Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Although Ebola and similar hemorrhagic fevers have occurred in the past, both the numbers and geographic spread of the 2014-15 West African Ebola epidemic were unprecedented. Ebola and the associated risks drove an improvised, sometimes ineffective, response from political and medical authorities. Fear, rather than rational planning, drove many decisions made at population and leadership levels. Institutions, practices, economies, and governments were all deeply affected by the demands engendered by this emergency. Ultimately, the epidemic revealed serious fault lines at all levels in the theories and practices of global public health. Doctors Without Borders/Medecins sans Frontieres (MSF), as the major provider of medical care to the afflicted, was deeply entangled in many of these issues. From difficult choices made for the care of individual patients to the impact of Ebola on entire health systems, the common thread in each chapter is how fear influenced the political and medical response. Using materials from the MSF archives, this book explores this theme in ten chapters and four eyewitness vignettes. The book examines the epidemic from the perspectives of a wide range of actors from distinct sectors, including a bioethicist, a political scientist, a historian, clinical doctors, policymakers, and anthropologists."

"ABSTRAK Artikel ini membahas hubungan antara framing media dan bagaimana media mainstream dan alternativemenggambarkan masalah pemboman Rumah Sakit MSF di Kunduz, Afghanistan. Teori-teori ilmu komunikasidigunakan dalam analisa perbandingan isi artikel-artikel media mainstream dan media alternative dalam waktu satubulan setelah pemboman Rumah Sakit MSF. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kedua media mainstream danalternative menggambarkan perspektif yang berbeda pada masalah yang sama. Media mainstream menggambarkanpemboman sebagai kerusakan tambahan akibat penyerangan terhadap tentara Taliban dan sebuah kesalahan yangmendorong Militer Amerika Serikat untuk melakukan investigasi sendiri yang akan berjalan dengan transparan.Namun, media alternative menggambarkan peristiwa sebagai pembantaian yang dilakukan dengan sengaja. Selainperbedaan pada isi artikel, perbedaan juga terlihat pada bagaimana kedua media menulis artikel mereka. Artikelmedia mainstream tidak terlihat bias dengan menghindari kata-kata sifat dan tidak terdapat pendapat atauargumentasi penulis , sedangkan dalam artikel media alternative terlihat sangat bias dengan banyaknya kata-katasifat dan pendapat atau argumentasi penulis.ABSTRACT This article examines the relationship between media framing and the way both mainstream and alternative mediaportray MSF Hospital bombing issue. Communication theories are used in a comparative content analysis thatexamines the articles written by mainstream and alternative media sources within a month after MSF Hospital bombing. The research finds that both mainstream and alternative media portray different perspectives on a similarissue. Mainstream media portrays the bombing as a collateral damage and a mistake, and toward this mistake U.S.will do their own investigation that will run unbiased and transparent. However, alternative media portrays theevent as a massacre that is done intentionally. Moreover, the way they construct their articles are different.Mainstream media article stay away from bias by avoiding any adjective words and not including author opinion orargumentation, while in alternative media article, there are a lot of adjective words and author opinion orargumentation.;This article examines the relationship between media framing and the way both mainstream and alternative mediaportray MSF Hospital bombing issue. Communication theories are used in a comparative content analysis thatexamines the articles written by mainstream and alternative media sources within a month after MSF Hospital bombing. The research finds that both mainstream and alternative media portray different perspectives on a similarissue. Mainstream media portrays the bombing as a collateral damage and a mistake, and toward this mistake U.S.will do their own investigation that will run unbiased and transparent. However, alternative media portrays theevent as a massacre that is done intentionally. Moreover, the way they construct their articles are different.Mainstream media article stay away from bias by avoiding any adjective words and not including author opinion orargumentation, while in alternative media article, there are a lot of adjective words and author opinion orargumentation.;This article examines the relationship between media framing and the way both mainstream and alternative mediaportray MSF Hospital bombing issue. Communication theories are used in a comparative content analysis thatexamines the articles written by mainstream and alternative media sources within a month after MSF Hospital bombing. The research finds that both mainstream and alternative media portray different perspectives on a similarissue. Mainstream media portrays the bombing as a collateral damage and a mistake, and toward this mistake U.S.will do their own investigation that will run unbiased and transparent. However, alternative media portrays theevent as a massacre that is done intentionally. Moreover, the way they construct their articles are different.Mainstream media article stay away from bias by avoiding any adjective words and not including author opinion orargumentation, while in alternative media article, there are a lot of adjective words and author opinion orargumentation.;This article examines the relationship between media framing and the way both mainstream and alternative mediaportray MSF Hospital bombing issue. Communication theories are used in a comparative content analysis thatexamines the articles written by mainstream and alternative media sources within a month after MSF Hospital bombing. The research finds that both mainstream and alternative media portray different perspectives on a similarissue. Mainstream media portrays the bombing as a collateral damage and a mistake, and toward this mistake U.S.will do their own investigation that will run unbiased and transparent. However, alternative media portrays theevent as a massacre that is done intentionally. Moreover, the way they construct their articles are different.Mainstream media article stay away from bias by avoiding any adjective words and not including author opinion orargumentation, while in alternative media article, there are a lot of adjective words and author opinion orargumentation."