Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKArgumen mengenai lsquo;hak rsquo; dan lsquo;equality rsquo; banyak digunakan beberapa tahun belakangan ini dalam menuntut legalisasi perkawinan sesama jenis oleh para pendukungnya. Penerapan prinsip equality dalam tuntutan legalisasi perkawinan sesama jenis adalah berkaitan erat dengan konsep hak asasi manusia karena prinsip equality merupakan salah satu prinsip penting dalam konsep tersebut. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat dalam kasus Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health merupakan putusan pengadilan yang terbaru mengenai perkawinan sesama jenis dan merupakan putusan penting yang mengubah secara radikal mengenai keabsahan perkawinan sesama jenis di Amerika Serikat dan mempunyai pengaruh besar ke Negara ndash; Negara lain. Penelitian ini menganalisis putusan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat tersebut, khususnya mengenai penerapan prinsip equality. Penelitian ini juga menganalisis mengenai perkawinan sesama jenis di Indonesia, apabila ditinjau dari perspektif universalitas dan relativisme budaya dalam hukum hak asasi manusia. Disimpulkan bahwa penerapan prinsip equality dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat tersebut secara khusus dan dalam isu perkawinan sesama jenis secara umum adalah tidak tepat. Di Indonesia, dari perspektif universalitas ndash; relativisme budaya hak asasi manusia maupun dari penerapan prinsip equality, disimpulkan bahwa perkawinan sesama jenis tidak dapat dilegalisasi.

---

ABSTRACT The lsquo rights rsquo and lsquo equality rsquo arguments have been widely used in the last couple of years by the same sex marriage supporters in claiming the legalization of same sex marriage. The principle of equality in same sex marriage legalization claims is closely related with the concept of human rights on the ground that the principle of equality is considered as one of the most important principles in the said concept. The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health is the latest decision concerning the legalization of same sex marriage that changes radically the legality of same sex marriage in the United States and may affect other nations. This research analyzes the said Decision, specifically on the application of the principle of equality. This research also analyzes the same sex marriage issue in Indonesia from the perspective of universality and cultural relativism of human rights. The conclusion of this research is that the principle of equality in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America was not correctly applied and therefore it cannot be used in the same sex marriage claims. And in Indonesia, it can be concluded that from the perspective of universality and cultural relativism of human rights, same sex marriage cannot be legalized. "

"ABSTRACTThis paper aims to explain the dimensions of inequality power relations and revictimization that occurred in a rape case by seduction in dating violence context. Using the case study of court decisions and radical feminist theory as a tool of analysis, the author argue that the narrative in the name of love used by perpetrators of sexual violence in personal relations is actually another manifestation of the inequality of power relations and become site of female body subjugation. Therefore, forms of exploitation that use a proof of love narrative in cases of forced sexual intercourse should be identified as part of sexual violence."

"ABSTRACTEven after the rise of Indonesian feminist film directors by the likes of Nia Dinata, Mira Lesmana, Mouly Surya, Nan T Achnas and Lola Amaria, the Indonesian moviegoers still flocked into badly written teenage romance dramas. This paper interrogates the way romance and femininities have been shaped within the cinematic representation in London Love Story 2, Promise and Dear Nathan. It is concluded that the Indonesian romance teenage dramas are entrenched with masculine power and dominance spectacles in which the feminine heroines have been treated as passive objects of desire whose agency and subjectivities are being stripped away. Using feminist literature on post feminist romance cinema, the heroines in these films have mostly been constructed as independent, smart and seemingly agentive at first, but nevertheless pursued romantic, traditional, heterosexual relationships saturated with masculine control and dominance. This paper shows that post feminist popular culture has transpired globally and morphed into transnational post feminism that influenced the production and consumption of such text in Indonesia."

"ABSTRACTThis paper focuses on the experience of women across generation living and interpreting love as part of their lives. Their experiences in living an interpreting love will be seen in two points, their romantic relationship and marriage or family institution. Based on the data of six subjects of research with different backgrounds like age, marital status and sexual orientation, showed that they have different perspective on love and marriage or family institution compare to mainstream society. They assume and believe love or romantic relationship has close relation with patriarchal cultural values, like mens domination, subordination and ownership if we agreed with mainstream societys thought on love. They also believe that marriage is an institution where patriarchys cultural values is produced there and will disadvantage women if the marriage is not built on equal and just relation. These six subjects of research agree with grand feminism narrative that love supposed to be not always related with ownership, mens domination and must be liberating women as an independence and autonomous person."

"This paper explains what love is by referring to the philosophical thoughts of some philosophers and the results of empirical research that have been done on the phenomena of love. Here also discussed the tendency to extend love on one side, narrowing and even negating love on the other. This paper takes the position that love as an existential project. Philosophically, love is seen as a continuing search for truth. As the fruit of the will and the sincerity of human endeavor, love has real and concrete results. In its concrete form, love is the embodiment of a common promise into reality a step by step process presents a concrete manifestation of the statements contained in the promise. This philosophical thought is corroborated by empirical studies of love that love differs from sexual passion or lust. Love can last long, eternal and stay intense through the couples efforts to care for each other, nurture and develop each other."

"ABSTRACTThis essay presents a theoretical discussion, analysis, and formulation to reconfigure new meanings, potentialities, and multiplicities of homosexual relationships. After a brief discussion on the rapid popularisation of marriage equality as the primary goal of queer movements, an overview of queer critique of marriage is provided. Attention given to the notion of homo normativity and the sharp criticism from queer negativity/queer anti social. For these critiques, subjects are encouraged to occupy the abject position, which I argue, only further depoliticise queer politics. After a critical overview of this political stance, I offer Foucault and Deleuze accounts to explore multiple forms of relationships beyond marital institution, focusing on the ways in which relationships are to be understood as in terms of potentialities, intensities, and emergent forms and functions beyond the existing language capacities and formalised forms. This essay should, however, not situated as masterly or prescriptive, but rather a modest effort to spur more critical concerns, discussions, and debates among queer Indonesians."

"ABSTRACTFalling in love is a universal experience that cannot be bounded by racial, religious, ethnic, even ideological barriers. The experiences of falling in love and be in the relationships are also faced by female feminists. In the experiences of failing in love, female feminists often confront with tension between their consciousness in holding feminist ideology and their collective experiences influenced by patriarchal culture. Therefore, they have to compromise and negotiate in the relationship. This paper aims to explain contemplative experiences of female feminists who are falling in love in the patriarchal culture in the three areas of analysis: feminist thoughts which are build their consideration and consciousness, the influences of patriarchal media, and practices in the love relationship in everyday lives. This study is descriptive qualitative using in depth interview as a method toward female feminists from diverse background in Yogyakarta. Surabaya, and Jombang. The results are the concept of love from female feminists cannot be separated from the existence of their partners, the experiences and the reproduction of media about the concept of love, as well as the practices of female feminists relationships, which already creating the concept of love before entering relationships."

"Artikel yang berjudul ''kasus pernikahan sejenis dalam perspektif hukum moral John Calvin'' ini pertama-tama akan menjelaskan sekilas mengenai fakta LGBT (lesbian, gay, biseksual, transgender), etika situasi sebagai dasar pembenaran dan komunitas yang memperjuangkan legalisasi pernikahan sejenis. Setlah itu penulis akan melakukan tinjuan terhadap hukum moral John Calvin untuk menyoroti, apakah dasar yang dijadikan pembenaran pernikahan sejenis itu tepat atau tidak. Temuan dalam penulisan ini, legalisasi pernikahan sejenis tidak memiliki landasan yang sesuai dengan hukum moral Calvin, dan karena itu tidak diterima oleh gereja "

"ABSTRAKPenelitian mengenai sikap peran gender bukanlah penelitian terbaru dan aplikasinya dalam keseharian kehidupan keluarga sudah diteliti, salah satunya adalah dengan preferensi mainan dan keduanya ditemukan memiliki hubungan. Penelitian ini berusaha untuk melihat korelasi antara sikap peran gender dan preferensi mainan anak dari ibu dengan mempertimbangkan komposisi jenis kelamin anak yang dimiliki. Hal ini dikarenakan beberapa penelitian menyebutkan komposisi jenis kelamin anak dapat mempengaruhi sikap peran gender orang tua, khususnya ibu. Penelitian menggunakan alat ukur Normative Gender Role Attitudes (NGRA) dari Athenstaedt (2000) untuk mengukur sikap peran gender dan preferensi mainan diukur dengan 7 poin skala likert. Hasil penelitian dari 142 partisipan menemukan adanya hubungan antara sikap peran gender ibu dengan mainan cross-gender sebesar r(142) = -0.312, p = 0.000, two-tailed dan pada mainan netral sebesar r(142) = -0.232, p = 0.003, two-tailed. Namun, tidak ditemukan perbedaan pada sikap peran gender maupun preferensi pemilihan mainan anak pada kedua kelompok ibu."

"Penelitian ini membahas advokasi perlindungan hak-hak anak sebagai respon legalisasi perkawinan bagi anak perempuan dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 1974. UU tersebut mengatur batas usia perkawinan perempuan pada usia 16 tahun, yang masih dikategorikan sebagai usia anak. Angka perkawinan anak yang tinggi di Indonesia dan ketiadaan respon pemerintah merevisi kebijakan telah menggerakan masyarakat sipil mengupayakan advokasi. Kelompok masyarakat sipil yang dimaksud adalah Koalisi 18+. Penelitian ini menjawab pertanyaan tentang bagaimana peran Koalisi 18+ mengadvokasi kenaikan batas umur pernikahan dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dalam kurun waktu 2014-2019. Pertanyaan penelitian akan dijawab menggunakan teori Aktivisme Politik oleh Pippa Norris. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitiatif dengan metode pengumpulan data wawancara mendalam dan studi literatur, ditemukan bahwa proses advokasi kebijakan dilakukan melalui tiga jalur yaitu, Uji Materi, pengajuan Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu), dan pengajuan Revisi Undang-Undang dengan menargetkan Pasal 7 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU Perkawinan. Dengan ini, Koalisi 18+ dapat dikategorikan sebagai agensi, tepatnya agensi modern. Adapun strategi yang dilakukan merupakan mixed action strategies, sementara target advokasi Koalisi 18+ dikategorikan sebagai state-oriented, karena pergerakannya ditujukan kepada tiga lembaga negara sekaligus (eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif). Keberhasilan Koalisi 18+ ditandai dengan dikabulkannya permohonan uji materi 2017-2018 dan disahkannya UU No. 16 Tahun 2019. Beberapa faktor yang signifikan pada keberhasilan ini yaitu, peluang politik, aliansi dengan aktor di dalam pemerintahan yang pro-perubahan, dan framing isu. Meskipun begitu, keberadaan Eva Kusuma Sundari sebagai gatekeeper perubahan UU dalam pemerintahan, menjadi faktor keberhasilan utama.

---

This study discusses the protection of children's rights as a response to the legalization of girls marriage in Law No. 1 of 1974. The law regulates age limit for women at 16 years, which still categorized as child age. The high rate of child marriage in Indonesia and the lack of government's response to policy revisions have moved civil society to seek advocacy. The civil society group in question is Koalisi 18+. This study addresses the question of Koalisi 18+ role in advocating increase of women's legal age for marriage in Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage throughout 2014-2019. Research questions will be answered with the theory of Political Activism by Pippa Norris. Using a qualitative approach with in-depth data collection methods and literature studies, it was found that the policy advocacy process was carried out through three channels, Judicial Review, submission of Regulations in Lieu of Law (Perppu), and submission of Law Revisions targeted Article 7 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law. With this, Koalisi 18+ can be categorized as an activism agency, a modern agency. The strategy adopted is a mixed action strategy, while the Koalisi 18+ targeted three state institutions at once (executive, legislative, and judicial), proofing it as state-oriented activism. The success of the 18+ Coalition marked by the granting of the 2017-2018 judicial review and the establishment of Law no. 16 of 2019. Some of the significant factors for this success are political opportunities, alliances with prochange actor in government, and issues framing. Even so, the existence of Eva Kusuma Sundari as a gatekeeper for changes to laws in the government, became the main success factor."