Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Abstract:"The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court defines more than ninety crimes that fall within the Court's jurisdiction: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression. How these crimes are interpreted contributes to findings of individual criminal liability, and moreover impacts upon the perceived legitimacy of the Court. And yet, to date, there is no agreed approach to interpreting these definitions. This book offers practitioners and scholars a guiding principle, arguments and aids necessary for the interpretation of international crimes. Leena Grover surveys the jurisprudence of the ICTY and ICTR before presenting a model of interpretive reasoning that integrates the guidance within the Rome Statute itself with articles 31-33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties""

""This guide to the crime of aggression provisions under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) offers an exhaustive and sophisticated legal analysis of the crime's definition, as well as the jurisdictional provisions governing the ICC's exercise of jurisdiction over the crime. A range of practical issues likely to arise in prosecutions of the crime of aggression before the ICC are canvassed, as is the issue of the domestic prosecution of the crime. It also offers an insight into the geopolitical significance of the crime of aggression and the activation of the ICC's ability to exercise its jurisdiction over the crime. The author's intimate involvement in the crime's negotiations, combined with extensive scholarly reflection on the criminalisation of inter-State uses of armed force, makes this highly relevant to all academics and practitioners interested in the crime of aggression"--"

"Pelaksanaan dan kepatuhan negara anggota Statuta Roma dalam melaksanakan permintaan kerjasama untuk menangkap dan menyerahkan sangatlah penting bagi  Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (ICC) dalam mencapai tujuannya untuk mengakhiri impunitas. Meskipun begitu, Pasal 98 Statuta Roma hadir sebagai bentuk pengesampingan dari kewajiban kerjasama tersebut. Salah satu negara anggota yang menggunakan pasal ini untuk tidak melakukan kewajiban kerjasamanya adalah Yordania dalam permintaan kerjasama ICC untuk menangkap dan menyerahkan Al Bashir. Menurut Yordania disini Pasal 98(1) berlaku sebab Al Bashir masih memiliki imunitas dan Pasal 98 (2) juga berlaku berdasarkan Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the League of the Arab States. Melalui metode penelitian hukum normatif yang berbasiskan pada data sekunder, hendak dianalisis apakah Pasal 98 benar berlaku di dalam kasus ini sehingga membuat Yordania tidak melanggar kewajibannya dengan tidak menangkap dan menyerahkan Al Bashir. Adapun melalui penelitian yang telah dilakukan, ditemukan kesimpulan bahwa pertimbangan ICC telah tepat bahwa Pasal 98 tidak berlaku dalam kasus ini. Oleh sebab itu penelitian ini menyarankan perlu dilakukan amandemen terhadap Pasal 98 khususnya untuk memperjelas terkait keberlakuannya terhadap negara yang menjadi subjek dari suatu rujukan Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (DK PBB). Selain itu mekanisme konsultasi yang tersedia dalam Pasal 97 Statuta Roma sebaiknya dapat menghasilkan suatu keputusan hukum yang mengikat terhadap pelaksanaan kerjasama oleh negara anggota. Dengan begitu setelah diputuskan di tahapan konsultasi bahwa tidak terdapat permasalahan yang diatur di Pasal 98, negara anggota wajib melaksanakan permintaan kerjasama tersebut.

---

The implementation and compliance of member states of the Rome Statute in carrying out requests for cooperation in arrest and surrender is essential for the International Criminal Court (ICC) in achieving its goal of ending impunity. Even so, Article 98 of the Rome Statute is present as a form of waiver of the cooperation obligation. One of the member states that use this article to not carry out its cooperation obligations is Jordan in the ICC's request for cooperation to arrest and hand over Al Bashir. According to Jordan, Article 98(1) applies because Al Bashir still has immunity and Article 98(2) also applies in accordance with the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the League of the Arab States. Through a normative legal research method based on secondary data, it will be analyzed whether Article 98 applies in this case so that Jordan does not violate its obligations by not arresting and handing over Al Bashir. As for the research that has been carried out, it was concluded that the ICC's consideration was correct in concluding Article 98 does not apply in this case. Therefore, this study suggests that it is necessary to amend Article 98 in particular to clarify its applicability to countries that are the subject of a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) referral. In addition, the consultation mechanism provided in Article 97 of the Rome Statute should be able to produce a binding legal decision on implementation of cooperation by member states. Thus, after it was decided at the consultation stage that there were no problems arising out of Article 98, member states were obliged to implement the request for cooperation. "

"The 1998 Rome Statute, the treaty establishing the International Criminal Court (ICC), includes a longer list of gender-based crimes than any previous instrument of international criminal law. The Statute's twentieth anniversary provides an opportunity to examine how successful the ICC has been in prosecuting those crimes, what challenges it has faced, and how its caselaw on these crimes might develop in future. Taking up that opportunity, this book analyses the ICC's practice in prosecuting gender-based crimes across all cases for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in the ICC up until mid-2018. This analysis is based on a detailed examination of court records and original interviews with prosecutors and gender experts at the Court. This book covers topics of emerging interest to practitioners in this field, including wartime sexual violence against men and boys, persecution on the grounds of gender and sexual orientation, and sexual violence against 'child soldiers'."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pengaruh dari Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes 2014 terhadap penuntutan kejahatan seksual yang diadili di Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. Dalam penelitian ini juga akan dibahas secara kronologis terkait pengaturan dan penuntutan kejahatan seksual di pengadilan- pengadilan sebelum Mahkamah Pidana Internasional untuk melihat signifikansi dari setiap pengadilan dalam penuntutan kejahatan seksual. Kejahatan seksual pada International Military Tribunal of Nuremberg and Tokyo (IMT dan IMTFE) pada masa Perang Dunia II belum dianggap sebagai kejahatan yang terpisah dan hanya sebagai bagian dari “mass atrocities”. Perkembangan dan pengaturan juga kejahatan seksual dapat dilihat pada pengadilan pidana internasional yang dibentuk oleh Dewan Keamanan PBB yaitu ICTY, ICTR dan SCSL. Dengan berkembangnya pengaturan kejahatan seksual dalam pengadilan-pengadilan ini maka keberhasilan Penuntut Umum dalam membuktikan kejahatan seksual telah menghasilkan landmark cases seperti putusan Prosecutor v. Tadic yang merupakan keberhasilan pertama oleh Penuntut Umum dalam membuktikan kejahatan seksual. Namun, tidak ada kejahatan seksual yang berhasil dituntut di Mahkamah Pidana Internasional sebelum diterbitkannya Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes 2014. Kasus pertama yang berhasil membuktikan kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan berupa kejahatan seksual adalah kasus Prosecutor v. Bemba setelah diterbitkan Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender Based Crimes 2014. Maka dari itu, penulis bertujuan untuk menjelaskan faktor- faktor dari ketidakberhasilan penuntutan kejahatan seksual di Mahkamah Pidana Internasional melalui kasus-kasus dan pengaruh Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender Based Crimes 2014 sebagai pedoman Penuntut Umum terhadap penuntutan kejahatan seksual di Mahkamah Pidana Internasional.

---

This thesis discusses the implementation of the Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes 2014 on the prosecution of sexual crimes tried at the International Criminal Court. This study will also discuss chronologically regarding the regulation and prosecution of sexual crimes in courts before the International Criminal Court to see the significance of each court in prosecuting sexual crimes. Sexual crimes at the International Military Tribunal of Nuremberg and Tokyo (IMT and IMTFE) during World War II were not considered separate crimes and only as part of "mass atrocities". The development and regulation of sexual crimes can be seen in the international criminal courts established by the UN Security Council, namely ICTY, ICTR and SCSL. With the development of the regulation of sexual crimes in these courts, the success of the Public Prosecutor in proving sexual crimes has resulted in landmark cases such as the decision of Prosecutor v. Tadic which is the first success by the Public Prosecutor in proving a sexual crime. However, no sexual crimes were successfully prosecuted in the International Criminal Court prior to the publication of the 2014 Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes. The first case that succeeded in proving crimes against humanity in the form of sexual crimes was the case of Prosecutor v. Bemba after the publication of the Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender Based Crimes 2014. Therefore, the author aims to explain the factors of the unsuccessful prosecution of sexual crimes at the International Criminal Court through cases and the influence of the 2014 Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender Based Crimes as the Public Prosecutor guide for the prosecution of sexual crimes at the International Criminal Court."

"This is the authoritative introduction to the International Criminal Court, fully updated in this sixth edition. The book covers the legal framework of the Court, the cases that it has heard and that are still to come, and the political debates surrounding its operation. It is written by one of the major authorities on the subject, in language accessible to non-specialists. The sixth edition brings legal references fully up to date in light of the Court's case law. Several trials have now been completed, with four convictions and a number of controversial acquittals. The book also discusses the situations that the Court is currently investigating, including Palestine, Georgia, Ukraine, Venezuela and the UK in Iraq. It also looks into the crisis with African states and the hostility of the United States to the institution."