Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Studi ini meneliti hubungan antara regulasi permodalan, diversifikasi usaha, pengawasan pasar pada bank, serta remunerasi Dewan terhadap efisiensi bank di Indonesia selama periode 2013 – 2022. Sampel penelitian yang digunakan adalah 77 bank umum yang terdaftar di OJK per Februari 2023. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode SFA untuk mengestimasi skor efisiensi perbankan serta regresi data panel untuk analisis pengaruh di dalam variabel penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukan regulasi permodalan yang diukur dengan CAR berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap efisiensi bank. Kemudian, diversifikasi usaha bank serta pengawasan pasar pada bank yang diukur dengan penggunaan auditor big 4 berdampak negatif yang tidak signifikan terhadap efisiensi bank. Terakhir, mekanisme remunerasi Dewan terbukti berpengaruh positif yang tidak signifikan terhadap efisiensi bank di Indonesia.

---

This study examines the relationship between bank capital regulation, income diversification, market discipline to banks, and board remuneration on bank efficiency in Indonesia during the 2013 – 2022 period. The sample used was 77 Indonesian banks registered in OJK as of February 2023[d1] . SFA method was employed to estimate bank efficiency scores and panel data regression for analysis of relationships in research variables. The results showed that bank capital regulation, as measured by CAR, has a significant negative effect on bank efficiency. Bank income diversification and market discipline, as measured by the use of big 4 auditor, have an insignificant negative impact on bank efficiency. Last, the Board's remuneration mechanism was proven to have an insignificant positive effect on bank efficiency in Indonesia.

"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh diversifikasi kredit terhadap risiko kredit, efisiensi, dan kapitalisasi bank. Data yang digunakan merupakan data panel yang terdiri dari 20 bank umum konvensional yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2007-2011. Metode penelitian menggunakan Fixed-Effect Model dan Random-Effect Model. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa diversifikasi kredit secara signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap risiko kredit dan efisiensi serta berpengaruh negatif terhadap kapitalisasi. Hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa diversifikasi kredit meningkatkan risiko kredit, meningkatkan efisiensi bank, dan menurunkan kapitalisasi bank.

---

The aim of this paper is to analyze how loan diversification affects credit risk, efficiency, and capitalization of commercial banks. Employing panel data from 20 conventional commercial banks listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during year 2007-2011, this research was conducted using Fixed-Effect Model and Random- Effect Model. Result obtained from the research showed that loan diversification positively significant affects credit risk and bank efficiency, and negatively significant affects bank capitalization. It implies that loan diversification increase the risk faced by banks, increase bank efficiency, and decrease bank capitalization."

"Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh dari pendapatan non-bunga terhadap profitabilitas dan risk-adjusted profitability bank pada bank yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2009-2015. Pendapatan non-bunga pada penelitian ini dibagi menjadi tiga kelompok yaitu pendapatan jasa dan komisi, pendapatan trading dan pendapatan lain-lain. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pendapatan non-bunga memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap profitabilitas bank dengan pendapatan jasa dan komisi yang memiliki kontribusi paling besar dibandingkan kelompok pendapatan non-bunga lainnya. Pendapatan non-bunga juga ditemukan meningkatkan riskadjusted profitability pada sampel bank. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa adanya korelasi yang tinggi antara pendapatan non-bunga dengan pendapatan bunga serta komponen penyumbang pendapatan bunga bank yaitu kredit yang disalurkan dan deposito.

---

This study analysis the effect of non-interest income on banks?s profitability and risk-adjusted profitability on listed bank during 2009-2015. This study classified non-interest income into three categories: fee-based income, trading income and other income. Non-interest income shows a positif relation on bank's profitability with fee-based income having biggest contribution compared with other category. This study find that non-interest income increase sample bank's risk-adjusted profitability. This study also find a high correlation between non-interest income and interest income and its component: loan and deposit."

"[ABSTRAKbrPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh dari struktur pasarperbankan terhadap profitabilitas dan stabilitas bank terkait rencana integrasisektor perbankan ASEAN yang merupakan salah satu cetak biru dari MasyarakatEkonomi ASEAN (MEA). Dalam mengukur struktur pasar perbankan digunakanpangsa pasar bank {Relative Market Power (RMP) Hypotesis} dan konsentrasipasar perbankan {Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) Hypothesis}. Penelitianini menggunakan data bank komersial yang terdaftar di pasar bursa saham negaraASEAN 4, yaitu Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, dan Filipina pada periode 2009-2014. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan RMP Hypothesis berlaku di perbankanASEAN dalam mempengaruhi profitabilitas bank, namun tidak berlaku diThailand dan Filipina. Di Indonesia SCP Hypothesis berlaku dominan dalammenentukan profitabilitas bank. Lain halnya dengan Malaysia, EfficiencyHypothesis mengonfirmasi hubungan pangsa pasar, konsentrasi pasar, danprofitabilitas bank. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa konsentrasi pasarperbankan berpengaruh negatif terhadap stabilitas bank pada perbankan ASEAN,Thailand dan Filipina. Hal tersebut mendukung konsep Concentration Fragility.Lain halnya dengan Indonesia dan Malaysia, konsetrasi pasar perbankan membuatbank lebih tidak stabil. Sehingga hal tersebut mendukung Concentration Stability.Penemuan penting dalam penelitian ini adalah bank dengan pangsa pasarbesar/ukuran besar dan permodalan kuat membuat bank dapat bersaing terkaitrencana integrasi sektor perbankan ASEAN. Hal tersebut dapat dilakukan denganmarger dan akuisisi, khususnya untuk Indonesia.;This study is aimed for analyzing the influence of banking market structure onbank profitability and stability related to ASEAN banking sector integrationplan which is in line with blue print of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC).In measuring banking market structure, the research utilized reference of bankmarket share {Relative Market Power (RMP) Hypotesis}and banking marketconcentration {Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) Hypotesis}. This researchalso utilized other references of commercial banks in which listed in stockexchange of ASEAN 4 countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Filiphinefor 2009 ? 2014 period. One of the research findings has shown that RMPHypotesis takes part in influencing bank profitability in ASEAN banks, but itdoes not work in Thailand and Filiphine. In case of Indonesia, SCP Hypothesisdominantly takes part in creating bank profitability. In case of Malaysia, on theother hand, Efficiency Hypothesis confirms market share, market concentration,and bank profitability. The research has also found out that banking marketconcentration contributes negative impact on bank stability in ASEAN banks,Thailand and Filiphine. This matter supports Concentration Fragility. On thecontrary, in case of Indonesia and Malaysia: banking market concentrationleads to more instability within the banks. The condition, therefore, supportsConcentration Stability. The important finding of this research is that highmarket share/bigger bank and strong capital leads to banks in order to win thecompetition in regard with ASEAN banking integration sector plan. Thisachievement can be reached by policy of merge and acquisition, especially forIndonesia banks.;This study is aimed for analyzing the influence of banking market structure onbank profitability and stability related to ASEAN banking sector integrationplan which is in line with blue print of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC).In measuring banking market structure, the research utilized reference of bankmarket share {Relative Market Power (RMP) Hypotesis}and banking marketconcentration {Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) Hypotesis}. This researchalso utilized other references of commercial banks in which listed in stockexchange of ASEAN 4 countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Filiphinefor 2009 ? 2014 period. One of the research findings has shown that RMPHypotesis takes part in influencing bank profitability in ASEAN banks, but itdoes not work in Thailand and Filiphine. In case of Indonesia, SCP Hypothesisdominantly takes part in creating bank profitability. In case of Malaysia, on theother hand, Efficiency Hypothesis confirms market share, market concentration,and bank profitability. The research has also found out that banking marketconcentration contributes negative impact on bank stability in ASEAN banks,Thailand and Filiphine. This matter supports Concentration Fragility. On thecontrary, in case of Indonesia and Malaysia: banking market concentrationleads to more instability within the banks. The condition, therefore, supportsConcentration Stability. The important finding of this research is that highmarket share/bigger bank and strong capital leads to banks in order to win thecompetition in regard with ASEAN banking integration sector plan. Thisachievement can be reached by policy of merge and acquisition, especially forIndonesia banks., This study is aimed for analyzing the influence of banking market structure onbank profitability and stability related to ASEAN banking sector integrationplan which is in line with blue print of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC).In measuring banking market structure, the research utilized reference of bankmarket share {Relative Market Power (RMP) Hypotesis}and banking marketconcentration {Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) Hypotesis}. This researchalso utilized other references of commercial banks in which listed in stockexchange of ASEAN 4 countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Filiphinefor 2009 – 2014 period. One of the research findings has shown that RMPHypotesis takes part in influencing bank profitability in ASEAN banks, but itdoes not work in Thailand and Filiphine. In case of Indonesia, SCP Hypothesisdominantly takes part in creating bank profitability. In case of Malaysia, on theother hand, Efficiency Hypothesis confirms market share, market concentration,and bank profitability. The research has also found out that banking marketconcentration contributes negative impact on bank stability in ASEAN banks,Thailand and Filiphine. This matter supports Concentration Fragility. On thecontrary, in case of Indonesia and Malaysia: banking market concentrationleads to more instability within the banks. The condition, therefore, supportsConcentration Stability. The important finding of this research is that highmarket share/bigger bank and strong capital leads to banks in order to win thecompetition in regard with ASEAN banking integration sector plan. Thisachievement can be reached by policy of merge and acquisition, especially forIndonesia banks.]"

"Penelitian ini menguji mengenai pengaruh diversifikasi pendapatan terhadap kinerja bank di Indonesia dengan menggunakan data individual 10 bank terbesar di Indonesia dari sisi aset ditahun 2013 yang mewakili 66% aset seluruh bank di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan data bank periode 2001 – 2013 dan menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa diversifikasi pendapatan secara signifikan memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap kinerja bank di Indonesia yang diwakili variabel RAROA penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa penurunan net interest margin berpengaruh signifikan terhadap peningkatan non interest income share pada bank di Indonesia.

---

This research examines the effect on income diversification on the performance of banks in Indonesia by using individual data from 10 largest bank in Indonesia in terms of assets in 2013 which represents 66% of assets of all banks in Indonesia. This study uses individual data banks period 2001 - 2013 and resulted in the conclusion that revenue diversification has a significant and positive effect on the performance of banks in Indonesia which represented by RAROA, this study also found that the decrease in net interest margin has significant effect on the increase in the share of non-interest income of banks in Indonesia."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan diversifikasi pendapatan dan diversifikasi internasional terhadap risiko bank. Objek penelitian adalah 38 bank umum di Indonesia sejak 2012 hingga 2017. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji regresi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa diversifikasi pendapatan memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap risiko bank sementara diversifikasi internasional tidak terbukti berpengaruh terhadap risiko bank. Implikasi penelitian ini adalah bank seharusnya tetap berhati-hati dalam melakukan upaya diversifikasi pendapatan dan mengelola risiko bank dari aktivitas tersebut. Regulator juga perlu meningkatkan perannya dalam mengawasi aktivitas diversifikasi pendapatan. Terkait diversifikasi internasional, meskipun tidak terbukti berpengaruh terhadap risiko bank namun manajemen bank sebaiknya tetap memperhatikan faktor-faktor risiko yang dihadapi saat menjalankan bisnis di luar negeri.

---

This study purposes to examine the relationship revenue diversification and international diversification toward bank risk. This study uses 38 banks that operate in Indonesia from 2012 to 2017. Analysis method in this study is regression test. The results indicate that revenue diversification has positive effect on bank risk while international diversification does not have effect on bank risk. Therefore, banks should remain cautious in making efforts to diversify revenue and manage bank risk from these activities. Regulator also needs to establish clear regulation in revenue diversification activities. Although this study can not prove the relationship between intenational diversification and bank risk, but banks should pay attention toward faced risk factors related business activites in abroad.

"

"Pengungkapan risiko dan tata kelola perusahaan memiliki peran yang penting baik bagi industriperbankan, investor, maupun stabilitas keuangan dalam jangka panjang. Selain itu, adanyaambiguitas hubungan antara pengungkapan dengan stabilitas bank syariah serta hubungan antara disclosure dengan profitabilitas bank menjadikan topik disclosure dan tata kelola perusahaan penting untuk diteliti. Oleh karena itu, studi ini bertujuan untuk melakukan pengujian hipotesis yang diharapkan dapat menjelaskan hubungan antara mandatory disclosure dan voluntary disclosureterhadap profitabilitas bank yang diproksikan dengan ROA (Return to Asset) serta hubungan antara mandatory disclosure dan voluntary disclosure terhadap stabilitas bank yang diproksikan dengan Z-score. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode OLS (Ordinary Least Square), RE (Random Effect), dan FE (Fixed Effect) untuk keempat model, dengan sampel 12 bank umum syariah (BUS) di Indonesia periode 2013-2018. Data yang digunakan bersumber dari laporan keuangan bank syariah, sementara indeks disclosure yang digunakan untuk mandatory disclosure adalah SEOJK dan indeks voluntary disclosure yang bersumber dari IFSB (Islamic Financial Service Board). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan secara signifikan dan positif antara pengungkapan risiko baik yang bersifat wajib dan sukarela terhadap stabilitas dan profitabilitas perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa semakin tinggi pengungkapanrisiko yang dilakukan oleh bank syariah, maka semakin tinggi stabilitas dan profitabilitas bank syariah. Berdasarkan hasil dari penelitian ini, menunjukkan bahwa pentingnya bagi bank syariah untuk meningkatkan pengungkapan yang bersifat wajib atau mandatory, serta memperluas pengungkapan yang bersifat sukarela atau voluntary.

---

Risk Disclosure and corporate governance have an important role for banks, investors, and long-term financial stability. In addition, there is an ambiguity in the relationship between disclosure and stability of Islamic banks as well as the relationship between disclosure and bank profitability, which makes this topic is necessary ti be examined. In accordance, this study aims to explain the relationship between mandatory disclosure and voluntary disclosure of the profitability of banks measured by ROA (Return to Asset) as well as the relationship between mandatory disclosure and voluntary disclosure of bank stability proxied by Z-scores. This study employs metode OLS (Ordinary Least Square), RE (Random Effect), dan FE (Fixed Effect) methods for all four models, with a sample of 12 Islamic commercial banks (BUS) in Indonesia for period of 2013-2018, and the sources of mandatory disclosure index comes from SEOJK while the voluntary disclosure index that is sourced from IFSB (Islamic Financial Service Board).The results of the first and second model both show that there is a significant and positive relationship between mandatory and voluntary disclosure on stability and mandatory disclosure on profitability. When banks increase their disclosure, Islamic banks will have higher stability and profitability. Based on the result from this study, it is important for Islamic banks to increase mandatory or mandatory disclosures and expand voluntary disclosures."

"Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat pengaruh dari variabel-variabel makroekonomi (inflasi, kurs, suku bunga, GDP, jumlah uang beredar), bank spesifik (CAR, bank deposit, bank size) dan struktur finansial (rasio total asset dengan GDP) terhadap profitabilitas bank yang ditunjukkan dengan return on asset (ROA). Penelitian ini menggunakan data-data keuangan dari 28 bank yang terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia. Pemilihan tahun 2009-2013 sebagai periode penelitian ditujukan untuk melihat pengaruh variabel-variabel tersebut pada sektor perbankan pasca krisis ekonomi dunia tahun 2008. Regresi linear berganda dilakukan terhadap data-data makroekonomi, bank spesifik dan struktur finansial baik secara terpisah maupun bersama-sama. Hasil penelitian menunjukan hanya terdapat tiga variabel yang mempengaruhi kinerja sektor perbankan secara signifikan, yaitu bank size, bank deposit dan struktur finansial. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa faktor internal lebih mempengaruhi profitabilitas perbankan dibandingkan faktor eksternal seperti makroekonomi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, peneliti menyarankan agar digunakan variabel kinerja perbankan lainnya yaitu, return on equity (ROE) dan net interest margin (NIM), untuk memberikan hasil penelitian yang lebih terperinci.

---

The Purpose of this study was focused on the effect of macroeconomic (inflation, exchange rates, interest rates, GDP, money supply), bank specific (CAR, bank deposits, bank size) and the financial structure ( ratio total asset with GDP ) on Indonesian bank's profitability shown by return on assets ( ROA). Bank?s performance was measured using return on assets (ROA). The study used financial data from 28 commercial banks that were listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) within the period of 2009 to 2013. The rationale for selecting the study period was to examine the hyact of the aforementioned variables on banking sector post 2008 global economy crisis. Multiple linear regression was applied on each variable category (macroeconomic, bank spesific and financial structure) exclusively as well as concurently.

The result of this study showed the dominate effect of three variables, namely bank size, bank deposit and financial structure, on bank?s profitability. The period insight that internal factor, other than internal factor such as macroeconomic variables, affected bank?s performance. Based on this study, the researcher suggested two variables, i.e. return on equity (ROE) and net interest margin (NIM), as proxy for bank?s profitability. The use of these variables might provide a more detail explanation on factors affecting bank?s performance."