Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The book about John Michell (1724-93) has two parts. The first and longest part is biographical, an account of Michell?s home setting (Nottinghamshire in England), the clerical world in which he grew up (Church of England), the university (Cambridge) where he studied and taught, and the scientific activities he made the center of his life. The second part is a complete edition of his known letters. He has been called a geologist, an astronomer, and a physicist, which he was, though we best remember him as a natural philosopher, as one who investigated physical nature broadly. His scientific contribution is not easy to summarize. Arguably he had the broadest competence of any British natural philosopher of the eighteenth century, equally skilled in experiment and observation, mathematical theory, and instruments, his field of inquiry was the universe. From the structure of the heavens through the structure of the Earth to the forces of the elementary particles of matter, he carried out original and far-reaching researches on the workings of nature."

"The book covers the theory of Michell structures being the lightest and fully stressed systems of bars, designed within a given domain, possibly within the whole space, transmitting a given load towards a given support. Discovered already in 1904 by A.G.M. Michell, the structures named after him have attracted constant attention due to their peculiar feature of disclosing the optimal streams of stresses equilibrating a given load and thus determining the optimal layout of bars. The optimal layouts emerge from among all possible structural topologies, thus constituting unique designs being simultaneously light and stiff. The optimal structures turn out to be embedded in optimal vector fields covering the whole feasible domain. Key features include: a variationally consistent theory of bar systems, thin plates in bending and membrane shells; recapitulation of the theory of optimum design of trusses of minimum weight or of minimal compliance; the basis of 2D Michell theory for a single load case; kinematic and static approaches; 2D benchmark constructions including Hemp’s structures and optimal cantilevers; L-shape domain problems, three forces problem in 2D, bridge problems; revisiting the old - and delivering new - 3D benchmark solutions; extension to multiple load conditions; Prager-Rozvany grillages; the theory of funiculars and archgrids; the methods of optimum design of shape and material inspired by the theory of Michell structures, industrial applications.The book can be useful for graduate students, professional engineers and researchers specializing in the Optimum Design and in Topology Optimization in general."

""Litigating International Law Disputes provides a fresh understanding of why states resort to international adjudication or arbitration to resolve international law disputes. A group of leading scholars and practitioners discern the reasons for the use of international litigation and other modes of dispute settlement by examining various substantive areas of international law (such as human rights, trade, environment, maritime boundaries, territorial sovereignty and investment law) as well as considering case studies from particular countries and regions. The chapters also canvass the roles of international lawyers, NGOs, and private actors, as well as the political dynamics of disputes, and identify emergent trends in dispute settlement for different areas of international law"--"The intention behind this book has therefore been to provide a unique perspective on international adjudication and arbitration. Rather than just examining procedural requirements and the operation of different courts and tribunals, or exploring the legal principles as articulated by international courts and tribunals, this book seeks to link the very nature of different substantive areas of international law with the procedures that are typically preferred for resolving disputes on that particular subject area and discern why such a preference may exist. The question is examined both in terms of preferences and practice of particular states or regions, and in relation to different areas of substantive international law"--"

"The Ritz-Carlton experience -- Principle 1 : define and refine. Set the foundation : communicating core identity and culture ; Be relevant -- Principle 2 : empower through trust. Select--don’t hire ; It’s a matter of trust -- Principle 3 : it’s not about you. Build a business focused on others ; Support frontline empathy -- Principle 4 : deliver wow! Wow : the ultimate guest experience ; Turn wow into action -- Principle 5 : leave a lasting footprint. Aspire, achieve, teach ; Sustainability and stewardship -- Conclusion : a lasting impression."

"ABSTRAKValiditas dan reliabilitas semiquantitative FFQ dalam mengukur asupan kalsium masih banyak menjadi perdebatan karena tidak melakukan pengukuran kuantitatif secara langsung. Tujuan dari studi ini adalah untuk mengetahui validitas dan reliabilitas pengukuran asupan kalsium menggunakan semiqauntitative FFQ dengan golden standard food weighing. Penelitian ini menggunakan disain studi cross-sectional yang dilakukan pada bulan April sampai dengan Mei 2018 pada 54 Mahasiswa Gizi Universitas Indonesia yang dipilih dengan simple ramdom sampling. Validitas semiquantitative FFQ dalam mengukur kalsium dibandingkan dengan food weighing yang dilakukan selama dua hari, dan reliabilitas ditentukan dengan membandingkan asupan kalsium dua kali pengukuran menggunakan semiquantitative FFQ. Median asupan kalsium mahasiswa gizi Universits Indonesia berdasarkan semiquantitative FFQ median SD adalah 537 407,5 mg/hari. Sedangkan median asupan kalsium dari dua hari food weighing adalah 569 375,6 mg/hari. Tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara asupan kalsium dari kedua metode P>0,05. koefisien korelasi asupan kalsium kedua metode sebesar r=0,42 dengan korelasi yang signifikan P=0,001. Analisis surrogate category menunjukan bahwa semiquantitative FFQ dapat membedakan asupan kalsium pada berbagai tingkat kuartil asupan ANOVA, P80 mulai dari cutoff asupan 800mg/hari. Namun spesifisitas dan negative predictive value tetap

---

ABSTRACTValidity and reliability of semiquantitative FFQ still in debate because it is not directly measure the quantitative amount of food consume. This study was aim to evaluated the validity and reliability semiquantitative FFQ in measuring calcium intake compare with food weighing as golden standard. This study was cross sectional study conducted in April until Mei 2018 to 54 female Nutrition student of Universitas Indonesia mean aged 21 years old selected by simple random sampling. Reproducibility was tested by the difference between calcium intakes from the semiquantitative FFQ completed twice. While respondent reported 2 days food weighing to got the true usual calcium intake to compared with semiquantitative FFQ. Median calcium intake responden based on semiquantitatvie FFQ was Mean SD 537 407,5 mg day. While median calcium intake from 2 days food weighing was 569 375,6 mg day. There was no statictical different of calcium intake between two method. Coeficient correlation between two method was r 0,42 with significant correlation among them p 0,001. FFQ could discriminate calcium intake into some different level of intake ANOVA, P80 using cutoff calcium start from 800 mg day. But the specificity and negative predictive value could not reach that value in all the cutoff used 700,800,1000,1100 mg day. There was a significant diference between calcium intake between first and second administration of semiquantiative FFQ."