Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKMuseum Bank Indonesia Jakarta dan Gedung Bank Indonesia Bandung merupakan bangunan yang dibangun pada masa penjajahan Belanda. Pada kedua bangunan ini terdapat unsur-unsur gaya bangunan Eropa yaitu Neo Klasik. Gaya bangunan Neo Klasik sangat terkenal dan berkembang di Eropa sejak abad ke-18. Artikel ini menjelaskan ciri khas bangunan karya Eduard Cuypers dan Marius J. Hulswit pada kedua bangunan yaitu Museum Bank Indonesia Jakarta dan Gedung Bank Indonesia Bandung. Eduard Cuypers dan Marius J. Hulswit adalah arsitek yang terkenal di Hindia Belanda dan banyak membuat bangunan-bangunan penting. Pada tiap bangunan yang dirancang oleh Eduard Cuypers dan Marius J. Hulswit selalu terdapat ornamen-ornamen Budhis yang terdapat pada candi Borobudur.

---

ABSTRACT

Jakarta Indonesian Central Bank museum and the building of Bandung Indonesian Central Bank was built in the era of Dutch Colonialism. Both of these buildings consist of Neoclassical architecture. Neoclassical architecture is very famous and quite evolved around Europe since the 18th century. This article explain the typical building's characteristic made by Eduard Cuypers and Marius J.Hulswit in Jakarta Indonesian Central Bank Museum and the building of Bandung Indonesian Central Bank. Eduard Cuypers and Marius J. Hulswit were a famous architect in Dutch East Indies and they have built many important buildings. Each building that designed by Eduard Cuypers and Marius J. Hulswit always contain budhis ornaments which is found in a temple Borobudur."

"[ABSTRAKKajian ini melakukan analisis kapabalitas dinamik terhadap pengelolaan daya saing pariwisata di Kota Tua Jakarta. Kota Tua Jakarta sebagai tempat wisata berkompetis dengan tempat wisata lainnya, baik di internal wilayah ataupun dengan dunia internasional. Untuk dapat sukses melalui kompetisi dibutuhan strategi pengelolaan daya saing (Teece, Pisano, dan Shuen, 1997). Salah satu strategi untuk itu dengan meningkatkan kapabilitas dinamik pengelolaan Kota Tua. Kapabilitas dinamik adalah kemampuan untuk mengelola sumber daya untuk memenuhi tantangan lingkungan yang dinamis sehingga mampu memiliki daya saing (Teece dan Augier, 2007). Kajian ini memberikan contoh bagaimana organisasi publik harus beradaptasi dalam linkungan yang dinamik dalam upaya mampu bertahan hidup dengan mengintegrasi, memodifikasi, dan menata ulang sumber daya yang dimiliki. Hasil analisis memperlihatkan ada tiga faktor yang dibutuhkan untuk meningkatkan kapabilitas dinamik Kota Tua Jakarta yaitu orang yang mampu, proses yang tangkas, dan relasi antar kelompok. Faktor pendorong ini berinteraksi dengan elemen kapabilitas dinamik yaitu berpikir ulang, berpikir kedepan, dan berpikir modifikasi untuk menciptakan kebijakan adapatif dalam memenuhi indek daya saing pariwisata. Kajian ini memakai metode riset tindakan berbasis sistem lunak. Adapun model riset tindakan ini menggunakan pendekatan dual imperative yang bertujuan untuk menyelesaikan masalah faktual dan mencari kebaruan dari teori yang ada.;

---

ABSTRACTThis paper explores dynamic capability for tourism competitiveness in old town Jakarta. Dynamic capability is the ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competencies to address rapidly changing environments (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). This paper provide ilustration how public organization used dynamic capability to keep organization fit to the competitive and dynamic situation. In this paper how the public organization continously anticipating and adjusting are using three driven factor (Rothaermel & Hess, 2004; Neo & Chen, 2007) at able people, agile process, and intergroup relationships and three key element (Neo & Chen, 2007) at thinking ahead, thinking again, and thinking across that used to achieve adaptive policies for tourism competitive advantage. Action research is conducted in the field of old town Jakarta governance including DKI Jakarta goverment, tourism department of Jakarta, Museum in Old Town Jakarta and comunities in Old Town Jakarta. These research is using SSM-Based AR to explores the messy situation in Old Town Jakarta. Soft Systems Methodology is used to tackling social complexity in old town Jakarta. These research are dual imperatives of action research as mentioned by Mc kay and Marshal (2001) and hardjosoekarto (2013).;This paper explores dynamic capability for tourism competitiveness in old town Jakarta. Dynamic capability is the ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competencies to address rapidly changing environments (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). This paper provide ilustration how public organization used dynamic capability to keep organization fit to the competitive and dynamic situation. In this paper how the public organization continously anticipating and adjusting are using three driven factor (Rothaermel & Hess, 2004; Neo & Chen, 2007) at able people, agile process, and intergroup relationships and three key element (Neo & Chen, 2007) at thinking ahead, thinking again, and thinking across that used to achieve adaptive policies for tourism competitive advantage. Action research is conducted in the field of old town Jakarta governance including DKI Jakarta goverment, tourism department of Jakarta, Museum in Old Town Jakarta and comunities in Old Town Jakarta. These research is using SSM-Based AR to explores the messy situation in Old Town Jakarta. Soft Systems Methodology is used to tackling social complexity in old town Jakarta. These research are dual imperatives of action research as mentioned by Mc kay and Marshal (2001) and hardjosoekarto (2013)., This paper explores dynamic capability for tourism competitiveness in old town Jakarta. Dynamic capability is the ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competencies to address rapidly changing environments (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). This paper provide ilustration how public organization used dynamic capability to keep organization fit to the competitive and dynamic situation. In this paper how the public organization continously anticipating and adjusting are using three driven factor (Rothaermel & Hess, 2004; Neo & Chen, 2007) at able people, agile process, and intergroup relationships and three key element (Neo & Chen, 2007) at thinking ahead, thinking again, and thinking across that used to achieve adaptive policies for tourism competitive advantage. Action research is conducted in the field of old town Jakarta governance including DKI Jakarta goverment, tourism department of Jakarta, Museum in Old Town Jakarta and comunities in Old Town Jakarta. These research is using SSM-Based AR to explores the messy situation in Old Town Jakarta. Soft Systems Methodology is used to tackling social complexity in old town Jakarta. These research are dual imperatives of action research as mentioned by Mc kay and Marshal (2001) and hardjosoekarto (2013).]"

"Bangunan cagar budaya di kawasan Kota Tua Jakarta dari tahun ke tahun semakin terancam oleh banjir. Identifikasi resiko kerusakan yang disebabkan oleh banjir belum menjadi perhatian dalam pengelolaan bangunan cagar budaya di kawasan Kota tua. Penilaian tingkat bahaya, kerentanan dan kemampuan penanganan pada setiap bangunan cagar budaya adalah informasi penting untuk proses perencanaan mitigasi bencana. Maka dari itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan suatu pendekatan penilaian kemungkinan dampak resiko kerusakan yang diakibatkan oleh banjir pada bangunan cagar budaya, khususnya pada kejadian banjir tahun 2013.Analisis resiko yang dilakukan pada 101 bangunan cagar budaya di evaluasi melalui metode Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation (SMCE). SMCE merupakan sebuah proses yang menggabungkan dan mentransformasikan data geografi menjadi keluaran untuk membantu pengambilan keputusan. Paramater untuk faktor bahaya banjir (ketinggian genangan, lama genangan dan frekuensi genangan), kerentanan cagar budaya (golongan bangunan cagar budaya), kerentanan fisik (indeks konservasi, umur bangunan, bahan bangunan), dan kemampuan penanganan (penanganan pasca banjir) digunakan untuk mengkalkulasi besaran resiko pada setiap bangunan cagar budaya.Pola distribusi keruangan memperlihatkan resiko tinggi berada pada wilayah utara kawasan Kota Tua (zona Sunda Kelapa) dan wilayah barat (zona Pekojan dan Pecinan), sedangkan tingkat resiko terendah berada di bagian tengah kawasan Kota Tua (zona kawasan Fatahillah). Implikasi resiko kerusakan tidak hanya berdampak pada bangunan itu sendiri, tetapi pada integritas setiap zona yang merepresentasikan ciri khas setiap wilayah (nilai budaya, historis, sosial, arsitektur).

---

Heritage building in Jakarta Old Town area threatening by flood every years. Spatial risk damage identification caused by flood is rarely getting attention for heritage building in old city heritage management. Hazard, vulnerability and coping assessment in every heritage building is a key information for disaster mitigation planning. Hence, this research purpose is to developing an approach to assessing risk damage possibilities that caused by flood to heritage building, particularly flood event in 2013.Risk assessment of 101 heritage building has been evaluated through Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation (SMCE). SMCE is a process combining and transforming geographical data into specific output to help decision making. Factor parameter for flood hazard (flood depth, flood duration and flood frequency), heritage vulnerability (heritage building rank), physical vulnerability (conservation index, heritage building age, and heritage building structural material), and coping capacity (post disaster action) have been used to calculate risk impact in every single heritage building in study area.Distribution pattern show high risk area is located at north Jakarta Old Town area (Sunda Kelapa Zone) and west area (Pekojan and Pecinan Zone). The lowest risk concentrate at the center of Jakarta Old Town area (Fatahillah Zone). Risk damage implication not only potentially affect the heritage building, but each zone integrity which is representation the uniqueness of area (culture value, historical value, social value and architecture) possibly degraded."

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai analisis partisipasi pegawai dalam pelaksanaan program Bank Indonesia Layanan Intranet Kita (BLINK). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif sebagai data utama dengan wawancara mendalam dan observasi langsung ditunjang dengan data-data kuantitatif melaui kuisioner jenis penelitian deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tingkat partisipasi pegawai di Bank Indonesia rendah. Faktor penghambat dalam partisipasi adalah keterbatasan sumber daya, kurangnya sosialisasi program, kurangnya memberikan ide/masukan dalam program, tidak adanya dukungan dalam program, faktor tidak adanya pemberian tanggung jawab yang diberikan atasan kepada bawahan, pegawai tidak merasa bertanggung jawab dalam program, pegawai yang belum terbiasa melakukan knowledge sharing.

---

This research focus the analysis application of employees participation in Bank Indonesia Layanan Intranet Kita (BLINK) program in Bank Indonesia Jakarta. This study used qualitative research with additional quantitative data approach with questionnaire and descriptive research. The result showed that employee participation in BLINK program was low. Participation’s barriers identified were the constrains of human resourse; the lack of program socialization; contributing ideas/advice in programs; motivation/support in the programs; the handover of responsibility by a superior to subordinate; feeling responsible to superior; the participation of surveilance on program; the employees hahe not been accustomed to knowledge sharing."

"Perkembangan penyelenggaraan dan pembangunan gedung bertingkat dewasa ini semakin komplek baik dari segi intensitas, teknologi maupun kebutuhan saran dan prasarananya. Pengamanan terhadap bahaya kebakaran pada bangunan gedung dan lingkungan adalah segala upaya yang menyangkut tumpuan dan persyaratan teknis yang diperlukan dalam mengatur dan mengendalikan penyelenggaraan pembangunan gedung. Penelitian dilakukan di lantai basemen 1 gedung D, perkantoran Bank Indonesia, Jakarta. Tempat tersebut dipilih karena memiliki tingkat risiko penyalaan api yang paling tinggi dibandingkan dengan lantai lainnya. Pada lantai basemen 1 terletak generator berkapasitas sangat besar (7500 kilovolt) untuk mensuplai listerik keseluruh gedung dan terdapat pula pusat pengendalian dan monitoring sistem listrik, detektor kebakaran, air dan instalasi lainnya, sehingga perlu dianalisis berapa tingkat risiko terhadap bahaya kebakaran sebenamya di lantai ini.Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian risk assessment ( analisis dan evaiuasi risiko) yaitu dengan menganalisis risiko-risiko dan mengevaluasi serta membuat rangking untuk menentukan tingkat risiko. Variabel-variabel penelitian yang diobservasi meliputi faktorfaktor penyalaan api (bahan bakar, oksigen dan sumber panas) dan manajemen sistem proteksi dan evakuasinya (deteksi dini, pemadaman kebakaran dan evakuasi).Ketiga elemen penyalaan api dievaluasi secara semikuantitatif dengan menghitung nilai risiko penyalaan apinya (X) sesuai dengan derajat risiko yang telah ditetapkan dalam klasifikasi risiko penyalaan api. Klasifikasi risiko yang ditetapkan adalah berdasarkan kemampuan penanggulangan oleh "fire management system" yang tersedia. Tahap berikutnya adalah menganalisis dan menghitung nilai sistem proteksinya (Y) yang terdapat di basemen 1 yang meliputi sistem deteksi dini, sistem pemadaman api dan sistem evakuasinya. Dan kedua nilai tersebut akan didapatkan nilai risiko faktual yang ada (existing risk) dengan menjumlahkan nilai risiko penyalaan api (X) dan nilai sistem proteksinya (Y). Hasil penjumlahan nilai tersebut dibandingkan dengan justifikasi nilai risiko faktual untuk menyimpulkan risiko keseluruhan.Dari hasil penelitian didapatkan nilai risiko penyalaan api keseluruhan sebesar 155. Tingginya nilai risiko penyalaan api di lantai basemen 1 diakibatkan oleh jumlah dan sifat sumber bahan bakar yang setiap saat dapat terbakar karena berada diatas titik flash pointnya. Sedangkan untuk nilai sitem proteksi keseluruhan didapatkan nilai sebesar 192. Berdasarkan nilai tersebut diatas maka didapatkan nilai risiko faktual sebesar 155 + 192 = 347. Nilai risiko faktual ini terdapat pada selang risiko sebagai substansial risk yang berarti aktifitas dapat diteruskan namun memerlukan perbaikan sistem (correction required) sampai risiko dapat diterima (nilai existing risk value > 480).Berdasarkan hasil-hasil yang didapat maka saran perbaikan yang diberikan meliputi kontrol secara enjiniring dan kontrol secara administratif. Secara enjiniring, manajemen Bank Indonesia harus melengkapi sarana proteksi yang belurn terpasang seperti fire extinguiser, sistem deteksi terutama di ruang generator dan sistem pemadaman kebakarannya. Demikian juga dengan memperbaiki layout ruang generator dan ruang parkir kendaraan sehingga bahan bakar berupa solar dan premium dapat diawasi dengan lebih baik. Secara administratif disarankan untuk membuat jadwal pemeliharaan sarana proteksi kebakaran dan standar operas; prosedur di ruang generator. Sistem yang terpasang harus terus menerus dipantau kemampuannya demikian juga operator yang bertanggung jawab harus dilatih dan ditingkatkan kemampuannya dalam menghadapi keadaan bahaya kebakaran.

---

Analysis of Fire Risk at First Basement Floor in D Building of Indonesian Bank Offices in JakartaThe development of multistoried building implementation and establishment at the present time become more complex from each aspect of intensity, technology and need of medium and infrastructure. Fire security of buildings and environment are entirely effort things related on technical pillar and conditions, which is needed to organize buildings establishment and to control them. The research was held on first basement floor in D building of Indonesian Bank offices in Jakarta. The place was chosen considering it had the highest risk of fire compared with the other floor in this building. There was a very high capacity of generator (7500 Kilovolt) at the first basement to supply electricity to whole building and there were also central controlling electric system and monitoring fire detector, water supply and more installation. These need an analysis of actual intensity level of fire risk at this building.

Including this research is risk assessment research (analysis and evaluation of risk), which are analyzing and evaluating perils and setting the determination for their level. The observed research variables included fire causal factors (fuel, oxygen and source of heating), management protection system and avoidance (early detection, fire extinguishments and evacuation).

Those of three fire elements will be evaluated in semi quantitative manner calculating the value of fire risk (X), compatible with risk level, which is carried out by fire risk classification. The determination of peril classification bases on the capability of prevention from fire management system that is available_ The next step is analyzing and summarizing values of their available protection system (Y) include early detection, fire extinguishments and evaluation system at first basement. Both of values will gain factual risk values from existing risk by summarizing values of fire risk (X) and values of protection system (Y). The result will be adjusted with factual risk values justification to gain a whole conclusion of risk.

From the research outcome discovered a whole fire risk values in amount of 155. The height of fire risk values at first basement were caused by number of fuel and its characteristic, which might be burn over flash point level. Mean of while, there is amount of whole protection system values as big as 192. Based on the values above summarized that factual fire risk will be 155 + 192 = 347. This factual risk value existed in a risk range as substantial risk where the activities can go on although required correction system until the risk can be accepted (existing risk value > 480).

According to the result that is concluded, the suggestions of improvement given are about control in both engineering and administrative manner. In engineering manner the Indonesian Bank management should provide uninstalled protection medium such as fire extinguisher, early detection system primly at generator room and the system of its fire extinguishments. Beside that, they should improve generator room and parking area layout, so that the fuel can be checked well. And in administrative manner suggested of setting schedule of fire protection medium and standard operation procedure in generator room. The installed system should be checked constantly and also a good responsible operator should be trained well and his capability should be improved to face immediate danger of fire."