Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPeraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Kerugian Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Pencemaran dan/atau Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup merupakan satu-satunya wadah hukum yang mengatur mengenai mekanisme perhitungan ganti rugi kerusakan dan/atau pencemaran lingkungan secara komprehensif dan menyeluruh di Indonesia. Sayangnya, peraturan menteri ini masih memiliki banyak kelemahan yang dapat menghambat proses pemulihan lingkungan hidup dan pelaksanaan sistem kompensasi bagi korban-korban. Beberapa kesalahan konsep yang terdapat dalam peraturan menteri ini adalah penuntutan secara bersamaan antara biaya pemulihan lingkungan hidup dan biaya kerusakan lingkungan hidup, metode perhitungan biaya pemulihan lingkungan hidup yang tidak berdasarkan biaya riil, dan kemungkinan terjadinya perhitungan ganda double counting . Skripsi ini akan menganalisis kesalahan-kesalahan tersebut dan memberikan solusi yang tepat melalui studi kepustakaan, perbandingan dengan The International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, wawancara, dan analisis Kasus Montara. The International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage adalah konvensi internasional yang menyediakan sistem kompensasi bagi korban-korban pencemaran minyak di laut. Secara garis besar, dalam The International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, biaya pemulihan lingkungan hidup dituntut berdasarkan biaya riil dengan menyertakan rencana restorasi. Rencana restorasi akan mencegah terjadinya perhitungan ganda. Sistem perhitungan ganti rugi yang diatur dalam The International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage diharapkan dapat menjadi pedoman bagi Indonesia untuk memperbaiki kelemahan-kelemahan sistem perhitungannya.

---

ABSTRACTRegulation of the Minister of Environment Number 7 Year 2014 Regarding Environmental Damage as A Consequence of Pollution and or Damage to the Environment is the only comprehensive law in Indonesia that regulates the mechanism of valuation environmental damage. Unfortunately, this ministerial regulation has several weaknesses which can hamper the environmental recovery and execution of compensation system for the victims. For instances, environmental recovery and environmental damage are compensated jointly, environmental recovery valuation is not based on actual cost, and a possibility of double counting. This thesis discusses about those weaknesses and provides an appropriate solutions through literature studies, comparative approach with the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, interviews, and an analysis of Montara Incident. The International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage is an international convention that provides compensation for victims of oil spill in the ocean. Basically in the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, environmental recovery cost valuation is based on actual cost through a restoration plan. This restoration plan helps to prevent double counting. Hopefully Indonesia may improve and rectify all those weaknesses with the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage as its guidance. "

"ABSTRAKGugatan Perwakilan Kelompok adalah salah satu hak gugat untuk menyelesaikan sengketa lingkungan di Indonesia, sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 32 Tahun 2009. Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok di Indonesia memiliki mekanisme penentuan anggota kelompok yaitu Pernyataan Keluar, yang nantinya berimbas pada proses pendistribusian ganti rugi setelah gugatan dikabulkan. Berdasarkan hubungan tersebut, Penulis mencoba mengkaji masalah yang ada di Indonesia, baik dalam peraturan maupun pelaksanaannya. Kemudian dilakukan perbandingan dengan negara lain yang telah menerapkan Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok sejak lama. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif, melalui wawancara kepada narasumber dan studi dokumen untuk dapat memberikan gambaran terhadap permasalahan yang diteliti.

---

ABSTRAKClass Actions is one of the legal standing stipulated in Law of Environmental Protection and Management No. 32 of 2009 to settle environmental disputes. Class Actions in Indonesia has opt out mechanism to determine its members, which in turn affects the process of settlement distribution after the verdict. Based on that connection, the Author tries to analyze the problems in Indonesia, in its regulations as well as the implementation. Then a comparison is made with other countries which has implemented Class Actions for longer period. This research is juridical normative, conducted through interview with a source and document study to depict the problems researched therein."

"As frustration mounts in some quarters at the perceived inadequacy or speed of international action on climate change, and as the likelihood of significant impacts grows, the focus is increasingly turning to liability for climate change damage. Actual or potential climate change liability implicates a growing range of actors, including governments, industry, businesses, non-governmental organisations, individuals and legal practitioners. Climate Change Liability provides an objective, rigorous and accessible overview of the existing law and the direction it might take in seventeen developed and developing countries and the European Union. In some jurisdictions, the applicable law is less developed and less the subject of current debate. In others, actions for various kinds of climate change liability have already been brought, including high profile cases such as Massachusetts v. EPA in the United States. Each chapter explores the potential for and barriers to climate change liability in private and public law"-- Provided by publisher.Contents Machine generated contents note: Part I. Legal, Scientific and Policy Aspects: 1. Introduction Jutta Brunne;e, Silke Goldberg, Richard Lord and Lavanya Rajamani; 2. The scientific basis for climate change liability Myles Allen; 3. Overview of legal issues relevant to climate change Jutta Brunne;e, Silke Goldberg, Richard Lord and Lavanya Rajamani; 4. Policy considerations Jutta Brunne;e, Silke Goldberg, Richard Lord and Lavanya Rajamani; Part II. National Laws: Asia and Pacific: 5. Australia Ross Abbs, Peter Cashman and Tim Stephens; 6. China Deng Haifeng; 7. India Lavanya Rajamani and Shibani Ghosh; 8. Indonesia Mas Achmad Santosa, Rifqi Assegaf and Josi Khatarina; 9. Japan Yukari Takamura; Africa/Middle East: 10. Egypt Dalia Farouk and Lamiaa Youssef; 11. Israel Issachar Rosen-Zvi; 12. Kenya Patricia Kameri-Mbote and Collins Odote; 13. South Africa Debbie Collier and Jan Glazewski; Europe and Eurasia: 14. European Union Ludwig Kra;mer; 15. Germany Hans-Joachim Koch, Michael Lührs and Roda Verheyen; 16. Poland Bartosz Kuras, Maciej Szewczyk, Dominik Walkowski, Tomasz Wardynski and Izabella Zielinska-Barlozek; 17. English law Silke Goldberg and Richard Lord; 18. Russia Fiona Mucklow Cheremeteff, Max Gutbrod, Daria Ratsiborinskaya and Sergei Sitnikov; North America: 19. Canada Meinhard Doelle, Dennis Mahony and Alex Smith; 20. United States of America Michael B. Gerrard and Gregory E. Wannier; Central and South America: 21. Brazil Yanko Marcius de Alencar Xavier and Pedro Lucas de Moura Soares; 22. Mexico Jose; Juan Gonzalez Marquez."