Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 184718 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Daikh Mudh Dullah Isa
Analisis yuridis perbandingan penindakan transfer pricing atas aspek intangible property di Indonesia dengan Jepang = juridical analysis of comparison of enforcement on transfer pricing aspects of intangible property in Indonesia and Japan
"[ABSTRAK
Transfer pricing bagi Indonesia merupakan tantangan besar untuk memaksimalkan penerimaan negara, karena tercatat oleh otoritas pajak Indonesia bahwa setiap tahunnya Indonesia dirugikan 1300 Trilliun Rupiah karena praktik transfer pricing ini. Bagi Jepang perhatian khusus diberikan untuk penanganan transfer pricing karena tumpuan penerimaan negara Jepang berada pada sektor perpajakan. Tantangan baru dalam hal transfer pricing adalah adanya praktik transfer pricing atas aspek intangible property yang ternyata banyak dilakukan oleh MNC yang saat ini rata-rata basis usahanya adalah intangible property. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui cara penindakan abuse of Transfer pricing dan cara penindakan praktek transfer pricing atas intangible property di Indonesia dan Jepang, serta untuk mengetahui apa sajakah yang menjadi kesulitan DJP Indonesia dan NTA Jepang dalam menangani praktik transfer pricing atas intangible property. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dan hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penindakan transfer pricing di Indonesia berpedoman pada PER DJP Nomor PER-22/PJ/2013 dan SE DJP Nomor SE-50/PJ/2013, sedangkan Jepang berpedoman pada Special Measures Tax Law 1986 yang diikuti NTA Administrative Guidelines, dan Indonesia belum memiliki aturan khusus penindakan transfer pricing atas intelectual property, sedangkan Jepang telah memiliki referensi khusus untuk menindak transfer pricing atas intelectual property, serta diketahui bahwa kesulitan yang dihadapi DJP dan NTA dalam mengatasi transfer pricing atas intangible property sama yaitu kesulitan dalam
ABSTRACT
Transfer pricing for Indonesia is a big challenge to maximize revenues, as recorded by the Indonesian tax authorities that each year 1300 Trillion Indonesian Rupiah harmed because of this transfer pricing practices. For Japan special attention is given to the handling of transfer pricing as the foundation of Japan's revenues are in the taxation sector. New challenges in terms of transfer pricing is the practice of transfer pricing aspects of intangible property, on which there are many MNCs are currently performed because the average base of their business is intangible property. This study aimed to determine how enforcement abuse of transfer pricing and how enforcement of transfer pricing practices on intangible property in Indonesia and Japan, as well as to know what are some difficulties Directorate General Of Tax Indonesia and National Tax Agency Japan dealing with transfer pricing practices on intangible property. This study uses normative legal research methods, and the results of this study indicate that the transfer pricing enforcement in Indonesia based on the PER DGT No. PER-22 / PJ / 2013 and SE DGT No. SE-50 / PJ / 2013, while Japan based on the Special Measures tax Law in 1986 which followed by the NTA Administrative Guidelines, and Indonesia does not have specific rules on transfer pricing enforcement on intelectual property, while Japan has had special reference to crack down transfer pricing on intelectual property aspect, and it is known that the difficulties faced by the Directorate General of Tax and National Tax Agency in dealing with transfer pricing on intangible property aspect is the same, and that is the difficulty in determining a reasonable price and the difficulty in finding a reasonable comparison. ;Transfer pricing for Indonesia is a big challenge to maximize revenues, as recorded by the Indonesian tax authorities that each year 1300 Trillion Indonesian Rupiah harmed because of this transfer pricing practices. For Japan special attention is given to the handling of transfer pricing as the foundation of Japan's revenues are in the taxation sector. New challenges in terms of transfer pricing is the practice of transfer pricing aspects of intangible property, on which there are many MNCs are currently performed because the average base of their business is intangible property. This study aimed to determine how enforcement abuse of transfer pricing and how enforcement of transfer pricing practices on intangible property in Indonesia and Japan, as well as to know what are some difficulties Directorate General Of Tax Indonesia and National Tax Agency Japan dealing with transfer pricing practices on intangible property. This study uses normative legal research methods, and the results of this study indicate that the transfer pricing enforcement in Indonesia based on the PER DGT No. PER-22 / PJ / 2013 and SE DGT No. SE-50 / PJ / 2013, while Japan based on the Special Measures tax Law in 1986 which followed by the NTA Administrative Guidelines, and Indonesia does not have specific rules on transfer pricing enforcement on intelectual property, while Japan has had special reference to crack down transfer pricing on intelectual property aspect, and it is known that the difficulties faced by the Directorate General of Tax and National Tax Agency in dealing with transfer pricing on intangible property aspect is the same, and that is the difficulty in determining a reasonable price and the difficulty in finding a reasonable comparison. ;Transfer pricing for Indonesia is a big challenge to maximize revenues, as recorded by the Indonesian tax authorities that each year 1300 Trillion Indonesian Rupiah harmed because of this transfer pricing practices. For Japan special attention is given to the handling of transfer pricing as the foundation of Japan's revenues are in the taxation sector. New challenges in terms of transfer pricing is the practice of transfer pricing aspects of intangible property, on which there are many MNCs are currently performed because the average base of their business is intangible property. This study aimed to determine how enforcement abuse of transfer pricing and how enforcement of transfer pricing practices on intangible property in Indonesia and Japan, as well as to know what are some difficulties Directorate General Of Tax Indonesia and National Tax Agency Japan dealing with transfer pricing practices on intangible property. This study uses normative legal research methods, and the results of this study indicate that the transfer pricing enforcement in Indonesia based on the PER DGT No. PER-22 / PJ / 2013 and SE DGT No. SE-50 / PJ / 2013, while Japan based on the Special Measures tax Law in 1986 which followed by the NTA Administrative Guidelines, and Indonesia does not have specific rules on transfer pricing enforcement on intelectual property, while Japan has had special reference to crack down transfer pricing on intelectual property aspect, and it is known that the difficulties faced by the Directorate General of Tax and National Tax Agency in dealing with transfer pricing on intangible property aspect is the same, and that is the difficulty in determining a reasonable price and the difficulty in finding a reasonable comparison. ;Transfer pricing for Indonesia is a big challenge to maximize revenues, as recorded by the Indonesian tax authorities that each year 1300 Trillion Indonesian Rupiah harmed because of this transfer pricing practices. For Japan special attention is given to the handling of transfer pricing as the foundation of Japan's revenues are in the taxation sector. New challenges in terms of transfer pricing is the practice of transfer pricing aspects of intangible property, on which there are many MNCs are currently performed because the average base of their business is intangible property. This study aimed to determine how enforcement abuse of transfer pricing and how enforcement of transfer pricing practices on intangible property in Indonesia and Japan, as well as to know what are some difficulties Directorate General Of Tax Indonesia and National Tax Agency Japan dealing with transfer pricing practices on intangible property. This study uses normative legal research methods, and the results of this study indicate that the transfer pricing enforcement in Indonesia based on the PER DGT No. PER-22 / PJ / 2013 and SE DGT No. SE-50 / PJ / 2013, while Japan based on the Special Measures tax Law in 1986 which followed by the NTA Administrative Guidelines, and Indonesia does not have specific rules on transfer pricing enforcement on intelectual property, while Japan has had special reference to crack down transfer pricing on intelectual property aspect, and it is known that the difficulties faced by the Directorate General of Tax and National Tax Agency in dealing with transfer pricing on intangible property aspect is the same, and that is the difficulty in determining a reasonable price and the difficulty in finding a reasonable comparison. , Transfer pricing for Indonesia is a big challenge to maximize revenues, as recorded by the Indonesian tax authorities that each year 1300 Trillion Indonesian Rupiah harmed because of this transfer pricing practices. For Japan special attention is given to the handling of transfer pricing as the foundation of Japan's revenues are in the taxation sector. New challenges in terms of transfer pricing is the practice of transfer pricing aspects of intangible property, on which there are many MNCs are currently performed because the average base of their business is intangible property. This study aimed to determine how enforcement abuse of transfer pricing and how enforcement of transfer pricing practices on intangible property in Indonesia and Japan, as well as to know what are some difficulties Directorate General Of Tax Indonesia and National Tax Agency Japan dealing with transfer pricing practices on intangible property. This study uses normative legal research methods, and the results of this study indicate that the transfer pricing enforcement in Indonesia based on the PER DGT No. PER-22 / PJ / 2013 and SE DGT No. SE-50 / PJ / 2013, while Japan based on the Special Measures tax Law in 1986 which followed by the NTA Administrative Guidelines, and Indonesia does not have specific rules on transfer pricing enforcement on intelectual property, while Japan has had special reference to crack down transfer pricing on intelectual property aspect, and it is known that the difficulties faced by the Directorate General of Tax and National Tax Agency in dealing with transfer pricing on intangible property aspect is the same, and that is the difficulty in determining a reasonable price and the difficulty in finding a reasonable comparison. ]"
2015
T-Pdf
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Agnes Lazuardi
Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Kesepakatan Harga Transfer dalam Mencegah Sengketa Transfer Pricing di Indonesia = Analysis on the Implementation of Advance Pricing Agreement Regulation as Transfer Pricing Dispute Prevention in Indonesia
"Pada Maret 2020, Kementerian Keuangan mengeluarkan PMK-22/2020 yang mengatur tentang kesepakatan harga transfer seraya melaraskan peraturan APA Indonesia dengan Aksi BEPS 14 agar lebih memberikan kepastian hukum. Sebagai bentuk adopsi, PMK-22/2020 mengatur ketentuan baru seperti perluasan pengertian hubungan istimewa yang tidak diatur dalam Pasal 18 ayat 4 UU PPh. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi kebijakan kesepakatan harga transfer dan faktor-faktor penghambat proses implementasi kebijakan kesepakatan harga transfer sebagaimana diatur dalam PMK-22/2020 dalam mencegah sengketa transfer pricing di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa implementasi kebijakan penentuan harga transfer di Indonesia sebagaimana diatur dalam PMK-22/2020 belum sepenuhnya memenuhi indikator content of policy. Indikator yang belum dipenuhi adalah indikator kelompok sasaran, dalam hal ini kebijakan APA yang seharusnya berlaku bagi Wajib Pajak yang ingin mengajukan APA namun juga diberlakukan bagi seluruh Wajib Pajak yang melakukan transaksi afiliasi meskipun tidak mengajukan APA. Di sisi lain, implementasi kebijakan kesepakatan harga transfer telah memenuhi seluruh indikator dalam context of policy yang terdiri dari kekuasaan, kepentingan, dan strategi, karakteristik lembaga dan penguasa, daya tanggap dan kepatuhan. Selanjutnya, faktor-faktor yang menghambat implementasi PMK-22/2020 dilihat dari sisi otoritas pajak, yaitu kompleksitas kasus dan transaksi Wajib Pajak, karakteristik negara yang ingin mempertahankan kepentingan negara masing-masing, komunikasi yang tidak lancar dengan otoritas pajak negara mitra, dan kesulitan dalam mengumpulkan dokumen pendukung dan kurangnya transparansi dari Wajib Pajak. Sedangkan, faktor-faktor yang menghambat implementasi PMK-22/2020, dilihat dari sisi Wajib Pajak adalah keraguan  Wajib Pajak terhadap otoritas pajak, interpretasi peraturan yang tidak jelas dan multitafsir, dan pengetahuan Wajib Pajak yang minim mengenai transfer pricing
In March 2020, the Ministry of Finance issued a PMK-22/2020 which stipulates the Advance Pricing Agreement whilst aligning the Indonesian advance pricing agreement regulation with BEPS Action 14 to provide more legal certainty. As a form of adoption, PMK-22/2020 stipulates new provisions such as extension of the definitions of special relationship which are not stipulated in Article 18 paragraph 4 of the Income Tax Law. Therefore, this study analyzed the implementation of the advance pricing agreement regulation and impediment factors of the implementation of the advance pricing agreement regulation as stipulated in PMK-22/2020 in preventing the transfer pricing disputes in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of the advance pricing agreement regulation in Indonesia as stipulated in PMK-22/2020 has not fully fulfilled the content of policy indicator. The indicator that has not been fulfilled is the target group indicator, in this case the advance pricing agreement regulation should have been applied limited to Taxpayers who want to apply for an advance pricing agreement, however it is also intended for all Taxpayers who conduct related party transactions even when the related party transactions are not in the context of advance pricing agreement. On the other hand, the implementation of the advance pricing agreement regulation has fulfilled all indicators in the context of implementation consisting of power, interests, and strategies, characteristics of institutions and rulers, responsiveness and compliance. Furthermore, the factors which impediment the implementation of PMK-22/2020 are seen in terms of tax authorities, namely the complexity of cases and Taxpayers’ transactions, the characteristics of countries who want to maintain their respective countries’ interests, communication that is not smooth with other tax authorities, and difficulties in collecting supporting documents and lack of transparency of taxpayers. Meanwhile, the factors that impediment the implementation of PMK-22/2020, in terms of taxpayers are doubts about taxpayers on tax authorities, interpretation of unclear regulations and multi-interpretation, and minimum knowledge about transfer pricing of the Taxpayer."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia, 2022
T-pdf
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Ratna Amiroh Utami
Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Pajak terhadap Sengketa Pembayaran Royalti atas Pemanfaatan Harta Tidak Berwujud dan Know-How sebagai Suatu Transaksi Transfer Pricing Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus pada 5 (Lima) Putusan Banding Pengadilan Pajak = Analysis of Tax Court Verdicts on Royalty Payments Disputes for The Use of Intangible Assets and Know-How as a Transfer Pricing Transaction in Indonesia: Case Studies on 5 (Five) Tax Court Appeal Verdicts
"Sengketa transfer pricing terhadap pembayaran royalti atas pemanfaatan harta tidak berwujud dan know-how tidak hanya berfokus pada penentuan harga transfer atas royalti. Sebelum menguji kewajaran dan kelaziman pembayaran royalti, terlebih dahulu harus dibuktikan eksistensi dan kepemilikan harta tidak berwujud dan manfaat ekonomis atas pembayaran royalti. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan Hakim dalam memutus sengketa pajak berdasarkan koreksi Otoritas Pajak (DJP) dan argumentasi Wajib Pajak yang didasarkan pada 5 (lima) putusan pengadilan pajak, serta memperoleh lesson learned berupa faktor-faktor substansial dalam transaksi pembayaran royalti kepada pihak yang dipengaruhi oleh hubungan istimewa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan berupa pendekatan kualitatif dengan melakukan studi literatur dan studi lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan Hakim dalam memutus sengketa didasari oleh pembuktian atas eksistensi dan kepemilikan, manfaat ekonomis, dan kewajaran harga royalti dari masing-masing pihak yang bersengketa dalam mempertahankan argumentasinya serta kesesuaian bukti dengan regulasi yang berlaku. Tax planning, penerapan prinsip kewajaran dan kelaziman usaha yang baik dan benar, kolaborasi dalam perumusan regulasi, dan standarisasi pemeriksaan menjadi solusi untuk meminimalisir jumlah sengketa transfer pricing atas pembayaran royalti.
Transfer pricing disputes concerning royalty payments for the use of intangible assets and know-how do not solely focus on determining the transfer price of royalties. Before assessing the fairness and reasonableness of royalty payments, the existence and ownership of the intangible assets and the economic benefits of the royalty payments must first be proven. This research aims to analyze the judges' considerations in resolving tax disputes based on corrections by the Tax Authority (DJP) and the taxpayer's arguments, as reflected in five tax court rulings. Additionally, the research seeks to derive lessons learned regarding the substantial factors in royalty payment transactions involving related parties. The research method used is a qualitative approach, involving literature review and field studies. The findings indicate that the judges' considerations in resolving disputes are based on the proof of existence and ownership, economic benefits, and the fairness of royalty prices from each disputing party in defending their arguments, as well as the conformity of evidence with applicable regulations. Tax planning, the application of proper and accurate arm's length principles, collaboration in regulatory formulation, and standardized audits are proposed as solutions to minimize the number of transfer pricing disputes over royalty payments."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia, 2024
S-pdf
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Achmad Amin
Analisis sanksi perpajakan atas penyalahgunaan transfer pricing (studi tentang penegakan sanksi perpajakan kasus putusan kasasi nomor 2239 K/PID.SUS/2012) = Analysis of tax penalties on transfer pricing abuse (study of tax penalties enforcement on Indonesia supreme court verdict number 2239 K/PID.SUS/2012)
"Tesis ini membahas tentang sanksi perpajakan atas penyalahgunaan transfer pricing di Indonesia. Metode penelitian di dalam tesis ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) yang dipadukan dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa Indonesia telah memiliki pengaturan transfer pricing di dalam hukum positif sebagai General Anti-Avoidance Rule, namun sanksi perpajakan atas penyalahgunaan transfer pricing tidak diatur secara spesifik, sehingga sanksi perpajakan atas penyalahgunaan transfer pricing mengacu pada sanksi perpajakan secara umum. Sebagai konsekuensinya, penyalahgunaan transfer pricing dalam kondisi tertentu dapat dikategorikan sebagai perbuatan pidana yang dapat dikenai sanksi pidana, walaupun secara umum merupakan pelanggaran administratif. Studi atas putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2239K/PID.SUS/2012 menunjukkan bahwa penyalahgunaan transfer pricing dalam kondisi tertentu dapat dikategorikan sebagai perbuatan pidana. Walaupun demikian, penyelesaian secara administratif lebih diutamakan daripada penyelesaian secara pidana, karena sanksi pidana menurut Undang-Undang Perpajakan merupakan sarana akhir (ultimum remedium). Di samping itu, untuk kepentingan penerimaan negara Undang-undang Perpajakan memberi peluang untuk melakukan penyelesaian pidana perpajakan dengan pendekatan restoratif-rehabilitatif, sehingga sanksi pidana seharusnya hanya dikenakan untuk tindak pidana perpajakan yang serius dan yang tidak dapat dipulihkan serta berdampak sangat besar terhadap masyarakat.
The thesis analyzes tax penalties on transfer pricing abuses in Indonesia. The research methodology in the thesis is normative legal research with statute approach combined with case approach and conceptual approach. The researcher found that Indonesia has had transfer pricing regulation in tax law as general antiavoidance rule, but the tax penalties on transfer pricing abuses were not specifically regulated, so that the tax penalties on transfer pricing abuses refer to general provisions of tax penalties. As a consequence, the transfer pricing abuses in some particular conditions may be considered as criminal act and may be subject to criminal penalties, eventhough by defult they are administrative violances. The study on Indonesia Supreme Court Verdict Number 2239 K/PID.SUS/2012 has shown that the transfer pricing abuses in some particular conditions were considered as criminal acts. However, the administrative settlements are preferable than criminal settlements, because the criminal penalties by the tax law are a last resort (ultimum remedium). Beside that, for tax revenue reasons, the tax law gives an opportunity to settle the tax crime by restorative-rehabilitative approach, so that criminal penalties should be imposed only for the serious criminal acts which can not be restored and have huge impacts on society."
Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2015
T43129
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Khalisa Zahra Savira
Analisis Biaya dan Manfaat atas Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Transfer Pricing (Studi Kasus PT X) = Cost and Benefit Analysis of Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) as an Alternative for Transfer Pricing Disputes (Case study of PT X)
"Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) merupakan salah satu alternatif penyelesaian
sengketa Transfer Pricing dengan bentuk perjanjian yang mengatur ketentuan harga
wajar sesuai dengan Arm's Length Principles untuk transaksi pada tahun yang
disepakati. Adapun alternatif lain yang dapat ditempuh oleh Wajib Pajak dalam
penyelesaian sengketa Transfer Pricing yaitu dengan Mutual Agreement Procedure
(MAP) atau penyelesaian sengketa sesuai Undang-Undang KUP Pajak seperti
upaya keberatan dan banding (dispute settlement). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk
menganalisis penggunaan APA sebagai salah satu alternatif penyelesaian sengketa
Transfer Pricing berdasarkan analisis biaya dan manfaat dengan menggunakan
studi kasus pada PT X. PT X merupakan anak perusahaan dari induk perusahaannya
yang berada di Jepang. PT X dalam prakteknya menjalankan fungsi pabrikasi atau
sebagai contract manufacturer. Berdasarkan skema bisnis yang dijalankan ini,
maka permasalahan Transfer Pricing menjadi suatu permasalahan yang selalu
dihadapi PT X pada setiap pemerikaan pajak. Analisis biaya dan manfaat dilakukan
dengan membandingkan komponen biaya dan manfaat dalam bentuk berwujud
(tangible) maupun tidak berwujud (intangible) dari setiap alternatif. Rekomendasi
penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan mengapa APA merupakan alternatif yang terbaik
bagi PT X diantara alternatif lainnya dalam menghadapi sengketa Transfer Pricing
Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) is an alternative for Transfer Pricing disputes
through an agreement that regulates fair price provisions in accordance with the
Arm's Length Principles for transactions in the agreed year. Other alternatives can
be reached by taxpayers in the settlement of Transfer Pricing disputes, such as the
Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) or dispute settlement in accordance with the
KUP Tax Law such as objection and appeal. This study aims to analyze the use of
APA as an alternative to transfer pricing dispute based on cost and benefit analysis
using a case study at PT X. PT X is a subsidiary of its parent company in Japan. In
practice, PT X performs the function a contract manufacturer. Based on this
business scheme, the Transfer Pricing problem is a problem that is always found in
every tax examination. The cost and benefit analysis is conducted by comparing the
components of costs and benefits in tangible and intangible forms of each
alternative. The recommendation of this research is to explain why APA is the best
alternative for PT X among other alternatives in dealing with Transfer Pricing
disputes"
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2020
T-Pdf
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Lutfiah
Analisis sengketa pajak marketing intangible atas biaya pemasaran PT Samsung Electronics Indonesia dan upaya penyelesaian sengketa marketing intangible = Analyses tax dispute of marketing intangible on marketing expenses of PT Samsung Electronics Indonesia and the effort in resolving tax dispute of marketing intangible
"Penelitian ini menganalisis transfer pricing atas biaya pemasaran yang menimbulkan sengketa marketing intangible pada pemeriksaan pajak PT Samsung Electronics Indonesia. Analisis difokuskan pada aktifitas pemasaran, biaya pemasaran yang dikeluarkan, regulasi transfer pricing yang digunakan ditinjau dari regulasi transfer pricing Indonesia dan OECD Guideline. Teknik pengolahan data melalui terlibat langsung dalam proses penelitian, studi kepustakaan, studi lapangan melalui wawancara dengan informan disertai pengolahan data. Melalui penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa koreksi marketing intangible tidak kuat. Upaya penyelesaian yang dipilih adalah Mutual Agreement Procedure atas koreksi yang telah dilakukan dan Advance Pricing Agreement untuk menghindari sengketa pajak dikemudian hari dan mendapatkan kepastian hukum.
This research analyses tax dispute transfer pricing on marketing intangible that occurred in tax audit of PT Samsung Electronics Indonesia. Analysis dispute of marketing intangible focused on marketing activities carried out, marketing costs incurred and transfer pricing regulation used. Data processing techniques through direct involvement in the research process, literature studies, field studies through interviews with informants accompanied by data processing. From this research we can conclude that correction made by tax auditors on marketing intangible is not strong. The selected resolution are apply Mutual Agreement Procedure on corrections made by the tax auditors and apply for Advance Pricing Agreement to avoid tax disputes in the future and get certainty."
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2016
T-pdf
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Smita Adinda
Analisis penetapan harga pasar wajar dalam Transfer Pricing atas Intra-Group Management Service di Indonesia = Analysis on Indonesia Tax Policy about Transfer Pricing for Intra-Group Management Services transactation in Indonesia
"Salah satu bentuk transaksi transfer pricing yang sering terjadi di dalam perusahaan multinasional adalah transaksi pemberian jasa manajemen atau intragroup management services. Jasa manajemen selain diberikan untuk meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan terkadang juga dijadikan sebagai upaya untuk meminimalisir beban pajak global sebuah perusahaan multinasional. Di Indonesia sendiri peraturan mengenai mekanisme transfer pricing diatur dalam PER- 32/PJ/2011, namun dalam PER-32 hanya dijelaskan mengenai penetapan harga pasar wajar untuk transaksi yang bersifat khusus secara keseluruhan.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas bagaimana kebijakan dan proses penetapan harga pasar wajar atas transaksi transfer pricing atas intra-group management services yang berlaku di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis data kualitatif. Data kualitatif didapatkan melalui studi literatur dan wawancara mendalam.
Dari hasil penelitian, kesimpulan yang dihasilkan adalah permasalahan intra-group management services secara khusus belum diatur secara baik di Indonesia dan kebijakan yang ada walau sudah komprehensif dan seusai dengan peraturan yang lazimnya berlaku secara internasional, belum memberikan cukup contoh-contoh kasus tentang bagaimana penetepan harga pasar wajar yang tepat untuk transaksi intra-group management services. Serta banyak kebijakan transfer pricing di India yang dapat menjadi masukan bagi kebijakan di Indonesia.
One form of transfer pricing transaction that are occur inside the multinational company is the intra-group management service. The intra-group management services are provided not only to improve the company?s performance but sometimes also used as an effort to minimize the company's global tax burden. In Indonesia legislation on transfer pricing mechanism set out in PER-32/PJ/2010, but in PER-32 there is only description regarding on how to determine an arm's length price for special nature transaction as a whole.
This study aims to discuss on how to determine an arm?s length price for intra-group management services transactions in Indonesia. Research method used in the research is qualitative approach with qualitative analysis. Qualitative data is gathered from literature study and in-depth interview.
Based on the research, can be concluded that intra-group management services issue has not been properly regulated in Indonesia and the existed regulations even though have been comprehensively regulated and have followed the track of international best practice there seems to exists some lacks of examples on how to determine an arm?s length price for intra-group management services. Nonetheless there are many of India?s transfer pricing rules that can be applied in Indonesia."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2012
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Leonard Saputra
Implikasi identifikasi harta tidak berwujud dengan dempe terhadap peraturan transfer pricing di Indonesia = The implication of intangible assets identification with dempe in the Indonesia's transfer pricing tax regulations
"Penelitian ini berfokus kepada analisis implikasi dari pengimplementasian konsep identifikasi fungsi dalam harta tidak berwujud yang dibahas dalam Action 8-10, dikenal sebagai DEMPE, dalam peraturan transfer pricing di Indonesia. Metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan menggunakan wawancara mendalam sebagai sumber data primernya. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat relevansi untuk menerapkan BEPS Action Plan 8-10 di Indonesia, konsep DEMPE dapat diterapkan secara efektif di Indonesia untuk mengatasi berbagai permasalahan, dan pengimplementasiannya hanya membutuhkan penyesuaian yang tidak terlalu signifikan karena secara tersirat konsep DEMPE tersebut sudah diaplikasikan terutama sebagai dasar pemeriksaan. Pengimplementasiannya dalam peraturan transfer pricing di Indonesia dapat menciptakan peraturan baru yang secara umum dijelaskan dalam Peraturan Menteri Keuangan PMK dan rinciannya dijelaskan kedalam Peraturan Dirjen Pajak PER dengan disesuaikan dengan relevansi di Indonesia yang memungkinkan ditambahkan fungsi marketing dalam konsep DEMPE tersebut. Implementasi ini diharapkan mampu mendekatkan pandangan setiap stakeholders terkait tata cara pengidentifikasian harta tidak berwujud yang menekankan pada analisis economic ownership.
This study is focusing to analyze the implications of implementing the concept of function identification in the intangible asset that is discussed in Action 8 10, known as DEMPE, in the Indonesia rsquo s transfer pricing regulations. This research method is descriptive research with more priority to in depth interview as primary data source. The result of this research is that there is relevance to apply BEPS Action Plan 8 10 in Indonesia, DEMPE concept can be applied effectively in Indonesia to overcome various problems, and its implementation only requires less significant adjustment because implicitly DEMPE concept has been applied mainly as basic inspection. Implementation in Indonesia 39 s pricing transfer rules can create new regulations that are generally described in PMK and the details will be explained in PER by adjusting to the relevance in Indonesia that allows added ldquo marketing rdquo function in the DEMPE concept. This implementation is expected to be able to get closer to each stakeholder 39 s perspective regarding to the procedure of identifying intangible assets that emphasizes the analysis of economic ownership. "
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2018
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Dalauleng, B. Rizki
Analisis Transfer Pricing of Technology Intangible Asset di Indonesia
"Globalisasi ekonomi, bisnis, dan Investasi mempersubur tumbuh dan berkembangnya perusahaan multinasional. Kemajuan pesat secara serentak yang berlangsung di bidang teknologi informasi, komunikasi, dan transportasi mengakibatkan arus perdagangan barang, modal, dan tenaga kerja di dunia melampaui batas-batas negara dan mendorong meningkatnya transaksi lintas batas (cross border transaction) antar negara. Peningkatan volume transaksi internasional oleh perusahaan multinasional menyebabkan transfer pricing untuk tujuan perpajakan teiab dan akan menjadi salah satu isu perpajakan yang sangat penting. Dalam era perekonomian yang teiah mendunia. transfer pricing telah menjadi isu penting baik bagi Wajib Pajak maupun otoritas pajak.
Ilmu pengetahuan telah menjadi faktor kunci dalam memacu pertumbuhan ekonomi di suatu negara. Wujud dari keberadaan ilmu pengetahuan tersebut dalam faktor-faktor produksi adalah teknologi. Teknologi dalam konteks transfer pricing berupa pemikiran, penelitian. dan pengembangan yang berkembang dalam sebuah operasi, proses, atau produk. Output dari pemikiran, penelitian, dan pengembangan inilah yang kemudian didefinisikan sebagai "intangible property" of a company. Teknologi sebagai media transfer pricing memberikan kesempatan pada perusahaan multinasional untuk me-manage arus kas dan tarif pajak efektif.
Mengingat globatisasi, aktifitas perusahaan multinasional dan Indonesia yang menganut sistem ekonomi terbuka mengakibatkan transaksi tidak hanya ditinjau sebagai hubungan antar subjek ekonomi tetapi juga interaksi antar Negara yang berkepentingan. Dalam praktik di Indonesia sehari-hari, walau diyakini penerapan transfer pricing banyak dilakukan, dipastikan kepatuhan pada ketentuan yang berlaku belum memadai. Dalam kaitannya dengan transfer pricing, belum ada aturan yang bersifat khusus dalam mempertimbangkan adanya transfer intangible asset.
Karya akhir inl bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah pernturan perpajakan Indonesia mampu mengidentifikasikan dan menentukan kepemilikan atas intangible property, dampak transfer pricing of intangible property terhadap Indonesia sebagai negara berkembang dan apa kemungkinan dampak yang ditimbulkan praktik tersebut terhadap penerimaan pajak negara serta bagaimana pelaksanaan transfer pricing rule di Indonesia dafam transaksi yang melibatkan
technology intangible asset.
Transfer pricing of technology merupakan masalah yang kompleks dan membutuhkan pertimbangan yang seksama. Di negara-negara maju misalnya Amerika Serikat maupun Kanada ataupun di beberapa negara berkembang seperti China dan Argentina, masalah ini sudah mendapatkan perhatian khusus dengan diterbitkannya beberapa kebijakan perpajakan terkait dengan masalah tersebut Sedangkan di Indonesia, regulasi yang mengatur tentang transfer pricing. intangible property maupun mengenai technology intangible asset masih sangat kurang. Hal ini bukan saja melepaskan potensi pajak yang scharusnya bisa dioptimalkan tetapi juga tidak memberikan kepastian hukum kepada Wajib Pajak karena memberikan peluang penafsiran yang sangat Juas kepada otoritas pajak berkaitan dengan regulasi tersebut.
Pemerintah Indonesia dalam hat ini Direktorat Jenderal Pajak seharusnya mengambil langkah kungkret dengan melakukan penguatan atas ketentuan-ketentuan yang berlaku saat ini termasuk diantaranya dengan menegaskan dan menjabarkan secara lebih rinci beberapa konsep dasar dalam transfer pricing termasuk mengenai transfer pricing of technology intangible asset sehingga dapat meningkatkan pemahaman mengenai transfor pricing dan bisa memberikan kepastian hukum bagi Wajib Pajak serta menjaga kepentingan Indonesia sendiri dari kemungkinan penghindaran atau penggelapan pajak melalui skema transfer pricing baik yang bersifat cross-border maupum domestik.
Economic globalization, business and lnvestment prospered the growth and development of multinational businesses. Quick simultaneous development happening at the information technology field. communication and transportation resulted in a flow of trade, capital and labor in the world, passing through countries border and pushing the increase of cross border transactions. The increase of international transactions volume by multinational companies causing transfer pricing for tax purposes. has been and will be one of a very important tax issue. In a global economy era, transfer pricing became an important issue for the taxpayer as well as for the tax authorities.
Science has become a key factor in accelerating the economy growth in a country, The substance of said science presence in production factors is techology. Technology in the context of transfer pricing is the thought, research and development in an operation, process or produce The output of thoughts, research and development is later on defined as "intangible property of a company", Technology through the medium of transfer pricing provides considerable opportunities for a multinational company to manage its cash flow and global effective tax rates.
Regarding globalization, activities of multinational companies and Indonesian, which very much practices the open economy system, causes the transaction not only to be seen as a relation between economical subjects but also as an interaction between the countries concerned. In daily practice in Indonesia, although assured that transfer pricing is often done, it is certain that obeying the valid provisions are not yet adequate. 1n its connection to transfer pricing, there are not yet special rules for taking into consideration the transfer intangible asset
This thesis is aimed at analyzing whether the Indonesian tax system will be able to identify and determine the ownership of intangible property, the lmpact of transfer pricing of intangible property towards Indonesia as a developing country and what are the possibilities of the impact resulting from said practice to the country's revenues and how will be the execution of transfer pricing rule in Indonesia in transactions involving technology intangible asset.
Transfer pricing of technology became a complicated problem, needing meticulous consideration. In developed countries, for example, the United States of America or Canada or sorae developing countries like China and Argentina, this problem has already got special attention through the establishing of a few tax policies connected to the problem.
While in Indonesia the regulations regulating transfer pricing intangible property as well as technology tangible asset is still insufficient. This fuct not only decreases the tax potentials which should be optimal. but also doesn't give judicial certainty to the taxpayer, because it gives an opportunity for a very broad interpretation to the tax authorities concerned with this regulations.
The Indonesian Government, in this case the Directorate General of Taxes should take concrete steps by strengthening the provisions valid at present, including clarifying and describing in more detail a few basic concepts in transfer pricing including the transfer pricing of technology intangible asset, so that a understanding of transfer pricing can be increased and the taxpayer obtains a judicial certainty while taking care of the well-being of Indonesia from the possibility of evasion and embezzlement of taxes through good transfer pricing schemes either cross border or domestic."
Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2009
T 27007
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Lulu Purwanti
Analisis Putusan Banding Pengadilan Pajak Atas Koreksi Biaya Royalti Penggunaan Trademark (Studi Kasus Sengketa Transfer Pricing Pada PT A Indonesia Tahun Pajak 2008) = Appeal Decision Analysis for the Royalty Expense Correction of the use a trademark (Case Study of Transfer Pricing dispute of PT A Indonesia in Fiscal Year 2008)
"Sengketa terjadi atas koreksi biaya royalti penggunaan trademark antara Direktorat Jenderal Pajak dan PT A Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kesesuaian koreksi biaya royalti dengan Arm’s Length Principle  (ALP) dan kesesuaian dasar pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Pajak dengan peraturan perundang-undangan perpajakan. Konsep yang digunakan adalah ALP atas transfer harta tidak berwujud menurut ketentuan perpajakan domestik dan OECD Transfer Pricing Guideline. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa koreksi yang dilakukan oleh DJP tidak sesuai dengan ALP dan dasar pertimbangan Majelis Hakim telah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan perpajakan. Saran dari penulis agar ketentuan TP di Indonesia lebih diperjelas guna mencegah terjadinya sengketa.
The dispute arise upon the correction to royalty expense for the use of trademark between PT A Indonesia and Directorate General of Taxes (DGT). This research aims to analyze comfirmity between the correction to royalty expense and the ALP. Also it is to analyze the consideration basis of the Judges at the Indonesia Tax Court in settling  the appeal dispute according to the prevailing tax regulation. The consept use in this research is the ALP of intangible asset transfer according to the domestic tax regulation and OECD Transfer Pricing Guideline. This research use the quantitative method approach. The result shows that the correction to royalty expense conducted by DGT is not complied with ALP and the consideration basis of the Judges’s decision in appeal dispute is in accordance with the prevaling tax regulation. This research suggested it is important to make clearer transfer pricing regulation in Indonesia to avoid any unnecessary disputes."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2016
S-pdf
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>