Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The paper in essence aims to highlight the transformation of state character in Indonesia as a result of globalization. The framework of analysis employed to highlight the transformation is through comparing the concept of nation-state and that of market-state. The paper argues that in terms of character the concept of nation-state has been slowly removed from policy making and in place of it the concept of market-state has gained more currency. "

"Tujuan ini penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan dampak dari globalisasi ekonomi terhadap jarak-negara ketidaksetaraan di 5 Negara Asia Tenggara. Dengan menggunakan data panel dan 3-tahun rata Data tertimbang, 145 sampel yang diamati dan kemunduran oleh Effect Model Fixed, kertas penelitian menemukan bahwa peningkatan ekonomi globalisasi dalam hal liberalisasi perdagangan menghasilkan ketimpangan pendapatan yang lebih tinggi dalam ASEAN5 masing-masing negara di 1981-2009 tergantung pada negara tahap perkembangan dan faktor produksi endowment, sementara peningkatan globalisasi perdagangan secara umum tidak mempengaruhi ketimpangan pendapatan. Di sisi lain tangan, peningkatan globalisasi ekonomi dalam hal liberalisasi keuangan mempengaruhi ketidaksetaraan pendapatan hanya melalui faktor saluran wakaf, efek dari dampak bervariasi, tergantung pada indeks yang digunakan dalam perhitungan. perdagangan dan Indeks liberalisasi keuangan termasuk penggunaan kedua de facto (% Perdagangan/GDP) (% Aset + Kewajiban/GDP) dan de jure tindakan.

---

This research's objective is to determine the impact of economic globalization towards within-country inequality in 5 South East Asian Countries. By using panel data and 3-years average weighted data, 145 samples are observed and regressed by Fixed Effect Model, the research paper finds that increased economic globalization in terms of trade liberalization produces higher income inequalities within ASEAN5 individual states in 1981-2009 depending on the country's stage of development and factors of productions endowment, while increased trade globalization in general does not affect income inequality. On the other hand, increased economic globalization in terms of financial liberalization affects income inequalities only through factor of endowments channel, effects of the impacts vary, depending on the index used during calculation. The trade and financial liberalization index includes the usage of both de facto (% Trade/GDP) (% Assets + Liabilities/GDP) and de jure measures (Sachs and Warner Index) (Chinn and Ito Inde)."

"Debates continue to multiply on the definition and rationale of Southeast Asia as a region and on the utility of the multidisciplinary field of area studies. However, we have now entered a post-colonialist, post-Orientalist, post-structuralist stage of reflection and re-orientation in the era of globalization, and a strong tendency on the part of insiders to pose these issues in terms of an insider-outsider dichotomy. On the one hand, the study of Southeast Asia for researchers from outside the region has become fragmented. This is for very obvious reasons: the strengthening and re-energizing of academic disciplines, the increasing popularity of other non-regional multidisciplinary studies, and the entry of globalization studies into our field of vision. On the other hand, how has the local Southeast Asian academy addressed these major issues of change in conceptualizing the region from an insider perspective? In filling in and giving substance to an outsider, primarily Euro-American- Australian-centric definition and vision of Southeast Asia, some local academics have recently been inclined to construct Southeast Asia in terms of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): a nation-state-based, institutional definition of what a region comprises. Others continue to operate at a localized level exploring small-scale communities and territories, while a modest number focus on sub-regional issues (the Malay-Indonesian world or the Mekong sub-region are examples). However, further reflections suggest that the Euro-American-Australian hegemony is a thing of the past and the ground has shifted to a much greater emphasis on academic activity within the region. Southeast Asia-based academics are also finding it much more important to network within the region and to capture, understand, and analyze what Chinese, Japanese, and Korean scholars are saying about Southeast Asia, its present circumstances and trajectories, and their increasingly close involvement with the region within a greater Asia-Pacific rim. The paper argues that the insider-outsider dichotomy requires considerable qualification. It is a neat way of dramatizing the aftermath of colonialism and Orientalism and of reasserting local priorities, agendas, and interests. But there might be a way forward in resolving at least some of these apparently opposed positions with recourse to the concepts of culture and identity in order to address Southeast Asian diversities, movements, encounters, hybridization, and hierarchies."