Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Kebebasan di dalam anarkisme adalah hasil dari usaha pembebasan. Hal itu membuat studi anarkisme memiliki teori yang kuat tentang diktum kebebasan dalam membela sosok-sosok tertindas. Usaha dalam pembebasan anarkis, akan diaplikasikan untuk mengoptimalkan diskursif ekofeminisme yang sedari awal bertujuan membela subjek Women-other dan Other-nature yang tertindas dari dominasi berbasis patriarki, dengan basis konsep dari ekofeminisme dipahami sebagai intra konektivitas. Tetapi dalam perjalanannya, basis justifikasi dari intra konektivitas, menjadi konsep yang memfemininkan alam dan menaturkan perempuan. Konsep itu akhirnya mengaburkan alur pembebasan subjek, bertentangan dengan makna kebebasan yang dalam teori anarkisme mendahulukan autentisitas dari otonomi kedirian. Anarko-ekofeminisme hadir untuk itu, hingga pembebasan punya makna yang radikal saat penindasan juga terasa begitu radikal. Konsep anarko-ekofeminisme ini merupakan eksplorasi dari hasil studi pemikiran Emma Goldman dan Murray Bookchin.

---

Freedom in anarchism is a result of liberation. Thus, the study of anarchism has a strong theory of the dictum of freedom, that defends oppressed individuals and communities, even at a conceptual stage. In restoring this anarchist liberty, ecofeminism discourse is pertinent, which defends the subject of Women Other and Other nature, oppressed from patriarchal based domination, with the concept of ecofeminism is understood as interconnectivity. However, in its journey, the justification for interconnection is trying to feminize nature and to naturalize women. The concept ultimately obscures the flow of subject liberation, contrary to the meaning of freedom which in the theory of anarchism prioritizing the authenticity of the autonomy of selfhood. Anarcho ecofeminism emphasized liberation, it strengthens the meaning of radicalism. In this study anarcho ecofeminism is explored through the study of Emma Goldman and Murray Bookchin."

"Diskursus lingkungan tidak terlepas dari persoalan mengenai bagaimana relasi yang terbentuk antara manusia dan alam. Sebagai salah satu pemikiran lingkungan, Sosial Ekologi yang digagas Murray Bookchin, menyoroti problem hierarki-dominasi sosial sebagai titik permasalahan ekologi. Sosial Ekologi memandang bahwa problem hierarki-dominasi sosial ini mempengaruhi persepsi dan relasi manusia dengan alam. Sosial Ekologi mengajukan perubahan sistem relasional lingkup sosial, dan menawarkan visi alternatif dari alam sebagai cerminan keberagaman dalam kesatuan dinamis dan relasi komplementer yang bebas dari unsur hierarki dan dominasi. Dalam pandangan seperti ini, baik relasi antar manusia sosial-masyarakat manusia , dan seluruh entitas alam digambarkan sebagai sesuatu yang tumbuh berdampingan dalam keberagama, serta bebas dari relasi superior dan inferior, yang ia sebut sebagai masyarakat ekologis.

---

An environmental discourse cannot be separated with the relation between human and its nature. As a part of environmental philosophy, Social Ecology presented by Murray Bookchin focuses on the hierarchical social domination as an ecological problem. Social Ecology argues that this problem influences the perspective and relation between human and nature. It also proposes a relational system change in the social circle and offers an alternative vision from the nature as a reflection of unity, diversity, and complementary relation which is free from any hierarchy and domination. In this point of view, both societal relationship and every entities belong to the nature shall be described as a harmonious diversity, and also free from superior inferior relationship, which Bookchin refers to as an ecological society."

"Pemberian air susu ibu (ASI) eksklusif pada bayi penting karena erathubungannya dengan kelangsungan hidup bayi, pertumbuhan dan per-kembangan yang optimal serta peningkatan kualitas generasi berikutnya.Penelitian ini bertujuan menentukan hubungan frekuensi pemeriksaan ke-hamilan dan konseling laktasi dengan pemberian ASI eksklusif. Rancanganpenelitian adalah kohor historikal. Analisis multivariabel dilakukan menilaihubungan dan faktor paling dominan antara variabel bebas (frekuensi pe-meriksaan kehamilan dan konseling laktasi), variabel perancu (penge-tahuan, pendidikan, pekerjaan, paritas dan tingkat pendapatan keluarga)dan variabel terikat (ASI eksklusif). Pada analisis regresi logistik ditemukanpengetahuan sebagai faktor paling dominan dalam pemberian ASI eksklusif(OR = 4,30; 95% CI = 1,98 _ 9,31). Pengetahuan yang baik tentang ASI ek-sklusif meningkatkan pemberian ASI eksklusif 4,30 kali lebih besar.Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah semakin sering frekuensi pemeriksaan ke-hamilan akan semakin tinggi pemberian ASI eksklusif, serta semakin ser-ing pemberian konseling laktasi oleh tenaga kesehatan semakin tinggi pem-berian ASI eksklusif.Exclusive breastfeeding is important because it is connected with infantsurvival, optimal growth and development and improving the quality of thenext generation. This study aims to analyze and determine the frequency ofprenatal care and relationship counseling lactation with exclusive breast-feeding. A historical cohort study design and bivariate and multivariableanalyzes performed to look for association and dominant factor among theindependent variables (frequency of prenatal care and counseling lactation),confounding variables (knowledge, education, employment, parity and levelof family income) with the dependent variable (exclusive breastfeeding). Inthe logistic regression analysis found knowledge as a dominant factor in theexclusive breastfeeding (OR = 4,30; 95% CI = 1,98 _ 9,31). The conclusionof this study is that the more often the frequency of antenatal care will in-crease exclusive breastfeeding, and the more lactation counseling given byhealth provider during antenatal visit will increase exclusive breastfeeding."

"Tiongkok merupakan salah satu perekonomian terbesar di dunia pada saat ini, disebabkan oleh pertumbuhan ekonominya yang pesat dan konsisten selama tiga dekade terakhir. Sebagai emerging economic power, investasi keluar menjadi salah satu prioritas untuk terus mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi dan pembangunannya. Pada tahun 2007, Tiongkok mendirikan Sovereign Wealth Fund bernama China Investment Corporation (CIC) untuk mengelola dan menginvestasikan dana negaranya. Seiring waktu, CIC menjadi kendaraan investasi yang diandalkan untuk menghasilkan keuntungan. Untuk itu, CIC pun mengeksplorasi berbagai instrumen dan model berinvestasi, salah satunya dalam bentuk investasi co-investment yang dilakukan dalam kerja sama dengan pihak swasta. Namun, iklim ketegangan dan kompetisi dagang dan investasi antara Tiongkok dan Amerika Serikat menuai pertanyaan dan kekhawatiran tentang motif politik dan strategis di balik strategi investasi CIC. Oleh karena itu, penulis menggunakan kerangka analisis Macro-Framework of Foreign Economic Policy untuk memahami faktor-faktor pendorong di balik investasi CIC dan kerja samanya di China-US Industrial Cooperation Fund. Pada umumnya, kerangka ini menjelaskan bahwa terdapat tiga variabel utama yang mendorong Tiongkok, melalui CIC, untuk memanfaatkan kerja sama dan kemitraan adaptif demi mencapai kepentingan tertentu. Melalui penelitian ini, penulis menemukan bahwa CIC memanfaatkan kerja sama China-US Industrial Cooperation Fund untuk mengamankan akses investasi ke pasar AS dan menghindari rezim pengawasan investasi asing di AS.

---

China is one of the largest economies in the world due to its rapid and consistent economic growth over the past three decades. As an emerging economic power, outbound investments has been a priority of the government to maintain economic growth and development. In 2007, China established a Sovereign Wealth Fund named China Investment Corporation (CIC) to manage and invest its state funds. Over time, CIC has become a reliable investment vehicle to generate profit for its shareholder, the Chinese state. For this reason, CIC has also explored various investment instruments and models, one of which is in the form of co-investment carried out in collaboration with the private sector. However, the recent backdrop of a strained trade and investment relationship between China and the United States has raised concerns about the political motives and orientation behind CIC’s investment strategy. The author uses the Macro-Framework of Foreign Economic Policy analytical framework to understand the driving factors behind CIC’s investment and its cooperation in the China-US Industrial Cooperation Fund. In general, this framework hypothesizes that there are three main variables that drive China, through the CIC, to utilise this ‘adaptive partnership’ to achieve its national interest. In this study, the author finds that CIC uses China-US Industrial Cooperation Fund to secure market access for its investments in the US market while avoiding scrutiny and blockade from the foreign investments committee in the US."

"Over the past several decades, perhaps no other contemporary philosopher has shaped the field of epistemology more than Alvin Goldman. Goldman and His Critics presents a series of original reading that critically examine Alvin Goldman's groundbreaking theories, writings, and ideas on a range of philosophical topics, followed by Goldman's responses to each essay. Featuring contributions from sixteen prominent philosophers, this volume offers a critical assessment of Goldman's work along with a lively give-and-take on core questions relating to the nature and structure of justification and knowledge, as well as the relevance of cognitive science to epistemology, experimental philosophy, and more. Essays probe deeply into Goldman's innovative contributions to epistemology-both individual and social-in addition to the philosopher's work in the field of cognitive science, metaphysics, and especially philosophy of mind-including the evolution of Goldman's thinking on --Simulation-Theory (ST), the controversial approach to mindreading and its role in human cognition. --Brian P. McLaughlin is a Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University, New Jersey. He has published numerous articles on topics relating to the philosophy of mind, the philosophy of psychology, and metaphysics. --Hilary Kornblith is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts. --Book Jacket.Goldman and His Critics presents a series of original essays contributed by influential philosophers who critically examine Alvin Goldman's work, followed by Goldman's responses to each essay.-Critiques Alvin Goldman's groundbreaking theories, writings, and ideas on a range of philosophical topics -Features contributions from some of the most important and influential contemporary philosophers -Covers Goldman's views on epistemology-both individual and social-in addition to cognitive science and metaphysics -Pays special attention to Goldman's writings on philosophy of mind, including the evolution of his thoughts on Simulation-Theory (ST)."