Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas kebijakan Aparatur Negara dalam dugaan tindakpidana korupsi. Dengan mengkaji konsep dan kewenangan kebijakan Aparatur Negara dalam Hukum Administrasi dan Hukum pidana. Kebijakan tersebut dinilai dari kedua pendekatan ilmu hukum tersebut untuk menilai kebijakan Aparatur yang bagaimana dapat dikriminalisasikan sebagai tindak pidana korupsi. Dalam tesis ini yang ingin didapatkan oleh penulis adalah (1) Apakah suatu kebijakanAparatur Negara yang melanggar ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan dapat dimungkinkan untuk dikenakan sanksi pidana; (2) Bagaimana terhadap suatu kebijakan Aparatur Negara yang di dalamnya mengandung unsur perbuatan melawan hukum atau unsur penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam tindak pidana korupsi; (3) Apakah terhadap kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Aparatur Negara yang memberikan keuntungan kepada orang lain atau korporasi dan menimbulkan kerugian negara dapat dikenakan tindak pidana korupsi sedangkan dia tidak ada menikmati hasil tindakannya. Penelitian ini mengunakan metode penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan mengunakan data sekunder seperti dari buku-buku dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan tindak pidana korupsi, kerugian negara, penyalahgunaan wewenag dan literatur-literatur terkait lainnya. Kebijakan Aparatur Negara harus berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan. Seorang pejabat dilarang melakukan penyalahgunaan wewenang yang melanggar ketentuan perundang-undangan. Namun disisi lain pejabat juga diberikan hak kebebasan dalam mengambil kebijakan untuk kepentingan orang banyak bahkan kalaupun undang-undang tidak mengaturnya dapat diterapkan berdasarkan AAUPB. Namun apabila kebijakan tersebut ada unsur mens rea (niat jahat) dan dilakukan dengan sengaja maka kebijakanAparatur Negara tersebut dapat diminta pertanggungjawab pribadi bukan jabatan atas perbuatannya tersebut. Kalau perbuatan itu tidak ada unsur mens rea maka masuk kedalam ranah hukum administrasi atau hukum perdata. Pada saat ini kebijakan Aparatur Negara telah masuk dalam kategori kriminalisasi. Hal ini terjadi karena adanya kesalahan dalam pemahaman dimana kerugian negara ditempat sebagai bukti utama telah terjadi korupsi atas perbuatannya yangmelawan hukum atau menyalahgunakan wewenang tanpa diikuti adanya unsur koruptif. Padahal dalam banyak kasus kerugian negara ini terjadi karena adanya kesalahan administratif atau kecurangan dari pihak pemenang tender yang memanipulasi barang dan data sehingga tidak sesuai spesifikasi yang mana dokumen tersebut dipalsukan dan dibuat seolah-olah sah dan legal. Oleh karenanya, dengan lahirnya Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Negara diharapkan dapat memberikan perlindungan akan kriminalisasi terhadap putusan dan/atau tindakan Aparatur Negara yang didalamnya tidak ada unsur koruptifnya.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis examines the policy of the State Apparatus in alleged corruption. To examines the concept and authority policy of the State Apparatus in Administrative Law and Criminal Law. The such policy is assessed from two approach the science of law to assessing how policies Apparatus which can becriminalized as an act of corruption. In this thesis that want achieved by the author are (1) Does a State Apparatus policies that violate the provisions of the legislation can be subject to criminal sanctions; (2) When is a policy of the State Apparatus can be regarded fulfill the elements of tort or elements of abuse of power in corruption; (3) A State Apparatus policies that provide benefits to another person or corporation and causing state losses while he did not get to enjoy the results of his conduct, whether such conduct may be subject tocorruption. This research uses research methods with normative juridical approach by using secondary data as the basis for this research as from books and legislation relating to corruption, state losses, abuse of power and other related literature and also supported by directly interviews to some of prosecutor in corruption. State Apparatus policy should be based law and legislation. A government official is prohibited do abuse of power that violate the statutoryprovisions. On the other hand the government official also granted the right of freedom in making decisions for the public good even if the law does not yet set such, the government official can make policy based on the Good Governance Principles. However, if the such policy has element of mens rea (malice) and there is deliberate and realized then the policies of the State Apparatus may be subject to responsibility in corruption. If the conduct did not have element mens rea thenhis conduct entered into the administrative law or civil law. At this time the policy of the State Apparatus has been included in the category of criminalization in corruption. This occurs because of an error in understanding where state losses in place as the primary evidence of corruption has occurred for his conduct against the law or abuse of power while his conduct without being followed by the corrupt elements. Therefore, there are cases of state losses caused toadministrative error or fraud, or because of defective juridical. To publication of Law No. 30 Year 2014 on the State Administration as a form protection to the criminalization of the decision and / or conduct of State Apparatus in which there is no element of corruptive;This thesis examines the policy of the State Apparatus in alleged corruption. Toexamines the concept and authority policy of the State Apparatus inAdministrative Law and Criminal Law. The such policy is assessed from twoapproach the science of law to assessing how policies Apparatus which can becriminalized as an act of corruption. In this thesis that want achieved by the authorare (1) Does a State Apparatus policies that violate the provisions of thelegislation can be subject to criminal sanctions; (2) When is a policy of the StateApparatus can be regarded fulfill the elements of tort or elements of abuse ofpower in corruption; (3) A State Apparatus policies that provide benefits toanother person or corporation and causing state losses while he did not get toenjoy the results of his conduct, whether such conduct may be subject tocorruption. This research uses research methods with normative juridical approachby using secondary data as the basis for this research as from books andlegislation relating to corruption, state losses, abuse of power and other relatedliterature and also supported by directly interviews to some of prosecutor incorruption. State Apparatus policy should be based law and legislation. Agovernment official is prohibited do abuse of power that violate the statutoryprovisions. On the other hand the government official also granted the right offreedom in making decisions for the public good even if the law does not yet setsuch, the government official can make policy based on the Good GovernancePrinciples. However, if the such policy has element of mens rea (malice) and thereis deliberate and realized then the policies of the State Apparatus may be subjectto responsibility in corruption. If the conduct did not have element mens rea thenhis conduct entered into the administrative law or civil law. At this time the policyof the State Apparatus has been included in the category of criminalization incorruption. This occurs because of an error in understanding where state losses inplace as the primary evidence of corruption has occurred for his conduct againstthe law or abuse of power while his conduct without being followed by thecorrupt elements. Therefore, there are cases of state losses caused toadministrative error or fraud, or because of defective juridical. To publication ofLaw No. 30 Year 2014 on the State Administration as a form protection to thecriminalization of the decision and / or conduct of State Apparatus in which thereis no element of corruptive;This thesis examines the policy of the State Apparatus in alleged corruption. Toexamines the concept and authority policy of the State Apparatus inAdministrative Law and Criminal Law. The such policy is assessed from twoapproach the science of law to assessing how policies Apparatus which can becriminalized as an act of corruption. In this thesis that want achieved by the authorare (1) Does a State Apparatus policies that violate the provisions of thelegislation can be subject to criminal sanctions; (2) When is a policy of the StateApparatus can be regarded fulfill the elements of tort or elements of abuse ofpower in corruption; (3) A State Apparatus policies that provide benefits toanother person or corporation and causing state losses while he did not get toenjoy the results of his conduct, whether such conduct may be subject tocorruption. This research uses research methods with normative juridical approachby using secondary data as the basis for this research as from books andlegislation relating to corruption, state losses, abuse of power and other relatedliterature and also supported by directly interviews to some of prosecutor incorruption. State Apparatus policy should be based law and legislation. Agovernment official is prohibited do abuse of power that violate the statutoryprovisions. On the other hand the government official also granted the right offreedom in making decisions for the public good even if the law does not yet setsuch, the government official can make policy based on the Good GovernancePrinciples. However, if the such policy has element of mens rea (malice) and thereis deliberate and realized then the policies of the State Apparatus may be subjectto responsibility in corruption. If the conduct did not have element mens rea thenhis conduct entered into the administrative law or civil law. At this time the policyof the State Apparatus has been included in the category of criminalization incorruption. This occurs because of an error in understanding where state losses inplace as the primary evidence of corruption has occurred for his conduct againstthe law or abuse of power while his conduct without being followed by thecorrupt elements. Therefore, there are cases of state losses caused toadministrative error or fraud, or because of defective juridical. To publication ofLaw No. 30 Year 2014 on the State Administration as a form protection to thecriminalization of the decision and / or conduct of State Apparatus in which thereis no element of corruptive, This thesis examines the policy of the State Apparatus in alleged corruption. Toexamines the concept and authority policy of the State Apparatus inAdministrative Law and Criminal Law. The such policy is assessed from twoapproach the science of law to assessing how policies Apparatus which can becriminalized as an act of corruption. In this thesis that want achieved by the authorare (1) Does a State Apparatus policies that violate the provisions of thelegislation can be subject to criminal sanctions; (2) When is a policy of the StateApparatus can be regarded fulfill the elements of tort or elements of abuse ofpower in corruption; (3) A State Apparatus policies that provide benefits toanother person or corporation and causing state losses while he did not get toenjoy the results of his conduct, whether such conduct may be subject tocorruption. This research uses research methods with normative juridical approachby using secondary data as the basis for this research as from books andlegislation relating to corruption, state losses, abuse of power and other relatedliterature and also supported by directly interviews to some of prosecutor incorruption. State Apparatus policy should be based law and legislation. Agovernment official is prohibited do abuse of power that violate the statutoryprovisions. On the other hand the government official also granted the right offreedom in making decisions for the public good even if the law does not yet setsuch, the government official can make policy based on the Good GovernancePrinciples. However, if the such policy has element of mens rea (malice) and thereis deliberate and realized then the policies of the State Apparatus may be subjectto responsibility in corruption. If the conduct did not have element mens rea thenhis conduct entered into the administrative law or civil law. At this time the policyof the State Apparatus has been included in the category of criminalization incorruption. This occurs because of an error in understanding where state losses inplace as the primary evidence of corruption has occurred for his conduct againstthe law or abuse of power while his conduct without being followed by thecorrupt elements. Therefore, there are cases of state losses caused toadministrative error or fraud, or because of defective juridical. To publication ofLaw No. 30 Year 2014 on the State Administration as a form protection to thecriminalization of the decision and / or conduct of State Apparatus in which thereis no element of corruptive]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implementasi, faktor yang mempengaruhi, dan strategi penguatan implementasi UU ASN di Provinsi Banten. Paradigma penelitian berupa post-positivisme dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi dokumen. Analisis data menggunakan model Miles dan Huberman terdiri dari reduksi data, display data, dan penarikan kesimpulan/verifikasi serta menerapkan teknik triangulasi untuk mengetahui keabsahan data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tiga hal utama. Pertama, implementasinya bersifat prosedural dan formalitas, sehingga menimbulkan dampak negatif seperti terjadinya kekosongan formasi tertentu, terhambatnya peningkatan kapasitas pegawai, rendahnya kinerja pegawai, dan belum terjaminnya pegawai purna bhakti. Permasalahan struktural dan kultural menjadi hambatan utama, seperti kurangnya aturan pendukung turunan UU ASN, rule based bureaucracy, kurang pengawasan, dan belum terbangun budaya sistem merit. Hasil tersebut mengarah pada good looking government. Kedua, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi menunjukkan bahwa context of implementation dan faktor lingkungan cenderung lebih berpengaruh dibandingkan content of policy dan struktur administrator. Political will kepala daerah cenderung masih rendah sehingga kurang mampu menyelesaikan permasalahan teknis yang terjadi. Ketiga, strategi penguatan implementasi menunjukkan kepala daerah dan perangkatnya membutuhkan internalisasi outcomes, mempertimbangkan strategic context, menentukan strategic content, dan merumuskan operational process. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya aturan pendukung, mendorong political will gubernur, strategi asistensi, ujicoba program, penganggaran terpusat untuk program skala ekonomi tinggi, menyusun simplifikasi peraturan, membuka ruang dan mendorong inisiatif lokal, dan peningkatan kapasitas pegawai lokal merupakan beberapa rekomendasi tersebut. Selain itu, terdapat rekomendasi yang berkaitan dengan implikasi teoritis berupa pengembangan konsep kerangka implementasi strategi dari Okumus disertai perubahan alur kerangka kerja dan adanya penambahan indikator.

---

This study aims to analyze the implementation, influence factors, and strategy strengthening the implementation of state civil apparatus policy in Banten Province. The research paradigm is post-positivism with qualitative approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and document studies. Data analysis using Miles and Huberman model consist of data reduction, data display, and conclusion / verification and applying triangulation technique in validation. The results show three main points. First, the implementation is procedural, programmatic, and formal, resulting in negative impacts such as vacancy formation, hampered capacity building of employees, low employee performance, minimum welfare of employees, and not guaranteed after employees pension. Structural and cultural issues are the main obstacles. These results lead to good-looking government. Second, influencing factors show that context of implementation and environmental factors are more influential than content of policy and administrator structure. Political will of sub-national governor is still low so that it is less able to direct the budget, capacity of employees, politics, economy, and legal framework. Third, the strategy of strengthening the implementation indicates that the sub-national governor and its agencies require outcomes, consider the strategic context, determine the strategic content, and formulate the operational process. This research recommendation targets implementation, influencing factors, and strategies for strengthening implementation. The need for supporting rules at both the central and sub-national levels encourages the political will of sub-national governor, assistance strategies, testing to technical stages, centralized budgeting for programs of a general nature, compiling simplification of regulations, opening up spaces and encouraging local initiatives, and capacity building of local officials are some of these recommendations. In addition, there are recommendations related to the theoretical implications of developing the concept of Okumus strategy with changes of the framework and addition of indicators."

"Dalam tulisan ini penulis akan menganalisis dan mengkritisi mengenai perdagangan pengaruh dan urgensi kriminalisasinya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah Salah satu norma yang diatur di dalam United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) adalah perdagangan pengaruh atau trading in influence. Indonesia telah meratifikasi konvensi antikorupsi ini, tetapi masih belum diundangkan ke dalam hukum positif. Memperdagangkan pengaruh memiliki korelasi kuat dengan tindak pidana korupsi yang harus melibatkan tiga pihak (trilateral relationships), yakni pihak yang memiliki kepentingan, orang yang memiliki pengaruh atau akses terhadap kekuasaan, dan pejabat atau otoritas publik. Namun, dalam rumusan pasal UNCAC dan konvensi antikorupsi lain masih mengakomodasi bentuk bilateral relationship yang merupakan bentuk dalam tindak pidana suap. Dalam perdagangan pengaruh pejabat tidak perlu memperdagangkan pengaruhnya, cukup dilihat bahwa pejabat tersebut menyalahgunakan kewenangannya. Perdagangan pengaruh sulit untuk dilihat bentuknya dan sudah mengakar dalam masyarakat Indonesia karena menganggap menggunakan pengaruh seseorang adalah hal yang wajar. Hal ini dapat terlihat dari praktik perdagangan pengaruh yang semakin marak terjadi dan dilakukan oleh orang-orang yang memiliki kekuasaan. Dalam praktiknya penuntut umum sering kali menggunakan Pasal 11 UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi juncto Pasal 55 ayat (1) juncto Pasal 64 ayat (1) untuk menjerat pelaku perdagangan pengaruh, tetapi dalam pembuktiannya tidak semua unsur dalam pasal tersebut terpenuhi secara sah dan meyakinkan. Berbanding terbalik dengan unsur-unsur dalam Pasal 18 UNCAC yang mengakomodasi perbuatan perdagangan pengaruh. Agar pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi berjalan lebih baik dan maksimal pengaturan norma untuk menjerat pelaku perdagangan pengaruh harus menjadi prioritas utama agar segera dibentuk undang-undang atau peraturan mengenai perbuatan memperdagangkan pengaruh dalam hukum positif di Indonesia.

---

In this paper, the author will analyze and criticize the trading of influence and the urgency of criminalization. One of the norms regulated in the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) is trading in influence. Indonesia has ratified this anti-corruption convention, but it has not yet been enacted into positive law. Trading in influence has a strong correlation with corruption which must involve three parties (trilateral relationships), namely parties with interests, people with influence or access to power, and officials or public authorities. However, the formulation of the UNCAC article and other anti-corruption conventions still accommodates the form of a bilateral relationship which is a form of bribery. In trading the influence of an official, it is not necessary to trade his influence, it is sufficient to see that the official is abusing his authority. Trading in influence is difficult to see in its form and is deeply rooted in Indonesian society because it is considered normal to use someone's influence. This can be seen from the practice of trading in influence which is increasingly prevalent and is carried out by people who have power. In practice, public prosecutors often use Article 11 of Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1) to ensnare the perpetrators of influence trading, but in proving not all elements in the article are legally and convincingly fulfilled. In contrast to the elements in Article 18 UNCAC which accommodates acts of trading in influence. For the eradication of criminal acts of corruption to run better and optimally, regulation of norms to ensnare influence trading actors must be a top priority so that laws or regulations are immediately formed regarding acts of trading in influence in positive law in Indonesia."

"ABSTRAKPada tanggal 15 Januari 2014 telah diundangkan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Dengan berlakunya undang-undang tersebut telah terjadi pula perubahan komposisi kelembagaan yang mengurusi urusan kepegawaian dan sumber daya aparatur negara yaitu, i Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi ldquo;Kemenpan-RB rdquo; , yang berwenang dalam perumusan dan penetapan kebijakan, koordinasi dan sinkronisasi kebijakan, serta pengawasan atas pelaksanaan kebijakan ASN; ii Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara ldquo;KASN rdquo; yang berwenang dalam monitoring dan evaluasi pelaksanaan kebijakan dan Manajemen ASN untuk menjamin terwujudnya Sistem Merit serta pengawasan terhadap penerapan asas serta kode etik dan kode perilaku ASN; iii Lembaga Administrasi Negara ldquo;LAN rdquo; yang berwenang dalam penelitian, pengkajian kebijakan Manajemen ASN, pembinaan, dan penyelenggaraan pendidikan dan pelatihan ASN; dan iv Badan Kepegawaian Negara ldquo;BKN rdquo; yang berwenang dalam penyelenggaraan Manajemen ASN, pengawasan dan pengendalian pelaksanaan norma, standar, prosedur, dan kriteria Manajemen ASN. Namun dalam penerapan Manajemen ASN masih jauh dari kata sempurna. Hal ini terjadi karena masih banyak terdapat penyimpangan-penyimpangan yang terjadi baik dari lembaga pemerintah, Aparatur Sipil Negara itu sendiri, maupun Pejabat daerah terkait.

---

ABSTRACTLaw No. 5 of 2014 concerning on State Civil Apparatus ldquo State Civil Apparatus Law rdquo has became effective since15 January 2014. The effectiveness of this State Civil Apparatus Law changed the organizational composition that will be taking care of the personnel affairs and resources of the state apparatus which are, i The Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara or ldquo Kemenpan RB rdquo , that authorized in the policies formulation and stipulation, coordination, synchronization, and supervision of policies implementation ASN ii State Civil Apparatus Commission Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara ldquo KASN rdquo , that authorized in the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of ASN Management and Policy to ensure the realization of merit system along with the supervision of the application of ASN rsquo s principles and codes of conduct iii Public Administration Institute Lembaga Administrasi Negeara or ldquo LAN rdquo , that authorized in conducting research, ASN Management policy review, and ASN coaching and training iv State Personnel Board Badan Kepegawaian Negara or ldquo BKN rdquo that authorized in the implementation of ASN Management, conducting supervision and control of the norms, standards, procedure, and criteria of ASN Management. However, the application and implementation of the ASN Management itself is still far from the word of perfect. This happens because there are still many of deviations occur either from the government agencies, or the ASN itself, as well as the related local officials. "

"ABSTRAKPengisian Jabatan Pimpinan Tinggi Aparatur Negara Sipil Berbasis Sistem Merit: Studi Kasus pada Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat dan Kota Depok Puncak perjalanan reformasi birokrasi di Indonesia adalah disahkannya UU ASN tahun 2014 yang secara tegas mendasarkan manajemen kepegawaian berbasis sistem merit ternyata tidak serta merta mampu diimplementasikan begitu saja di Indonesia. Penyelenggaraan pengisian Jabatan Pimpinan Tinggi yang berbasis merit ternyata mengalami hambatan baik dari sisi kebijakan maupun penatalaksanaannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan sistem merit dalam pengisian jabatan pimpinan tinggi ASN, determinan sistem merit dalam pengisian jabatan berbasis sistem merit, serta strategi meningkatkan efektifitas penerapannya. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif, dengan mengambil kasus pengisian JPT pada Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat dan Kota Depok diharapkan mampu menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1 secara historis model seleksi/promosi pejabat yang pernah ada dan diterapkan di Indonesia ada tiga model, yakni collegua gift, selective logging, dan relative merit; 2 praktik seleksi terbuka saat ini di Provinsi Jawa Barat dan Kota Depok masih belum sepenuhnya merit karena masih terdapat hambatan struktural structural blockage dan budaya cultural blockage dalam penyelenggaraannya; hambatan-hambatan ini harus diatasi dengan merumuskan strategi-strategi agar merit secara absolut dapat dilakukan. Strategi-strategi yang dirumuskan dan dibangun dalam sepuluh hingga dua puluh tahun 2014 -2035 . Pada tahapan pertama, di sepuluh tahun pertama, strategi yang dibangun adalah penguatan kelembagaan berbasis sistem merit serta paradigma merit. Kemudian pada sepuluh tahun berikutnya dibangun strategi secara makro mengenai pemisahan kekuasaan politik dalam birokrasi sehingga terbentuknya tren model MSDM berbasis sistem merit. Kata kunci: sistem merit, PNS, pengisian jabatan pimpinan tinggi, seleksi terbuka.

---

ABSTRACTRecruitment of Civil State Apparatus for Senior Executive Level Based Merit System Case Study on West Java Province and Depok City The turning point of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia is the published of Civil State Apparatus Act in 2014. The Act stated that merit system is the basic fundamental system for managing civil apparatus in Indonesia. Unfortunately, the recruitment of Senior executive level in bureaucracy which is becoming the model of merit implementation has many obstacles. This research aim are analyzing recruitment for senior executive level based merit system determining merit system factors in recruit the senior executive level, and designing strategies to build the merit effectiveness. Researcher hope that by using qualitative perspective, and case study in West Java Province and Depok City this research questions. The result of this research are 1 historically, by analyzing the model of civil servant promoting system in Indonesia, there are divided into three model, such as colleague gift, selective logging, and relative merit 2 practically, open recruitment system for recruiting the senior executive level in West Java province and Depok City are still have many obstacles or blockage, such as structural blockage and cultural. For this reasons, finally, the researcher design the strategies to implement merit effectively. The strategies design in two steps, obviously, in one decade 2014 2025 the strategies called strengthening the institution and built the paradigm of merit. Second step 2025 2035 , it design the splitting of bureaucracy and politics to build the future HRM based merit. Keywords merit system, civil service apparatus, senior executive level, recruitment, open selection "

"Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) membawa perubahan besar bagi manajemen ASN di Indonesia melalui penerapan sistem merit. Sistem merit adalah prinsip penting dalam manajemen ASN yang bertumpu pada kualifikasi, kompetensi, dan kinerja secara adil dan wajar tanpa membedakan latar belakang politik, ras, warna kulit, agama, asal usul, jenis kelamin, status pernikahan, unsur, atau kondisi kecacatan (UU No. 5 Tahun 2014). Perjalanan menuju sistem meritokrasi yang sehat juga sangat berliku. Menjamurnya praktik jual beli jabatan yang masuk dalam kategori korupsi dan sudah melembaga juga menjadi keresahan besar bagi masyarakat. Seseorang bisa mendapatkan jabatan tertentu hanya dengan “orang dalam”, tanpa memperhatikan kompetensi dan juga kualifikasinya. Untuk itu, sistem merit hadir sebagai sistem yang diharapkan dapat menciptakan birokrasi yang profesional, kompeten, dan berintegritas tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis refleksi pelaksanaan sistem merit di Indonesia dalam seleksi rekrutmen CASN dan seleksi terbuka JPT. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori sistem merit dengan dimensi competence, qualification, performance, openness, dan fair and orderly process. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post-positivist dengan teknik pengumpulan data kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan sistem merit di Indonesia belum baik akibat dari resistensi internal, keterbatasan kapasitas pengawasan, dan praktik nepotisme.

---

The enactment of Law No. 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus (ASN) has brought significant changes to ASN management in Indonesia through the implementation of the merit system. Merit system is an important principle in ASN management that emphasizes qualification, competence, and performance fairly and justly without discrimination based on political background, race, skin color, religion, origin, gender, marital status, elements, or disability status (Law No. 5 of 2014). The journey towards a healthy meritocracy has also been very winding. The rampant practice of buying and selling positions, which is categorized as corruption and has become institutionalized, is also a major concern for the public. Someone can get a certain position only with "insiders", without considering their competence and qualifications. Therefore, the merit system comes as a system that is expected to create a bureaucracy that is professional, competent, and has high integrity. This study aims to analyze the reflection of the implementation of the merit system in Indonesia in CASN recruitment selection and open JPT selection. This study uses the merit system theory with the dimensions of competence, qualification, performance, openness, and fair and orderly process. This study uses a post-positivist approach with qualitative data collection techniques through in-depth interviews and literature studies. The results of this study show that the implementation of the merit system in Indonesia is not yet good due to internal resistance, limited supervisory capacity, and nepotism practices."

"Dewasa ini masyarakat menaruh perhatian yang lebih kepada kebijakan dan tingkah laku pejabat publik terlebih dalam masalah korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme (KKN). Notaris sebagai pejabat publik tentunya tidak lepas dari perhatian masyarakat dalam hal permasalahan KKN. Pada saat ini terdapat beberapa kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia yang dianggap melibatkan Notaris. Hal tersebut menyebabkan proses kriminalisasi terhadap profesi Notaris tersebut. Proses Kriminalisasi terhadap Notaris itu sendiri pastinya dianggap sangat merugikan Notaris bila ia telah menjalankan jabatannya dengan sangat berhati-hati dan sesuai dengan ketentuan UUJN dan Kode Etik Notaris.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti apakah penentuan tarif pengurusan akta oleh notaris dalam kasus ini telah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi notaris yang menjalankan jabatannya terhadap suatu kasus tindak pidana korupsi.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode pendekatan yuridis normative dan penarikan kesimpulannya bersifat deskriptid analitis. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah penentuan tarif yang dilakukan oleh Notaris dalam kasus ini tidak sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan tidak terdapat suatu perlindungan hukum yang diatur khusus bagi notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya.

---

Today people pay more attention to the policy and behavior of public officials especially on the issue of corruption, collusion and nepotism. Notaries as public officials must not be separated from the public's attention in terms of corruption problems. At the moment there are several cases of Corruption in Indonesia were considered to involve a Notary. This led to the criminalization of the Notary profession. The criminalization of the Notary process itself must be considered very detrimental to the Notary when he has run his position very carefully and in accordance with the provisions of the Code UUJN and Notary.This study aimed to examine whether the determination of the maintenance rates by a notary deed in this case in accordance with the legislation in force and how the legal protection for a notary who runs the office for a case of corruption.The method used in this research is a normative juridical approach and withdrawal are descriptive analytical conclusions. The conclusion from this study is the determination of tariffs performed by a Notary in this case is not in accordance with the legislation in force and there is a special set of legal protection for a notary in the running position."

"Kejaksaan dalam menjalani fungsi kekuasaan yudikatif di bidang penuntutan dalam penegakan hukum dan keadilan, juga melakukan fungsi-fungsi yudikatif lain yang diberikan oleh undang-undang. Terutama dalam penanganan perkara korupsi yang salah satu tujuan utamanya ialah untuk memulihkan atau mengembalikan kerugian keuangan negara akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Dengan mengoptimalkan kewenangan diskresi Kejaksaan yang sudahdiakui sejak pertama kali diundangkan Undang-Undang Kejaksaan Pokok Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 1961 bahwa di Indonesia Jaksa Agung berwenang mengenyampingkan perkarapidana berdasarkan kepentingan umum. Maka seharusnya eksistensi diskresi kejaksaan dengan berlandaskan asas oportunitas dapat dijadikan acuan para jaksa untuk melawan praktik-praktik korupsi yang sudah merajalela dan banyak menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara, agar proses pengembalian tersebut dapat dilakukan tanpa harus melewati tahapan persidangan yang begitu panjang. Untuk itu maka diperlukan adanya regulasi khusus dan pemahanan komperhensif agar dapat menemukan suatu formula yang tepat dan efektif dalam mengantisipasi berbagai bentuk kejahatan korupsi. Dengan mencari korelasi antara penerapan asas oportunitas dan asas oportunitas, serta dengan menggunakan metode perbandingan hukum terhadap peraturan-peraturan di berbagai negara di dunia.

---

State Attorney, in running the function of judicial power in prosecution field for law enforcement and justice, also performs other judicial functions which are given by the law. Especially in handling corruption cases that one of the main objectives (purposes) is to recover or restore state financial losses due to Corruption. By optimizing the state Attorneys discretion authority that has been recognized since it was first enacted by the Generals Attorney Law Number 15 of 1961 that in Indonesia the Attorney General has the authority to disregard criminal cases based on public interests. So the existence of a prosecutors (state attorneys) discretion based on the principle of opportunity can be used as a reference to fight corruption practices that are already rampant and cause a lot of state financial losses, so that the return process can be carried out without having to go through such a long trial. For this reason, special regulations and comprehensive understanding are needed in order to find an appropriate and effective formula in anticipating various forms of corruption. By looking forcorrelations between the application of the legality of principle and the principle of opportunity, and by using the method of comparing laws against regulations in various countries in the world."

"Corruption cases in Indonesia from the perspective of criminal law and government bureaucracy."