Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"In the summer of 1950, FBI agents arrested Julius Rosenberg and charged him with conspiracy to commit espionage. Specifically the Justice Department accused him of passing-through his brother-in-law-the secret of the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union. A few weeks later they charged Julius is wife Ethel with the same crime to pressure them to name spies. Convicted and sentenced to death at the height of cold war anti-communist hysteria, the couple was plunged into a whirlwind of appeals, protests, and propaganda until their executions in June 1953. Their deaths did little to silence protest, however; as martyrs their case became legend and cast a spotlight on their two orphaned sons. More than half a century later the trial and executions remain living and breathing controversies. This book uses nearly one thousand newly discovered state department documents for the first time to expose protest movements from 84 cities in 48 countries around the world. While the Truman administration initiated the charges against the Rosenbergs, officials were just beginning to grasp the significance of the case overseas when Eisenhower took office. This prompted a harsh reset in the governments largely untested propaganda apparatus, which struggled to persuade the global community of the wisdom of executing the couple. Allies and potential allies remained unconvinced that the United States had the moral authority to lead and win the Cold War. These new documents allow the history of the Rosenberg case to be told as a pivotal and transnational Cold War event."

"During the cold war, the superpowers endeavored to win hearts and minds through what came to be called public diplomacy. Many of the target audiences were on the front lines in Europe. But other, larger ones resided in areas outside Europe, in the throes of decolonization and poverty. Among these lands, for all the drama of war, intervention, and revolution, the majority experienced the cold war as public diplomacy, as a media war for their allegiance rather than as a violent war for their lives. In these areas, superpower public diplomacy encountered issues of race, empire, poverty, and decolonization, all in flux as they intersected with the cold war, and with long-running anti-imperialist currents. The challenge to US public diplomacy was acute, as the image of the United States was inseparable from Jim Crow and from Washingtons European alliances. Yet the greater consequence of these campaigns was not for American diplomacy, but rather for postwar international history, when the non-European world responded to this media war by joining it. Newly independent voices launched public diplomacy campaigns of their own, making for a crowded field. In addition to validating the strategic importance of public diplomacy, this proliferation of voices articulated a different vision. Reappropriating the space left between the poles of the superpower conflict, this global conversation formulated the Third World project around a nucleus of nonalignment, development, and anticolonial racial solidarity. The Global South response to the Cold War thereby helped to coalesce the third world as a transnational imagined community."

"Tesis ini membahas diplomasi publik NATO di Eropa pasca perang dingin. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan sumber data dari media video tentang NATO baik yang diproduksi oleh Divisi Diplomasi Publik NATO PDD yang dibentuk pada tahun 2003 maupun yang diproduksi sebelum berdirinya PDD ini. Secara acak saya mengambil 30 video tentang NATO. Dari ke 30 video tersebut, 10 dibuat oleh Associated Press AP dan 20 dibuat oleh PDD. Video ini dianalisa dengan teori agenda setting, konsep diplomasi publik dan konsep diplomasi militer. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa NATO menggunakan media massa dan mekanisme agenda setting, diplomasi publik dan diplomasi militer sebagai agenda operasinya karena dalam media video yang dianalisis ini terdapat agenda-agenda tertentu, khususnya politik, dengan tujuan mempengaruhi pandangan pemirsanya, mempromosikan kepentingannya pada publik dan entitas politik lainnya, serta untuk menunjukan kerjasama militer NATO. Pada 10 video produksi AP menunjukan bahwa NATO adalah penyelamat warga Kosovo keturunan Albania. NATO berpartisipasi dalam menjaga perdamaian di Kosovo dan melaksanakan misi PBB dalam KFOR sebagai pasukan pengamat dan penjaga perdamaian di Kosovo. Pada 20 video produksi PDD menunjukan bahwa NATO siap menghadapi ancaman Rusia, ISIS, teroris dan musuh lainnya serta NATO terdepan dalam misi kemanusiaan seperti tanggap bencana dan perlindungan di jalur perdangan laut. NATO aktif menjaga keamanan dan melindungi anggota-anggota dari berbagai ancaman konvensional ataupun cyber threat. NATO juga aktif mengadakan latihan militer bersama dengan anggota dan mitranya.

---

This thesis explains about NATO rsquo s public diplomacy in Europe post Cold War. This research used qualitative method with sources of datas from videos about NATO, both from NATO Public Diplomacy Division PDD , which founded in 2003 and from the year before the division was built. The researcher randomly picked 30 videos about NATO and from those videos, 10 was made by Associated Press AP and 20 videos made by PDD. The video is analyzed with the agenda setting theory, public diplomacy concept and military diplomacy concept.

From the results of the study it can be concluded that NATO uses mass media and agenda setting, public diplomacy and military diplomacy mechanisms as its operational agenda. Because it is shown in the video that there are certain agendas, especially politics, with the aim of influencing the viewer 39 s perception, promoting their interests to the public and other political entities, and to demonstrate NATO 39 s military cooperation. Based on 10 videos made by AP, it shows that NATO is the savior of Kosovo citizens of Albanian descent.

NATO is participating in maintaining peace in Kosovo and implementing the UN mission in KFOR as an observer and peacekeeping force in Kosovo, and on 20 videos made by PDD shows that NATO is ready to face the threat against Russia, ISIS, terrorists and other enemies, and that NATO is leading in humanitarian missions such as disaster response and maritime protection. NATO actively maintains security and protects members from various conventional threats or cyber threats. NATO is also active in conducting joint military exercises with its members and partners."