Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The commentary on the Vienna convention on the law of treaties provides an in-depth article-by-article analysis of all provisions of the Vienna convention. The texts are uniformly structured : (I) purpose and function of the article, (II) historical background and negotiating history, and (III) elements of the article. The Vienna convention on treaties between states and IOs and between IOs is taken into account where appropriate. In sum, the present commentary contains a comprehensive legal analysis of all aspects of the international law of treaties. Where the law of treaties reaches into other fields of international law, e.g. the law of state responsibility, the relevant interfaces are discussed and contextualized. "

"Summary: Présentation de l'éditeur : "The 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations has for over 50 years been central to diplomacy and applied to all forms of relations among sovereign States. Participation is almost universal. The rules giving special protection to ambassadors are the oldest established in international law and the Convention is respected almost everywhere. But understanding it as a living instrument requires knowledge of its background in customary international law, of the negotiating history which clarifies many of its terms and the subsequent practice of states and decisions of national courts which have resolved other ambiguities. Diplomatic Law provides this in-depth Commentary. The book is an essential guide to changing methods of modern diplomacy and shows how challenges to its regime of special protection for embassies and diplomats have been met and resolved. It is used by ministries of foreign affairs and cited by domestic courts world-wide. The book analyzes the reasons for the widespread observance of the Convention rules and why in the special case of communications - where there is flagrant violation of their special status - these reasons do not apply. It describes how abuse has been controlled and how the immunities in the Convention have survived onslaught by those claiming that they should give way to conflicting entitlements to access to justice and the desire to punish violators of human rights. It describes how the duty of diplomats not to interfere in the internal affairs of the host State is being narrowed in the face of the communal international responsibility to monitor and uphold human rights.""

"The Commentary on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides an in-depth article-by-article analysis of all provisions of the Vienna Convention. The texts are uniformly structured: (I) Purpose and Function of the Article, (II) Historical Background and Negotiating History, and (III) Elements of the Article. The Vienna Convention on Treaties between States and IOs and between IOs is taken into account where appropriate. In sum, the present Commentary contains a comprehensive legal analysis of all aspects of the international law of treaties. Where the law of treaties reaches into other fields of international law, e.g. the law of state responsibility, the relevant interfaces are discussed and contextualized. With its focus on international practice, the Commentary is addressed to academia, as well as to practitioners of international law."

"This book offers a comprehensive analysis of the law of treaties based on the interplay between the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and customary international law. Written by a team of renowned international lawyers, it offers new insight into the basic concepts and methodology of the law of treaties and its problems."

"ABSTRAKPerjanjian internasional dianggap sebagai sumber hukum internasional yangtertinggi. Namun, pada prakteknya banyak negara yang mencoba melarikan diridari kewajiban yang timbul dari perjanjian internasional yang telah disepakatidengan alasan salah satunya bertentangan dengan hukum nasionalnya (doktrinatau konstitusinya). Dalam Vienna Convention on The Law Treaties 1969("VCLT") sendiri terdapat dua pasal yang mengatur hubungan antara hukumnasional dengan perjanjian internasional yang telah disepakati. Dengan jelas padapasal 27 VCLT menyatakan bahwa hukum nasional tidak dapat dijadikan alasanpembenar sebuah negara tidak melakukan kewajiban yang timbul dari perjanjianinternasional. Dengan keberadaan pasal 27 VCLT tidak kemudian dapatmengabaikan pasal 46 VCLT. Ketentuan tersebut merupakan pengecualian daripasal 27 VCLT yang diartikan secara negatif bahwa sebuah negara dapatmengajukan hukum nasionalnya sebagai alasan pembenar batalnya keterikatanterhadap perjanjian internasional, jika melanggar hukum nasional suatu negaraterkait dengan kompetensi perwakilan pada saat menyatakan kesepakatannyaterhadap perjanjian internasional, pelanggarannya nyata, dan menyangkut halyang dasar dan penting. Prakteknya memang terdapat negara-negara yangmencoba untuk tidak melaksanakan kewajiban perjanjian internasional, contohkasus La Grand, namun ICJ sudah mencoba untuk tetap menegakkan ketentuandari pasal 27 VCLT, sedangkan pasal 46 VCLT jarang diajukan sebagai alasanpembenar. Skripsi ini berbentuk penelitian hukum yang menggunakan studiyuridis normatif.

---

ABSTRACTTreaty is regarded to be the highest source of international law. However, in

practice there are many countries which try to run away by the obligation that

establishes from treaty, which one of the reasons is inconsistency with the

national law (doctrine or constitution). Based on Vienna Convention on The Law

of Treaties 1969 ("VCLT"), there are two articles that regulate the relation

between national law and a ratified treaty. In accordance with article 27 VCLT, a

state may not invoke their national law as justification not to exercise their treaty

obligation. However, the existence of article 27 VCLT is without prejudice to

article 46 VCLT. That article is the exception of article 27 VCLT which can be

negatively stipulated that a state may invoke their national law as justification to

cancel their consent to a treaty, if it violates their national law regarding the

competency of a state representative, manifest, and fundamental of importance. In

practice, many countries indeed tried to run away from their treaty obligation, for

instance La Grand Case, however ICJ had tried to apply law in accordance with

article 27 VCLT, in contrast article 46 VCLT is seldom invoked by states. This

thesis is concluded as a legal research that uses normative legal method."

"The authors, each of whom is an experienced practitioner in the field of international arbitration, draw on experience in a wide variety of national jurisdictions. In addition to drafting chapters independently, each has made invaluable contributions to other authors? chapters. Authoritative case law research was further provided by dozens of contributors with expertise in specific jurisdictions worldwide. The analysis thoroughly covers the major issues that have arisen in the application of the Convention, including the following: the use of reservations made by Contracting States; the distinctions between recognition and enforcement and between recognition sought at the seat of the arbitration and outside the seat; the role of the courts in reviewing arbitral awards and, in particular, the Convention?s focus on safeguarding due process standards; the ?more favourable rights? principle embodied in Article VII(1); the relevance of forum shopping and asset spotting to the application of the Convention; and the role of formalities and formalism"