Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kondisi industri telekomunikasi saat ini, pengelolaan modal kerja, posisi dari likuiditas, profitabilitas dan solvabilitas pada perusahaan dengan jangka waktu penelitian selama sepuluh tahun. Dari hasil penelitian ini dapat dilihat bahwa kondisi industri telekomunikasi saat ini bergeser dari penggunaan sms dan telpon menjadi penggunaan internet. Hasil dari cash conversion cycle (CCC) pada perusahaan dengan pengelolaan modal kerja positif lebih cepat dibanding perusahaan dengan modal kerja negatif. Posisi likuiditas dari perusahaan modal kerja negatif lebih menghawatirkan dibanding dengan perusahaan modal kerja positif. Profitabilitas terhadap likuiditas lebih berpengaruh kuat dan signifikan pada perusahaan dengan modal kerja negatif. Sedangkan profitabilitas terhadap risiko modal kerja lebih berpengaruh pada perusahaan dengan modal kerja positif. Penilaian solvabilitas perusahaan dengan modal kerja negatif berada di zona abu-abu dan perusahaan dengan modal kerja positif selalu berada pada zona aman.;

---

ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the current condition of the telecommunications industry, working capital management, the position of liquidity, profitability and solvency of the company for a period of over ten years of research. From these results it can be seen that the condition of the telecommunications industry is currently shifting from the use of sms and calls into internet usage. The results of the cash conversion cycle (CCC) at the company with positive working capital management faster than companies with negative working capital. The liquidity position of the company is more worrying negative working capital compared with positive working capital companies. Profitability of the liquidity more robust and significant influence on the company with negative working capital. While the profitability of the risks of working capital have more influence on companies with positive working capital. Rate solvency of companies with negative working capital is in the gray zone and the company with positive working capital always be on the safe zoneLiquidity;This study aims to determine the current condition of the telecommunications industry, working capital management, the position of liquidity, profitability and solvency of the company for a period of over ten years of research. From these results it can be seen that the condition of the telecommunications industry is currently shifting from the use of sms and calls into internet usage. The results of the cash conversion cycle (CCC) at the company with positive working capital management faster than companies with negative working capital. The liquidity position of the company is more worrying negative working capital compared with positive working capital companies. Profitability of the liquidity more robust and significant influence on the company with negative working capital. While the profitability of the risks of working capital have more influence on companies with positive working capital. Rate solvency of companies with negative working capital is in the gray zone and the company with positive working capital always be on the safe zoneLiquidity, This study aims to determine the current condition of the telecommunications industry, working capital management, the position of liquidity, profitability and solvency of the company for a period of over ten years of research. From these results it can be seen that the condition of the telecommunications industry is currently shifting from the use of sms and calls into internet usage. The results of the cash conversion cycle (CCC) at the company with positive working capital management faster than companies with negative working capital. The liquidity position of the company is more worrying negative working capital compared with positive working capital companies. Profitability of the liquidity more robust and significant influence on the company with negative working capital. While the profitability of the risks of working capital have more influence on companies with positive working capital. Rate solvency of companies with negative working capital is in the gray zone and the company with positive working capital always be on the safe zoneLiquidity]"

"Skripsi ini berisikan mengenai penelitian yang menganalisis pengaruh leverage dan likuiditas pada manajemen pendapatan dan modal pada bank umum yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2010-2015, penelitian ini menggunakan sampel 29 bank umum yang terdaftar pada tahun 2009 di BEI serta mengacu pada peraturan yang ditetapkan dalam peraturan bank Indonesia yaitu Basel III. Loans Loss Provisions (LLP) mewakili perhitungan manajemen modal dan pendapatan, Hasil dari penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa leverage dan likuiditas berperan dalam manajemen modal dan pendapatan. Ketika leverage meningkat maka terdapat peningkatan terhadap nilai LLP, hal ini berlaku juga pada likuiditas hasil penelitian ini menungkapkan ketika likuiditas meningkat terdapat peningkatan terhadap LLP. Teknik pengujian yang terpilih dalam penelitian ini ialah Random Effect Model (REM). Kesimpulan penelitian ini dengan menjaga kestabilan leverage dan likuiditas yang ada pada perusahaan dapat berpengaruh pada modal dan pendapatannya.

---

This reseach contains the study to analyze the effect of leverage and liquidity on eanings and capital management in commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) period 2010-2015. This study used a sample of 29 commercial banks listed on the Stock Exchange in 2009 and refers to the rules that laid down in the regulations, Basel III. Loans loss provisions (LLP) represents management's calculation of earnings and capital, results from this study demonstrate that leverage and liquidity play a role in the management of earnings and capital. When leverage increases, there is an increase in the value of LLP. It applies also to the results of liquidity, when liquidity increases there is an increase in the value of LLP. Random Effect Model (REM) is the chosen techinal testing in this study. The conclusion of this study is to maintain the stability of leverage and liquidity in the company because it affects to the earnings and capital."

"[ABSTRAKBank dalam menjalankan pengelolaan likuiditasnya mempunyai potensikeuntungan dan kerugian yang selalu mengikuti. Untuk mengendalikan risikotersebut perlu suatu proses manajemen risiko yang memadai, mulai dariidentifikasi risiko, pengukuran risiko hingga implementasi mitigasi risiko.Pengukuran risiko likuiditas pada Bank Sinarmas yaitu menggunakan LiquidityCoverage Ratio. Penyediaan likuiditas sangat penting untuk mengantisipasiadanya kebutuhan likuiditas sehingga dapat mengcover kewajiban Bank baikdalam kondisi normal maupun krisis. Namun demikian, penyediaan likuiditastidak boleh tersedia secara berlebihan karena timbul biaya likuiditas yang harusditanggung oleh Bank. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penetapan limit biayapengelolaan likuiditas yang bersedia di tanggung oleh Bank berdasarkan riskappetite dari management serta batas limit maksimum Liquidity Coverage Ratioharus ditetapkan oleh Bank. Penetapan limit tersebut merupakan hal pentingdalam proses mitigasi risiko agar pendapatan yang hilang karena adanyapenyediaan likuiditas dapat diminimalkan sehingga dapat tercipta peningkatanlaba bagi Bank. Data yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini merupakan komponendari Liquidity Coverage Ratio Bank Sinarmas selama 3 Tahun (2012-2014).Metode dalam penelitian ini secara kuantitatif. Pada kondisi saat ini BankSinarmas belum melakukan pengelolaan likuiditas jangka pendeknya secaraefektif. Hal ini terbukti dari hasil perhitungan rata-rata Liquidity Coverage Ratioyang masih tinggi yaitu 206.01%. Bahkan pernah tertinggi sebesar 392% padabulan Juli 2014. Regulator menetapkan batas Liquidity Coverage Ratio minimumsebesar 100%. Dengan adanya, penetapan pengelolaan biaya pemeliharaanlikuiditas maksimum dan penetapan limit maksimum Liquidity Coverage Ratiodiharapkan dapat diimplementasikan oleh Bank Sinarmas sehingga dapat terciptapeningkatan laba bagi Bank

---

ABSTRACTBank in carrying out liquidity management always followed with potential gainsand losses. There should be an adequate risk management process to manage theserisks, starting from risk identification, risk measurement to risk mitigationimplementation. Liquidity risk measurement in Bank Sinarmas using LiquidityCoverage Ratio. The providing of liquidity is very important to anticipate liquidityneeds so as to cover the liabilities of the Bank both in normal and crisisconditions. However, the providing of liquidity should not be available to excessliquidity because there will be costs to be borne by the Bank. Therefore, it isnecessary to establish limit liquidity management fee paid by the Bank preparedbased on the risk appetite by management as well as the maximum limit of theLiquidity Coverage Ratio must be determined by the Bank. The limit settingprocess is important in order to mitigate the risk of lost revenue due to theproviding of liquidity could be minimized so as to create an increase in profits forthe Bank. Data obtained in this study is a component of the Liquidity CoverageRatio Bank Sinarmas for 3 years (2012-2014). The method in this research isquantitative. In the current conditions the Bank Sinarmas not do short-termliquidity management effectively. This is evident from the results of thecalculation of average Liquidity Coverage Ratio are still high at 206.01%. Thehighest ever amounted to 392% in July 2014. Regulator set a minimum limit ofthe Liquidity Coverage Ratio at 100%. With the, determination of maximumliquidity management of maintenance costs and maximum limits LiquidityCoverage Ratio is expected to be implemented by the Bank Sinarmas so as tocreate an increased Bank profitability;Bank in carrying out liquidity management always followed with potential gainsand losses. There should be an adequate risk management process to manage theserisks, starting from risk identification, risk measurement to risk mitigationimplementation. Liquidity risk measurement in Bank Sinarmas using LiquidityCoverage Ratio. The providing of liquidity is very important to anticipate liquidityneeds so as to cover the liabilities of the Bank both in normal and crisisconditions. However, the providing of liquidity should not be available to excessliquidity because there will be costs to be borne by the Bank. Therefore, it isnecessary to establish limit liquidity management fee paid by the Bank preparedbased on the risk appetite by management as well as the maximum limit of theLiquidity Coverage Ratio must be determined by the Bank. The limit settingprocess is important in order to mitigate the risk of lost revenue due to theproviding of liquidity could be minimized so as to create an increase in profits forthe Bank. Data obtained in this study is a component of the Liquidity CoverageRatio Bank Sinarmas for 3 years (2012-2014). The method in this research isquantitative. In the current conditions the Bank Sinarmas not do short-termliquidity management effectively. This is evident from the results of thecalculation of average Liquidity Coverage Ratio are still high at 206.01%. Thehighest ever amounted to 392% in July 2014. Regulator set a minimum limit ofthe Liquidity Coverage Ratio at 100%. With the, determination of maximumliquidity management of maintenance costs and maximum limits LiquidityCoverage Ratio is expected to be implemented by the Bank Sinarmas so as tocreate an increased Bank profitability;Bank in carrying out liquidity management always followed with potential gainsand losses. There should be an adequate risk management process to manage theserisks, starting from risk identification, risk measurement to risk mitigationimplementation. Liquidity risk measurement in Bank Sinarmas using LiquidityCoverage Ratio. The providing of liquidity is very important to anticipate liquidityneeds so as to cover the liabilities of the Bank both in normal and crisisconditions. However, the providing of liquidity should not be available to excessliquidity because there will be costs to be borne by the Bank. Therefore, it isnecessary to establish limit liquidity management fee paid by the Bank preparedbased on the risk appetite by management as well as the maximum limit of theLiquidity Coverage Ratio must be determined by the Bank. The limit settingprocess is important in order to mitigate the risk of lost revenue due to theproviding of liquidity could be minimized so as to create an increase in profits forthe Bank. Data obtained in this study is a component of the Liquidity CoverageRatio Bank Sinarmas for 3 years (2012-2014). The method in this research isquantitative. In the current conditions the Bank Sinarmas not do short-termliquidity management effectively. This is evident from the results of thecalculation of average Liquidity Coverage Ratio are still high at 206.01%. Thehighest ever amounted to 392% in July 2014. Regulator set a minimum limit ofthe Liquidity Coverage Ratio at 100%. With the, determination of maximumliquidity management of maintenance costs and maximum limits LiquidityCoverage Ratio is expected to be implemented by the Bank Sinarmas so as tocreate an increased Bank profitability;Bank in carrying out liquidity management always followed with potential gainsand losses. There should be an adequate risk management process to manage theserisks, starting from risk identification, risk measurement to risk mitigationimplementation. Liquidity risk measurement in Bank Sinarmas using LiquidityCoverage Ratio. The providing of liquidity is very important to anticipate liquidityneeds so as to cover the liabilities of the Bank both in normal and crisisconditions. However, the providing of liquidity should not be available to excessliquidity because there will be costs to be borne by the Bank. Therefore, it isnecessary to establish limit liquidity management fee paid by the Bank preparedbased on the risk appetite by management as well as the maximum limit of theLiquidity Coverage Ratio must be determined by the Bank. The limit settingprocess is important in order to mitigate the risk of lost revenue due to theproviding of liquidity could be minimized so as to create an increase in profits forthe Bank. Data obtained in this study is a component of the Liquidity CoverageRatio Bank Sinarmas for 3 years (2012-2014). The method in this research isquantitative. In the current conditions the Bank Sinarmas not do short-termliquidity management effectively. This is evident from the results of thecalculation of average Liquidity Coverage Ratio are still high at 206.01%. Thehighest ever amounted to 392% in July 2014. Regulator set a minimum limit ofthe Liquidity Coverage Ratio at 100%. With the, determination of maximumliquidity management of maintenance costs and maximum limits LiquidityCoverage Ratio is expected to be implemented by the Bank Sinarmas so as tocreate an increased Bank profitability, Bank in carrying out liquidity management always followed with potential gainsand losses. There should be an adequate risk management process to manage theserisks, starting from risk identification, risk measurement to risk mitigationimplementation. Liquidity risk measurement in Bank Sinarmas using LiquidityCoverage Ratio. The providing of liquidity is very important to anticipate liquidityneeds so as to cover the liabilities of the Bank both in normal and crisisconditions. However, the providing of liquidity should not be available to excessliquidity because there will be costs to be borne by the Bank. Therefore, it isnecessary to establish limit liquidity management fee paid by the Bank preparedbased on the risk appetite by management as well as the maximum limit of theLiquidity Coverage Ratio must be determined by the Bank. The limit settingprocess is important in order to mitigate the risk of lost revenue due to theproviding of liquidity could be minimized so as to create an increase in profits forthe Bank. Data obtained in this study is a component of the Liquidity CoverageRatio Bank Sinarmas for 3 years (2012-2014). The method in this research isquantitative. In the current conditions the Bank Sinarmas not do short-termliquidity management effectively. This is evident from the results of thecalculation of average Liquidity Coverage Ratio are still high at 206.01%. Thehighest ever amounted to 392% in July 2014. Regulator set a minimum limit ofthe Liquidity Coverage Ratio at 100%. With the, determination of maximumliquidity management of maintenance costs and maximum limits LiquidityCoverage Ratio is expected to be implemented by the Bank Sinarmas so as tocreate an increased Bank profitability]"

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempengaruhi pengaruh manajemen modal kerjaterhadap profitabilitas perusahaan dalam siklus bisnis yang berbeda di Indonesia.Sampel dari penelitian ini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan yang bergerak dalamindustri manufaktur yang listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia mulai dari tahun 2009sampai 2015. Pengukuran manajemen modal kerja menggunakan cash conversioncycle, profitabilitas menggunakan gross profit margin, dan siklus bisnis diukurdengan PDB. Dalam penelitian ini juga diukur pengaruh dari komponen-komponencash conversion cycle itu sendiri terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan. Komponen ituantara lain receivable conversion period, payable defferal period, dan inventoryconversion period. Dari hasil penelitian ini siklus bisnis tidak mempengaruhihubungan manajemen modal kerja yang dikur dengan cash conversin cycleterhadap profitabilitas.

---

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to determine the effect of working capital managementon the company?s profitability through different business cycle. The sampel in thisstudy using the manufactur firms that listing on BEI from 2006 through 2015. Weuse cash conversion cycle as a working capital management measures, gross profitmargin as a profitability measures, and GDP as a business cycle measures. In thisstudy, we also measure the impact from the componen of working capotalmanagement it self on firm?s profitabiltiy. The component are receivableconversion period, payable defferal period, and inventory conversion period. Theresult from the study is the business cycle doesn?t affect the relationship betweenworking capital management on firm?s profitability."

"Manajemen modal kerja bertujuan untuk memaksimalkan profit, ketika meminimalisasi risiko dari ketidakmampuan membayar utang jangka pendek. Efisiensi dari manajemen modal kerja tergantung dari keseimbangan antara likuiditas dan profitabilitas yang diatur oleh perusahaan. Mengelola manajemen modal kerja dapat menggunakan Cash Conversion Cycle CCC yang terdiri dari Receivable Collection Period RCP , Inventory Conversion Period ICP , dan Payment Defferal Period PDP dan melihat pengaruhnya terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan dengan Gross Operating Profit GOP. Dengan mengambil sampel pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia pada tahun 2002 ndash; 2011 dan dipisahkan antara periode sebelum dan sesudah resesi global, ditemukan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan antara Receivable Collection Period RCP dengan profitabilitas perusahaan pada keseluruhan waktu.

---

Working capital management aims to maximize profits, while minimizing the risk of an inability to pay short term debt. The efficiency of working capital management depends on the balance between liquidity and profitability set by the company. Managing working capital management can use the Cash Conversion Cycle CCC consisting of Receivable Collection Period RCP , Inventory Conversion Period ICP , and Payment Defferal Period PDP and see its effect on the profitability of companies with Gross Operating Profit GOP. By taking a sample of the companies listed on the stock exchanges of Indonesia in 2002 2011 and separated between the periods before and after the global recession, found a significant relationship between Receivable Collection Period RCP with the overall profitability of the company at the time."

"[Tujuan penulisan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan serta pengaruh dari manajemen modal kerja terhadap profitabilitas untuk perusahaan manufaktur di Indonesia dengan melihat rasio perputaran hutang, piutang dan persediaan pada periode 2009-2013. Jumlah perusahaan yang termasuk kedalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 175 perusahaan dengan periode 5 tahun. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan 1 model dengan jumlah total 4 rasio yang digunakan untuk menggambarkan modal kerja dan profitabilitas, antara lain return on assets, account receivable turnover, account payable turnover dan inventory turnover. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa variabel account receivable turnover dan inventory turnover berpengaruh terhadap profitabilitas, namun variabel account payable turnover tidak berpengaruh terhadap profitabilitas secara signifikan.

---

The purpose of this writing is to determine relationship and effect of efficiency of working capital toward profitability by looking at payable turnover ratio, accounts receivable turnover ratio and inventories turnover ratio on manufacture’s company in Indonesia (2009-2013). The number of companies included in this study are 175 companies on 5 years. This study used 1 model with 4 ratio, such as return on assets, account receivable turnover, account payable turnover dan inventory turnover. Result from this study shown that variable variabel account receivable turnover dan inventory turnover has significant effect for profitability, but account payable turnover does not significantly affect the profitability.;The purpose of this writing is to determine relationship and effect of efficiency of working capital toward profitability by looking at payable turnover ratio, accounts receivable turnover ratio and inventories turnover ratio on manufacture’s company in Indonesia (2009-2013). The number of companies included in this study are 175 companies on 5 years. This study used 1 model with 4 ratio, such as return on assets, account receivable turnover, account payable turnover dan inventory turnover. Result from this study shown that variable variabel account receivable turnover dan inventory turnover has significant effect for profitability, but account payable turnover does not significantly affect the profitability.;The purpose of this writing is to determine relationship and effect of efficiency of working capital toward profitability by looking at payable turnover ratio, accounts receivable turnover ratio and inventories turnover ratio on manufacture’s company in Indonesia (2009-2013). The number of companies included in this study are 175 companies on 5 years. This study used 1 model with 4 ratio, such as return on assets, account receivable turnover, account payable turnover dan inventory turnover. Result from this study shown that variable variabel account receivable turnover dan inventory turnover has significant effect for profitability, but account payable turnover does not significantly affect the profitability.;The purpose of this writing is to determine relationship and effect of efficiency of working capital toward profitability by looking at payable turnover ratio, accounts receivable turnover ratio and inventories turnover ratio on manufacture’s company in Indonesia (2009-2013). The number of companies included in this study are 175 companies on 5 years. This study used 1 model with 4 ratio, such as return on assets, account receivable turnover, account payable turnover dan inventory turnover. Result from this study shown that variable variabel account receivable turnover dan inventory turnover has significant effect for profitability, but account payable turnover does not significantly affect the profitability., The purpose of this writing is to determine relationship and effect of efficiency of working capital toward profitability by looking at payable turnover ratio, accounts receivable turnover ratio and inventories turnover ratio on manufacture’s company in Indonesia (2009-2013). The number of companies included in this study are 175 companies on 5 years. This study used 1 model with 4 ratio, such as return on assets, account receivable turnover, account payable turnover dan inventory turnover. Result from this study shown that variable variabel account receivable turnover dan inventory turnover has significant effect for profitability, but account payable turnover does not significantly affect the profitability.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh working capital management terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan pada business cycle yang berbeda pada perusahaan manufaktur yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2010-2019. Pengukuran manajemen modal kerja menggunakan cash conversion cycle dengan komponennya yaitu receivable conversion period, inventory conversion period, dan payable deferral period. Profitabilitas diukur melalui return on assets dan gross profit margin, serta siklus bisnis ditentukan berdasarkan pertumbuhan PDB. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa manajemen modal kerja memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan dan tidak signifikan terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan.Dari hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa siklus bisnis berpengaruh dan tidak berpengaruh terhadap signifikansi pengaruh manajemen modal kerja terhadapprofitabilitas perusahaan di Indonesia.

---

This study aims to analyze the effect of working capital management on company profitability in different business cycles in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010-2019. The measurement of working capital management uses a cash conversion cycle with its components, namely the receivable conversion period, inventory conversion period, and payable deferral

period. Profitability is measured through return on assets and gross profit margin, and the business cycle is determined based on GDP growth. The results showed that working capital management had a significant and insignificant effect on company

profitability. The results of the study also show that the business cycle has an effect and has no effect on the significant effect of working capital management on the profitability of companies in Indonesia."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dampak manajemen working capital (sebagai ukuran likuiditas perusahaan) terhadap profitabilitas operasional dan profitabilitas bersih pada perusahaan manufaktur terbuka di Indonesia periode 2000 hingga 2013. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga ditujukan untuk mengetahui dampak dari dinamika ekonomi industri terhadap pengaruh manajemen working capital terhadap profitabilitas operasional dan profitabilitas bersih perusahaan. Terdapat lima komponen manajemen working capital yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini: (1) cash conversion cycles, (2) number of days accounts receivable, (3) number of days inventories, (4) number of days accounts payable, dan (5) rasio ketersediaan kas. Penelitian ini menguji tiga skenario siklus bisnis yang terjadi pada industri manufaktur di Indonesia (Upturn, Normal, dan Downturn). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh negatif yang signifikan antara komponen manajemen working capital pada profitabilitas, kecuali rasio ketersediaan kas yang memiliki pengaruh positif yang signifikan, dimana hal tersebut mengindikasikan bahwa perusahaan dengan siklus konversi kas yang singkat dan memiliki cadangan kas yang tinggi memiliki profitabilitas operasional dan profitabilitas bersih yang relatif lebih tinggi. Selain itu, hasil penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa siklus bisnis tidak memberikan dampak yang signifikan terhadap pengaruh manajemen working capital terhadap profitabilitas.

---

This research is aimed to determine the impact of working capital management (as a liquidity measurement) on operational profitability and net profitability of the Indonesian public listed manufacturing companies in the period between 2000 and 2013. Moreover, this research is aimed to find the impact of industry-wide economic fluctuation towards the relationship between working capital management and company profitability. There are five components of working capital management investigated in this research: (1) cash conversion cycles, (2) number of days accounts receivable, (3) number of days inventories, (4) number of days accounts payable, and (5) cash reserve ratio. This research investigated three possible scenarios of business cycles that occur in the manufacturing industry (upturn, normal, and downturn periods). The results of this study indicate that there are significant negative impacts between each component of working capital management on both operating and net profitability, except cash reserve ratio which has indicated significant positive direction, meaning that the companies with shorter cash conversion cycle and greater cash reserve are relatively more profitable both for operating and net activities. In addition, the results of this study indicate that business cycles are unable to bring significant impact on the relationship between working capital management and profitability."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menguji pengaruh manajemen modal kerja melalui cash conversion cycle dan komponenenya (hari piutang dagang, hari persediaan barang, dan hari hutang dagang) terhadap profitabilitas hasil operasi perusahaan. Penelitian menggunakan regresi berganda data panel dengan metode random effect dengan sampel 129 perusahaan yang ada pada sektor industri manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan data tahun 2008-2011. Digunakan juga variabel kontrol pertumbuhan penjualan, ukuran perusahaan, tingkat hutang, dan likuiditas perusahaan untuk dilihat pengaruhnya pada profitabilitas. Hasil penelitian menujukan bahwa cash conversion cycle tidak secara langsung mempengaruhi profitabilitas melainkan melalui hari piutang dagang, variabel kontrol yang mempengaruhi profitabilitas adalah ukuran perusahaan dan tingkat hutang perusahaan. Penelitian ini juga melakukan regresi pada 3 sub-sektor yang ada pada sektor industri manufaktur yang menunjukan bahwa profitabilitas tidak dipengaruhi langsung cash conversion cycle. Pada sub-sektor aneka industri profitabilitas dipengaruhi oleh hari piutang dagang dan hari persediaan barang, sedangkan pada sub-sektor barang konsumsi profitabilitas dipengaruhi oleh hari piutang dagang dan dari hutang dagang. Variabel kontrol yang mempengaruhi profitabilitas pada ke 3 sub-sektor tidak sama persis dengan sektor industri manufaktur, namun beragam.

---

ABSTRAKThis study examined the effect of working capital management on profitability from operating activities through cash conversion cycle and its compnent days of accounts receivable days of nventory and days of accounts payable This study used panel data regression with random effects method used sample of 129 firms that exist in the manufacturing sector in Indonesia Stock Exchange over the 2008 2011 period This study used sales growth firm size debt level and liquidity as control variable see its effect on profitability The results addressing the cash conversion cycle that does not directly affect profitability but through the days of accounts receivables the control variables that affect the profitability of the company and is firm size and levelof corporate debt This study also perform regression on 3 sub sectors that exist in the manufacturing sub sector the regression shows that profitability is not affected directly by cash conversion cycle In the various industry sub sector profitability is affected by the days of accounts receivable and days of inventory while in the consumer goods sub sector profitability is affected by days of accounts receivable and days of accounts payable Control variables that affect profitability in the 3 subsector is not exactly the same with the manufacturing sector however diverse."

"ABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mencari tahu pengaruh dari ManajemenModal Kerja yang diproksikan menggunakan Receivable Collection Period, Days Salesof Inventory, dan Days of Payable Outstanding terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan padaperusahaan consumer goods yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode2007 sampai dengan 2014. Pengujian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode RandomEffect (REM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Receivable Collection Period tidakmemiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap profitabilitas, sedangkan Days Sales ofInventory, dan Days of Payable Outstanding memiliki pengaruh positif terhadapprofitabilitas

---

ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to analyze the effect of Working Capital Managementthat are projected using Receivable Collection Period, Days Sales of Inventory, andDays of Payable Outstanding on firm profitability of consumer goods companies thatare listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia within the range of 2007 to 2014. The regressionswere conducted using Random Effect Method. The result showed that ReceivableCollection Period has no significant impact on firm probability. However, Days Sales ofInventory and Days of Payable Outstanding showed a positive significant impact to firmprofitability."