Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Indonesia merupakan negara dengan kekayaan alam yang melimpah. Lebih dari 10-20 jenis tumbuhan dan satwa yang ada di dunia berada di wilayah Indonesia. Namun sekarang ini keberadaan sumber daya alam hayati dan ekosistem di Indonesia sedang terancam. Hal ini disebabkan beberapa factor yang salah satu diantaranya adalah banyaknya jumlah perdagangan satwa liar dilindungi di Indonesia. Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya mengatur bahwa perdagangan satwa liar dilindungi sebagai suatu tindak pidana. Indonesia yang meratifikasi CITES pada tahun 1978 juga harus mengikuti ketentuan CITES dalam mengatur dan mengupayakan perlindungan hukum terhadap perdagangan satwa liar dilindungi.Skripsi ini mengambil studi kasus perdagangan ilegal Trenggiling sebagai satwa yang dilindungi. Sejak bulan Oktober 2016, Trenggiling telah dimasukkan dalam daftar Appendiks I CITES sehingga perdagangan dalam negeri maupun luar negeri adalah dilarang kecuali untuk tujuan non-komersil maupun keadaan luar biasa. Namun hingga saat ini perdagangan Trenggiling masih dapat ditemukan. Hal ini menunjukkan penegakan hukum dalam peraturan nasional masih belum dapat dilakukan secara optimal. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena masih banyak aparat penegak hukum yang belum menyadari dan mengerti secara penuh ancaman terhadap ekosistem ketika perdagangan satwa liar marak terjadi. Sehingga diperlukan perbaikan pada faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana perdagangan ilegal satwa liar ini.

---

Indonesia is a country which has high biodiversity.10 20 of plant and animal species in this world are exist in Indonesia. But nowadays the existence of natural resources and ecosystems in Indonesia are being threatened. Endangerment of their lives caused by several factor, one of which is the number of illegal wildlife trade in Indonesia which grows rapidly. Law No. 5 of 1990 on Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems rules that trading protected species is a crime. Indonesia as a country who has ratified CITES in 1978 should follow the convention to sought the regulation which create the law to protect wildlife species.

This thesis will take case study of Pangolin Manis javanica illegal trade. Since October 2016, Pangolin has been put to the list of Appendix I CITES which means the trade of this species is prohibited except for non commercial purpose or extraordinary reasons. This shows that law enforcement against illegal wildlife trade as stipulated in Indonesia Law cannot be executed optimally. This can happen because many of the law enforcers do not fully understand the threats of wildlife illegal trade to the ecosystem destruction. So it is necessary to improve all factors that affect law enforcement against criminal acts such wildlife trade."

"[ABSTRAKIndonesia merupakan negara dengan kekayaan alamnya yang tinggi. Tercatat bahwa negara Indonesia memiliki 10-20% dari jenis tumbuhan dan satwa yang ada di dunia. Namun dewasa ini keberadaan sumber daya alam hayati dan ekosistem di Indonesia sedang terancam. Terancamnya kehidupan mereka disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor salah satunya adalah maraknya perdagangan satwa liar khususnya untuk satwa liar yang dilindungi di Indonesia. Kegiatan perdagangan satwa yang dilindungi merupakan tindak pidana menurut undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya. Terlebih lagi, Indonesia telah meratifikasi Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) pada tahun 1978 melalui Keputusan Presiden No. 43 tahun 1978, yang pada intinya Konvensi ini memberikan mekanisme internasional untuk mengatur perdagangan satwa liar. CITES mengatur dan mengawasi perdagangan dengan menggunakan ?daftar negatif? seperti perdagangan semua spesies yang diperbolehkan dan tidak diatur kecuali spesies tersebut muncul di appendiks. Skripsi ini mengambil studi kasus perdagangan burung Kakatua Kecil Jambul Kuning (Cacatua sulphurea) sebagai satwa yang dilindungi. Burung ini termasuk satwa yang dilindungi dan juga termasuk dalam Appendiks I CITES. Oleh karena itu baik perdagangan dalam negeri dan untuk tujuan ekspor adalah dilarang kecuali untuk tujuan non-komersil. Namun hingga saat ini perdagangan burung Kakatua Kecil Jambul Kuning masih dapat ditemukan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum terhadap perdagangan satwa liar sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No.5 Tahun 1990 belum dapat dilakukan secara optimal. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena masih banyak para penegak hukum yang belum memahami secara penuh ancaman terhadap keanekaragaman hayati ketika banyak terjadi perdagangan illegal satwa liar yang dilindungi. Sehingga diperlukan perbaikan di semua faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana perdagangan tersebut.ABSTRACTIndonesia is a high biodiversity country. Indonesia has 10-20% of plant and animal species that exist in the world. But today the existence of natural resources and ecosystems in Indonesia are being threatened. Endangerment of their lives caused by several factors, one of which is the illegal wildlife trade, especially for the wildlife in Indonesia. Trading protected species is a crimes according to the law No. 5 of 1990 on Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems. Moreover, Indonesia has ratified the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 1978 through Presidential Decree No. 43 in 1978. CITES provides an international mechanism for governing wildlife trading by using the "negative list" such as trade of all species are allowed and are not regulated unless these species appear in the appendix. This thesis will take case study of illegal trade Small Yellow-crested Cockatoo Bird (Cacatua sulphurea) as one of the protected animals. Cacatua sulphurea is protected animals according to the law No. 7 of 1999 on Preservation of Plants and Animals and also included in Appendix I of CITES. Therefore both domestic and for export purposes is prohibited except for non-commercial purposes. But until now the trade Small Yellow-crested cockatoo birds can still be found. This shows that law enforcement against illegal wildlife trade as stipulated in Law No. 5 of 1990 can not be performed optimally. This can happen because the law enforcers are still many who do not fully understand the threats to biodiversity as prevalent crime of trafficking in protected wildlife. So that the necessary improvement in all factors that affect law enforcement against criminal acts such trade.;Indonesia is a high biodiversity country. Indonesia has 10-20% of plant and animal species that exist in the world. But today the existence of natural resources and ecosystems in Indonesia are being threatened. Endangerment of their lives caused by several factors, one of which is the illegal wildlife trade, especially for the wildlife in Indonesia. Trading protected species is a crimes according to the law No. 5 of 1990 on Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems. Moreover, Indonesia has ratified the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 1978 through Presidential Decree No. 43 in 1978. CITES provides an international mechanism for governing wildlife trading by using the "negative list" such as trade of all species are allowed and are not regulated unless these species appear in the appendix. This thesis will take case study of illegal trade Small Yellow-crested Cockatoo Bird (Cacatua sulphurea) as one of the protected animals. Cacatua sulphurea is protected animals according to the law No. 7 of 1999 on Preservation of Plants and Animals and also included in Appendix I of CITES. Therefore both domestic and for export purposes is prohibited except for non-commercial purposes. But until now the trade Small Yellow-crested cockatoo birds can still be found. This shows that law enforcement against illegal wildlife trade as stipulated in Law No. 5 of 1990 can not be performed optimally. This can happen because the law enforcers are still many who do not fully understand the threats to biodiversity as prevalent crime of trafficking in protected wildlife. So that the necessary improvement in all factors that affect law enforcement against criminal acts such trade.;Indonesia is a high biodiversity country. Indonesia has 10-20% of plant and animal species that exist in the world. But today the existence of natural resources and ecosystems in Indonesia are being threatened. Endangerment of their lives caused by several factors, one of which is the illegal wildlife trade, especially for the wildlife in Indonesia. Trading protected species is a crimes according to the law No. 5 of 1990 on Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems. Moreover, Indonesia has ratified the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 1978 through Presidential Decree No. 43 in 1978. CITES provides an international mechanism for governing wildlife trading by using the "negative list" such as trade of all species are allowed and are not regulated unless these species appear in the appendix. This thesis will take case study of illegal trade Small Yellow-crested Cockatoo Bird (Cacatua sulphurea) as one of the protected animals. Cacatua sulphurea is protected animals according to the law No. 7 of 1999 on Preservation of Plants and Animals and also included in Appendix I of CITES. Therefore both domestic and for export purposes is prohibited except for non-commercial purposes. But until now the trade Small Yellow-crested cockatoo birds can still be found. This shows that law enforcement against illegal wildlife trade as stipulated in Law No. 5 of 1990 can not be performed optimally. This can happen because the law enforcers are still many who do not fully understand the threats to biodiversity as prevalent crime of trafficking in protected wildlife. So that the necessary improvement in all factors that affect law enforcement against criminal acts such trade., Indonesia is a high biodiversity country. Indonesia has 10-20% of plant and animal species that exist in the world. But today the existence of natural resources and ecosystems in Indonesia are being threatened. Endangerment of their lives caused by several factors, one of which is the illegal wildlife trade, especially for the wildlife in Indonesia. Trading protected species is a crimes according to the law No. 5 of 1990 on Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems. Moreover, Indonesia has ratified the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 1978 through Presidential Decree No. 43 in 1978. CITES provides an international mechanism for governing wildlife trading by using the "negative list" such as trade of all species are allowed and are not regulated unless these species appear in the appendix. This thesis will take case study of illegal trade Small Yellow-crested Cockatoo Bird (Cacatua sulphurea) as one of the protected animals. Cacatua sulphurea is protected animals according to the law No. 7 of 1999 on Preservation of Plants and Animals and also included in Appendix I of CITES. Therefore both domestic and for export purposes is prohibited except for non-commercial purposes. But until now the trade Small Yellow-crested cockatoo birds can still be found. This shows that law enforcement against illegal wildlife trade as stipulated in Law No. 5 of 1990 can not be performed optimally. This can happen because the law enforcers are still many who do not fully understand the threats to biodiversity as prevalent crime of trafficking in protected wildlife. So that the necessary improvement in all factors that affect law enforcement against criminal acts such trade.]"

"Indonesia sebagai negara yang memiliki keanekaragaman hayati yang tinggi, dikenal sebagai ldquo;hotspot rdquo; perdagangan jenis tumbuhan dan satwa liar karena perannya sebagai peyuplai terbesar di kawasan Asia. Di saat yang sama, Indonesia juga dikenal sebagai negara dengan laju penurunan keanekaragaman hayati yang tinggi. Penurunan ini salah satunya disebabkan oleh maraknya perdagangan ilegal jenis tumbuhan dan satwa liar. Selama ini, upaya penegakan hukum atas kejahatan tersebut hanya berfokus pada jenis yang dilindungi saja. Hal ini dikarenakan Undang-undang No. 5 tahun 1990 sebagai induk kebijakan konservasi di Indonesia tidak memberikan ketentuan sanksi yang memadai terhadap kegiatan perdagangan ilegal jenis tumbuhan dan satwa liar, khususnya bagi jenis yang tidak dilindungi. Padahal, terdapat banyak jenis, yang tidak termasuk jenis yang dilindungi, namun berada dalam kondisi populasi yang terancam dan masih diperdagangkan secara bebas. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif dengan tujuan untuk mencari alternatif instrumen penegakan hukum yang dapat menjerat para pelaku perdagangan ilegal jenis tumbuhan dan satwa liar yang tidak dilindungi undang-undang. Dengan mengambil sudut pandang yang lebih luas terhadap aktifitas perdagangan, tidak terbatas pada aktifitas jual beli saja, maka terdapat beberapa undang-undang yang dapat dijadikan alternatif instrumen penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan ini, yaitu ; undang-undang tindak tindak pidana korupsi, undang-undang kepabeanan, undang-undang karantina ikan, hewan, dan tumbuhan, undang-undang kehutanan, serta undang-undang perikanan. Keberadaan undang-undang ini dapat menjadi solusi untuk mengisi kekosongan hukum, namun, hal ini tidak mengurangin urgensi untuk mengevaluasi kebijakan dalam undang-undang konservasi sumber daya alam hayati yang selama ini berlaku di Indonesia.

---

Indonesia, as one of the countries that has very high rates of biodiversity, is well known as the ldquo hotspot rdquo of international wildlife trade because of its role as the biggest supplier in Asia. However, Indonesia is also well known as the country that experienced massive biodiversity degradation, which is mostly caused by the high number of illegal trading of plant, animal, and other wildlife form. Until this very day, the law enforcement on illegal wildlife trade is only focused on protected species because Undang Undang No. 5 tahun 1990, as the prime reference of conservation rsquo s policy in Indonesia, does not provide adequate instrument of sanction on illegal trade of unprotected species, whereas there are lots of species in Indonesia that are threatened in the wild and are still being traded illegally. This research is using juridical normative approach, with the purpose to provide an alternative instrument of law enforcement on illegal trading of unprotected species from another act aside of Undang Undang No. 5 tahun 1990. If we consider the trade of wildlife as more than a process of selling and buying, then there are some acts that can be used as an alternative of law enforcement instrument, such as an anti corruption act, anti money laundering act, custom act, quarantine act, forestry act, and fisheries act. Those acts are used only as an alternative, and it does not lessen the urgency to evaluate the current conservation policy in Indonesia itself."

"Indonesia sebagai negara kepulauan merupakan satu kesatuan wilayah yurisdiksi yang berdaulat dan mempunyai wewenang untuk mengatur, mengelola dan memanfaatkan kekayaan laut yang dimilikinya. Kekayaan sumber daya perikanan yang dimiliki Indonesia menimbulkan ancaman, yaitu adanya illegal fishing yang mengganggu terhadap stabilitas keamanan laut atau maritime security. Menyadari bahwa luasnya wilayah Indonesia dan juga ancaman illegal fishing, maka penegakan hukum di laut tidak dilaksanakan oleh satu institusi secara mandiri. TNI AL, Kepolisian Perairan, Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan serta Bakorkamla adalah lembaga penegak hukum di laut yang berwenang atas penegakan hukum illegal fishing.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektifitas penegakan hukum dan penjelasan keterkaitan illegal fishing dengan maritime security. Untuk menjelaskan permasalahan, kerangka teoritis yang dipakai adalah penegakan hukum di laut, ocean policy, global policing dan transnational organized crime.Penelitian kualitatif ini dilaksanakan dengan metode wawancara terstruktur dan juga focus group discussion. Data yang dikumpulkan mengindikasikan bahwa penegakan hukum yang dilaksanakan belum sepenuhnya efektif akibat tidak adanya harmonisasi dan koordinasi diantara penegak hukum karena pelaksanaan masih bersifat subsektoral. Ancaman illegal fishing terkait maritime security adalah karena dampak tindakan tersebut menghambat pelaksanaan pembangunan jangka panjang yang berada dalam kerangka ocean policy dan juga merupakan ancaman terhadap keamanan dan kedaulatan negara dengan pelibatan kapal berbendera asing yang melakukan penangkapan ikan tanpa izin.

---

Indonesia as an archipelago state has a vast area of jurisdiction over the sea and as a sovereign state has the authority to rule, to manage, and to harness the wealth of natural resources at sea. The wealth of fishery resources that Indonesia have creates a threat, and that threat is illegal fishing that disturbe the maritime security. Realizing the vast area of Indonesian water and the rising threat of illegal fishing, the law enforcement at the sea did not execute by one institution only. Indonesian navy, marine police, ministry of marine and fishery, and Bakorkamla are the institution that has the authority at sea as law enforcer on illegal fishing.

This research aims to know the effectiveness of law enforcement and the explanation and the relatedness between illegal fishing and maritime security. To explain the problems, the theoretical framework being used are law enforcement at sea, ocean policy, global policing, and transnational organized crime.

This qualitative research used structural interview method and focus group discussion. The data being collected indicate that law enforcement that has been executed is not entirely effective because of the disharmony and lack of coordination between the law enforcer due to the nature of subsectoral execution. The threat of illegal fishing and maritime security are those actions causing delay of long term development in the framework of ocean policy and also a threat towards national security and its sovereign by the involvement of foreign ship that's been doing illegal fishing."

"Fisheries have an important and strategic role in the development of national economy, especially in promoting the expansion of employment opportunities, income generation, and the improvement of living standards of small fishermen, fish farmers and the parties entrepreneurs in the field of fisheries. The importance of the fisheries sector requires the preservation of the fisheries sector while maintaining the environment, sustainability, and availability of fish resources. Maritime country which has a large fishery resources often attract the attention of foreign fishing vessels to engage in fishing illegally (hereinafter referred to illegal fishing). Other factors that cause illegal fishing is the world's fish needs (demand) increased, on the other hand the world supply of fish is declining, as well as the occurrence of excess demand mainly of marine fish species such as tuna. Efforts to tackle illegal fishing is a matter that must be considered by a country. These measures should be set out clearly in the regulations of the country concerned. In fact the efforts taken between one country and another are differents. One example is the act of sinking foreign by the Indonesian government."

"Penelitian ini membahas peran Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan dalam upaya untuk menggurangi perdagangan ilegal. Permasalahan pelaksanaan kebijakan UU No.5 Tahun 1990 yang tidak jalan karena ringannya hukum di berlakukan serta pengawasasan oleh polhut yang tidak efektif karena terbatasnya SDM Polhut. Penelitian ini Post-positivis yang mengkaitkan hasil penelitiannya dengan teori Bell dan McGillivary peran pemerintah sebagai Administrative Regulation, Anticipatory Continuing Controls, Planning Prevention, dan Protecting Nature. Dari keempat dimensi belum berjalan dengan baik karena masih ada kendala dan kebijakan dasar sedang direvisi maka pemerintah menerapkan sistem multidoor untuk memberatkan sanksi yang diberikan dan bekerjasama dengan MMP, penyidik PNS, WCS dan WWF.Kata Kunci: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Peran Pemerintah, Perdagangan, ilegal satwa liar.

---

This undergraduate thesis discussesd the role of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry from the efforts made in tackling illegal trade in protected wildlife. The problem is implementation policy of law No.5 of 1990 not appropriate with procedure as casually given minor offences, monitoring is also less effective due to a number of forest ranger in addition. This Post positivis research which related result of the research and theory of Bell and McGillivary on the role of the Government as the Administrative Regulation, Anticipatory Continuing Controls, Planning Prevention and Protecting Nature. The four dimenstion are not well on of this research that Law is being revised so the government implements multidoor system to burden the sanction and cooperate with MMP, PPNS, WCS, WWF."

"Tugas Karya akhir ini membahas mengenai tindakan penegakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Indonesia dalam memberantas tindakan yang tergolong kepada Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated IUU Fishing sebagai upaya menjaga kedaulatan wilayah laut Indonesia. Oleh karena itu tulisan ini berfokus kepada langkah-langkah penegakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Indonesia dalam upaya memberantas IUU Fishing yang terjadi wilayah laut Indonesia, yang kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teori sistem hukum yang dikemukakan oleh Lawrence M. Friedman. Hasil dari tulisan ini menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum terhadap IUU Fishing yang dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah Indonesia telah memenuhi ketiga unsur sistem hukum yang dikemukakan oleh Lawrence M. Friedman sebagai indikator yang menentukan efektif atau tidaknya suatu penegkan hukum. Adapun ketiga unsur sistem hukum tersebut adalah unsur struktur hukum yang ditandai dengan adanya institusi yang melaksanakan penegakan hukum terhadap IUU Fishing, kemudian unsur substansi dan kultur hukum yang ditandai dengan terciptanya peraturan-peraturan hukum, yang diiukuti dengan sikap tegas dan komitmen pemerintah Indonesia dalam melaksanakan penegakan hukum dalam upaya menjaga kedaulatan wilayah laut.

---

This final paper discusses about law enforcement actions conducted by the Government of Indonesia in eradicating the actions that considered Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated IUU Fishing in an effort to maintain the Indonesia marine territorial sovereignty. Therefore, this paper focuses on law enforcement measures conducted by the Government of Indonesia in an effort to eradicate IUU fishing that occurs in Indonesia sea territory, which are then analyzed using the legal system theory propounded by Lawrence M. Friedman. The results of this paper show that law enforcement against IUU fishing implemented by the Government of Indonesia has met the three elements of the legal system propunded by Lawrence M. Friedman as an indicator that determines whether the law enforcement is effective or not. The three elements of the legal system is an element of the legal structure that is characterized by the institutions that implemented law enforcement against IUU fishing, then the element of substance and legal culture that is characterized by the creation of legal regulations, which followed with the attitude and commitment of the Government of Indonesia in performing law enforcement in an effort to maintain the marine territorial sovereignty."

"Perdagangan satwa liar yang tidak dilindungi di Indonesia menunjukkanpeningkatan yang semakin marak beberapa tahun belakangan, baik secara langsungmaupun melalui dunia maya. Kenyataan bahwa banyak dari praktik perdagangantersebut yang tidak sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlakumenunjukkan bahwa terdapat ketidakjelasan penegakan hukum dalam perdagangansatwa liar yang tidak dilindungi di Indonesia. Perdagangan satwa liar yang tidakdilindungi di Indonesia harus diatur dengan jelas dan rinci dalam peraturanperundang-undangan sehingga dapat mendorong penegakan hukum yang tepat dansesuai. Oleh karena itu, penulis memandang perlu meninjau kembali pengaturan,penerapan dan penegakan hukum terhadap perdagangan satwa liar yang tidakdilindungi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode yuridis-normatifmelalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara kepada beberapa narasumber. Hasilpenelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan dan penegakan hukum dalamperdagangan satwa liar yang tidak dilindungi di Indonesia sampai saat ini tidakberjalan sesuai peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Pada akhir penelitian,penulis memberi saran kepada pemerintah untuk meningkatkan pengawasanterhadap perdagangan satwa liar yang tidak dilindungi di Indonesia sertamempertimbangkan insentif, disinsentif, maupun sanksi administratif dan pidanasebagai bentuk- bentuk pilihan penegakan hukum dalam pengaturan perdagangansatwa liar yang tidak dilindungi di Indonesia.

---

The unprotected wildlife trade in Indonesia has shown an increasing trend in recent

years, both directly and through cyberspace. The fact that many of these trading

practices are not in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations shows that

there is a lack of clarity in the law enforcement of the unprotected wildlife trade in

Indonesia. The unprotected wildlife trade in Indonesia must be regulated clearly

and in detail in the laws and regulations so as to stimulate accurate and appropriate

law enforcement. Therefore, the author consider it is necessary to review the

regulation, implementation, and the law enforcement of the unprotected wildlife

trade in Indonesia. This research was conducted using legal-normative method

through literature study and interviews with several experts. The result of this study

indicate that the implementation and the law enforcement in the unprotected

wildlife trade in Indonesia has not been conducted according to the prevailing laws

and regulations. At the end of the thesis, the author recommend the government to

increase the supervision of the unprotected wildlife trade in Indonesia and to

consider incentive, disincentive, as well as administrative and criminal sanctions

as the forms of law enforcement options in the unprotected wildlife trade regulation

in Indonesia"

"Tesis ini membahas tentang kedudukan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha KPPU dalam struktur ketatanegaraan, mekanisme penegakan hukum persaingan usaha dan kekuatan hukum Putusan KPPU, serta analisis mengenai apakah seharusnya mekanisme penegakan hukum persaingan menggunakan sistem peradilan administratif mengingat KPPU merupakan lembaga dengan kewenangan menjatuhkan sanksi administratif. Tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif doktrinal dengan melakukan analisis permasalahan melalui pendekatan asas-asas hukum serta mengacu pada norma-norma hukum yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, dimana sumber data dititikberatkan pada data sekunder yang diperoleh dari berbagai bacaan seperti peraturan perundang-undangan, buku-buku, dan internet yang dinilai relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: Pertama, KPPU merupakan lembaga negara penunjang auxiliary state rsquo;s organ bersifat independen yang dibentuk untuk membantu kinerja lembaga negara utama dibidang penegakkan hukum persaingan usaha. Kedua, Kekuatan putusan KPPU sangat tergantung dari reaksi terlapor, akan mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap bila : 1 Pelaku Usaha tidak mengajukan keberatan, 2 alasan keberatan terhadap putusan KPPU ditolak oleh pengadilan negeri dan pelaku usaha tidak mengajukan kasasi kepada MA, dan 3 alasan-alasan Kasasi yang diajukan ditolak oleh MA. Ketiga, sistem peradilan administrasi di Indonesia diselenggarakan oleh PTUN, dan PTUN telah mengatur secara tegas bahwa yang menjadi wewenangnya adalah persengketaan yang timbul dalam bidang Tata Usaha Negara, sedangkan KPPU bukanlah pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dan Putusan KPPU bukan keputusan Tata Usaha Negara, sehingga KPPU bukanlah termasuk dalam lingkup kewenangan dari peradilan administrasi negara.

---

This thesis discusses the position of Business Competition Supervisory Commission KPPU in the constitutional structure, mechanism of law enforcement business competition and legal force of KPPU 39 s Decision, and an analysis of whether the competition law enforcement mechanisms should use administrative court system considering KPPU is an institution with the authority to impose administrative sanctions. This thesis uses normative doctrinal research method by conducting problem analysis through law principles approach and referring to legal norms existed in laws, where the data sources are focused on secondary data obtained from various literatures such as legislation, books, and internet sources which are considered as relevant. The results show that First, KPPU is an independent auxiliary state 39 s organ formed to assist the performance of main state organs in field of business competition law enforcement. Secondly, the KPPU rsquo s decision force depends very much on the reaction of convict, will have legal force decision if 1 the business actor does not object 2 the reason for objection to KPPU 39 s decision is rejected by district court and business actor does not appeal to Supreme Court 3 proposed cassation reasons was rejected by Supreme Court. Thirdly, the administrative court system in Indonesia is administered by the State Administrative Court, and the Administrative Court has stipulates that its authority is a dispute arising in field of State Administration, while KPPU is not a State Administrative Officer and KPPU 39 s Decision is not a State Administrative Decision, so that KPPU is not within the scope of authority of state administrative court."

"Tesis ini mengkaji dan menganalisa tentang Penanganan dan Penegakkan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Jakarta Pusat Nomor. 66/Pid.B/Tpk/2012/Pn.Jkt.Pst dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor : 137PK/PID.SUS/2010). Permasalahan yang diangkat diantaranya adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan antara tindak pidana korupsi dan tindak pidana pencucian uang, modus pencucian uang yang dilakukan dari tindak pidana asalnya korupsi, serta penanganan dan penegakkan hukum terhadap tindak pidana pencucian uang dari hasil tindak pidana korupsi.Tujuan daripada tesis ini untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisa penanganan dan penegakkan hukum tindak pidana pencucian uang dengan pokok tindak pidana korupsi, menjelaskan dan menganalisa kendala yang dihadapi dalam menjaga keamananpada system perbankan, serta untuk menjelaskan solusi yang dapat digunakan untuk dapat mengantisipasi keamanan system perbankan. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode mormatif yuridis yang bersifat kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data adalah dengan cara penelitian kepustakaan guna menemukan pasal-pasal dan konsep-konsep yang berisi kaedah hukum, yang kemudian dihubungkan dengan permasalahan yang sedang dihadapi dan disistematisasikan sehingga menghasilkan klasifikasi yang selaras dengan penelitian ini. Selanjutnya data yang diperoleh tersebut akan dianalisis secara induktif kualitatif untuk sampai pada kesimpulan.Hasil penelitian diperoleh adanya kelemahan-kelemahan pada system perbankan Bank Mandiri, sehingga menimbulkan peluang terjadinya kejahatan. Sistem keamanan yang harus mengutamakan kerahasiaan user id belum ditingkatkan atau dikaji secara periodik, sehingga dapat meninmbulkan potensi kerawanan berupa pembobolan melalui illegal akses. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan masih terdapat kelemahan pada system keamanan perbankan Bank Mandiri.

---

This test analyzed on Handling and Law Enforcement of Money Laundering Criminal Offense from the Corruption Criminal Offense Proceeds (Case Study of Ruling of Central Jakarta Court Number 66/Pid.B/Tpk/2012/Pn.Jkt.Pst and Ruling of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 137PK/PID.SUS/2010). The issues are to know about relations between corruption criminal action and money laundering criminal offense, modus of money laundering from the corruption criminal offense, and handling of law enforcement towards money laundering criminal offense from the corruption criminal offense proceeds.The aims of this test are to clarify and analyze handling and law enforcement for money laundering criminal offense with the main corruption criminal offense, to clarify and analyze constraints encountered to keep security in the system of banking, and solution that can be used to anticipate banking system security. The method used is the qualitative normative juridical method. Technique of data collection is by means of bibliography research to find articles and drafts containing criteria of laws, which is then connected to the issues in process and systematize thereby producing the uniform classification with this research. Furthermore, data obtained will be analyzed inductive-facultative until the conclusion.Result of the research was obtained the weaknesses to the banking system of Bank Mandiri, thereby arising from opportunity for the occurrence of crime. Security system that shall prioritize the confidentiality of user id not yet developed or analyzed periodically, so that it arises from potential susceptibility competency in terms of piercing through illegal access. Based on research, there are still weaknesses to the banking security system of Bank Mandiri. An effort taken to keep technology and information system security conducted by the banking in a certain period of time. In addition, it should be any caution in the process of personnel recruitment that will supervise and serve IT at Bank Mandiri."