Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perseteruan antara KPK dan POLRI merupakan salah satu kejadian yang menimbulkan gejolak politik dan sosial karena menyangkut komitmen dan dukungan terhadap upaya pemberantasan korupsi sehingga keberhasilan penyelesaiannya sangat berpengaruh pada image dan dukungan publik pada pemerintah. Dengan menggunakan teori dramatisme, penelitian ini mendeskripsikan aspek dramatik dalam retorika Presiden Jokowi dan Presiden SBY dalam menyelesaikan konflik KPK - POLRI. Dalam dramatisme, retorika dianalisis berdasarkan lima elemen dramatistik (dramatisic pentad) yaitu scene, act, agent, agency dan purpose sehingga dapat diketahui konteks (guilt) dan menilai motif (motives) yang mendasari retorika tersebut serta elemen apa yang menjadi kunci persuasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pola retorika tidak ajeg, tetapi mengikuti guilt yang dialami. Ketidakajegan tersebut dapat dilihat dari bagaimana Presiden menentukan kelima unsur dramatistic pentad dalam retorikanya serta unsur-unsur mana yang ditonjolkan sebagai kunci persuasi.

---

The enmity of KPK and POLRI is one of the most intensious political and social event because of its importance for struggling of corruption erradiction. Its solution will have great impact on government image and public support. By using dramatism theory, this research describes the dramatic aspects of rhetoric of President SBY and President Jokowi in resolve the conflict. The rhetoric was analyzed using dramatistic pentad that contains five elements of drama: act, scene, agent, agency, and purpose in order to determine kind of guilt and motives underlied the rhetoric and to determine the key element for persuasion. The results shows that there is no persistency in rhetorical pattern but based on guilt. The impersistence could be found in how President define the dramatistic pentad in its rhetoric and which elements stresses over the other four.dramatism, dramatistic pentad, President’s rhetoric, persuasion."

"Effective presidential rhetoric is an important issue. This study investigated the argumentation of President Susilo Bambang Yudoyono's State of Nation Address 2006. The argumentation to investigate encompasses clain, narration, explanation, and evaluation which consists of validity, reliability, and significancy. Content analysis is employed by investigating every word, phrase, and discourse in the text. It is discovered that the address does not belong to the rhetoric of crisis, and it puts more importance on economy than most other issues, and it was prepared to avoid controversy. It was dominated by narration than other elements of argumentation, and it was a lack of evaluation which consists of validity, reliability, and significancy."

"ABSTRAKSebagai rangkaian kunjungannya ke Amerika Serikat, setelah menghadiri forumG-20, Presiden Indonesia, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) berpidato diUniversitas Harvard. Salah satu tujuannya adalah merespons pidato pidatoBarrack Obama di Kairo. Dalam pidato yang berjudul ?Toward Harmony amongCivilizations? tersebut, SBY menyampaikan sembilan langkah yang dapatditerapkan untuk mencapai keharmonisan antar peradaban. Selain penjabaranlangkah-langkah tersebut, SBY juga membangun retorika hubungan komunitasMuslim, terutama Indonesia, dengan Amerika. Penelitian ini mencobamenjabarkan formasi retorika, strategi, serta motivasi yang dibangun oleh SBY.Dengan pendekatan analisis wacana kritis dengan didukung oleh teori benturanperadaban, penelitian ini menemukan adanya kecenderungan untuk memperkuatcitra Indonesia di mata dunia alih-alih memposisikan Islam sebagai rekanAmerika dalam mencapai perdamaian dunia.

---

AbstractAfter attending the G-20 forum, the president of Indonesia, Susilo BambangYudhoyono (SBY) gave a speech in Harvard University as one of his activities inthe United States of America. It is also a response to Barrack Obama?s speech inCairo. Through his speech, which titled ?Toward Harmony among Civilizations?,SBY presented nine imperatives to achieve harmony. Besides, he also builtrhetoric of relationship between Muslim community, especially Indonesia, andAmerica. This study aims to elaborate rhetoric formation, strategy, and motivationwhich are built by SBY. By using critical discourse analysis approach and clash ofcivilization theory, it discovers that there is a tendency to strengthen the image ofIndonesia instead of arranging Islam as a partner of America to attain world?speace."

"Sebagai makhluk sosial, kita tidak dapat dipisahkan dari komunikasi dan interaksi sosial dengan orang lain. Seperti yang telah kita ketahui, untuk berinteraksi dan berkomunikasi dengan orang lain, kita membutuhkan bahasa. Bahasa merupakan elemen penting dalam berkomunikasi dan berinteraksi. Sebagai alat komunikasi dalam interaksi sosial, bahasa juga berperan penting dalam menjaga hubungan sosial di antara pemakainya. Dalam berkomunikasi, terdapat prinsip-prinsip kerjasama yang mengatur kita dalam berkomunikasi. Prinsip-prinsip kerjasama tersebut terdiri dari beberapa maksim. Namun, dalam prosesnya, kita seringkali melanggar maksim-maksim tersebut dengan tujuan sebagai strategi menarik perhatian kawan bicara. Dalam film Madagascar 3: Europe‟s Most Wanted terdapat banyak pelanggaran maksim sebagai strategi persuasi. Dengan menggunakan teori implikatur percakapan, teori retorik, dan teori-teori lain, seperti teori kesantunan, teori co-active persuasion, dan teori relasi kuasa, akan membantu untuk menganalisis pelanggaran maksim sebagai strategi persuasi. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah pelanggaran maksim dapat digunakan sebagai strategi persuasi.

---

As social beings, we cannot be separated from social interaction and communication. We need to interact and communicate with other people. As we all know, to communicate and interact with other people, of course, we need a language. Language is foremost a means of communication and interaction. As a communication tool in social interaction, language is also important in keeping a good social relation among language users. There are cooperative principles which control us in the way we communicate with others. The cooperative principles contain some maxims. Yet, in the middle of conversation, we usually flout or violate the maxims in order to attract the hearers. In the movie Madagascar 3: Europe‟s Most Wanted, there are so many flout of maxims or exploit of maxims which is done by Alex, Marty, Melman, and Gloria as a persuasion strategy. By using conversational implicature theory, rhetoric theory, and some theories like politeness theory, co-active persuasion theory, and power relation theory will help to analyze this research on the use of flouting maxims and violating maxims as persuasion or rhetoric strategy. The finding of this research is that flout of maxims or exploit of maxims can be used as persuasion strategy."