Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 2060 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Rizqan Naelufar
"[ABSTRAK
Tesis ini merupakan kajian yang hendak melihat konsep lembaga yang
berwenang dalam sebuah proses peradilan. Relevansi antar lembaga sebagaimana
dimaksud yaitu Komisi Informasi dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara adalah
berwenang dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa keterbukaan informasi publik.
tujuan daripada keterbukaan informasi publik adalah dalam rangka mengawal
kebebasan informasi sebagai falsafah Hak Asasi Manusia dalam generasi ketiga.
Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori Hukum, teori Politik Hukum Nasional,
Teori Pembagian Kekuasaan dan Kekuasaan Keempat, kerangka konsep yang
digunakan yaitu peradilan administrasi dalam perspektif politik hukum dan
Kebebasan atas informasi sebagai HAM.
Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan bahwa komisi informasi ditempatkan
layaknya peradilan tingkat pertama karena hasil dari putusan dapat dimintakan
banding kepada PTUN, dalam proses di PTUN menggunakan hukum acara
tersendiri yang menempatkan PTUN sebagai peradilan Banding. atas hasil
penelitian maka terdapat suatu paradigma baru dalam sistem peradilan di
Indonesia. Gagasan yang diambil dari penelitian adalah dengan
mengkonsolidasikan sistem penyelesaian sengketa informasi publik dalam
peradilan khusus dibawah PTUN, Konsep demikian digunakan agar dapat
mengawal dan memperkuat sistem hukum dan peradilan di Indonesia.

ABSTRACT
This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.;This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.;This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia., This thesis is a study that about to the concept of authorized institutions
the process of judicial. Relevance between institutions referred to the Commission
of Information and Administrative Court is competent in the process of dispute
public resolution disclosure. Objectives rather than public disclosure is in order to
guard the freedom of information as the philosophy of human rights in third
generation. in this research, using the theory of Law, Nationalism Legal policy,
Separation of Power Theory and Powers Fourth (De Vierde Macht), the
conceptual framework used is the administrative court in the political perspective
and freedom of information as a human rights.
Results of the research showed that the commission of information like
first instance courts as a result of the decision can be appealed to the
Administrative Court. process in the Administrative Court uses its own procedural
law which puts the Administrative Court of Appeals. on the results of the
research, there is a new paradigm in the justice system in Indonesia. The idea
from research by consolidating system public information of dispute resolution in
a special court under the Administrative Court. Thus, the concept is used in order
to initiate and strengthen the legal and judicial system in Indonesia.]"
2015
T43067
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Habli Robbi Taqiyya
"ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini membahas mengenai bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam menilai
hal-hal dan/atau keadaan-keadaan yang memberatkan dan meringankan pidana,
terkait penentuan berat ringannya pidana. Undang-undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2008
tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman mewajibkan hakim untuk mempertimbangkan
sifat baik dan sifat jahat dari terdakwa dalam mempertimbangkan berat ringannya
pidana. Namun hingga saat ini belum ada pengaturan yang jelas mengenai
pedoman pemidanaan bagi hakim terkait hal-hal dan/atau keadaan-keadaan yang
wajib dipertimbangkan dalam penentuan berat ringannya pidana tersebut.
Pedoman pemidanaan ini sangat penting untuk mengurangi subjektifitas hakim
dalam menilai hal-hal dan/atau keadaan yang meringankan dan memberatkan
pidana, sehingga dapat mengurangi disparitas pemidanaan. Dalam skripsi juga
dianalisa putusan hakim dalam perkara Adiguna Sutowo, terkait pertimbangan
hakim dalam putusan ini terhadap adanya perdamaian diluar sidang pengadilan
sebagai alasan yang meringankan pidana.

ABSTRACT
The Focus of this study is concerning the consideration of Judge in assessing
elaboration and/or any circumstance which could be a mitigation and an
incrimination of punishment, that related to the decision of punishment. Act
Number 4 year 2008 concerning Indonesia Judicial Power stipulates the duties of
judge to consider the behaviour of the accused to decide the final punishment.
However, up until this moment, there is no lucid regulation concerning the
guideline of punishment for judge in connection with such elaboration and/or any
circumstance that should be taken into account in deciding the punishment. The
guideline of punishment is utterly necessary to redeem the subjectivity of judge in
assessing such elaboration and/or circumstance which could be a mitigation and
an incrimination of punishment, and in the end it will defect the punishment
disparity. This study also analyzes the judge verdict in case of Adiguna Sutowo,
in which related to judge consideration about any non-litigation settlement as a
mitigation of punishment."
2009
S22585
UI - Skripsi Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
cover
Johanna Fungsiwinata
"Skripsi ini membahas tentang pengaturan dan penerapan mengenai Ganti rugi dan Rehabilitasi sebagai hak terpidana atas terjadinya Error in Persona. Tindakan Error in persona merupakan tindakan yang terjadi akibat inkonsistenitas pelaksanaan dalam Integrated Criminal Justice System. Ganti rugi dan Rehabilitasi merupakan satu bentuk perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia yang dimiliki oleh terpidana dalam hal terjadinya Error in Persona. Akan tetapi, pengaturan Ganti rugi dan Rehabilitasi bagi terpidana belum diatur secara terperinci, sehingga pada akhirnya pemberian Ganti rugi dan Rehabilitasi dilakukan berdasarkan ketentuan dalam UU No. 8 tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, PP No. 27 tahun 1983 tentang Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana, serta Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia No: 983/KMK.01/1983 tentang tata cara pembayaran Ganti kerugian. Kewenangan pemberian Ganti Rugi dan rehabilitasi dimiliki oleh Negara. Pembayaran Ganti Kerugian oleh negara ditentukan secara limitatif, yakni minimal sebesar Rp. 5.000.- dan maksimal sebesar Rp. 1.000.000,- sedangkan apabila yang bersangkutan sakit atau cacat atau mati, maka besarnya ganti kerugian maksimal Rp 3.000.000,-. Besarnya ganti rugi sudah tidak lagi sesuai dengan perkembangan zaman, akan tetapi tidak dimungkinkan pemberian jumlah ganti rugi yang melebihi dari apa yang terdapat dalam ketentuan yang ada karena belum ada dasar hukum yang mengatur hal tersebut. Penulisan skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan data sekunder sebagai sumber datanya.

This research explains about the regulation and implementation of Compensation And Rehabilitation as Right of the Condemned in Error In Persona. Error in persona is something that caused by inconcistency in the realization of Integrated Criminal Justice System. Compensation And Rehabilitation is a kind of the protection for the Human Rights in the condemned for Error in Persona action. But, the regulation about Compensation And Rehabilitation for the condemned hasn't arranged in detail, so in the end the Compensation And Rehabilitation is given according to the certainty in The Law Number 8 Year 1981, writs about Criminal Procedure Law, The Government Regulation Number 27 Year 1983, writs about The Implementation of Criminal Law Procedure, and The Monetary Ministry Regulation Number: 983/KMK.01/1983, writs about the Procedure in Giving Compensation. The authority in Giving Compensation And Rehabilitation is owned by the State. The Compensation Payment is arranged limitatively, for the minimum is Rp. 5.000,- and the maximum is Rp. 1.000.000,- while if the condemned got sick, deformity, or dead, the amount for the compensation is Rp. 3.000.000,- for maximum. The amount of the compensation is out of date, but there is no possibility giving the amount of compensation bigger than the amount in the Regulation because there is no law foundation which arrange that problems. The writing of this research uses a library research method using secondary data sources."
Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2009
S22575
UI - Skripsi Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Hana Maria Fransisca
"Salah satu asas dalam Hukum Acara Perdata adalah asas hakim pasif. Asas ini mengatur bahwa hakim dilarang untuk memperluas ruang lingkup pokok perkara dan memberikan putusan terhadap apa yang tidak diminta oleh penggugat. Dalam praktek peradilan perdata di Indonesia, penerapan asas ini telah mengalami pergeseran berdasarkan beberapa putusan Mahkamah Agung. Skripsi ini akan membahas mengenai ketentuan asas hakim pasif dalam Hukum Acara Perdata, ruang lingkup asas hakim pasif serta penerapannya didalam beberapa putusan Mahkamah Agung.. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif.

One of the principles in Civil Procedural Law is the principle of passive judge. This principle provides that a judge may not extend the scope of the case and give a judgment for something that is not claimed by the claimant. In the civil court practices in Indonesia, the application of this principle has shifted based on a number of judgments of the Supreme Court. This mini-thesis will elaborate the provisions concerning the principle of passive judge in Civil Procedural Law, the scope of the principle of passive judge, and its application in a number of Supreme Court judgments. The research is conducted through literature study and by using the normative juridical approach."
Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2009
S22557
UI - Skripsi Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Indroharto
Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1991
342.06 IND u
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Stroink, F.A.M.
Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1996
BLD 342.06 STR a
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Borman, J.A.
Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1987
BLD 342.066 BOR p
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Yogyakarta: Genta, 2014
342.065 98 BUN
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Simanjuntak, Enrico
"ABSTRAK
Dalam dimensi sejarah, perluasan kewenangan Peradilan Administrasi dilakukan
oleh para hakim peradilan administrasi, sebagai bagian dari proses penemuan
hukum (judicial activism) untuk mengisi keterbatasan-keterbatasan UU. No.
5/1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (atau UU. No. 51/2009 dalam
perubahan terakhirnya). Namun, perluasan kewenangan absolut peradilan
administrasi melalui praktek peradilan berjalan diametral dengan politik hukum
kebijakan legislasi. Dalam penelitian ditemukan disharmoni kebijakan politik
hukum di bidang pengaturan eksistensi dan fungsi kompetensi absolut Peradilan
Administrasi, hal ini disebabkan karena tidak adanya grand design dari para
pembuat kebijakan, khususnya di bidang legislasi, untuk membangun suatu sistem
peradilan administrasi yang efektif, berwibawa dan kuat sesuai dengan cita negara
hukum Indonesia. Kelemahan aturan hukum seringkali disikapi bukan dengan
memperhatikan keselarasan sistem, namun menggunakan pendekatan-pendekatan
reaktif, yakni berorientasi membuat aturan dan lembaga baru, untuk menata
sistem hukum yang terganggu atau bermasalah. Dalam penelitian ini dibahas pula
beberapa rancangan undang-undang (RUU) yang secara langsung akan
mempengaruhi fungsi peradilan administrasi ke depan, disamping menganalisis
sinkronisasi kebijakan legislasi dan regulasi dari lima undang-undang mutakhir
yang memperluas/menegaskan kewenangan Peradilan Administrasi dalam sistem
hukum nasional yaitu : 1) UU. Keterbukaan Informasi Publik; 2) UU. Pelayanan
Publik; 3) UU. Pemilu Anggota DPR/D dan DPD; 4) UU. Pengelolaan
Lingkungan Hidup; 5) UU. Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Pada
akhirnya, Peneliti berkesimpulan bahwa politik hukum yang mengatur dan
mengelola sistem penyelesaian sengketa antara warga masyarakat atau badan
hukum dengan pemerintah dalam kebijakan legislasi maupun regulasi harus
disusun dalam suatu grand design perubahan yang mencerminkan hakikat
perlindungan hukum kepada masyarakat. Namun perlindungan hukum ini akan
lebih bermakna apabila kompentensi peradilan administrasi tidak dibatasi oleh
ketentuan sebagaimana dimaksud pasal 1 angka 9 UU PERATUN, maupun
pembatasan-pembatasan hukum lainnya, namun mencakup semua tindakan
hukum publik administrasi pemerintahan.

ABSTRACT
In historical dimension, the extension of the administrative courts jurisdiction is
exercised by administrative judge as part of the judicial activism to strengthen the
weakness of the Administrative Court Act no. 5/1986 (last revised on the Act no.
51/2009). Unfortunately, the extension of the administrative court jurisdiction has
been diametrically opposed with the legal policy of legislation. The analysis will
demonstrate disharmony of the effectiveness legislation of judicial administrative
court power, due to the lack of lawmakers grand design to build a effective and
strong judiciary system of administrative court based on the idea of Indonesian
rule of law. The defective of the laws and regulations tends to be faced in reactive
approach for building new regulation or institution. Realizing the lack of political
will of the lawmakers to build a effective and strong administrative court power,
the reseacher propose some ideas and arguments to optimalize the power of
administrative court by systematizing and re-thingking some actual legal issues
relating the future of administrative court jurisdiction (ius constituendum).
Relating to this topic, the researcher examine as well some of the draft bills whose
impact to the future of the administrative court function, besides analyzing current
policies which has been expanding the administrative court jurisdiction in national
law system namely : 1) Freedom Information Act; 2) Public Service Act; 3)
Legislative and Senate Election Act; 4) Enviromental Protection and Management
Act; 5) Land Acquistition For Public Purposes Act. Finally, the researcher has a
conclusion that legal policy which regulates and operates national legal system of
the conflict resolution between the government and the citizen must be composed
and designed based on a supporting grand design to promote and guarantee legal
protection for citizens. This protection would be more meaningful if the
jurisdiction of the administrative court are not limited only to the specific criteria
of the administrave court decision according to article 1 figure law 9 Law No.
51/2009, including another legal exemption, but also cover all the public legal
action of administrative authority."
Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014
T39285
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>