Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This accessible and non-technical introductory text presents the principal methods and key concepts involved in understanding and applying cost-benefit analysis, and demonstrating how to evaluate whether an investment project or policy proposal will contribute to increase social welfare. Gines de Rus incorporates the latest thinking on issues such as the treatment of risk and uncertainty, and the importance of institutional arrangements in ensuring the correct use of the technique."

"When people begin to talk about cost-benefit analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, and return-on-investment, they often envision eye-glazing mathematical gobbledgook. Even when the letters in equations like the one above are explained, people may have ...."

"This book, which was first published in 1972, is not a collection of case-studies in cost-benefit analysis, of which there had been already several in use employing techniques of varying degrees of sophistication. Nor is it a manual of instruction with particular orientation for less developed counties, such as those produced under the auspices of the U.N. and the O.E.C.D. What this volume does attempt is to introduce the student of economics to the logic and the concepts used in cost-benefit analysis."

"Laporan ini menyajikan berbagai asumsi dan perkiraan yang akan mendukung Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) yang berkaitan dengan regulasi penghematan air. Dalam rangka untuk memberi masukan bagi Pemerintah negara bagian dengan mempertimbangkan peraturan penghematan air yang ada. Analisis ini berfokus pada efisiensi, kelompok rujukan, sensitivitas, dan analisis skenario. Laporan ini telah mempertimbangkan biaya dan manfaat dari proyek-proyek pemerintah ini dan keseluruhan Strategi.

---

This report presents a range of assumptions and estimates that will underpin a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) of options relating to water savings regulation. In order to advising the State government on the desirability or not of retaining the existing water saving regulations. The analysis focuses on the efficiency, referent group, sensitivity and scenario analysis. It considers the costs and benefits of those projects and of the overall Strategy."

"ABSTRAKPengembangan Kawasan Monas telah direncanakan sesuai dengan Keputusan Presiden no.25 Tahun 1995. Namun pada tahun 1998 pengembangan tersebut menjadi terhenti dikarenakan adanya krisis moneter. Saat ini pengelola Kawasan Monas ingin melanjutkan kembali pengembangan tersebut sesuai dengan masterplan yang ada. Sehingga sebagai bahan pertimbangan dalam melanjutkan pengembangan Kawasan Monas diperlukan suatu penelitian mengenai kelayakan apakah pengembangan ini perlu untuk dilakukan. Penelitian untuk uji kelayakan proyek pengembangan ini dengan menggunakan metode analisis biaya manfaat. Hal tersebut dikarenakan didalam proyek pemerintah lebih mengedepankan manfaat dibandingkan profit yang diterima. Dalam penelitian ini didapatkan nilai manfaat yang tidak terlihat dari pengembangan Kawasan Monas sebesar Rp 42.017.808.000 dan dengan biaya pengembangan sebesar Rp 387.243.999.397 sehingga dengan nilai ini didapatkan hasil analisis biaya manfaat sebesar 1,49 yang mana menandakan bahwa proyek pengembangan ini layak untuk dilakukan

---

ABSTRACTMonas Area Development has been planned in accordance with the Presidential Decree No.25 of 1995. However, in 1998 the development came to a standstill due to the financial crisis. Currently the Monas area want to resume the development in accordance with the existing masterplan. So as consideration in the continuing development of Monas area, required a feasibility study on whether this development needs to be done. Research to test the feasibility of this development project using cost benefit analysis. That is because the government project is more utilitarian than the profit earned. In this study, the value of benefits which are not visible from the development area of Monas are Rp 42,017,808,000 and development costs amounted is Rp 387 243 999 397. So based on these values, showed a point from cost benefit analysis is 1.49 which indicates that the development project is feasible to do."