Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKTujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah menguji hubungan simultan antara nilaiperusahaan, praktek corporate govenance, dan struktur kepemilikan dengan 114perusahaan yang terbuka di Bursa Efek Jakarta pada tahun 2003. Variabel strukturkepemilikan adalah Cash flow rights, wedge (control rights - cash flow rights),persentase kepemilikan blockholders oleh pihak asing namun diduga sebenarnyaorang Indonesia (atau disingkat Asing Tapi Indonesia, (ASTINDO)). Nilai perusahaanakan diukur dengan proksi Tobin?s Q dan praktek corporate governance diukurdengan corporate governance index (CGI) yang dikembangkan oleh Arsjah (2005).Karena hubungan endogen antar variabel, metode two stage least squares dipakai. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa praktek corporate governance tidak berpengaruhsignifikan kepada nilai perusahaan, tetapi nilai perusahaan menjadi prediktor positifuntuk praktek corporate governance. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa perusahaan yangmempunyai nilai perusahaan yang tinggi memilih praktek corporate governance yangbaik untuk meningkatkan nilai perusahaan. Namun, perusahaan belum tentu dapatmemberi signal tentang kualitas perusahaan dengan menerapkan praktek corporategovernance yang baik. Hasil ini mungkin terjadi karena implementasi praktekcorporate governance merupakan hal yang baru di indonesia dan karena pasar masihsulit mencerminkan pengaruh praktek corporate governance kepada nilai perusahaansebab kekurangan informasi yang memadai tentang praktek corporate governance. Ketika wedge perusahaan tinggi, pengaruh praktek corporate governance kepadanilai perusahaan melemah. 'Wedge adalah variabel yang mengukur insentif pemegangsaham mayoritas akhir untuk mengekspropriasi pemegang saham minoritas. Dengandemikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa efektivitas praktek corporate governancedipengaruhi oleh insentif untuk melakukan ekspropriasi dari pemegang sahampengendali akhir. Struktur kepemilikan dan nilai perusahaan tidak mempunyai hubungan sistematik.Hasil ini mendukung bahwa struktur kepemilikan ditentukan secara endogen,sehingga struktur kepemilikan tersebar maupun terkonsentrasi masing-masingmembawa masalah keagenan, tetapi sekaligus memberikan kuntungan yang dapatmenjadi kompensasi masalah keagenan masing-masing. ASTINDO dalam struktur kepemilikan perusahaan ternyata tidak menguranginilai perusahaan atau tidak mengekspropriasi kekayaan pemegang saham minoritas.Tetapi persentase kepemilikan ASTINDO berpengaruh negatif kepada praktekcorporate governance. Tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh dari kepemilikanASTINDO dan kepemilikan blockholders benar-benar asing (BLOCKA) kepada nilaiperusahaan dan praktek corporate goverance. Dengan asumsi ASTINDO diukur dengan benar, hasil tersebut meragukan argumen bahwa kepemilikan BLOCKA berpengaruh positif kepada kinerja perusahaan dan praktek corporate governance.

---

AbstractThe primary objective of this study is to test simultaneous relationships among thevalue of the firm, the practice of corporate govemanee, and the ownership structure ona sample of 114 companies quoted in the Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSX) for the year 2003. The ovmership structure variables include cash flow rights, wedge (controlrights - cash-flow rights), and percent of ownership by foreign bloclcholders that presumably are Indonesian blockholders (FBIB). The value of the firm is measured byproxy of Tobin's Q and the practice of corporate governance is measured by corporategovemance index (CGI) developed by Arsjah (2005). Because of the endogeneity among the variables, the two stage least squares are employed.The study finds that practice of corporate govemance fails to affect value of thefirm, but value of the firm is a positive predictor of practice of corporate governance.These results suggest that highly valued firms adopt the practice of the good corporategovemance because they believe that the practice of the good corporate governancewill further raise fimr value. However, adopting the practice of good corporate governance may not translate to higher fimi value. This may due to the fact thatimplementation of the practice of the corporate govemance is something new in Indonesia and that market may have difficulty in reflecting the effects of the practice ofthecorporategovemanceonthevalueofthefirmbecauseofthelackofproper information.Further, the influence ofthe practice ofthe corporate governance on the value ofthe firm becomes less, when the wedge of the firm becomes higher. Wedge is the variable that estimates incentives of ultimate majority shareholders to expropriate minority shareholders. Therefore, I conclude that effectiveness of the practice of the corporate govemance is influenced by the expropriation incentives of the ultimate majority shareholders.Ownership structure and the value of the firm have no systematic relation. This result supports that the ownership structure of a firm is the endogenous outcome of decisions. In other words, ownership structure is chosen so as to maximize the value ofthe firm, and that greater diffuseness in ownership, although it makes the agencyproblemmoresevere,conveyscompensatingadvantagesonfirmsthatchoosetorelyon a difiiise ownership structure.FBIB does not extract private benefits for themselves or do not expropriate thewealth of the minority shareholders. But, percent of ownership by FBIB has negative effectsonthepracticeofthecorporategovernance.Thereisno differencebetweentheinfluence of percent of ownership by foreign bloekholders and of percent of ownership by PBIB on the value of the firm and the practice of the corporate governance.Assuming that percent of ownership by FBIB are accurately measured, this result casts some doubt on the argument that ownership by foreign bloclcholders has positive effects on the performance and the practice of the corporate governance."

"[ABSTRAKTujuan utama dari penulisan studi ini adalah untuk melakukan pengujian hubungan simultan antara aktivitas pengawasan dewan komisaris dan kinerja perusahaan dengan menggunakan sampel sebanyak 156 perusahaan. Penelitian ini menemukan bukti bahwa aktivitas pengawasan perusahaan dapat mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan, begitu juga sebaliknya, kinerja perusahaan dapat mempengaruhi aktivitas pengawasan perusahaan yang dilakukan oleh dewan komisaris. Pengujian tambahan juga dilakukan terhadap 47 perusahaan untuk meneliti apakah hubungan simultan ini dimoderasi oleh nilai dari praktek corporate governance. Ditemukan bukti bahwa praktek corporate governance mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan, tetapi tidak mempengaruhi aktivitas pengawasan. Studi ini juga menemukan bahwa jumlah kepemilikan keluarga, dan tingkat hutang mempengaruhi frekuensi aktivitas pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh dewan komisaris.

---

ABSTRACTThe primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity. An additional test was performed with smaller sample of 47 companies to found the evidence that the score of corporate governance practice moderated the relationship between monitoring activity and firm performance. There is an empirical evidence that corporate governance affected the firm performance but do not affect the monitoring activity. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner.;The primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity. An additional test was performed with smaller sample of 47 companies to found the evidence that the score of corporate governance practice moderated the relationship between monitoring activity and firm performance. There is an empirical evidence that corporate governance affected the firm performance but do not affect the monitoring activity. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner.;The primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity. An additional test was performed with smaller sample of 47 companies to found the evidence that the score of corporate governance practice moderated the relationship between monitoring activity and firm performance. There is an empirical evidence that corporate governance affected the firm performance but do not affect the monitoring activity. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner., The primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity. An additional test was performed with smaller sample of 47 companies to found the evidence that the score of corporate governance practice moderated the relationship between monitoring activity and firm performance. There is an empirical evidence that corporate governance affected the firm performance but do not affect the monitoring activity. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner.]"

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini berfokus pada apakah corporate investment, financing dan cash policies saling berhubungan dan dipengaruhi oleh pola life-cycle pada masing-masing tahapan perusahaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan investment dan equity turun seiring dengan tahapan life-cycle sedangkan debt dan cash holding naik dari tahapan introduction menuju growth dan turun dari growth ke shake-out/decline. Penelitian ini meneliti pada perusahaan publik terdaftar di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan berbagai proksi life-cycle. Dari hasil tersebut menunjukan corporate policies mengukuti tahapan life-cycle perusahaan.

---

ABSTRACTThis research examine life cycle impact whether on corporate investment, financing and examine pattern of corporate policies in each of life cycle stage. Result of this research find that investments and equity issuance decrease with firm life cycle, while debt issuance and cash holdings increase in the introduction and growth stages and decrease in the mature and shake out decline stages of the firm rsquo s life cycle. The analysis of this research using public companies in Indonesia. These results using various proxies for life cycle. The results show that corporate policies follow a firm life cycle. "

"Tujuan dari studi empiris ini adalah untuk menguji dan menganalisis struktur tata kelola perusahaan (proporsi komisaris independen, rapat dewan komisaris, struktur kepemilikan, dewan direksi dan rapat komite audit) dalam hubungannya dengan pengungkapan modal intelektual. Sampel dari penelitian empiris ini perusahaan non keuangan dan non pemerintah yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) di 2012-2015. Hasil dari studi empiris yaitu (1) proporsi komisaris independen memiliki dampak yang signifikan dan positif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (2) rapat dewan komisaris memiliki dampak yang signifikan dan negatif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (3) struktur kepemilikan tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (4) jumlah dewan direksi memiliki pengaruh signifikan dan negatif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (5) pertemuan komite audit berpengaruh signifikan dan positif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual.

---

The objective of this empirical study is to examine and to analyze the effect of corporate governance structure (independent commissioner, board of commissioner meetings, ownership structure, board of director, and audit committee meetings) on the relation of intellectual capital disclosure. The sample of this empirical study is the manufacturing company that listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) in 2012-2015. The result of this empirical study are (1) independent commissioner had positive significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (2) board of commissioner meetings had negative significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (3) ownership structure had not significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (4) board of director had negative significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (5) audit committee meetings had positive significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh tingkat efektivitas dewan komisaris dan komite audit serta kepemilikan keluarga terhadap luasnya pengungkapan lingkungan pada perusahaan-perusahaan publik yang terdaftar di dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan regresi data panel model fixed effect dengan total sampel sebanyak 222 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode tahun 2008 sampai dengan tahun 2012. Hasil dari penelitian ini menemukan bahwa rata-rata tingkat pengungkapan lingkungan adalah sebesar 3,38% yang menunjukkan tingkat pengungkapan lingkungan masih relatif rendah yang kemungkinan disebabkan belum ada ketentuan mengenai apa saja yang harus diungkapkan terkait pengungkapan lingkungan. Rata-rata skor efektivitas dewan komisaris dan komite audit berada pada kategori ‘fair’. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa efektivitas dewan komisaris dan efektivitias komite audit memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap pengungkapan lingkungan, sedangkan kepemilikan keluarga memiliki pengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap pengungkapan lingkungan.

---

ABSTRACTThe aim of this research is to analyze the effect of the level of board commissioner and audit committee effectiveness as well as family ownership of the extent of environmental disclosure in public listed companies at the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This study use fixed effects model of panel regression for hypothesis testing, with a total sample of 222 listed companies at Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2008 to 2012. The findings reveal that the average level of environmental disclosure of is at 3.38% which relatively is stil very low. This may due to there is no mandatory requirement on what to disclose in environmental disclosure. The average score of the board of commissioner and audit committee effectiveness are in the 'fair' category. In addition, this study also reveals that the board of commissioner effectiveness and audit committee effectiveness have a positive and significant impact on environmental disclosure, while family ownership have negative and significant impact on environmental disclosure.;The aim of this research is to analyze the effect of the level of board commissioner and audit committee effectiveness as well as family ownership of the extent of environmental disclosure in public listed companies at the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This study use fixed effects model of panel regression for hypothesis testing, with a total sample of 222 listed companies at Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2008 to 2012. The findings reveal that the average level of environmental disclosure of is at 3.38% which relatively is stil very low. This may due to there is no mandatory requirement on what to disclose in environmental disclosure. The average score of the board of commissioner and audit committee effectiveness are in the 'fair' category. In addition, this study also reveals that the board of commissioner effectiveness and audit committee effectiveness have a positive and significant impact on environmental disclosure, while family ownership have negative and significant impact on environmental disclosure.;The aim of this research is to analyze the effect of the level of board commissioner and audit committee effectiveness as well as family ownership of the extent of environmental disclosure in public listed companies at the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This study use fixed effects model of panel regression for hypothesis testing, with a total sample of 222 listed companies at Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2008 to 2012. The findings reveal that the average level of environmental disclosure of is at 3.38% which relatively is stil very low. This may due to there is no mandatory requirement on what to disclose in environmental disclosure. The average score of the board of commissioner and audit committee effectiveness are in the 'fair' category. In addition, this study also reveals that the board of commissioner effectiveness and audit committee effectiveness have a positive and significant impact on environmental disclosure, while family ownership have negative and significant impact on environmental disclosure., The aim of this research is to analyze the effect of the level of board commissioner and audit committee effectiveness as well as family ownership of the extent of environmental disclosure in public listed companies at the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This study use fixed effects model of panel regression for hypothesis testing, with a total sample of 222 listed companies at Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2008 to 2012. The findings reveal that the average level of environmental disclosure of is at 3.38% which relatively is stil very low. This may due to there is no mandatory requirement on what to disclose in environmental disclosure. The average score of the board of commissioner and audit committee effectiveness are in the 'fair' category. In addition, this study also reveals that the board of commissioner effectiveness and audit committee effectiveness have a positive and significant impact on environmental disclosure, while family ownership have negative and significant impact on environmental disclosure.]"

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kepemilikan, karakteristik dewan serta variabel ekonomi dan finansial terhadap kesulitan keuangan pada perusahaan nonkeuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2009-2018. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan tujuan penelitian eksplanatif. Instrumenyang digunakan dalam pengumpulan data kuantitatif penelitian ini adalah melalui Laporan Tahunan dan Laporan Keuangan yang diterbitkan oleh perusahaan nonkeuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2009-2018. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi logistik. Variabel yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini adalah variabel kepemilikan (mencakup kepemilikan saham besar, kepemilikan saham besar institusional dan kepemilikan saham besar noninstitusional, kepemilikan dewan direksi), karakteristik dewan (mencakup proporsi dewan komisaris dan ukuran dewan komisaris) yang termasuk kedalam variabel tata kelola perusahaan. Variabel ekonomi dan finansial dalam penelitian ini adalah profitabilitas dan laba ditahan. Secara umum, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hanya satu variabel yang negatif signifikan terhadap kesulitan keuangan yaitu profitabilitas dan seluruh variabel tata kelola tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap kesulitan keuangan perusahaan.characteristics of the board as well as economic and financial variables on financial difficulties in non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2009-2018. This study uses a quantitative approach with the aim of explanatory research. InstrumentThe quantitative data used in this research is through the Annual Reports and Financial Statements issued by non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2009-2018. The analytical technique used is logistic regression analysis. The variables studied in this study are ownership variables (covering large share ownership, large institutional share ownership and large non-institutional share ownership, board of directors ownership), board characteristics (including the proportion of the board of commissioners and the size of the board of commissioners) which are included in the corporate governance variable. Economic and financial variables in this study are profitability and retained earnings. In general, the results of the study indicate that only one variable that has a significant negative impact on financial difficulties is profitability and all governance variables have no effect on the company's financial difficulties."

"Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh ESG terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan dengan menggunakan proksi ROA, ROE, dan Tobin’s Q. Variabel kontrol dalam penelitian ini adalah firm size, financial leverage, asset turnover, dan asset growth. Penelitian ini menggunakan 80 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada periode 2017 2022 dengan menggunakan purposive sampling technique. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel yang diolah menggunakan Stata 17. Penelitian ini menggunakan ESG score Bloomberg dan data laporan keuangan melalui Refinitiv Eikon sebagai sumber data. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ESG tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan yang diukur dengan masing-masing proksi Return on Asset, Return on Equity, dan Tobin’s Q.

---

This study analyzes the impact of ESG on corporate financial performance using proxies such as ROA, ROE, and Tobin's Q. The control variables in this study are firm size, financial leverage, asset turnover, and asset growth. The study employs 80 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2017-2022, using a purposive sampling technique. Panel data is processed using Stata 17. The study utilizes Bloomberg ESG scores and financial report data from Refinitiv Eikon as data sources. The results show that ESG does not have a significant impact on corporate financial performance as measured by the proxies Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Tobin's Q."

"Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis pengaruh insider ownership serta konsentrasi kepemilikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Populasi penelitian adalah semua perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode tahun 2010-2013 yang memiliki laba positif dan laporan keuangan yang lengkap. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 61 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI periode tahun 2010-2013 atau 244 observasi. Analisis data dilakukan dengan analisis regresi data panel dengan bantuan program software EViews versi 7.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa insider ownership memiliki pengaruh signifikan positif terhadap nilai perusahaan, namun penelitian ini tidak berhasil menguji pengaruh konsentrasi kepemilikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.

---

The purpose of this research is to analyze the influence of insider ownership and ownership concentration on firm value. The study population is all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2010-2013 which has a positive profit and complete financial statements. The sample of this research is 61 manufacturing companies listed on the IDX period 2010-2013 or 244 observations. Data analysis was done by regression analysis of panel data with the help of software program EViews version 7.0. The results show that insider ownership has a significant positive influence on firm value, but this research did not successfully test the effect of ownership concentration on firm value."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis determinan kebijakan memegang kas perusahaan. Sampel yang digunakan merupakan perusahaan nonkeuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dari periode 2008 hingga 2015. Fokus penelitian ini dibagi menjadi dua, yaitu aspek keuangan dan aspek direksi. Penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa kebijakan memegang kas perusahaan memiliki pengaruh negatif signifikan dengan kesempatan pertumbuhan, tingkat utang, nilai modal bersih, dan belanja modal; dan hubungan positif signifikan dengan arus kas dari aktivitas operasi dan volatilitas arus kas. Sebaliknya, ukuran perusahaan dan dividen tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kebijakan memegang kas perusahaan. Aspek direksi, seperti jumlah direksi dan proporsi komisaris independen, juga tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kebijakan memegang kas perusahaan. Teori pecking order, static trade-off, dan motif berjagajaga dapat menjelaskan sebagian besar variabel determinan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Sedangkan teori biaya keagenan hanya dapat menjelaskan satu variabel saja, yaitu kesempatan pertumbuhan. Temuan ini konsisten dengan penelitian tentang kebijakan kas perusahaan di negara-negara berkembang yang pernah dilakukan sebelumnya.

---

This study aims to analyze the determinants of corporate cash holdings of non-financial listed companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2008 ? 2015 periods. The focus of this study is divided into two aspects, namely financial and board characteristics. The study finds that corporate cash holdings have significant negative relationships with growth opportunities, leverage, net working capital, and capital expenditure; and significant positive relationships with operating cash flow and cash flow volatility. Firm size and dividends do not have significant relationships with corporate cash holdings. In addition to the financial aspects, board characteristics, such as numbers of directors and independent commissioners, also do not pose significant relationships with corporate cash holdings. Pecking order theory, static trade-off theory and precautionary motive can explain most of variables used in this study. On the other hand, agency cost theory explains merely one variable, namely growth opportunities. This finding is consistent with previous studies about corporate cash holdings in developing countries."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh Asset Growth Rate terhadap future stock return di mana dalam penelitian terdahulu diketahui bahwa asset growth rate memiliki kekuatan dalam memprediksi keuntungan masa depan dari sebuah saham. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan dua variabel kontrol yaitu, size dan book-to-market ratio. Penelitian ini menggunakan regresi data panel pada 309 perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) selama periode 2014-2018. Diperoleh bahwa Asset growth rate tidak memiliki pengaruh pada future stock return pada perusahaan yang tercatat di BEI namun variabel kontrol yang berupa size memiliki pengaruh pada future stock return

---

ABSTRACTThis study discusses the impact of asset growth rate on future stock return of listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Asset growth rate is one of the strongest predictors to predict future stock returns. Furthermore, this study also used two control variabels which has been proved to be one of the best predictors for future stock return such as size and book-to-market ratio. This study is quantitative research study with multiple regression method for data panel with 309 listed companies during the period 2014-2018 for the sample. The result of this study provides evidence that independen variabel included in the model (asset growth rate) show no significant impact to future stock return of listed companies in IDX. On the other hand, the control variabels which is size gave a positive and significant impact to stock return."