Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Abstract. The aim of this study is to find out if the concentration of the biggest shareholder, the control rights and the ratio ofcash flow rights-control rights of the controlling shareholders contributed to profitability. This study uses purposive samplingtechnique in collecting the data and linear panel regression in analysing the panel data. The result of this study shows that theownership concentration of the biggest shareholders has positive impact to company profitability as big shareholders havebigger incentive and thus better chance to do supervision upon the management. The study also found that the control rightsconcentration of controlling shareholders have negative effect to profitability since more concentrated power of the controllingshareholders made the shareholders position stronger and may incline them to gain individual profit which in turn will reducethe company’s profit. On the contrary, higher ratio of cash flow rights to-control rights contributed positively to profitabilitybecause higher cash flow rights will tend to prevent the controlling shareholders from expropriating the company’s assets."

"Abstract. Ownership structure has a direct relationship with company’s capital structure where the cost of capital is the main component in the calculation of economic value added to measure the value of the firm. This research aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership, public ownership, institutional ownership, and government ownership on economic value added, used as a measurement of the firm value. This research uses an unbalanced panel data of 182 observations data of all listed companies in the period of 2007-2011 that issued dividend regularly every year during the research’s year. The result shows: (1) managerial ownership has no significant effect on economic value added, (2) public ownership has a significant positive effect on economic value added, (3) institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on economic value added, (4) government ownership has no significant effect on economic value added, (5) ownership structure (managerial ownership, public ownership, institutional ownership, government ownership) simultaneously has a significant positive effect on economic value added.Abstrak. Ownership structure memiliki keterkaitan secara langsung dengan struktur modal perusahaan dimana biaya modal merupakan komponen utama dalam penghitungan economic value added guna mengukur nilai perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur kepemilikan yang terdiri dari kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan publik, kepemilikan institutional, dan kepemilikan pemerintah terhadap economic value added yang digunakan sebagai sebuah pengukuran nilai perusahaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan unbalanced panel data sejumlah 182 data observasi dari sampel seluruh perusahaan yang listed selama periode 2007-2011 dan menerbitkan dividen secara rutin setiap tahunnya selama tahun penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) kepemilikan manajerial tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap periode economic value added, (2) kepemilikan public memiliki pengaruh positif secara signifikan terhadap economic value added, (3) kepemilikan institusional memiliki pengaruh positif secara signifikan terhadap economic value added, (4) kepemilikan pemerintah tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap economic value added, (5) struktur kepemilikan (kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan publik, kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan pemerintah) secara simultan memiliki pengaruh positif secara signifikan terhadap economic value added."

"Abstract. There is an increasing trend among investors to consider Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in determining company incentives are to be invested in. Obviously, investors would prefer to make INVESTMENTS in companies that adopt Good Corporate Governance rather than otherwise. This view has eventually led to a belief that GCG can give added values not only to the adopting company, but also to the stakeholders. This research analyzes the impacts of family ownership and founding CEO/chairperson on a company?s costs of debt. This topic is chosen in consideration that there are still a lot of family-owned companies in Indonesia. The research uses a positivist-quantitative paradigm and the samples are 64 family-owned companies listed at the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2007 to 2009. The research also uses a random effect model. The results of the research indicate that family ownership has positive but insignificant impacts, while founding CEO/chairperson has no impacts on a company?s costs of debt."

"Abstract. This study aims to analyze the influence of corporate governance structure on underpricing when firms perform an Initial Public Offering (IPO). This study is based on the signaling theory, stating that the existence of proper corporate governance structure at the time the firm conducting IPO will give the firm a high quality signal to potential investors. The corporate governance structure tested includes the size of Board of Commissioners (BOC), the level of independence of the Board of Commissioners, and the existence of an audit committee. The hypothesis testing is done using a multiple regression model with a sample of 95 observations from firms doing IPOs listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2005-2012. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that: (1) the size of Board of Commissioners is negatively correlated and affects underpricing, (2) the level of independence of the Board of Commissioners has no effect on underpricing, (3) the existence of an audit committee has no effect on underpricing, (4 ) corporate governance structure (the BOC size, the independence of the Board of Commissioners, and the existence of audit committees) simultaneously has a positive and significant correlation to underpricing. Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untukmenganalisis pengaruhstruktur corporate governance terhadap underpricing pada saat perusahaan melakukan Initial Public Offering (IPO). Penelitian ini didasarkan pada teori sinyal (signaling theory) yang menyatakan bahwa keberadaan struktur corporate governance yang baik pada saat perusahaan melakukan IPO akan memberikan sinyal kualitas perusahaan yang tinggi kepada investor potensial. Struktur corporate governance yang diuji meliputi jumlah anggota dewan komisaris, tingkat independensi dari dewan komisaris, dan keberadaan komite audit. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan menggunakan model regresi berganda dengan sampel 95 observasi dari perusahaan yang melakukan IPO yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2005-2012. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan bukti empiris bahwa: (1) jumlah anggota dewan komisaris berkorelasi negatif dan berpengaruh terhadap underpricing, (2) tingkat independensi dari dewan komisaris tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap underpricing, (3) keberadaan komite audit tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap underpricing, (4) struktur corporate governance (jumlah anggota dewan komisaris, independensi dewan komisaris, dan keberadaan komite adit) secara simultan memiliki korelasi positif dan signifikan terhadap underpricing."

"Ownership structure memiliki keterkaitan secara langsung dengan struktur modal perusahaan dimana biaya modal merupakan komponen utama dalam penghitungan economic value added guna mengukur nilai perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur kepemilikan yang terdiri dari kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan publik, kepemilikan institutional, dan kepemilikan pemerintah terhadap economic value added yang digunakan sebagai sebuah pengukuran nilai perusahaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan unbalanced panel data sejumlah 182 data observasi dari sampel seluruh perusahaan yang listed selama periode 2007-2011 dan menerbitkan dividen secara rutin setiap tahunnya selama tahun penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) kepemilikan manajerial tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap economic value added, (2) kepemilikan publik memiliki pengaruh positif secara signifikan terhadap economic value added, (3) kepemilikan institusional memiliki pengaruh positif secara signifikan terhadap economic value added, (4) kepemilikan pemerintah tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap conomic value added, (5) struktur kepemilikan (kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan publik, kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan pemerintah) secara simultan memiliki pengaruh positif secara signifikan terhadap economic value added.

---

Ownership structure has a direct relationship with company’s capital structure where the cost of capital is the main component in the calculation of economic value added to measure the firm value. This research aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership, public ownership, institutional ownership, and government ownership on economic value added which used as a measurement of firm value. This research uses an unbalanced panel data of 182 observations data of all listed companies that listed in the period 2007-2011 and issuing dividend regularly every year during the research's year.

The result shows: (1) managerial ownership has no significant effect on economic value added, (2) public ownership has a significant positive effect on economic value added, (3) institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on economic value added, (4) government ownership has no significant effect on economic value added, (5) ownership structure (managerial ownership, public ownership, institutional ownership, government ownership) simultaneously has a significant positive effect on economic value added."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis determinan dalam menentukan tingkat pengungkapan whistleblowing system dengan menggunakan indikator penelitian yaitu besarnya ukuran perusahaan, komposisi komisaris independen, kepemilikan saham publik, independensi auditor, tingkat rasio utang serta tingkat pertumbuhan perusahaan. Sampel penelitian yaitu sebanyak 474 emiten yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode tahun 2013. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan studi empiris dengan menggunakan data cross section. Pengolahan data dianalisis menggunakan model regresi berganda. Pengujian signifikansi hipotesis dilakukan dengan melakukan uji-F dan uji-t. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa besarnya ukuran perusahaan, independensi auditor dan tingkat rasio utang perusahaan berpengaruh positif terhadap tingkat pengungkapan whistleblowing system. Variabel kepemilikan saham publik berpengaruh negatif terhadap tingkat pengungkapan whistleblowing system. Variabel komposisi komisaris independen tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap pengungkapan whistleblowing system. Variabel tingkat pertumbuhan perusahaan yang diproksikan dengan present book value menunjukkan pengaruh negatif terhadap tingkat pengungkapan whistleblowing system.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to analyze the determinant that decides the disclosure rate of the whistleblowing system, with the research indicators such as the size of the companies, composition of independent commissioner, public ownerships, auditor rsquo s independency, rate of debt ratio, and company rsquo s growth rate. Research samples are 474 emitents which are listed at the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2013. This research is an empirical study with a cross section data. The data process is analyzed using the double regression model. Hypothesis significance testing is done with F test and t test. The result of the test shows that the size of the company, auditor rsquo s independence, and rate of debt ratio gives a positive affects to the rate of whistleblowing system disclosure. The public ownerships variable gives negative effect to the rate of whistleblowing system disclosure. The independent commissioner rsquo s composition doesn rsquo t give significant effect to the whistleblowing system disclosure. As for the company rsquo s growth rate variable, which is proxied with present book value, shows a negative effect to the whistleblowing system disclosure."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kepemilikan pemerintah terhadap kinerja perusahaan BUMN yang diproksikan dengan Tobin?s Q. Kinerja perusahaan yang diukur dengan Tobin?s Q ini kemudian dibandingkan antara perusahaan BUMN dengan non BUMN. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel sejumlah 1716 observasi dari sampel perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2005-2010. Analisis regresi dari penelitian ini menggunakan Random Effect Model (REM) dan untuk menunjukkan perbedaan kinerja perusahaan digunakan Uji Beda T-Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) kepemilikan pemerintah tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan BUMN, (2) kinerja perusahaan yang diukur dengan Tobin?s Q memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan antara BUMN dengan non BUMN.

---

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of government ownership on state-owned enterprise performance proxied by Tobin?s Q. Firm performance as measured by Tobin?s Q is compared between state-owned enterprise and non state-owned enterprise. This research uses a panel data sample of 1716 observations of the listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2005-2010 period.

The Random Effect Model (REM) is used to determine regression analysis of government ownership and firm performance, meanwhile the T-Test to distinguish the performance differences. The results show: (1) government ownership doesn?t have a significant effect on state-owned enterprise performance, (2) firm performance as measured by Tobin?s Q has a significant difference between state-owned enterprise and non state-owned enterprise."

"Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mencari tahu pengaruh COVID-19 terhadap performa saham perusahaan perbankan yang dimiliki negara (BUMN) pada periode 2020 hingga 2021, serta apakah corporate governance memengaruhi dampak COVID-19 terhadap performa saham bank BUMN. Area performa saham yang dilihat pada penelitian ini merupakan volatilitas harga saham, trading volume saham, serta return dari saham bank BUMN. Sampel terdiri dari empat perusahaan perbankan BUMN yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan merupakan regresi panel data. Ditemukan bahwa COVID-19 memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap volatilitas harga saham, trading volume saham, serta return dari saham bank BUMN. Serta, corporate governance dapat memitigasi dampak dari COVID-19 tersebut terhadap volatilitas harga saham dan trading volume saham bank BUMN di Indonesia, namun corporate governance tidak dapat memitigasi dampak tersebut terhadap return saham bank BUMN di Indonesia.

---

This study aims to find out the effect of COVID-19 on the performance of shares of state-owned banking companies (BUMN) in the period 2020 to 2021, as well as whether corporate governance influences the impact of COVID-19 on the performance of shares of state-owned banks. The areas of stock performance seen in this study are stock price volatility, trading volume of shares, and returns from state-owned bank shares. The sample consists of four state-owned banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research method used is panel data regression. It was found that COVID-19 had a significant effect on share price volatility, trading volume of shares, and returns from shares of state-owned banks. Also, corporate governance can mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on share price volatility and trading volume of shares of state-owned banks in Indonesia, but corporate governance cannot mitigate this impact on share returns of state-owned banks in Indonesia."

"Penelitian ini menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh karakteristik kepemilikan, reformasi perpajakan, dan hubungan politik terhadap tindakan pajak agresif. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 53 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia untuk tahun 2007-2010 dengan total observasi sebanyak 212 firm-years. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif reformasi perpajakan terhadap tindakan pajak agresif karena pada reformasi perpajakan tahun 2009 tersebut terdapat penurunan tarif pajak. Karakteristik kepemilikan tidak terbukti mempengaruhi tindakan pajak agresif. Hubungan politik tidak terbukti berpengaruh terhadap tindakan pajak agresif.

---

This study examines and analyzes the effect of ownership characteristics, tax reform, and political connection to tax aggressiveness. The sample of this study were 53 companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange for the years 2007-2010.

The results show that there are positive effect of tax reform on tax aggressiveness in accordance with the tariff reduction on the new income tax. Ownership characteristics were not shown to affect tax aggressiveness. Political connections were not proven to affect the tax aggressiveness."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kepemilikan pemerintah, independensi Dewan Komisaris, dan efektivitas Komite Audit terhadap kinerja keuangan BUMN. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 34 BUMN yang namanya terdaftar pada situs Kementerian BUMN dan mempublikasikan Laporan Tahunan (Annual Report) untuk periode tahun 2012 hingga tahun 2014, dengan total observasi sebanyak 102 firms-years dengan data balanced panel.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan pemerintah memiliki pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan BUMN, sementara independensi Dewan Komisaris memiliki pengaruh negatif dan tidak signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan BUMN, serta efektivitas Komite Audit memiliki pengaruh positif namun tidak signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan BUMN.

---

This research aims to analyze the effect of government ownership, Board of Commissioners independence, and Audit Committee effectiveness on state-owned enterprises? (SOEs/BUMNs) financial performance. Samples taken for this research are 34 BUMNs which names are listed on The Ministry of SOE?s website, all of which have published their Annual Reports for the periods starting from 2012 to 2014. There are 102 firms-years observations in total with balanced panel data.

Results show that government ownership has a positive and significant effect on BUMNs financial performance, while Board of Commissioners independence has a negative yet insignificant effect on BUMNs? financial performance, and Audit Committee effectiveness also has a positive yet insignificant effect on BUMNs? financial performance."