Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian yang telah dilakukan ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dan menganalisis kesesuaian dosis teknik IMRT dan VMAT antara distribusi dosis pada TPS dengan distribusi dosis yang terukur oleh dosimeter film gafchromic EBT2, MatriXXEvolution dan EPID pada kasus kanker KNF, paru dan prostat. Percobaan dilakukan menggunakan Pesawat Linac Varian Rapid Arc dengan TPS Eclips yang dimiliki oleh Rumah Sakit MRCCC SHS. Pengolahan data dari ketiga dosimeter tersebut menggunakan software MATLAB, Omni Pro IMRT dan portal dosimetry. Untuk perbandingan dilakukan analisis data sekunder yang telah dilakukan oleh pihak RS MRCCC SHS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan indeks gamma rata-rata data sekunder pasien masih dalam toleransi dengan nilai >90%. Hasil pengukuran menggunakan film EBT2, MatriXXEvolution dan EPID dengan kriteria gamma 3% / 3mm pada kasus kanker KNF, paru dan prostat menunjukan bahwa indeks gamma yang diperoleh melewati batas toleransi yang diizinkan yaitu lebih dari 90%. Selisih indeks gamma antara dosimetri film gafchromic, MatriXXEvolution dan EPID pada teknik VMAT dan IMRT tidak terlalu jauh, dengan rentang 0,01 – 5,36%. Perbedaan indeks gamma menunjukkan bahwa direkomendasikan pengukuran menggunakan detektor MatriXXEvolution daripada menggunakan film dosimetri EBT2 dan EPID. Selisih persentase rata-rata indek gamma pada teknik IMRT dan VMAT berada pada rentang 0,02 – 5,31%. Selisih antara hasil pengukuran dan data sekunder menggunakan MatriXXEvolution dengan hasil penelitian Miura et al. diperoleh dengan rentang 0 – 6%. Data penelitian ini sangat mendukung penelitian yang telah dilakukan sebelumnya oleh Hussein et al., (2013), Nalbant et al., (2014), Elawady et al, (2014), Pham (2013), Miura et al., (2014).

---

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this research was to evaluate and analyze the compatibility dose IMRT and VMAT technique between the dose distribution in the TPS and the dose distributions which measured by the film dosimeter gafchromic EBT2, MatriXXEvolution and EPID in the case of KNF cancer, lung and prostat. The experiments were done by using Varian linac Plane Rapid Arc with TPS Eclips owned by the MRCCC Siloam Hospital Semanggi. The data processed of the three dosimeters were using MATLAB software, Omni Pro IMRT and Dosimetry portal. For the comparative analysis of secondary data has been made by MRCCC SHS. The results showed an average gamma index of secondary data patients within tolerances with values > 90%. The measurement results EBT2 film, MatriXXEvolution and EPID of using criteria gamma 3% / 3mm in the case of NPC cancer, lung and prostate indicates that the gamma index gained over the limit allowed tolerance of more than 90%. Gamma index difference between the film dosimetry gafchromic, MatriXXEvolution and EPID on VMAT and IMRT techniques are not too far away, with a range of 0.01 to 5.36%. Differences show that the gamma index measurement using a MatriXXEvolution better than using EBT dosimetry film 2 and EPID. The difference in the average percentage of gamma index on IMRT and VMAT technique to be in the range of 0.02 to 5.31%. The difference between the measurement results and secondary data using MatriXXEvolution and the results Miura et al. Measurement in the range of 0-6%. Data from this study strongly support previous research by Hussein et al., (2013), Nalbant et al., (2014), Elawady et al, (2014), Pham (2013), Miura et al., (2014)"

"Latar Belakang: Hingga saat ini belum pernah dilakukan studi untuk menganalisis parameter dosimetri diantara teknik Three Dimentional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy-Step and Shoot (IMRT-SS), IMRT-Helical Tomotherapy (HT) dan Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) pada kanker prostat di Departemen Radioterapi RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo.Metode: Studi eksperimental eksploratorik dengan melakukan intervensi pada 10 data CT plan pasien kanker prostat yang diradiasi di Departemen Radioterapi RSUPN-CM. Dosis 78 Gy diberikan pada PTV dalam 39 fraksi. Hasil: rerata V75Gy rektum dan buli antara teknik 3D-CRT dengan tiga teknik lainnya, seluruhnya memperlihatkan perbedaan yang bermakna (p <0,05). Rerata V5Gy RVR antara teknik 3D-CRT vs VMAT dan HT, IMRT-SS vs HT dan VMAT vs HT bermakna secara statistik dengan nilai p<0,0001. Rerata durasi penyinaran paling tinggi didapatkan dengan teknik HT (rerata 4,70±0,84 menit). Kesimpulan: Angka V75Gy Rektum dan buli antara teknik 3D-CRT berbeda signifikan dibandingkan dengan tiga teknik lainnya. Teknik IMRT-SS menggunakan 5 arah sinar ko-planar mampu memberikan distribusi dosis yang baik terhadap PTV dan organ kritis meskipun tidak superior dibandingkan dengan teknik HT dan VMAT. Teknik HT memiliki konformitas yang lebih inferior dibandingkan dengan teknik VMAT. Durasi penyinaran terpendek dengan menggunakan teknik VMAT, berbeda signifikan dibandingkan dengan 3 teknik lainnya.

Background: There is limited study comparing dosimetry parameters between four different techniques; Three Dimentional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy-Step and Shoot (IMRT-SS), IMRT-Helical Tomotherapy (HT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in relation to prostate cancer in Radiotherapy Department RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo.

Method: Experimental study with intervention on 10 prostate cancer patients' CT planning data. All the subjects underwent radiation in radiotherapy department RSUPN-CM. 78 Gy dose in 39 fractions was given for PTV. Results: The mean V75Gy rectum and bladder between 3D-CRT and the other three above mentioned techniques all showed significant results (p <0.05). V5Gy RVR between 3D-CRT vs VMAT and HT, IMRT-SS vs HT and VMAT vs HT is statistically significant (p <0.0001). The longest radiation time was done with HT (mean 4.70±0.84 minutes).

Conclusion: V75Gy rectum and bladder between 3D-CRT is statistically significant compared with the other three techniques. Even though, it is not superior compared to HT and VMAT, IMRT-SS using 5 co-planar beams are able to provide good dose distribution for PTV and critical organs. HT have inferior conformity compared to VMAT. Shortest radiation time was done using VMAT (statistically significant compared to three other techniques)."

"ABSTRACTNilai indeks gamma yang dihasilkan antara satu perencanaan dengan perencanaan lainnya berbeda. Perbedaan ini mungkin dipengaruhi oleh banyak hal seperti detektor yang digunakan, kasus kanker yang berbeda, dll. Akan tetapi, terdapat passing criteria yang direkomendasikan oleh AAPM TG 119, sehingga seharusnya nilai indeks gamma tidak akan bernilai jauh dari passing criteria yang telah direkomendasikan. Oleh karena itu, pada penelitian ini akan dilakukan evaluasi konsistensi verifikasi yang dilakukan di RS MRCCC Siloam Hospital Semanggi dengan cara melihat perbedaan nilai rata-rata indeks gamma setiap tahunnya selama 8 tahun sejak tahun 2011-2018. Uji statistika juga dilakukan untuk menganalisis perbedaan dan pengaruh antara detektor yang berbeda, kasus kanker yang berbeda, serta teknik penyinaran yang berbeda terhadap nilai indeks gamma yang dihasilkan. Peralatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Pesawat LINAC Varian Clinac iX dengan TPS Eclipse versi 8.6-13, detektor 2D array bilik ionisasi MatriXXEvolution , EPID serta software Portal Dosimetry, Omni Pro I rsquo;mRT dan SPSS. Secara umum, metode penelitian dibagi menjadi beberapa tahap yaitu : pencatatan data pasien, verifikasi perencanaan, evaluasi indeks gamma, uji statistika dan analisis. Uji statistika yang digunakan merupakan uji Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney dan Wilcoxon. Uji Kruskal Wallis digunakan untuk melihat perbedaan rata-rata nilai indeks gamma setiap tahunnya. Uji Mann Whitney digunakan untuk melihat perbedaan rata-rata nilai indeks gamma antara kanker otak dan kanker prostat serta melihat perbedaan rata-rata nilai indeks gamma yang dihasilkan antara teknik IMRT dan VMAT. Uji Wilcoxon digunakan untuk melihat perbedaan rata-rata nilai indeks gamma detektor MatriXX dan EPID. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistika pada nilai rata-rata indeks gamma antara dua detektor, dua teknik IMRT dan VMAT, serta antara dua kasus kanker yang berbeda, sedangkan nilai rata-rata indeks gamma per tahun tidak signifikan secara statistika. Secara keseluruhan, nilai rata-rata indeks gamma setiap tahunnya konsisten. Oleh karena itu, disimpulkan bahwa verifikasi yang dilakukan di RS MRCCC Siloam selama 8 tahun konsisten secara statistika.

---

ABSTRACTThe gamma index value generated between one plan and another is normally different. This can be affected by many factors such as the usage of different detectors, different type of cancer cases, etc. However, there is certain passing criteria recommended by AAPM TG 119, thus the gamma index value ideally should not be much far from the recommended passing criteria. Therefore, this study will evaluate the verification consistency conducted at MRCCC Siloam Hospital Semanggi by looking at the difference between the mean value of gamma index every year for 8 years since 2011 2018. Statistical tests were also performed to analyze differences and effects between different detectors, different cancer cases, and different irradiation techniques on the resulting gamma index values. The equipment used in this research was LINAC Varian Clinac iX with TPS Eclipse version 8.6 13, 2D detector MatrixEvolution ionization array, EPID and Dosimetry Portal software, Omni Pro I 39 mRT and SPSS. In general, the study method is divided into several stages patient data recording, planning verification, gamma index evaluation, statistical test run, and analysis. The statistical test used is Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney and Wilcoxon test. The Kruskal Wallis test was used to see the average difference in the gamma index value annually. In addition, Mann Whitney test was used to see the difference in gamma index mean values between brain cancer and prostate cancer and to see the difference in gamma index mean values generated between IMRT and VMAT techniques. Furthermore, Wilcoxon test was used to see the difference in gamma index mean values of MatriXX and EPID detectors. The results showed statistically significant differences on the gamma index mean values between two detectors, two IMRT and VMAT techniques, and between two different cancer cases, while the difference between gamma index mean value per year was not statistically significant. Overall, the average value of the gamma index each year is consistent. Therefore, the verification performed at MRCCC Siloam Hospital for over 8 years is consistent statistically."

"[Telah dilakukan penelitian dalam mengevaluasi pengaruh material homogen dan inhomogen pada teknik IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy) menggunakan modalitas Fan Beam CT (FBCT) dan Cone Beam CT (CBCT) terhadap Gamma Index (GI). Perencanaan ulang dilakukan untuk 5 pasien kanker paru kanan pada modalitas FBCT dan CBCT menggunakan TPS Phillips Pinnacle energi foton 6 MV. Menggunakan Teknik IMRT 30 segmen, 50 segmen, dan 70 segmen untuk perencanan terapi. Calculation Grid Resolution (CGR) 0.2 cm dan 0.4 cm digunakan sebagai resolusi dalam perhitungan dosis. Serta kalibrasi bilangan CT (KBC) FBCT, CBCT, dan linear dipergunakan sebagai koreksi CT density number. Pengukuran plannar dose untuk evaluasi Gamma Index (DD 2% / DTA 2 mm, passing rate 90%) dilakukan pada SAD 100 cm dengan material homogen dan inhomogen pada kedalaman 1.5 cm, 5 cm, dan 10 cm. Didapatkan deviasi nilai rata-­‐rata GI antara CGR 0.2 cm dengan 0.4 cm material homogen modalitas FBCT dan CBCT berturut-­‐tutut ≤1.46% dan ≤ 1.13%. Serta deviasi pada material inhomogen sebesar ≤ 2.54% (FBCT) dan ≤ 1.74% (CBCT). Deviasi Nilai rata-­rata GI antara FBCT dengan CBCT dengan CGR 0.2 cm berturut-­turut ≤ 1.95% (homogen) dan ≤ 2.36% (inhomogen). Dan deviasi Nilai rata-­‐rata GI antara material homogen dan material ekuivalen homogen sebesar ≤ 0.80%. Dari hasil penelitian yang didapat, bahwa evaluasi Gamma Index dapat dipengaruhi oleh jumlah segmen, modalitas CT, kalibrasi bilangan CT, Calculation Grid Resolution, dan kedalaman material.

---

These Studies have been carried out to evaluate the effect of a homogeneous and inhomogeneous material on IMRT Technique (Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy) using Fan Beam CT (FBCT) and Cone Beam CT (CBCT) for the Gamma Index (GI). The Phillips Pinnacle treatment plan was used to replan 5 patients on right side of lung cancer. Photon 6 MV was applied to this technique with 30 segments, 50 segments, and 70 segments, repectively. Using Calculation Grid Resolution (CGR) 0.2 cm and 0.4 cm for resolution in the calculation of the dose. As well as the calibration of CT numbers (CCN) FBCT, CBCT, and the linear density are used as a correction CT number. The planar measurement for the evaluation of Gamma Index (DD 2% / DTA 2 mm, the passing rate of 90%) carried out at 100 cm SAD with the homogeneous and inhomogeneous material at a depth of 1.5 cm, 5 cm, and 10 cm, respectively. We obtained deviation average value of GI between CGR 0.2 cm and 0.4 cm using the homogeneous material on FBCT and CBCT modality ≤1.46% and ≤ 1:13%, respectively. As well as the material inhomogeneous deviation of ≤ 2.54% (FBCT) and ≤ 1.74% (CBCT). The deviation of the average GI value between FBCT with CBCT with CGR 0.2 cm respectively ≤ 1.95% (homogeneous) and ≤ 2.36% (inhomogeneous). Finally, the deviation of the average GI value between homogeneous and equivalent of homogeneous material is ≤ 0.80%. From the results obtained, that the Gamma Index can be influenced by the number of segments, modalities of CT, calibration of CT numbers, calculation grid resolution and depth of material.

, These

Studies

have

been

carried

out

to

evaluate

the

effect

of

a

homogeneous

and

inhomogeneous

material

on

IMRT

Technique

(Intensity

Modulated

Radiotherapy)

using

Fan

Beam

CT

(FBCT)

and

Cone

Beam

CT

(CBCT)

for

the

Gamma

Index

(GI).

The

Phillips

Pinnacle

treatment

plan

was

used

to

replan

5

patients

on

right

side

of

lung

cancer.

Photon

6

MV

was

applied

to

this

technique

with

30

segments,

50

segments,

and

70

segments,

repectively.

Using

Calculation

Grid

Resolution

(CGR)

0.2

cm

and

0.4

cm

for

resolution

in

the

calculation

of

the

dose.

As

well

as

the

calibration

of

CT

numbers

(CCN)

FBCT,

CBCT,

and

the

linear

density

are

used

as

a

correction

CT

number.

The

planar

measurement

for

the

evaluation

of

Gamma

Index

(DD

2%

/

DTA

2

mm,

the

passing

rate

of

90%)

carried

out

at

100

cm

SAD

with

the

homogeneous

and

inhomogeneous

material

at

a

depth

of

1.5

cm,

5

cm,

and

10

cm,

respectively.

We

obtained

deviation

average

value

of

GI

between

CGR

0.2

cm

and

0.4

cm

using

the

homogeneous

material

on

FBCT

and

CBCT

modality

≤1.46%

and

≤

1:13%,

respectively.

As

well

as

the

material

inhomogeneous

deviation

of

≤

2.54%

(FBCT)

and

≤

1.74%

(CBCT).

The

deviation

of

the

average

GI

value

between

FBCT

with

CBCT

with

CGR

0.2

cm

respectively

≤

1.95%

(homogeneous)

and

≤

2.36%

(inhomogeneous).

Finally,

the

deviation

of

the

average

GI

value

between

homogeneous

and

equivalent

of

homogeneous

material

is

≤

0.80%.

From

the

results

obtained,

that

the

Gamma

Index

can

be

influenced

by

the

number

of

segments,

modalities

of

CT,

calibration

of

CT

numbers,

calculation

grid

resolution

and

depth

of

material.

Key

words

:

Calculation

Grid

Resolution,

Calibration

of

CT

Numbers,

Cone]"

"Latar Belakang: Radioterapi baik sebagai terapi tunggal maupun sebagai terapi kombinasi, memegang peranan yang penting dalam penatalaksanaan kanker payudara kiri. Eskalasi dosis dikatakan mampu meningkatkan kontrol dan menurunkan angka kekambuhan namun di sisi lain dapat meningkatkan angka toksisitas. Hingga saat ini masih terus dilakukan studi untuk menganalisis parameter dosimetri diantara teknik Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy-Field and Field, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, dan Helical Tomotherapy pada kanker payudara di departemen Radioterapi RSUPN-CM. Metode: Studi eksperimental eksploratorik dengan melakukan intervensi pada 10 data CT plan pasien kanker payudara kiri yang diradiasi di Departemen Radioterapi RSUPN-CM. Dosis 50 Gy diberikan pada PTV dalam 25 fraksi. Cakupan PTV dievaluasi menggunakan Indeks konformitas CI dan indeks homogenitas HI. Menilai perbandingan PTV lokal D98, D95, D2, D50 dan supraklavikula dan menilai organ kritis sekitar target seperti paru kiri ipsilateral V20 le; 30, paru kanan contralateral V5 le; 50, jantung V25 le;10, payudara kanan contralateral Dmean < 5Gy. Hasil: Dari hasil analisis statistik tidak ditemukan adanya perbedaan yang bermakna antara 3DCRT-FIF, VMAT maupun HT dalam mencapai dosis D98 dan D95, pada D50 terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna antara 3DCRT-FIF dengan VMAT p=0,000, 3DCRT-FIF dengan HT p=0,000, namun tidak terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna antara VMAT dengan HT p=0,508. Dalam hal ini, ketiga teknik mampu memberikan cakupan dosis minimal yang baik pada volume target, meskipun begitu dari hasil penelitian ini teknik HT mampu memberikan nilai rerata D95 yang superior. Untuk D50 lokal ditemukan adanya perbedaan yang bermakna di 3 kelompok yang ada yaitu antara 3DCRT-FIF dengan VMAT p=0,000, 3DCRT-FIF dengan HT p=0,000, maupun VMAT dengan HT p=0,005. Didapat teknik HT memiliki nilai rerata D50 yang paling baik 50.01 0.25. Untuk D2 dari hasil analisis statistik ditemukan adanya perbedaan yang bermakna di 3 kelompok yang ada yaitu antara 3DCRT-FIF dengan VMAT p=0,005, 3DCRT-FIF dengan HT p=0,005, maupun VMAT dengan HT p=0,005.Kesimpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna rerata D98 dan D95, namun terdapat perbedaan bermakna pada cakupan dosis D2 dan D50 antara teknik 3DCRT-FIF vs VMAT, 3DCRT-FIF vs HT, dan VMAT vs HT, seluruhnya memperlihatkan perbedaan yang bermakna p < 0,05 . Rerata durasi penyinaran paling tinggi didapatkan dengan teknik HT dan paling rendah pada 3DCRT-FIF.

---

Background: Radiotherapy as a main or combination therapy, holds an important role in the management of left breast cancer. Dose escalation is said to increase control and lower recurrence rate. On the other hand, dose escalation increases toxicity. Until now there is many study comparing dosimetry parameters between three different techniques; Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy ndash; Field and Field 3DCRT-FIF, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy VMAT and Helical Tomotherapy HT and in relation to left breast cancer in radiotherapy department RSUPN-CM. Method: This is an experimental study with intervention on 10 left breast cancer patients, CT planning data. All the subjects underwent radiation in radiotherapy department RSUPN-CM. 50 Gy dose in 25 fractions was given for PTV. Afterwards, PTV coverage was evaluated using conformity index CI and homogeneity index HI . Comparison of critical organs was evaluated using Dmax le; 50 Gy spinal cord, V25 le; 10 heart, V20 le; 30 lung ipsilateral and V5 le; 30 lung contraleteral and Dmean < 5 Gy right breast. Results: From the statistical analysis there is no difference between 3DCRT-FIF, VMAT and HT in achieving D98 in local PTV. At the D95 value there is a difference between 3DCRT- and VMAT p = 0.022, 3DCRT-FIF with HT p = 0.005, but no value exists between VMAT and HT p = 0.508. In this case, one of the techniques employed gives a good minimum amount of volume targets, although the results of this technique HT are able to provide a superior D95% average. For D50% locally found, there are three groups that exist between 3DCRT-FIF with VMAT p = 0,000, 3DCRT-FIF with HT p = 0,000, and VMAT with HT p = 0,005. HT technique has the highest mean D50 50.01 0.25. For D2 of the analysis results found there were significant differences in 3 groups that existed between 3DCRT-FIF with VMAT p = 0,005, 3DCRT-FIF with HT p = 0,005, and VMAT with HT p = 0,005.Conclusion: There is no D98% and D95%, but there is still a difference with D2% and D50% between 3DCRT-FIF vs VMAT, 3DCRT-FIF vs HT, and VMAT vs HT, all significant differences (p <0.05). The highest average duration of exposure with HT and lowest on 3DCRT-FIF."

"Latar Belakang: Radiasi eksterna seringkali digunakan untuk mengurangi gejala dari metastasis otak. Teknik radiasi paliatif Whole Brain masih merupakan terapi standar bagi pasien kanker dengan metastasis otak, namun teknik radiasi ini dapat menyebabkan penurunan fungsi neurokognitif yang diakibatkan oleh inflamasi akibat radiasi pada daerah hipokampus. Hal ini memicu penggunaan Hippocampal Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) untuk mengurangi efek samping penurunan neurokogntif yang terkait hipokampus. Thesis ini membahas perbandingan dosimetri teknik radiasi Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), dan Helical Tomotherapy (HT) pada Hippocampal Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) untuk menilai apakah ada perbedaan parameter dosimetri dari ketiga teknik radiasi tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan studi eksperimental eksploratif dengan melakukan intervensi pada data CT-plan pasien metastasis otak secara in silico. Parameter dosimetri yang dinilai adalah Conformity Index, Homogenity Index, Treatment Time, D98% PTV, D2% PTV, D50% PTV, D100% Hipokampus, dan Dmax Hipokampus. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik dalam parameter Homogenity Index, D98% PTV, D2% PTV, dan D50% PTV pada semua kelompok data teknik radiasi, dimana Helical Tomotherapy (HT) memiliki nilai rerata yang paling baik dibandingkan kedua teknik radiasi lainnya. Untuk parameter yang lainnya baik Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) maupun Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) memiliki nilai rerata yang tidak berbeda bermakna, kedua teknik radiasi tersebut masih memungkinkan sebagai tehnik pilihan dalam HSWBRT. Masih diperlukan penelitian lebih lanjut dengan jumlah sampel yang lebih besar guna menilai dengan baik teknik radiasi mana yang paling unggul untuk digunakan dalam perencanaan HS-WBRT serta menghasilkan perencanaan radiasi yang lebih baik.

---

Background: Radiation therapy is still a standard treatment in brain metastases cases. Whole brain radiation therapy is widely used to reduce debilitating symptoms, on the other hand this treatment could decrease neurocognitif function due to radiationinduced inflammation of the hippocampus. This is the ground reason to apply Hippocampal Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy (HS-WBRT), in order to reduce hippocamus related side effects. The focus in this study is to analyze dosimetric parameter between Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), and Helical Tomotherapy (HT) in Hippocampal Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) to asses any differences in dosimetric values. This study is an experimental study on CT and delivered treatment planing data, recalculated in silico as a hippocampal sparing treatment planning to be compared. The dosimetric parameter that were used in this study are Conformity Index, Homogenity Index, Treatment Time, D98% PTV, D2% PTV, D50% PTV, D100% Hippocampus, dan Dmax Hippocampus. The dosimetric comparisons between the three modalities resulted in statistically significant differences in Homogenity Index, D98% PTV, D2% PTV, D50% PTV, D100% where Helical Tomotherapy (HT) has a better mean value among the rest of the group. In other dosimetric comparisons, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) does not have any significant differences, as such both modalities allows for sparing of the hippocampus with acceptable means value in many dosimetric parameters. Further research is nedeed, particularly with larger sample to assess superiority in HS-WBRT modalities, as such to increase efficacy in its treatment planning."

"ABSTRAKVerifikasi dosis harus dilakukan pada setiap pra-terapi yang menggunakan teknik IMRT. Salah satu alat ukur dosimetri IMRT adalah matriks jenis ion chamber matriXX-FFF,IBA yang memberikan hasil pengukuran dosis secara real-time, serta tidak diperlukan kalibrasi berkala. Tetapi, dosimetri tersebut memiliki resolusi spasial terbatas, tergantung pada ukuran dan bentuk detektor serta ada efek transport elektron sekunder dari dinding detektor ke dalam volume detektor, sehingga seringkali mengakibatkan hasil verifikasi cukup rendah. Hal tersebut salah satunya dapat diatasi dengan metode back projection yang diusulkan oleh Poppe et al. Pada penelitian ini metode tersebut diterapkan dengan menggunakan fungsi kernel dari lapangan tunggal, kemudian diaplikasikan pada variasi lapangan persegi, kondisi No-BuildUp NBU dan BuildUp BU , posisi Extended-SSD, serta kasus IMRT dengan energi 6 MV dan 10 MV. Analisis indeks gamma Dose Difference/DD dan Dose to Agreement/DTA digunakan untuk memverifikasi efektivitas metode ini. Fungsi kernel diperoleh dari lapangan persegi 4 cm dengan dekonvolusi perbandingan MatriXX-FFF dan TPS. Hasil menunjukan terjadi peningkatan nilai passing grade secara keseluruhan 0 - 15.9 , = 4.84 , ? = 4.81 , dimana nilai tertinggi pada lapangan persegi 4 cm dan 5 cm, baik kondisi NBU dan BU. Hal tersebut mengindikasikan adanya ketergantungan kernel terhadap ukuran lapangan. Hasil penerapan pada kasus IMRT juga memberikan kecenderungan peningkatan nilai passing grade. Kedepannya perlu dilakukan penelitian yang lebih lanjut mengenai hubungan fungsi kernel terhadap ukuran lapangan serta penerapan pada kasus IMRT lebih banyak.

---

ABSTRACT

Verification process has to be carried out every pre treatment by using Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy IMRT . One of dosimetry tools for IMRT is matrix detector type of ionization chamber that gives the result of dose measurement in real time, and is not required calibration periodically. But, the dosimetry has finite spatial resolution, depends on size and shape of detector, and occur the effect of secondary electron transpot from detector wall to detector volume, so that often gives the result of gamma parameter low enough. One of solutions, it can be solved by back projection method proposed by Poppe et al. In this research, that method could be applied by using kernel function of single field, then be used for variations of square field, no BuildUp NBU and BuildUp BU condition, extended SSD position, and IMRT case with 6 MV and 10 MV. Analysis of gamma parameter Dose Difference DD and Dose to Agreement DTA is used to verify the effectiveness of this method. The kernel function is obtained from square field of 4 cm by deconvolution from comparison of MatriXX FFF and TPS. The results show increasing passing grade value for all of fields 0 15.9 , 4.84 , 4.81 , where the highest values are on square field of 4 cm and 5 cm at NBU and BU condition. All of those indicate the dependence kernel function to size of field. Application result of IMRT cases also give the same trend of increasing passing grade value. For the next, it needs to do research more about the relationship kernel function to size of field and the application of this method on IMRT case."

"[ABSTRAKTelah dilakukan verifikasi dosis organ target dan jaringan sehat di sekitar target dengan menempatkan TLD Rod LiF100 dan film Gafchromic EBT2 di lubang slab bagian pelvis dari phantom Rando Alderson untuk simulasi kanker prostat. TLD dievaluasi menggunakan TLD Reader Harshaw, sementara Film Gafchromic EBT2 dipindai menggunakan scanner Epson Perfection V700 dengan mode transmisi, red channel dan resolusi 72 dpi. Pengukuran dosis titik dilakukan dengan membandingkan antara dosis yang direncanakan TPS Eclipse ver. 11 dan dosis yang diukur pada target organ target dan organ beresiko menggunakan teknik IMRT dan VMAT. Hasilnya adalah deviasi dosis pada organ target menggunakan teknik IMRT dan VMAT adalah kurang dari 5%. Demikian pula, deviasi dosis pada bladder dan rectum untuk kedua teknik juga kurang dari 5% karena posisinya sangat dekat dengan target volume. Di sisi lain, deviasi dosis di femoral head lebih dari 5% untuk kedua teknik karena lokasinya pada gradien dosis rendah. Selanjutnya, deviasi dosis organ target untuk teknik IMRT cenderung lebih kecil dari teknik VMAT baik untuk TLD dan Film. Perbedaan dosis pada dosis titik organ target antara IMRT dan VMAT kurang dari 1% tetapi terjadi pada dosis yang random untuk organ beresiko. Adapun dosis permukaan pada teknik IMRT cenderung lebih kecil dari teknik VMAT jika kita menggunakan TLD, tetapi dosis pada film EBT2 cenderung sama antara teknik IMRT dan VMAT.

---

ABSTRACTHave been done the dose verification of the target and healthy tissues around by placing the TLD Rod LiF100 and EBT2 Gafchromic film at slab hole of pelvic part of the Alderson Rando phantom for prostate cancer simulation. The Exposed TLDs was evaluated using the TLD Reader Harshaw, while Gafchromic Film EBT2 was scanned using Epson Perfection V700 scanner with transmission mode, red channel and resolution 72 dpi. The point dose measurements were compared between planned dose TPS Eclipse ver. 11 and measured dose at target volume organ and organ at risk for IMRT and VMAT techniques. The result is the dose difference at target volume for IMRT and VMAT are less than 5%. Similarly, the dose difference at Bladder and Rectum for both techniques are also less than 5% due to the position of OAR is very close to target volume. On the other hand, the dose difference at Femoral head are more than 5% for both techniques because the location of OAR already in low gradient dose. Furthermore, the difference dose of the target volume for IMRT technique is tends to be smaller than VMAT either for TLD and film detectors. The dose difference at point dose of target volume between IMRT and VMAT techniqe are less than 1% but it occur in random number for organ at risk. More over, the surface dose of IMRT tend to be smaller than VMAT dose if we are using TLDs, but the dose of EBT2 films tend to be similar between IMRT and VMAT techniques, Have been done the dose verification of the target and healthy tissues around by placing the TLD Rod LiF100 and EBT2 Gafchromic film at slab hole of pelvic part of the Alderson Rando phantom for prostate cancer simulation. The Exposed TLDs was evaluated using the TLD Reader Harshaw, while Gafchromic Film EBT2 was scanned using Epson Perfection V700 scanner with transmission mode, red channel and resolution 72 dpi. The point dose measurements were compared between planned dose TPS Eclipse ver. 11 and measured dose at target volume organ and organ at risk for IMRT and VMAT techniques. The result is the dose difference at target volume for IMRT and VMAT are less than 5%. Similarly, the dose difference at Bladder and Rectum for both techniques are also less than 5% due to the position of OAR is very close to target volume. On the other hand, the dose difference at Femoral head are more than 5% for both techniques because the location of OAR already in low gradient dose. Furthermore, the difference dose of the target volume for IMRT technique is tends to be smaller than VMAT either for TLD and film detectors. The dose difference at point dose of target volume between IMRT and VMAT techniqe are less than 1% but it occur in random number for organ at risk. More over, the surface dose of IMRT tend to be smaller than VMAT dose if we are using TLDs, but the dose of EBT2 films tend to be similar between IMRT and VMAT techniques]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memverifikasi dosis radiasi radioterapi pada kasus kanker payudara dan kanker nasofaring (KNF). Percobaan dilakukan dengan menggunakan Linac Varian Trilogy radiasi foton berenergi 6 MV. Detektor yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah film gafchromic, MatriXX 2D array, TLD, dan EPID. Film gafchromic dan TLD ditempatkan dalam phantom rando untuk mengevaluasi distribusi dosis pada volume target, sedangkan untuk mendapatkan hasil registrasi film gafchromic dan MatriXX 2D array ditempatkan dalam Multi Cube, dan dilakukan juga penyinaran pada EPID. Hasil perbedaan distribusi dosis teknik IMRT dan VMAT antara film dengan dosis preskripsi TPS pada KNF PTV70 adalah 6,87% dan 8,55%, pada KNF PTV50 adalah 14,43% dan 4,65%, sedangkan pada kanker payudara 11,98% dan 12,10%. Perbedaan nilai dosis antara TLD dengan dosis preskripsi TPS teknik IMRT dan VMAT pada KNF PTV50 sebesar 1,76% dan 1,60%, dan pada kanker payudara sebesar 7,06% dan 3,36%. Selisih perbedaan nilai gamma indeks teknik IMRT dan VMAT pada KNF sebesar -0,09% dan -1,65% antara film dan MatriXX, dan 5,13% dan 1,43% antara film dengan EPID. Pada kanker payudara selisih perbedaan nilai gamma indeks teknik IMRT dan VMAT sebesar 0,51% dan 0,19% antara film dengan MatriXX, dan 2,28% dan 4,38% antara film dengan EPID. Verifikasi dosis radioterapi dan registrasi citra pada kasus kanker payudara dan KNF dapat dilakukan menggunakan film gafchromic, TLD, MatriXX 2D array, dan EPID.

---

This study was aimed to verify the radiation dose in the case of breast cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The experiments were performed using a Varian Trilogy Linac at 6 MV photon radiation and gafchromic films, Matrixx 2D Array, TLD, and EPID detectors. Gafchromic films and TLD were inserted into rando phantom to measures the dose on target volume and organ at risk. In order to evaluated the gamma index, gafchromic films and Matrixx 2D array were placed in the Multi Cube, and was irradiated with EPID in position. Results of the dose distribution differences on IMRT and VMAT between film and TPS on NPC PTV70 was 6.87% and 8.55%, the NPC PTV50 was 14.43% and 4.65%, and for breast cancer was 11,98% and 12,10%. The dose differences between TLD and TPS on IMRT and VMAT for NPC PTV50 was 1.76% and 1.60%, and the breast cancer was 7.06% and 3.36%. Gamma index differences on IMRT and VMAT technique on NPC was -0.09% and -1.65% between film and MatriXX, and 5.13% and 1.43% between films and EPID. In breast cancer the gamma index differences on IMRT and VMAT was 0.51% and 0.19% between films and MatriXX, and 2.28% and 4.38% between films and EPID. Radiotherapy dose verification and image registration for breast cancer and NPC was done using gafchromic film, TLD, MatriXX 2D array, and EPID."

"Latar Belakang: Radiasi kraniospinal adalah metode radiasi yang sering digunakan pada kasus keganasan sistem saraf pusat yang menyebar ke cairan cerebrospinal, sehingga area radiasinya sangat luas meliputi seluruh otak dan canalis spinalis. Akibat daerah radiasi yang luas, area radiasi harus dibagi menjadi beberapa lapangan yang menghasilkan kesulitan dalam mengatasi junction antar lapangan tersebut.Kesulitan lain adalah banyaknya organ kritis yang terlibat dan usiapasien yang mayoritas anak-anak. Saat ini belum terdapat data penelitian yang menganalisis radiasi kraniospinal dengan teknik Three Dimentional Conformal Radiotherapy 3D-CRT, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy IMRT, dan IMRT-Helical Tomotherapy HT di Indonesia. Metode: studi eksperimental eksploratorik dengan melakukan intervensi planning terhadap 10 data CT plan pasien kraniospinal yang diradiasi di Departemen Radioterapi RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo. Dosis 36 Gy diberikan dalam 20 fraksi.Cakupan PTV kranial dan spinal dievaluasi menggunakan indeks konformitas CI dan indeks homogenitas HI.Dilakukan pencatatan parameter organ kritis lensa mata, mata, kelenjar parotis, kelenjar submandibula, tiroid, paru-paru, jantung, ginjal, testis dan ovarium, serta paparan radiasi pada seluruh tubuh.Selain itu juga dilakukan pencatatan jumlah MU dan durasi sinar beam on time.Hasil: Teknik HT adalah teknik terbaik dalam pencapaian angka HI dan CI serta perlindungan terhadap organ kritis, namun memiliki paparan radiasi seluruh tubuh tertinggi dibandingkan teknik 3D CRT dan IMRT selain nilai MU tertinggi dan durasi penyinaran terlama sehingga harus dipertimbangkan penggunaannya pada pasien anak-anak karena resiko secondary malignancy yang tinggi. Teknik 3D CRT dengan arah sinar opposing lateral untuk lapangan kranial dan dari posterior untuk lapangan spinal memiliki nilai HI dan CI terburuk dengan keterbatasan kemampuan melindungi organ kritis namun memiliki paparan radiasi seluruh tubuh dan MU terendah serta durasi penyinaran terpendek.

---

Background: Craniospinal radiation is a method of radiation that is often used in cases of malignancy of the central nervous system that spread to cerebrospinal fluid, so that the area of ??radiation is very broad covering the entire brain and spinal canal. Due to the large area of radiation, the radiation area must be divided into several fields that produce difficulty in overcoming the inter-field junction. In addition, the number of critical organs involved and the age of patients with the majority of children result in separate considerations in the choice of craniospinal radiation techniques. Currently there is no research data that analyzes craniospinal radiation with Three Dimentional Conformal Radiotherapy 3D-CRT, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy-Step and Shoot IMRT-SS, and IMRT-Helical Tomotherapy HT techniques in Indonesia. Method: exploratory experimental study by planning intervention on 10 CT plan data of craniospinal patients radiated in Radiotherapy Department of Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital. Dose 36 Gy is given in 20 fractions. Cranial and spinal PTV coverage was evaluated using the conformity index CI and homogeneity index HI. Performed recording of critical organ parameters of lens, eye, parotid gland, submandibular gland, thyroid, lung, heart, kidney, testis and ovary, and exposure to radiation throughout the body. In addition, also recorded the number of MU and the duration of the beam. Results: The HT technique is the best technique for achieving HI and CI figures and protection of critical organs, but has the highest body-wide radiation exposure compared to CRT and IMRT 3D techniques in addition to the highest MU values and longest exposure duration so should be considered in children high risk of secondary malignancy. 3D CRT technique with opposite lateral beam direction for the cranial field and from the posterior to the spinal field has the worst HI and CI values with limited ability to protect critical organs but has the lowest total body radiation and MU exposure as well as the shortest duration of irradiation. "