya dengan pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan kajian pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga penelitian dapat memberikan gambaran terkait praktik edukasi perpajakan terhadap Wajib Pajak badan asing yang terdaftar di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing. Objek penelitian adalah praktik edukasi perpajakan di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing yang dilakukan selama tahun 2019. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa praktik edukasi perpajakan terhadap Wajib Pajak Kantor Perwakilan Perusahaan Asing dan Bentuk Usaha Tetap, baik dari segi metode edukasi, teknik edukasi, materi edukasi, pemberi materi edukasi, maupun sarana pendukung, secara umum telah sesuai dengan pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Sedikit perbedaan yang ditemukan pada praktik edukasi perpajakan adalah bentuk upaya penyesuaian yang dilakukan KPP Badan dan Orang Asing dalam menghadapi tantangan berupa uniknya karakteristik Wajib Pajak badan asing yang merupakan Subjek Pajak Luar Negeri yang perlakuan perpajakannya dipersamakan dengan subjek pajak badan serta beban kerja tambahan dalam bentuk penyelesaian administrasi pembebasan dan restitusi PPN dan/atau PPnBM bagi Perwakilan Negara Asing dan Organisasi Internasional.

---

This study was conducted to determine the practice of tax education implemented on foreign corporate taxpayers registered in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office and their compliance with the rules and regulations. This study uses a qualitative approach by collecting data through interviews and reviewing the guidelines and provisions of the laws and regulations so that the research can provide an overview related to the practice of tax education for foreign corporate taxpayers who are registered in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office. The object of the research is the practice of taxation education in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office conducted during 2019. The results of this study indicate that the practice of taxation education for Taxpayers of Representative Office of Foreign Companies and Permanent Establishments, whether in terms of educational methods, educational techniques, educational materials, providers of educational material, and supporting facilities, are generally in accordance with the guidelines and provisions of the legislation. The slight difference found in the practice of taxation education is a form of adjustment efforts made by Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office for overcoming challenges faced in the form of the matchless characteristics of foreign corporate taxpayers who are Foreign Tax Subjects whose tax treatment is equivalent to corporate tax subject and additional workload in the form of settling the administration of exemption and refund of VAT and/or Sales Tax on Luxury Goods which are granted for Representatives of Foreign Countries and determined International Organizations."

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai kepastian hukum penanaman modal asing di Indonesia kemudian membandingkan Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal di Indonesia dan Vietnam. Pokok permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana kepastian hukum penanaman modal asing di Indonesia serta bagaimana perbandingan undang-undang penanaman modal di Indonesia dan Vietnam. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui, memahami dan menganalisi masalah kepastian hukum Penanaman Modal Asing di Indonesia, dan perbandingan Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal antara Indonesia dan Vietnam. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder diantaranya peraturan perundang-undangan dan buku-buku.Penanaman Modal Asing memberi manfaat dan dampak yang positif untuk pertumbuhan ekonomi suatu negara, begitu juga untuk Indonesia dan Vietnam yang masih dianggap sebagai destinasi investasi Asia dan dunia. Banyak faktor yang menjadi bahan pertimbangan bagi penanam modal untuk menanamkan modalnya pada suatu negara, salah satunya adalah jaminan kepastian hukum. Masalah kepastian hukum seringkali menjadi penghambat masuknya investasi, khususnya di Indonesia karena ketidakpastian hukum menyebabkan iklim investasi menjadi tidak kondusif. Penelitian ini membandingkan Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal antara Indonesia dan Vietnam, kemudian menemukan beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan didalamnya. Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal harus bisa mengakomodir kepentingan penanam modal asing dengan memberi kepastian hukum, diikuti dengan penegakan hukum, tanpa mengurangi kepentingan nasion.

---

This research examines the legal certainty of foreign investment in Indonesia and subsequently compares the investment laws between Indonesia and Vietnam. The principal issue raised in this research is about the legal certainty of foreign investment in Indonesia as well as how the Indonesian laws of investment are compared to the laws of investment in Vietnam. As for the purpose of this research is to discover, comprehend and analyze the legal certainty problem of Foreign Investment in Indonesia, and the comparison of Investment Laws between Indonesia and Vietnam. This research is a legal research which is juridical normative using secondary data such as legislation and books.

Foreign investment gives benefits and impact which are positive for economic growth of a country, as well as to Indonesia and Vietnam which are still regarded as the investment destination in Asia and in the world. There are many factors taken into consideration for investors to invest in a country, one of them is legal certainty assurance. Legal certainty problem often obstructs the entry of investment, especially in Indonesia because the legal uncertainty made it inconducive for investment. This research attempts to compare the laws of investment between Indonesia and Vietnam, and subsequently locate the similarities and differences between them. Investment laws should be able to accommodate the interests of foreign investors by providing legal certainty, followed by law enforcement, without jeopardizing national interest."

"Penelitian ini membahas tentang kepastian hukum penanaman modal asing dalam hukum penanaman modal di Indonesia yaitu dengan membandingkan peraturan penanaman modal asing di Indonesia dan Thailand, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal dan The Investment Promotion Act. B.E. 2560, serta melihat juga kepastian hukum terhadap Penanaman Modal Asing di bidang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum dan pendekatan perundang-undangan, sehingga diketahui bahwa terdapat ketidakjelasan mengenai pengaturan penanaman modal asing di Indonesia, yang menimbulkan tumpang tindih antara peraturan pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah, serta menimbulkan ketidakjelasan birokrasi. Kemudian dalam penanaman modal asing di bidang pertambangan mineral dan batubara, pemerintah seharusnya dapat mengontrol dalam pengelolaannya karena mineral dan batubara berperan penting dalam kemakmuran dan kesejahteraan rakyat. Kemudian terdapat perbedaan dan persamaan antara Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal dan The Investment Promotion Act. B.E. 2560 di Thailand. Persamaannya terdapat pada pemberlakuan undang-undang, adanya lembaga khusus, dan pemberian fasilitas serta insentif dalam kegiatan penanaman modal. Perbedaanya, terdapat pada substansi undang-undang, bentuk badan usaha, koordinasi dan pengawasan serta evaluasi terhadap kegiatan penanaman modal asing. Dengan demikian, diperlukan ketentuan yang ada harus jelas dan detail, dari peraturan tertinggi hingga peraturan pelaksananya harus sesuai dan dapat direalisasikan, khususnya ketentuan mengenai perizinan dan koordinasi antara pemerintah pusat dan daerah, serta pengawasan terhadap penegakan hukum juga harus tetap dilaksanakan dan berkelanjutan.

---

This research discusses the legal certainty of foreign investment in investment law in Indonesia by comparing the regulations of foreign investment in Indonesia and Thailand, under The Act Number 25 of 2007 on Investment and The Investment Promotion Act. B.E. 2560, and also see legal certainty to Foreign Capital Investment in Mineral and Coal Mining according to The Act Number 4 of 2009 about Mineral and Coal Mining. This research uses normative juridical research method with comparative law approach and statutory approach, there is unclear about foreign investment arrangement in Indonesia, causing overlap between central and local government regulations, and causing bureaucratic uncertainty. Then in foreign investment of mineral and coal mining, the government should be able to control in its management because mineral and coal have an important role in prosperity. There are differences and similarities between The Act Number 25 of 2007 on Investment and The Investment Promotion Act. B.E. 2560 in Thailand. The similarities are in the enactment of the law, the existence of special institutions, and the provision of facilities and incentives in investment activities. The difference is in the substance of the law, the form of business entity, coordination and supervision and evaluation of foreign investment activities. Therefore, the necessary provisions must be clear and detailed, from the highest regulation to the implementing regulations to be appropriate and realizable, in particular provisions on licensing and coordination between central and local government, and supervision of law enforcement must also be implemented and sustained."

"Dalam kebijakan perpajakan, pengampunan pajak merupakan istrumen kebijakan suatu Negara untuk menaikan pendapatan Negara dalam waktu singkat. Dalam pelaksanaannya memerlukan istrumen-instrumen pendukung untuk mensukseskan program tersebut. Indonesia setidaknya telah melaksanakan program pengampunan pajak lebih dari 1 (satu) kali, mulai dari tahun 1964, terakhir dilaksanakan pada Tahun 2015. Kemudian digulirkan kembali pada Tahun 2016, pembahasannya sedang berjalan di Dewan perwakilan Rakyat. Tesis ini membahas pengampunan pajak dan pelaksanaannya di Indonesia dan Negara lain, serta kaitan antara pengampunan pajak di Indonesia dengan kepastian hukum. Penelitian yang menggunakan metode yuridis normatif ini, menyimpulkan bahwa dalam pelaksanaan pengampunan pajak memerlukan landasan hukum yang kuat dan instrumen-istrumen pendukung untuk menjamin kepastian dalam pelaksanaannya.

---

In the context of tax policy, an amnesty constitutes a policy instrument through which a country can stimulate an immediate increase in tax revenue. In practice, it takes a number of other supporting instruments in order for that program to succeed. Indonesia has granted tax amnesty at least four times, in 1964, 1984, 2008 and 2015. In 2016 the same program is set to commence and currently matters relating to its implementation are being discussed in the House of Parliament. This thesis discusses how tax amnesty in Indonesia and other countries is implemented and the relevance of such program to Legal Certainty. This juridical –normative research concludes that the commencement of the tax amnesty program requires a strong legal basis and all the corresponding instruments to ensure successful implementation of the program."

"Pemberlakuan UU Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal telah membuka babak baru dalam mewujudkan kepastian hukum bagi kegiatan penanaman modal baik asing maupun domestik di Indonesia. Keberadaan klausula pendahulu (grandfather clause) dalam Undang-Undang tersebut khususnya menjamin kepastian hukum bagi investasi yang telah dilakukan sebelum berlakunya UU Nomor 25 Tahun 2007. Akan tetapi, sayangnya komitmen ini tidak dijabarkan lebih lanjut dalam tataran operasional dan sektoral. Dalam sektor-sektor layanan kesehatan dan perdagangan internasional, berbagai peraturan pelaksana justru menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang merugikan tidak saja para investor asing tetapi juga Indonesia sendiri. Peraturan-peraturan baru mengenai industri farmasi, pedagang besar farmasi dan registrasi obat telah mengacaukan struktur industri farmasi yang selama ini telah bekerja dengan baik di Indonesia. Terlebih lagi, ketentuan mengenai satu angka pengenal importir (API) bagi satu importir juga tidak mengindahkan cara kerja industri farmasi sehingga menimbulkan berbagai kesulitan. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis peraturan-peraturan tersebut dan memberikan usulan mengenai bagaimana peraturan-peraturan itu disinkronisasi dan dikonsistenkan dengan kerangka hukum mengenai penanaman modal pada umumnya.

---

The enactment of Law Number 25 Year 2007 on Investments has opened a new chapter in the realization of legal certainty for investment activities both foreign and domestic in Indonesia. The existence of grandfather clause in the Law particularly provides legal certaincy for investments already performed before the enactment of Law Number 25 Year 2007. Unfortunately, however, this commitment is not translated further into operational and sectoral levels. In healthcare and international trade sectors, various implementing regulations have stirred legal uncertainty that is detrimental not only for foreign investors but also Indonesian national economy itself. New regulations concerning pharmaceutical industries, pharmaceutical wholesaler and drug registration have disrupted Indonesian pharmaceutical industry’s existing structure that has proven to work well for a long time. Moreover, legal provision requiring an importer to only have one importer identification number clearly disregarded the working of pharmaceutical production thus causing so much troubles. This research seeks to identify and analyse those implementing regulations and thereupon proposing on how the regulations should be synchronized and made consistent with the general legal framework for investments in Indonesia."

"Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) digunakan untuk mengukur tingkat produktivitas KPP Pratama di Indonesia. 288 KPP Pratama digunakan sebagai sampel periode 2009-2012. KPP dibagi menjadi dua group KPP yang homogen berdasar analisis cluster. Input yang digunakan yaitu jumlah pegawai, biaya operasional dan jumlah wajib pajak. Penerimaan pajak dan laporan SPT digunakan sebagai output. Hasil DEA menunjukkan 11 KPP Pratama tetap efisien selama periode 2009-2012. Regresi tobit digunakan untuk mengkaji pengaruh input dan output terhadap skor efisiensi, hasilnya variabel output dan jumlah wajib pajak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap skor efisiensi, sedangkan biaya operasional tidak berpengaruh signifikan, jumlah pegawai hanya berpengaruh signifikan pada group 1 namun tidak berpengaruh signifikan pada group 2.

---

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to measure productivity level of small taxpayer offices in Indonesia. Using 288 tax offices as a sample during period 2009-2012. Tax offices grouped into two homogen groups using cluster analysis. Input used in the analysis are number of tax employee, operational cost and number of taxpayers. Tax income and number of tax returns are used as outputs. DEA results show 11 tax offices remain efficient during 2009-2012. Tobit regression is used to determine the effect of the input and output to the efficiency score, the results show that output variables and number of taxpayers as a determinant factors, while operational cost not a determinant factor. Number of employee is a determinant factor in group 1 but not in group 2."

"Pembentukan perusahaan grup badan usaha milik negara berbentuk persero sedang gencar dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Republik Indonesia agar tercipta perusahaan grupyang ramping dan kuat. Dengan dilakukannya pembentukan perusahaan grup tersebut, persero-persero yang terlibat diharapkan akan semakin fokus dalam mengembangkan bisnisnya dari hulu hingga ke hilir. Akan tetapi, terdapat polemikpolemik dari gagasan pembentukan perusahaan grup ini. Mulai dari tidak adanya peraturan yang sistematis, rinci, dan komperhensif mengenai pembentukan perusahaan grup beserta hubungan-hubungan yang terjadi didalamnya, hingga terlalu kuatnya dominasi negara di dalam anak perusahaan akibat penyisipan saham seri A dwi-warna yang mengaburkan batasan antara kepemilikan dan pengendalian sehingga melunturkan prinsip separate legal entity. Adapun penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode yuridis-normatif melalui kajian peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan serta menganalisis doktrin-doktrin ahli hukum terkait dengan permasalahan yang dibahas. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Indonesia belum mengakomodasi kerangka regulasi yang valid dan memadai dalam pembentukan perusahaan grup baikdari segi pendirian, hubungan antara induk dan anak perusahaan, perpajakan, keuangan, persaingan usaha, kepailitan, dan sebagainya. Kemudian, tidak adanyabatasan yang jelas mengenai peran negara dalam dominasi dan/atau kontrol anak perusahaan melalui saham seri A dwi-warna yang berpotensi menyebabkan pengurusan perusahaan menjadi tidak efisien dan mencederai prisip-prinsip Good Corporate Governance.

---

The establishment of a state-owned group company is being intensively carried out by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia in order to create a lean and strong group company. By encouraging these group companies, the involved companies are expected to be more focused on developing their business from upstream to downstream. However, there are several problems and polemics about the establishment of this kind of group company. Starting from the absence of systematic, detailed, and comprehensive regulations regarding the establishment of group companies as well as the relationships that will occur within parent and subsidiary company, to the overly strong dominance of the state in the subsidiary company due to the insertion of golden share which is owned by Indonesia Government that obscures the boundary between ownership and control as well as injures the principleof separate legal entity. The research is conducted by juridical-normative method through the study of relevant legislation and analyzing the doctrines from legalexperts which are related to the issues discussed. The results of this study conclude that Indonesia has not accommodated a valid and adequate regulatory frameworkregarding group companies in terms of establishment, relations between parent and subsidiaries companies, taxation, finance, business competition, bankruptcy, and so on. Then, there is no clear boundary regarding the role of the state in dominating and/or controlling subsidiaries through golden share which has the potential to cause the management of the company to be inefficient and injure the principles of Good Corporate Governance."