Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Dalam perkembangannya terdapat dua kasus yang sama mengenai permohonan izin perkawinan beda agama namun terdapat perbedaan dalam penetapannya. Dalam penetapan Nomor 46/Pdt.P/2016/Pn.Skt hakim menerima, sedangkan dalam penetapan Nomor 71/Pdt.P/2017/Pn.Bla hakim menolak. Akibatnya terdapat perbedaan pandangan apakah perkawinan beda agama diperbolehkan atau tidak di Indonesia. Penulisan Skripsi ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan statute approach dan pendekatan kasus case approach. Hal ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari lebih jauh terkait peraturan perkawinan beda agama dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974, serta menganalisis kasus perkawinan beda agama yang telah terjadi. Dalam penelitian ini didapatkan bahwa Undang-Undang Perkawinan bukannya tidak mengatur mengenai perkawinan beda agama, namun karena Undang-Undang Perkawinan tidak mengenal perkawinan beda agama sehingga keabsahan perkawinan dikembalikan kepada hukum agamanya masing-masing. Dan adanya Pasal 35 huruf a Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan merupakan merupakan bentuk peran negara dalam hal administrasi mengenai pencatatan bagi perkawinan beda agama untuk mencatatkan perkawinannya melalui penetapan pengadilan, sehingga perkawinan tersebut dapat dicatatkan agar terjaminnya kepastian hukum terhadap perkawinan beda agama.

---

Nowadays, there are two similar cases concerning permission of inter religions marriage but there are differences in judge rsquo s verdict. In verdict number 46 Pdt.P 2016 Pn.Skt the judge accept, whereas in the verdict number 71 Pdt.P 2017 Pn.Bla the judge rejected. Consequently there are differences in whether the inter religions marriage is allowed or not in Indonesia. This research uses normative legal research, by using statute approach and case approach. It aims to learn more associated with setting up inter religions marriage in Law No. 1 of 1974, as well as analyzing some cases of inter religions marriage that has taken place. In this study it was found that the Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage is not regulating the inter religions marriage, but the Marriage Law does not recognize the inter religions marriage so that the validity of the marriage is returned to the perspective of religious law. And the existence of Article 35 point a of the Population Administration Act is a form of state 39 s role in administrative matters of recording for the inter religions marriage to register their marriage through the determination of the court, so that the marriage can be recorded in order to ensure legal certainty to the inter religions marriage."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat ketika perkawinan berlangsung pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 yang mengatur kembali perjanjian perkawinan di Indonesia yang memberikan perluasan terhadap jangka waktu pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan yang sebelumnya tidak dapat dibuat setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan menjadi dapat dibuat setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan. Namun, dalam prakteknya masih banyak pihak-pihak yang tidak mengetahui mengenai peraturan baru tersebut yang menyebabkan dilakukannya tindakan hukum yang berlebihan sehingga tujuan diputuskannya putusan tersebut tidak tercapai. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan tipologi deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dengan adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dapat mempermudah pihak-pihak yang sebelumnya belum membuat perjanjian perkawinan sebelum perkawinan berlangsung menjadi dapat dibuatnya perjanjian perkawinan tersebut sehingga para pihak mendapatkan kembali hak-haknya yang sebelumnya hilang karena tidak dibuatnya perjanjian perkawinan tersebut. Oleh karena itu sangat dibutuhkannya penyebaran informasi mengenai pembaruan peraturan perjanjian perkawinan di Indonesia.

---

This thesis discusses the entering into a marriage agreement when marriage takes place after the Constitutional Court Decree No. 69 PUU XIII 2015 which re regulates marriage agreements in Indonesia providing extensions to the period to enter into a marriage agreement, in which before the issuing of this Decree, a marriage agreement was not able to be entered into after marriage but currently a marriage agreement is able to be entered into after marriage. However, in practice there are still many parties who are not aware of the new regulation causing excessive legal action to be made resulting in the purpose of the Decree to not be reached. This research is a qualitative research with descriptive typology. The result of this research is that the Constitutional Court Decree shall be able to facilitate the parties that have not entered into a marriage agreement before marriage therefore the marriage agreement can be made in order for the parties to obtain their previously lost rights as a result for not entering into a marriage agreement beforehand. Therefore, it is highly necessary to spread information regarding the renewal of the marriage agreement regulation in Indonesia."

"ABSTRAK Perkawinan campuran adalah suatu perkawinan antara dua warganegara yang berbeda, dimana satu pihak warga negara Indonesia dan pihak lain warga negara asing. Calon suami istri sebelum atau pada waktu perkawinan atau suami istri setelah perkawinan, dapat membuat perjanjian kawin mengenai harta benda dalam perkawinan. Perjanjian kawin dalam perkawinan campuran, yang dibuat setelah berlangsungnya perkawinan mengenai harta kawin berupa hak atas tanah, tidak dapat berlaku surut terhadap hak atas tanah yang diperoleh sebelum adanya perjanjian kawin. Status hak atas tanah berupa hak milik, hak guna bangunan dan hak guna, usaha, tidak dapat dipunyai atau dimiliki oleh warga negara asing baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung. Bagaimana jika hak atas tanah berupa hak guna bangunan yang diperoleh selama perkawinan campuran, dilakukan pemisahan harta berdasarkan penetapan pengadilan. Dalam menjawab masalah tersebut, dipergunakan metode penelitian normatif, dengan mengkaji keabsahan perkawinan campuran,  subjek dan objek hak atas tanah dan waktu  hak atas tanah diperoleh, yaitu sejak atau sebelum  perkawinan campuran sah secara hukum. Harta kawin berupa hak atas tanah yang diperoleh sebelum perkawinan campuran sah, tetap merupakan milik pribadi masing masing suami istri, yang tidak dapat dijadikan objek pemisahan harta  Harta kawin berupa hak atas tanah yang diperoleh setelah perkawinan campuran sah, yang oleh undang-undang pokok agraria, dilarang dipunyai oleh warga negara asing melalui perkawinan campuran, tidak dapat dilakukan melalui pemisahan harta.

Kata Kunci: Harta Kawin, Perkawinan Campuran, Pemisahan Harta

---

ABSTRACT Mixed marriage is a marriage between two different citizens, where one party is an Indonesian citizen and the other is a foreign citizen. Prospective husband and wife before or at the time of marriage or husband and wife after marriage, can make a marriage agreement regarding property in marriage. Agreements for marriage in mixed marriages, which are made after the marriage takes place regarding the property of marriage in the form of land rights, cannot apply retroactively to the rights to land acquired prior to the marriage agreement. The status of land rights in the form of property rights, building use rights and usufructuary rights, business, cannot be owned or owned by foreign citizens either directly or indirectly. What if the land rights in the form of building usufructuary rights obtained during mixed marriages are carried out by the separation of assets based on court decisions. In answering the problem, normative research methods are used, by examining the validity of mixed marriages, the subject and object of land rights and when land rights are obtained, ie from or before a mixed marriage is legally legal. Marital assets in the form of land rights acquired before a mixed marriage are legal, still private property of each husband and wife, which cannot be the object of the separation of assets of married property in the form of land rights obtained after a legal mixed marriage, which is based on agrarian law, prohibited from being owned by foreign nationals through mixed marriages, cannot be done through the separation of property.

Keywords: Marriage Assets, Mixed Marriage, Property Separation

 

"

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai penetapan beberapa penyimpangan terkait persatuan harta kekayaan yang disepakati oleh pasangan suami dan istri, yang dibuat dalam bentuk Perjanjian Kawin, sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. dimana sebelum berlakunya Surat Direktur Jendral Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kementrian Dalam Negeri Nomor: 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL tentang Pencatatan Pelaporan Perjanjian Kawin tertanggal 19 Mei 2017, Perjanjian Kawin hanya dapat dibuat sebelum dan pada saat Perkawinan, namun setelah keluarnya Surat Direktur Jendral Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kementrian Dalam Negeri, Perjanjian Kawin dapat dibuat sebelum, pada saat, dan selama perkawinan berlangsung. Adapun permasalahan yang diangkat dalam tesis ini adalah mengenai Penetapan Pengadilan Tangerang Nomor 874/Pdt.P/2017/PN.Tng tertanggal 1 November 2017, yang diperlukan terkait permohonan pencatatan perkawinan yang dicatatkan saat perkawinan dilangsungkan; dan, status harta perkawinan sebelum dan setelah dicatatkan di Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut digunakan metode yang digunakan dalam tesis ini adalah Yuridis-Normatif dengan tipologi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Adapun Analisa data dilakukan dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Analisa didasari pada fungsi dari Penetapan Pengadilan terkait pencatatan perjanjian kawin selama perkawinan dilangsungkan setelah dikeluarkannya Surat Direktur Jendral Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kementrian Dalam Negeri Nomor: 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL dan akibat hukum yang mungkin akan terjadi dari pencatatan perjanjian kawin selama perkawinan berlangsung. Hasil penelitian adalah bahwa pada tanggal 19 Mei 2017, Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil telah mengakui adanya pencatatan perjanjian kawin setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan dan tidak mensyaratkan perlunya penetapan dari Pengadilan Negeri, serta akibat hukum dari pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan seperti ini adalah dipenuhinya unsur publisitas menjadikan pihak ketiga ikut tunduk kedalam Perjanjian Kawin.

---

This thesis discussed the establishment of several deviations regarding wealth affiliation between husband and wife that defined in the Marriage agreement, stated in Article 29 Law No. 1 of 1974 about Marriage. Before the creation of General Director Letter of Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL) No: 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL on the Report Registration of Marriage Agreement, dated Mei 19th, 2017, marriage agreement could only be created before or on the marriage itself, but after the release of General Director Letter Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL), marriage agreement could be created before the day, on the day and during the marriage ceremony. Therefore, the problem that specified in this thesis is about the stipulation of Tangerang District Court No. 874/Pdt.P/2017/PN.Tng dated November 1st, 2017, about the need for a plea in registering marriage that registered during the marriage ceremony and the status of marriage wealth before and after registered to Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL). To answer the problem, Juridical-Normative method is used with descriptive typology research. The data analysis method that is used is the statute approach and case approach. The analysis were based on the function of the establishment of court regarding the registration of marriage agreement during the marriage ceremony after the letter of General Director of Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL) No: 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL is issued. And also the law consequences that might happened to the registration of the marriage agreement during the marriage ceremony. The result of this research is that on May 19th, 2017, Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL) is already admitted the registration of marriage agreement during the marriage ceremony and did not give any requirement from the national court. Also, the consequences of the marriage agreement like this are full of publicity that makes the third party should obey the Marriage Agreement."

"[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung.

---

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

, Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

]"

"Sebuah perjanjian pranikah adalah perjanjian yang dibuat oleh beberapa sebelum menikah untuk mengatur konsekuensi dari pernikahan ke properti. Berdasarkan pasal 29 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia, agar perjanjian pranikah dapat mengikat pihak ketiga, harus didaftarkan oleh catatan sipil pernikahan. Di sebuah Kasus pihak telah lalai untuk mendaftarkan perjanjian pranikah mereka, kata perjanjian tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat lebih pihak ketiga. Metode analisis adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Data dan bahan hukum yang diperoleh melalui penelitian sastra dan wawancara dengan Notaris dan Ex Notaris. Itu Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan dasar hukum dari pendaftaran pranikah perjanjian setelah menikah dan untuk mengetahui hukum mengikat perjanjian yang ke Pihak ketiga. Berdasarkan penelitian, ada peraturan mengenai pendaftaran perjanjian pranikah setelah menikah dalam hukum yang ada dan peraturan. Namun, ada kemungkinan bahwa Hakim berbasis keputusannya pada analogi hukum untuk mendaftar bahwa perjanjian pranikah sesuai dengan Peraturan di Perdata Indonesia tentang kelalaian mendaftarkan acara hukum (pernikahan, kematian) dalam pencatatan sipil dapat dilakukan melalui pengadilan. Untuk mendaftar (setelah itu) oleh kantor catatan sipil. pranikah yang Perjanjian yang telah terdaftar setelah menikah tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat terhadap pihak ketiga yang memiliki hubungan hukum sebelum pendaftaran itu.

---

A prenuptial agreement is an agreement made by a couple before marriage to arrange the consequences of a marriage to the property. Based on article 29 Paragraph 1 of the Indonesian Marriage Act, in order that a prenuptial agreement can bind the third parties, it must be registered by a civil registrar of marriage. In a case the parties have been negligent to register their prenuptial agreement, said agreement does not have binding power over third parties. The analytical method is a normative juridical approach. The legal data and materials are obtained through literary research and interviews with a Notary and Ex Notary. The purpose of this research is to find the legal basis of the registration of a prenuptial agreement after marriage and to know the legal binding of that agreement to the third parties. Based on the research, there is no regulation concerning the registration of a prenuptial agreement after marriage in the existing laws and regulation. However, there is a possibility that a Judge based his decision on a legal analogy to register that prenuptial agreement in accordance with the regulation in the Indonesian Civil Code concerning the negligence to register a legal event (marriage, death) in the civil registration can be done through a court order to register (afterwards) by the civil registration office. That prenuptial agreement that has been registered after marriage does not have binding power towards the third parties who have a legal relation before that registration."

"Umumnya suami-istri akan mempertahankan keberlakuan akta perjanjian perkawinan. Seiring hal tersebut, hingga kini belum ada pengaturan mengenai pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan. Dapat atau tidaknya pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan berlangsung; landasan hukum pertimbangan hakim; dan akibat-akibat hukumnya. Metodelogi penelitian adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan berlangsung tidak dapat dilakukan dengan cara apapun juga. Pasal 1338 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tidak sesuai diterapkan dalam kasus ini. Pasal 35 dan Pasal 36 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan diterapkan sejak dikabulkannya pembatalan. Setiap pihak tetap bertanggung jawab pribadi atas segala utangnya.

---

Generally husband and wife will retain the enforceability of the prenuptial agreement. As it is, until now there has been no regulation regarding cancellation of the prenuptial agreement. Whether or not cancellation of the prenuptial agreement after marriage; judges considered the legal basis; and the legal consequences. Normative research method and qualitative approach. Cancellation of the prenuptial agreement after marriage can't be done by any means. Article 1338 Civil Lawbook isn't applicable in this case. Article 35 and Article 36 Marriage Law applied since the granting of the annulment. Each party remain personally liable for any debts."

"Penelitian ini berjudul pengesahan perkawinan beda agama yang dilangsukan di Indonesia. Permasalahan penelitian ini meliputi pengaturan mengenai perkawinan beda agama dan pertimbangan hakim mengenai pengesahan perkawinan beda agama, sebagaimana yang terdapat dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokwerto Nomor 54/Pdt.P/2019/PN Pwt. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif, tipologi penelitian deskriptif analitis, menggunakan data sekunder, dengan yang dan dianalisis secara kualitatif, dengan bentuk laporan deskriptif analitis. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah hakim dalam pertimbangannya tidak mengindahkan aturan undang-undang perkawinan mengenai sahnya perkawinan, dimana dalam pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Perkawinan sahnya perkawinan harus diperbolehkan oleh kedua agama calon mempelai, dan bukan hanya dari satu calon mempelai saja dan artinya hakim menganalisis diluar dari kewenangannya. Hakim dalam pertimbangannya ini hanya melihat dari dispensasi yang diberikan oleh salah satu agama, namun tidak mengindahkan aturan agama yang lain. Hakim diberikan kewenangan oleh Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan bukan untuk mengesahkan perkawinan tetapi hanya berwenang untuk memerintahkan mencatatkan perkawinan beda agama, yang artinya hakim tidak berwenang untuk mengesahkan suatu perkawinan, karena sahnya perkawinan berdasarkan agama.

---

This research is entitled the legalization of the interfaith marriage held in Indonesia. The problem of this research covers a regulation of interfaith marriage and the judge’s consideration for the legalization of interfaith marriage, as contained in the Purwokerto Judicial Court Decision number 54/Pdt.P/2019/Pn Pwt. The research method is normative juridical, typology of the research used was descriptive analytical, using secondary data, and analyzed qualitatively, in the form of analytical descriptive reports. The conclusion of this research is that the judges in their consideration didn’t heed the marriage law regarding the validity of marriage , where in article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law, the marriage must be permitted by the two prospective bride-to-be, and not only by one prospective bride and its mean the judge in their analyzes outside of their authority. The judges in their consideration only consider from the excemption by one religion, but they didn’t heed the rules of other religions.The judges were given authority by the Population Administration Law not to validating marriage but only has the authority to order the registry office to register of interfaith marriages , which means that the judge is not to validating a marriage, because marriage is legitimately based on religion."

"ABSTRACTTopik utama dalam skripsi ini adalah mengenai penerapan hukum terhadap penggantian kerugian akibat tidak dilaksanakannya janji untuk menikahi ditinjau dari hukum perkawinan Indonesia dan hukum Islam. Penulisan skripsi ini di latar belakangi oleh maraknya kasus ingkar janji untuk menikahi yang menimbulkan kerugian baik materiil maupun immateriil bagi pihak yang dibatalkan khitbah-nya secara sepihak. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas dalam skripsi ini adalah mengenai kedudukan yuridis dari janji kawin, penerapan hukum terhadap penggantian kerugian akibat ingkar janji untuk menikahi, serta membahas mengenai analisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam putusan pengadilan nomor 3277 K/Pdt/2000 dimana ke-tiga permasalahan tersebut akan di analisis menggunakan hukum perkawinan Indonesia dan hukum Islam. Penelitian dalam skripsi ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan jenis data kualitatif, serta skripsi ini bertujuan untuk memberikan informasi kepada masyarakat bahwa ingkar janji untuk menikahi yang menimbulkan kerugian dapat dituntut penggantian kerugian. Kesimpulan dari penulisan skripsi ini bahwa dasar hukum dalam penggantian kerugian akibat tidak dilaksanakannya janji untuk menikahi menurut hukum perdata Indonesia adalah menggunakan Pasal 1365 mengenai perbuatan melawan hukum, sedangkan dasar hukum dari Hukum Islam adalah menggunakan kaidah fiqih yaitu kaidah Laa Dharara Walaa Dhirar.

---

ABSTRACTThe main topic of this thesis is about the application of law on claiming for compensation due to false promises of marriage according to Indonesian Marriage Law and Islamic Law. Writer rsquo s background of thought in choosing this topic is because the increasing of false marriage rsquo s promise cases that results materiil and immateriil loss especially for women whose khitbah are canceled unilaterally. There are three problems that will be discussed in this thesis. First, is about the juridical position of promises to marry. Second, is about the application of the law on claiming compensation due to false promises of marriage. And third, the law consideration used by the judge on decision number 3277 K Pdt 2000 and all of the problems will be analyzed using Indonesian Marriage Law and Islamic Law. Juridical ndash normative approach will be used for analyzing qualitative data taken. The purpose of this research is to give useful information that someone who is disadvantaged by false promise of marriage can claim for compensation according to Indonesian Civil Law and Islamic Law Fiqh. The conclusion of this thesis, according to tort theory in Indonesian Civil Law and laa dharaa walaa dhirar principle in Islamic Fiqih Law someone who is disadvantages by false promises to marry can claim for compensation."