Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKRangkaian konflik komunal yang terjadi pada tahun 1998 hingga 2001kemudian berlanjut menjadi aksi teror menimbulkan pertanyaan besar sejumlahkalangan Salah satunya adalah mempertanyakan apakah intelijen kepolisiangagal berperan sebagai alat negara dalam mendeteksi mengantisipasi danmemberikan infomasi penting terkait kerusuhan yang terjadi di wilayah Poso Akhirnya dalam kurun waktu lebih dari dua tahun 2005 2007 sebagian besarpelaku teror yang beroperasi di pulau Sulawesi pada umumnya dan di kota Posopada khususnya berhasil dibongkar dan diungkap intelijen Polri Pengungkapanini memunculkan pertanyaan bagaimana intelijen kepolisian berhasilmengungkap jaringan tersebut Penelitian ini mengunakan pendekatan kualitatif Metode in depthinterview digunakan untuk pengumpulan data penelitian Informan sebagai narasumber penelitian ini merupakan anggota kepolisian yang pernah bertugas dalamoperasi kepolisian di Poso selama konflik dan teror Poso tahun 1998 2007 Informan lainya adalah pelaku teror serta tokoh masyarakat Poso Untukmenjawab pertanyaaan penelitian digunakan teknik analisa timeline fishbone danwildcard analysis Untuk menganalisa kegagalan inteljen tersebut penulis mengunakananalisa kegagalan intelijen dengan pendekatan teori Thomas Copeland Sedangkanuntuk analisa keberhasilan intelijen digunakan antithesis dari teori kegagalanThomas Copeland Dalam penelitian ini penulis akhirnya menemukan sejumlahvariabel kegagalan maupun keberhasilan intelijen Polri sesuai dengan penjelasanThomas Copeland pada sisi Kebijakan dan Kepemimpinan Organisasi AnalisisIntelijen dan Persepsi Informasi Ancaman

---

ABSTRACTThe series of communal conflict that occurred in 1998 and 2001 andcontinued into terror raise a big question One is the question whether the policefailed to act as an intelligence tool in detecting state anticipating and providingimportant information related to the riots in Poso Finally in a period of more thantwo years 2005 2007 most of the terrorists who operated on Sulawesi in generaland in the town of Poso in particular had been uncovered and revealed by Policeintelligence This disclosure raises the question of how police intelligenceuncovered the network This research uses a qualitative approach In depth interview method isused for research data collection Informants as a resource of this research are amember of the police who had served in the police operation in Poso during theconflict and terror Poso in 1998 2007 Other informants are terrorists andcommunity leaders in Poso To answer the research questions this research usestimeline fishbone and wildcard analysis techniques To analyze the intelligence failure the author uses the theory of ThomasCopeland about intelligence failure Antithesis of the theory of Thomas Copelandis used to analyze the intelligence success In this research the authors finallydiscover number of variables intelligence failures and successes in accordancewith the explanation Thomas Copeland on the Policy and Leadership Organization Intelligence Analysis and Perception of Threat Information ;The series of communal conflict that occurred in 1998 and 2001 andcontinued into terror raise a big question One is the question whether the policefailed to act as an intelligence tool in detecting state anticipating and providingimportant information related to the riots in Poso Finally in a period of more thantwo years 2005 2007 most of the terrorists who operated on Sulawesi in generaland in the town of Poso in particular had been uncovered and revealed by Policeintelligence This disclosure raises the question of how police intelligenceuncovered the network This research uses a qualitative approach In depth interview method isused for research data collection Informants as a resource of this research are amember of the police who had served in the police operation in Poso during theconflict and terror Poso in 1998 2007 Other informants are terrorists andcommunity leaders in Poso To answer the research questions this research usestimeline fishbone and wildcard analysis techniques To analyze the intelligence failure the author uses the theory of ThomasCopeland about intelligence failure Antithesis of the theory of Thomas Copelandis used to analyze the intelligence success In this research the authors finallydiscover number of variables intelligence failures and successes in accordancewith the explanation Thomas Copeland on the Policy and Leadership Organization Intelligence Analysis and Perception of Threat Information ;The series of communal conflict that occurred in 1998 and 2001 andcontinued into terror raise a big question One is the question whether the policefailed to act as an intelligence tool in detecting state anticipating and providingimportant information related to the riots in Poso Finally in a period of more thantwo years 2005 2007 most of the terrorists who operated on Sulawesi in generaland in the town of Poso in particular had been uncovered and revealed by Policeintelligence This disclosure raises the question of how police intelligenceuncovered the network This research uses a qualitative approach In depth interview method isused for research data collection Informants as a resource of this research are amember of the police who had served in the police operation in Poso during theconflict and terror Poso in 1998 2007 Other informants are terrorists andcommunity leaders in Poso To answer the research questions this research usestimeline fishbone and wildcard analysis techniques To analyze the intelligence failure the author uses the theory of ThomasCopeland about intelligence failure Antithesis of the theory of Thomas Copelandis used to analyze the intelligence success In this research the authors finallydiscover number of variables intelligence failures and successes in accordancewith the explanation Thomas Copeland on the Policy and Leadership Organization Intelligence Analysis and Perception of Threat Information , The series of communal conflict that occurred in 1998 and 2001 andcontinued into terror raise a big question One is the question whether the policefailed to act as an intelligence tool in detecting state anticipating and providingimportant information related to the riots in Poso Finally in a period of more thantwo years 2005 2007 most of the terrorists who operated on Sulawesi in generaland in the town of Poso in particular had been uncovered and revealed by Policeintelligence This disclosure raises the question of how police intelligenceuncovered the network This research uses a qualitative approach In depth interview method isused for research data collection Informants as a resource of this research are amember of the police who had served in the police operation in Poso during theconflict and terror Poso in 1998 2007 Other informants are terrorists andcommunity leaders in Poso To answer the research questions this research usestimeline fishbone and wildcard analysis techniques To analyze the intelligence failure the author uses the theory of ThomasCopeland about intelligence failure Antithesis of the theory of Thomas Copelandis used to analyze the intelligence success In this research the authors finallydiscover number of variables intelligence failures and successes in accordancewith the explanation Thomas Copeland on the Policy and Leadership Organization Intelligence Analysis and Perception of Threat Information ]"

"Perkembangan lingkungan strategis dan geopolitik global saat ini menjadi perhatian serius bagi Pemerintah Indonesia. Konflik bersenjata serta ketegangan politik antar negara-negara menjadi potensi ancaman yang tidak dapat diprediksi. Keberadaan diaspora Indonesia menjadi fokus Pemerintah Indonesia dalam rangka melindungi keselamatan Warga Negara Indonesia yang ada di luar negeri dari potensi ancaman konflik global. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis fungsi intelijen dan kendala yang dihadapi dalam kegiatan pengamanan intelijen dalam operasi evakuasi WNI di Ukraina dalam konflik Rusia-Ukraina. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data wawancara terhadap beberapa pihak-pihak yang berkompeten di bidang perlindungan Warga Negara Indonesia di luar negeri. Hasil penelitian ini adalah Pemerintah Indonesia melakukan serangkaian kegiatan pengamanan intelijen dalam rangka melindungi Warga Negara Indonesia yang berada di wilayah konflik. Pemerintah Indonesia berhasil meminimalisisr potensi ancaman bagi WNI di wilayah konflik dengan mengeluarkan Nota Diplomatik dan pengerahan Satuan Tugas Khusus dari berbagai elemen pemerintahan. Kendati demikian, Pemerintah Indonesia belum memiliki regulasi yang secara komprehensif mengatur koordinasi operasi evakuasi WNI di luar negeri.

Kata kunci: Ancaman, Pengamanan, Intelijen, Warga Negara

---

The dynamics of the global strategic and geopolitical environment are currently a serious concern for the Indonesian government. Armed conflicts and political tensions between countries are potential threats that cannot be predicted. The Indonesian diaspora's existence is the Indonesian government's focus to protect the safety of Indonesian citizens abroad from any potential threats of global conflict. This study aims to analyse the function of intelligence and the obstacles encountered in intelligence security activities within evacuation operations for Indonesian citizens in Ukraine during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. This study uses a qualitative research method with interview data collection techniques with several parties who are involved in the field of protection for Indonesian citizens abroad. The results of this study are that the Indonesian government carries out numerous intelligence security activities to protect Indonesian citizens in conflict areas. The Indonesian government succeeded in reducing potential threats to Indonesian citizens in conflict areas by issuing Diplomatic Notes and deploying Special Task Forces from various government elements. Nevertheless, the Indonesian government has not had a comprehensive regulation, leading to coordinating evacuation operations for citizens abroad."

"Fenomena desistensi dari terorisme tidak hanya sebatas menjelaskan bagaimana mantan pelaku teror dapat berhenti menjadi teroris atau kembali terlibat dalam kelompok teroris.  Di sisi lain, penelitian tentang Desistensi dari terorisme harus menjawab berbagai macam faktor dan pengaruh lain yang mendukung seseorang mengalami Desistensi dari terorisme. Peneliti memulai penelitian ini dengan tinjauan existing literatur tentang Desistensi dari terorisme, dengan mempertimbangkan tantangan konseptual dan meninjau teori utama kerangka kerja dan temuan empiris dari Desistensi dari terorisme khususnya di Indonesia. Didasarkan pada hal ini terdapat kemungkinan pembentukan tipologi Desistensi dari terorisme berserta peramalannya dapat memberikan pandangan yang berbeda terkait penanganan dan pencegahan tindak pidana terorisme. Peramalan tersebut akan mencakup berkembangnya kondisi idling mode yang cenderung dialami oleh mantan pelaku teror. Setelah idling mode, ditemukan catalyst event yang mendorong mantan pelaku teror kembali melakukan aksinya. Kondisi ini juga tidak terlepas dari pengaruh globalisasi yang telah mengakibatkan badai informasi, di mana mantan pelaku teror terlibat dan memiliki peran dalam organisasi terorisme. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif, Peneliti melakukan wawancara mendalam terhadap 35 Mantan Teroris, serta melakukan Focus Group Disscussion (FGD) bersama 13 Pakar intervensi pelaku teror. Dari hasil penelitian ini, tergambarkan bagaimana wujud dari tipologi Desistensi dari terorisme. Berdasarkan tipologi tersebut, dapat dilihat faktor yang mendukung dan menghambat terjadinya Desistensi dari terorisme, seperti catalyst event dan idling mode. Di bagian akhir, penelitian ini membahas tentang bentuk intervensi yang dapat dilakukan kepada Mantan pelaku teror, yaitu pendekatan heaven, home, dan habit.

---

The phenomenon of Desistance from Terrorism is not only limited to explaining how former terrorists can stop being terrorists or get involved in terrorist groups again. On the other hand, research on Desistance from Terrorism must address various other factors and influences that support a person experiencing Desistance from Terrorism. The researcher started this research by reviewing the existing literature on Desistance from Terrorism, taking into account the conceptual challenges and reviewing the main theoretical framework and empirical findings of Desistance from Terrorism, especially in Indonesia. Based on this, there is a possibility that the establishment of a typology of Desistance from Terrorism along with its forecasting can provide different views regarding the handling and prevention of terrorism crimes. The forecasting will include the evolving conditions of idling mode that former perpetrators of terror tend to experience. After idling mode, a catalyst event was found that pushed former terror perpetrators back into action. This condition is also inseparable from the influence of globalization which has resulted in a storm of information, in which former terror perpetrators are involved and have a role in terrorism organizations.  Using qualitative methods, the researcher conducted in-depth interviews with 35 former terrorists, as well as conducted a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with 13 terrorism intervention experts. From the results of this study, it is described how the form of the tipology of Desistance from Terrorism is described. Based on this tipology, it can be seen the factors that support and inhibit the occurrence of Desistance from Terrorism, such as catalyst events and idling modes. In the end, this study discusses the forms of intervention that can be done to ex-terrorists, namely heaven, home, and habit approaches."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang pilihan rasional teroris radikal Islam dalam memilih modus serangan studi kasus terorisme di Indonesia dari tahun 2000 hingga 2010. Identifikasi menunjukan terdapat tiga modus serangan teroris yang dilakukan oleh kelompok teroris tersebut. Penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa dalam memilih modus serangan yang akan digunakan, teroris selalu memperhitungkan dan mempertimbangkan pilihan rasional berbagai faktor baik personal (motif dan kemampuan pelaku) maupun situasional (situasi dan kondisi target serta ketersediaan akses pendukung operasi) sehingga dapat mencapai tujuan yang diinginkan.

---

This paper discussed the rational choice of radical Islamic terrorists in selecting the mode of attack, based on case studies of terrorism in Indonesia during 2000 to 2010. Identification showed that there are three modes of terrorist attacks carried out by terrorist groups. This study explains that in choosing a mode of attack that will be used, terrorists always take into account and consider the rational choice of a variety of factors both personal (the perpetrator's motives and abilities) or situational circumstances (situations and conditions of the target and the availability of access to operations support) so as to achieve the desired goal."

"Metode pendanaan terorisme di Indonesia terus berkembang semakin kompleks dan variatif. Dari yang awalnya menggunakan metode-metode konservatif seperti kurir tunai, badan amal, dan perampokan bank, kini mereka mulai memanfaatkan kemajuan teknologi keuangan, seperti peretasan terhadap Fintech ilegal. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisis pertimbangan teroris dalam memanfaatkan fintech sebagai sumber pendanaan mereka serta penanggulangannya. Analisis dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan teori yang digagas oleh Michael Freeman tentang pertimbangan teroris dalam pemilihan metode pendanaan mereka. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kasus, yaitu peretasan speedline.com oleh Rizki Gunawan pada tahun 2011 untuk pendanaan terorisme. Data penelitian didapatkan melalui wawancara pelaku peretasan tersebut, ahli dari PPATK, OJK, penyidik Densus 88, laporan, serta jurnal yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa aspek yang menjadi prioritas utama dalam pendanaan terorisme adalah aspek keamanan pelaku, kuantitas dana yang didapat, dan tingkat kemudahan dalam mengumpulkan dana.

---

Terrorism financing method in Indonesia is developing in an alarming rate, to the point it is now becoming more complex than before. Terrorists traditionally use conventional methods like robberies, charities and courier service to fund their activities, today terrorists are able to utilize modern methods in financing their activities due to the rapid development in financial technology nowadays, one example is by hacking an illegal Fintech Company. Therefore, this research is conducted in order to explain and analyze the consideration behind the usage of illegal fintech company to finance terrorism activities and how to prevent it. The analysis on this research is done by using the theory that is coined by Michael Freeman about the reasoning of terrorists when choosing their financing method. The method used in this research is case study, and the case that is used for this research is the terrorism financing hacking of speedline.com in 2011 by Rizki Gunawan. Research data are acquired from interviews with the perpetrators, experts from INTRAC (PPATK), Special Detachment 88, reports, and journals that are relevant with the research. As a result, this study found that the priority aspects in terms of terrorist financing are security, quantity, and the simplicity while obtaining funds."

"Peristiwa 11 September 2001 adalah momentum yang sangat tepat bagi Amerika Serikat untuk memulai perang terhadap teroris internasional secara terbuka. Sejak saat itu, negara penguasa tunggal dunia ini mulai membuat kebijakan-kebijakan strategis di dalam negerinya untuk mempersempit dan memberangus gerak para teroris. Dengan segala sumberdaya yang dimiliki dan menggunakan segala instrumen yang bisa dipakai, AS berusaha untuk menghentikan segala aksi teror yang masih mungkin terjadi. Bersamaan dengan itu, lewat kampanye War on Terrorisme global, AS menggalang kerjasama dalam berbagai bentuk dengan semua negara di dunia. Lewat pedekatan slick and carrot dan penawaran dua pilihan, "bersama Amerika atau bersama teroris," membuat kampanye AS ini sukses besar, dalam arti mendapat dukungan mayoritas dari negara-negara di dunia. Dengan menggunakan instrumen-instrumen politik internasional, seperti penetrasi dan intervensi melalui sarana media massa dan militer membuat siapa saja yang dianggap AS sebagai teroris akan sangat mudah "ditaklukkan."Didakwanya Al-Qaedah, kelompok Islam garis keras sebagai pelaku aksi teror terhadap AS kembali membangkitkan wacana permusuhan Islam dan Barat, semacam perang antar peradaban yang diramalkan Samuel Huntington di awal tahun 90-an. Bersamaan dengan itu tuduhan dan kritikan terhadap Islam sebagai ideologi yang mendukung aksi kekerasan semakin menguat, terutama di negara-negara Barat yang tidak mengenal Islam secara proporsional, sehingga sampai ada yang berpikiran ideologi ini harus dihancurkan. Bahkan dibeberapa tempat, pasca terjadinya serangan 11 September 2001 warga muslim diperlakukan secara kasar bahkan ada yang menggunakan kekerasan fisik, khususnya di negara yang warga muslimnya minoritas.Pilihan-pilihan strategi yang digunakan Amerika terlihat sangat dipengaruhi oleh orang-orang di sekeliling Presiden Bush yang cenderung beraliran konfrontasionalis, yang melihat setiap persoalan dengan kacamata permusuhan dan cenderung memilih cara kekerasan dalam menyelesaikan setiap persoalan.Kebijakan Amerika memerangi teroris telah menimbulkan implikasi negatif bagi komunitas muslim di berbagai belahan dunia, termasuk bagi komunitas Islam Politik di Indonesia. Secara psikologis, instrumen penetrasi dan intervensi yang dijalankan Amerika telah menimbulkan ketakutan dan kengerian yang mendalam di kalangan komunitas Islam Politik dalam menghadapi aksi-aksi counter terrorism. Tindakan-tindakan represif yang diambil aparat keamanan di dalam negeri dalam upaya mencari dan menangkap para pelaku aksi teror yang tidak jarang menimbulkan persoalan baru dalam masyarakat, khususnya masalah keamanan. Pada sisi lain, upaya memerangi teroris juga semakin memperkuat resistensi komunitas Islam Politik terhadap kebijakan-kebijakan yang dijalankan Amerika baik di dalam maupun di luar negeri. Apalagi ketika langkah-langkah yang diambil terkesan sangat sejalan dengan apa yang diinginkan Amerika.

---

The 9/11-terror attack was a momentum for the United States to begin its war towards international terrorists openly. It was since this attack that the world super power began to re-formulate its domestic strategic policies in order to limit and diminish the movement of the terrorists. With all resources and instruments that it has, the United States attempted to avoid all possible terror attacks, which may happen in the future. Along with it, through its war on terror campaign, the U.S. organizes multilateral cooperation in any form with all countries around the world. Through its stick and carrot approach, it offers others with two choices that is either "to be with the U.S or with the terrorists". This approach has been successful in terms that it gains support from various countries. It uses international political instruments, such as penetrating and intervening others through media and military so that the U.S. can easily overcome those who are considered by the U.S as terrorists.

The charge over Al-Qaedah, a group of radical Muslims as the actor behind the deadly terrorist attack has awakened the old hatred between Islam and the West, as a clash of civilization, which was first emerged as a thesis formulated by Samuel Huntington in the early 1990s. The accusation and attack towards Islam as an ideology that supports violence acts is strengthening, especially in Western Countries, which do not really understand Islam. Therefore, it is unquestionable that many of them think that Islam has to be destroyed. In fact, in various places after the 9/11 attacks, many Muslims have been badly treated, especially for those who live as a minority groups.

All of these strategic policies have been very much influenced by those officials close to President George W. Bush who tends to be confrontative, meaning that he always try to see all problems in enmity and tend to use violence actions in solving every problems.

The U.S. policies to fight the terrorists have created negative impact to the Muslim community in various countries around the world, including those in Indonesia. Psychologically, the penetration and intervention policies that are adopted by the U.S. have created fear among the political Islam communities. Repressive actions that are taken by the state apparatus in many cases have formed new problems in the community, such as the security issues. On the other hand, the attempts to fight terrorists have also strengthened the Muslims' community resistance towards U.S. foreign or domestic policies. Worse still, those policies are taken in order to secure the U.S. interests."

"ABSTRAKDesistensi teroris telah menjadi gagasan yang dikaji oleh para praktisi dan peneliti dalam waktu yang cukup lama, namun masih menjadi salah satu studi yang kurang dikembangkan dalam ranah Kriminologi. Secara kualitatif, penelitian ini menjelaskan proses desistensi pada tiga mantan teroris anggota ISIS dan Jemaah Islamiyah serta alasan-alasan yang mendasari keputusan mereka. Data primer didapatkan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan tiga narasumber dan dianalisis menggunakan teori differential association Sutherland dan Cressey, cognitive transformation Giordano dkk dan theory of self-help dari Donald Black. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa (1) ada kesenjangan antara realita yang dipersepsikan oleh teroris dengan realita yang sesungguhnya, (2) aksi teror merupakan perwujudan dari grievance, dan (3) desistensi tercapai ketika individu mengalami pergeseran kognitif yang menghapus kesenjangan dan grievance yang tadinya dimiliki."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini bertujuan menjelaskan kondisi asimetri informasi beserta implikasinya dalam information sharing intelijen pada kasus Teror Sarinah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan melakukan wawancara mendalam terhadap narasumber praktisi dan akademisi, serta studi dokumen yang berkaitan dengan Teror Sarinah. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan dua hal dari pertanyaan penelitian. Berdasarkan pertanyaan pertama, kondisi asimetri informasi intelijen terbukti telah terjadi dalam information sharing kontra terorisme pada kasus Teror Sarinah yang didasarkan atas terpenuhinya tiga unsur yaitu adanya ketimpangan penguasaan informasi, pertukaran informasi yang tidak optimal, dan kesepakatan pendapat dari para instansi terkait, bahwa informasi intelijen yang berasal dari information sharing tidak efektif. Kemudian berdasarkan pertanyaan kedua, asimetri informasi intelijen dalam information sharing kontra terorisme pada kasus Teror Sarinah, terbukti memiliki implikasi negatif yang berakhir pada kegagalan antisipasi Teror Sarinah. Implikasi tersebut digambarkan dalam tiga kondisi. Pertama, asimetri informasi berimplikasi pada munculnya keraguan atau menurunnya tingkat kepercayaan diantara sesama instansi penyelenggara kontra terorisme, kedua kecenderungan instansi untuk bekerja secara sendiri-sendiri/individualistik dalam mengatasi aksi teror, dan yang terakhir lemahnya koordinasi diantara penyelenggara intelijen. Temuan menarik dan Saran dijelaskan pada bagian akhir tesis ini.

---

ABSTRACTThis research explains the asymmetry conditions in intelligence sharing information and their negative implications in Sarinah Bombing Case. In terms of collecting data through qualitative method, this research uses the result of interview process with practitioners and academics, and study literature related to Sarinah Bombing Case. The results of this study conclude two things from the research question. First, the asymmetry condition of intelligence information proved to have occurred in the information sharing of counter terrorism in Sarinah terror case. It came from the fulfillment of three indicators, such as the unequal information gap, the non optimal condition of information exchange, and the opinion's agreement from relevant institutions. It shows that the intelligence information derived from ineffective information sharing. Second, intelligence information asymmetry in information sharing on counterterrorism in the Sarinah terror case created negative implications that ended in the failure anticipation of Sarinah Bombing. The implications are illustrated in three conditions, which are 1 the information asymmetry has implications for the emergence of trust levels among counter terrorism organizing agencies 2 there are tendencies from agencies to work individually in overcoming acts of terror 3 there is a lack coordination among intelligence operators. Interesting Findings and Suggestions are explained at the end of this research."

"Penelitian ini berusaha melihat implementasi operasi intelijen secara kolaborasi dalam rangka pemberantasan terorisme di Poso. Adapun dalam operasi intelijen terdapat dua bentuk operasi yaitu operasi intelijen secara fusi dan operasi intelijen secara kompartemen. Kedua operasi ini secara normatifnya diharapkan dapat terciptanya sebuah kolaborasi yang baik, dari mulai aktivitas hingga pada produk intelijen. Adapaun lokasi penelitian adalah wilayah Poso Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah, karena mengingat banyaknya satuan penanganan yang terlibat dalam permasalahan keamanan di Poso. Pertanyaan penelitian berfokus kepada benarkah imlementasi operasi intelijen secra kolaborasi dalam pemberantasan terorisme di Poso efektif?. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Penelitian ini akan menggunakan teori kolaborasi untuk mengetahui sejauh mana kolaborasi berjalan serta hambatannya. Peneliti akan membandaingkan kenyataan implementasi di lapangan dan mencoba melihat apakah kolaborasi berjalan secara efektif atau tidak ?. Karena banyaknya satuan penanganan yang terlibat, seolah terjadinya rivalitas dalam pelaksanaan tugas operasi. Untuk memperdalam analisa, akan digunakan analisa SWOT dan Wild Card Analysis untuk melihat efektifitas kolaborasi operasi intelijen antara Kompartemen dan Fusi.

---

This study tried to look at the implementation of collaborative intelligence

operations in order to eradicate terrorism in Poso. As for the intelligence operation, there are two forms of surgery which is a fusion of intelligence operations and intelligence operations in the compartment. The second operation is expected to create a normative good collaboration, from the star activity to the intelligence product. As for the location of the research is the area of Poso in Central Sulawesi Province. Because given the many units involved in handling security issues in Poso.

Research questions focus on true implementation of collaborative intelligence operations in the Poso effective counter-terrorism?. This research is qualitative research. This study will use the theory of collaboration to determine the extend of collaboration and resistance running. This study will compare the reality of implementation on the ground and tried it see if the collaboration works effectively or not?, because of the handling unit as the rivalry involved in the implementation of the operation tasks. Analysis will be used to deepen the analysis SWOT and Wild Card to see the effectiveness of collaborative intelligence operations between compartments and fusion."