Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This book presented in a consistent structural style that provides both a general summary of individual topics within the field along with additional details to assist those with some background knowledge in the subject area, this handy volume provides information related to the field of anorectal disease in a format that is easily accessible for rapid acquisition of knowledge. Each topic is outlined in a multidisciplinary fashion with the medical, surgical, and pathological aspects clearly detailed in each section. Each section clearly describes the condition with up-to-date management guidelines and precious clinical pearls. The volume features high quality illustrations in the form of elegant hand drawn figures, tables, photographs of physical findings, endoscopic finds and radiographs. The clinical photographs and x-rays will be of great value to gastroenterologists whose specialty is not coloproctology. Chapters on computerized tomographic colography (virtual colonoscopy) and others cover the newer technologies employed for diagnostic purposes in these diseases. "

"ABSTRAKLatar Belakang : Gangguan fungsi defeksi, yang diketahui sebagai sindrom Low Anterior Resection (LARS) menjadi masalah utama paska pembedahan kanker rektum yang akan berpengaruh pada kualitas hidup. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menngetahu insidens LARS pada pasien paska prosedur preservasi sfingter ani dan faktor- faktor yang mempengaruhi LARS.Metode : Pasien kanker rektum yang menjalani eksisi total mesorektal dan anastomosis colorectal selama periode 2017-2018 berpartisipasi dalam pengisian kuesioner LARS. Parameter klinis yang dianalisis dan untuk perbandingan fisiologi anorektal antara mayor LARS dan no LARS atau minor LARS menggunakan pengukuran biofeedback.Hasil: Studi ini melibatkan 40 pasien, mayor LARS didapatkan pada 42,5% pada pasien yang menjalani low anterior resection (LAR). Radioterapi preoperatif dan level anastomosis berhubungan dengan major LARS dengan odd ratio 0,1 (95% CI : 0,02- 0,49) and 0,07 (95% CI 0,01- 0,39). Dilakukan penghitungan luasan dibawah kurva (AUC) dengan cara receiver operating characteristic (ROC) sebesar 0,77 dan didapatkan titik potong level anastomosis di 5 cm dengan nilai ramal negative 88,23%. Pengukuran biofeedback menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan pada tekanan anal istirahat (resting anal pressure) dan tekanan kontraksi maksimal (maximal squeeze pressure) diperkirakan terjadi gangguan pada fungsi sfingter dan terapi preoperatif berperan untuk terjadinya LARS.Kesimpulan: LARS merupakan masalah signifikan yang diteukan pada hampir sepertiga pasien kanker rektum paska pembedahan. Resiko terkena mayor LARS meningkat dengan adanya terapi preoperatif dan rendahnya level anastomosis.

---

ABSTRACTBackground : Defective defecation n function, also known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), is common problem after surgical treatment of rectal cancer that has a detrimental effect on quality of life. This study aimed to look for the incidence of LARS in patients whose native rectum could not be kept and determine factors influencing major LARS.Methods : Retal cancer patients who underwent tumor removal with mesorectal excision and colorectal anastomosis during the years 2017-2018 were asked to participate a structured interview using the verified version of the LARS questionnaire. Clinical parameters were analyzed and anorectal physiology was compared between those with major LARS and those without LARS by biofeedback measurement.Results : This study included 40 patients ,major LARS was found at 42,5% in those who underwent low anterior resection , which incidence 22% than other group. Preoperative radiotherapy and level of the anastomosis associated with major LARS at an odd ratio 0,1 (95% CI : 0,02- 0,49) and 0,07 (95% CI 0,01- 0,39). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0,77. The cut-off anastomotic level was at 5 cm, which gave a negative predictive value of 88,23%. Biofeedback measurement showed a significant difference in the resting anal pressure and maximal squeeze pressure, which suggests that dearrangement in sphincteric function and preoperative therapy may contribute to the LARS.Conclusion : LARS is significant problem found in about one third of rectal patients after surgery. Risk of having major LARS increases with preoperative treatment and lower anastomotic level."

"The work describes a new method of sphincter salvage in surgery of rectal cancer. Low tumors of the rectum are traditionally treated with amputation of the rectum. However, this operation is not well-received by patients, since it results in a permanent colostomy. By contrast, intersphincteric resection allows sphincter salvage even in low tumors and is now widely accepted among experts in the field of colorectal surgery. The book will describe the basics (pathology,physiology, radiology) as well as the surgical technique and its different modifications."

"This third edition text provides a completely revised and updated new version of this unique, modern, practical text that covers the strategic evaluation, specific approaches, and detailed management techniques utilized by expert colorectal surgeons caring for patients with complex problems–whether they result from underlying colorectal disease or from complications arising from previous surgical therapy. The format follows that of both a “how to” manual as well as an algorithm-based guide to allow the reader to understand the thought process behind the proposed treatment strategy. By making use of evidence-based recommendations, each chapter includes not only background information and diagnostic/therapeutic guidelines, but also provides a narrative by the author on his/her operative technical details and perioperative “tips and tricks” that they utilize in the management of these complex surgical challenges. Distinctive to this book, is the reliance on experts in the field including past presidents of the ASCRS, as well as multiple other national and internationally recognized surgeons, to lend their personal insight into situations where data may be more sparse, but individual and collective experience is paramount to making sound decisions and thereby optimizing patient outcomes. The text includes chapters on the assessment of risk and methods utilized to minimize perioperative complications. In addition, it incorporates sections covering the medical and surgical therapies for abdominal, pelvic and anorectal disease. Moreover, the technical challenges of managing complications resulting from the original or subsequent operations is addressed. The underlying focus throughout the text is on providing pragmatic and understandable solutions that can be readily implemented by surgeons of varying experience to successfully treat complex colorectal problems. However, it also goes beyond the technical aspects of colorectal surgery and includes special sections highlighting the essence of a surgeon; covering aspects involving the medical-legal, ethical, and economic challenges confronting surgeons. Throughout the text, each author provides an ongoing narrative of his/her individual surgical techniques along with illustrations and diagrams to “personally” take the reader through the crucial steps of the procedure, and key points of patient care inherent to that topic. Additionally, where appropriate, links to online videos give the reader an up-front look into technical aspects of colorectal surgery."

"This book seeks to promote an integrated approach among the various specialists involved in the management of rectal cancer with a view to ensuring that treatment is tailored appropriately to the individual patient. For ease of use, a question and answer format is employed. The focus is on those issues typically confronted during daily clinical practice in relation to risk factors, imaging, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The services of an outstanding panel of authors representative of the major European oncological societies have been acquired in order to formulate the questions and provide the answers. All who need assistance in addressing concerns that arise from the need for multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer will find the book to be an ideal source of helpful information."

"Sampai Saat ini tatalaksana operatif merupakan pilihan dalam penatalaksanaan pada fistula para-anal. Penelitiian ini bertujuan mengetahui mengenai angka rekurensi, inkontinensia alvi, waktu penyembuhan, dan keluhan pasien setelah tatalaksana operatif. Metode penelitian adalah cross-sectional. Pada hasil rekurensi komplek fistula para-anal 4%, tidak ada yang mengalami inkontinensia alvi dengan waktu rata-rata penyembuhan 13,11 minggu. Rekurensi fistula paraanal sederhana 2,6% dan inkontinensi alvi 2,6%. Dengan waktu rata-rata penyembuhan 5,66 minggu. Tidak ditemukan rekurensi maupun inkontinensia alvi pada Abses anorektal yang ditatalaksana dengan waktu rata-rata penyembuhan 2.5 minggu. Rekurensi abses yang disertai oleh fistula para-anal 50 %, tidak ada yang mengalami inkontinensia alvi dengan waktu rata-rata penyembuhan 6.6 minggu. Keluhan pasien setelah operasi adalah lamannya waktu penyembuhan, rasa nyeri dan tidak nyaman terutama pada tatalaksanan dengan operasi teknik seton. Kesimpulan yang didapat adalah angka rekurensi dan inkontinensia yang sama apabila dibandingkan dengan kepustakaan.

---

Until now the threatment of choise for Para-anal fistula still surgery. This study aims to identified the recurrence, incontinentia alvi, time to heal and patient complaining after surgery. The method of this study is cross-sectional. Patient with complex para-anal fistula had recurrence of 4%, no incontinentia alvi, time to heal 13,11 weeks. Patient with simple para-anal fistula had recurrence of 2,6%, incontinentia alvi 2,6%, time to heal 5,66 weeks. Patient with abses anorektal had no recurrence and incontinentia alvi, time to heal 2,5 weeks. The patient with abses with para-anal fistula had recurrence of 50 %, no incontinentia alvi, time to heal 6,6 weeks. The patient complaining mostly about long time to heal and paint after surgery. This study had same result that found in the literature."

"PURPOSE: Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare. Accordingly, their clinical features are not well-documented and optimal treatment has not been established. The objective of this study is to clarify the rates and patterns of recurrence after surgical resection of rectal GISTs, with a focus on outcomes and therapeutic modalities.METHODS: The registry was designed to collect data on rectal GISTs recorded between January, 2003 and December, 2007 at 40 participating institutions of the Kinki GIST Study Group. The principal variables were the rates and patterns of recurrence of rectal GISTs. Other study variables were age, sex, tumor size, mitotic count, distance from the anal verge, tumor location, surgical procedures, surgical margins, and recurrence-free survival.RESULTS: Twenty-four cases were registered, 11 (45.8%) of which were classified as high-risk by the modified NIH criteria. Locoregional recurrence (7/23, 30.4%) was the predominant recurrence pattern after curative resection, with rates that did not differ after local excision (33.3%; 3/9) vs. extended resection (28.6%; 4/14). The recurrence rates were high (25.0%) even for patients with low-risk disease. There was only one case of recurrence among patients who received perioperative treatment with imatinib.CONCLUSIONS: Rectal GISTs showed high rates of local recurrence regardless of the surgical procedure. Perioperative treatment with imatinib may improve outcomes."