Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPerkembangan situasi ekonomi internasaional semenjak tahun 1970-andiwarnai dengan peningkatan lalu lintas modal antar negara yangt telahmenimbulkan perdebatan di kalangan praktisi dan akademisi. Dengan latarbelakang tersebut, tulisan ini mencoba mengangkat mengenai landasan teoritisdari globalisasi keuangan yang diusung oleh dua pandangan liberal yaituKeynesian dan neoliberal. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa kedua pandangantersebut memiliki posisi yang sama kuat di bidang akademis dan terdapatperdebatan yang tidak berujung mengenai berbagai aspek dari globalisasikeuangan. Tulisan ini kemudian menemukan bahwa literatur globalisasi keuangandi negara berkembang sangat fokus pada pembahasan mengenai penyebab dankonsekuensi dari fenomena tersebut.

---

ABSTRACTInternational economics has witnessed a dramatic increase in capital flowsbetween countries since 1970s. It has also sparked debate between practitionersand academician in explaining this phenomenon. Against this backdrop, thisliterature review tries to explain the theoretical foundation of the financialglobalization using liberal and Keynesian perspective. This literature finds thatboth perspectives are well-argued and the debate reaches an inconclusivity. Thisliterature also finds that most of the writings about globalization in developingcountries focus on the cause and effect of that particular phenomenon., International economics has witnessed a dramatic increase in capital flowsbetween countries since 1970s. It has also sparked debate between practitionersand academician in explaining this phenomenon. Against this backdrop, thisliterature review tries to explain the theoretical foundation of the financialglobalization using liberal and Keynesian perspective. This literature finds thatboth perspectives are well-argued and the debate reaches an inconclusivity. Thisliterature also finds that most of the writings about globalization in developingcountries focus on the cause and effect of that particular phenomenon.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penyebab gagal bayar asuransi dan pengaruh penerapan PSAK 71 dan PSAK 74 terhadap risiko gagal bayar. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan Teori Regulasi Kepentingan Publik (public interest regulation theory). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus. Data penelitian bersumber dari kuesioner dan wawancara. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan analisis konten, tematik, dan konstan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa gagal bayar dapat terjadi karena: (1) fraud, (2) underreserved, (3) lemahnya tata kelola atau pengendalian internal, (4) manajemen investasi yang buruk, (5) portofolio produk asuransi, dan (6) lemahnya regulasi dan pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh regulator. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan pandangan mengenai apakah PSAK 71 dan PSAK 74 sudah sesuai dengan Teori Regulasi Kepentingan Publik karena sebagian berpendapat bahwa kedua PSAK tersebut dapat mengurangi risiko gagal bayar, sebagian berpendapat bahwa PSAK tidak memiliki korelasi dengan gagal bayar, dan sebagian lainnya menyatakan tidak tahu. PSAK 71 dan PSAK 74 akan mengubah pelaporan keuangan perusahaan asuransi menjadi lebih konservatif, transparan, mudah dibandingkan dan akuntabel. Dengan begitu, secara tidak langsung akan mempengaruhi manajemen risiko dan tata kelola perusahaan asuransi. PSAK 74 juga mengubah proses pencadangan menjadi lebih konservatif

---

This study aims to analyze the causes of insurance insolvency and the effect of PSAK 71 and PSAK 74 implementation on the risk of default. Analysis is carried out by using Public Interest Regulation Theory. This is a qualitative research with case study method. Research data are sourced from questionnaires and interviews. Data analysis is done by using content, thematic, and constant comparative analysis. The results indicates that defaults can occur due to: (1) fraud, (2) underreserved, (3) weak governance or internal control, (4) poor investment management, (5) insurance product portfolio, and (6) weak regulations and supervision carried out by regulators. The study shows that there are different views about whether PSAK 71 and PSAK 74 is in accordance with Public Interest Regulation Theory because some argue that both PSAK can reduce the risk of default, some argue that PSAK does not have a correlation with default, and some others state that they do not know. PSAK 71 and PSAK 74 will turn insurance companies financial reporting to be more conservative, transparent, comparable and accountable. That way, it will indirectly affect the risk management and governance of insurance companies. PSAK 74 also turns the reserving process into more conservative."

"This book provides a blend of well-founded professional and scientific perspectives on the potential of Environmental finance in developing and transition countries. All institutions and the clients they serve will be affected by the changing climate. In this new reality, green finance will not be a luxury, but a way of meeting clients' needs effectively and doing sound business. ;"