Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan moneter dan makroprudensial melalui risk taking bank di Indonesia. Pentingnya analisis jalur pengambilan risiko (risk-taking channel) dalam mekanisme transmisi kebijakan moneter karena termasuk jalur terbaru dan berbeda dengan jalur bank lending yang telah lama dikemukakan sebelumnya dalam teori kebijakan moneter. Risk-taking channel ini mempengaruhi penawaran kredit oleh perbankan melalui keputusan bank untuk menyalurkan kredit berdasarkan perubahan perilaku bank dalam menghadapi risiko bank. Penelitian ini juga menyadari dampak dari kebijakan moneter dan makroprudensial dan peran akan karakteristik dari bank, serta kondisi makroekonomi seperti pertumbuhan ekonomi dan tingkat inflasi. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah fixed effect melalui data panel pada periode tahun 2012-2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan 3 jenis proksi untuk mengukur risiko bank. Hasil dari penelitian ini menemukan bahwa dampak dari kebijakan moneter dan kebijakan makroprudensial secara signifikan memengaruhi risiko bank. Sehingga disimpulkan bahwa risk taking channel eksis di perbankan Indonesia.

---

This study aims to analyze monetary and macroprudential policies through risk taking banks in Indonesia. The importance of risk-taking channel analysis in the transmission mechanism of monetary policy is that it is a newer route and is different from the bank lending channel that has been previously proposed in monetary policy theory. This risk-taking channel affects the supply of credit by banks through the bank's decision to channel credit based on changes in bank behavior in dealing with bank risk. The study also recognizes the impact of monetary and macroprudential policies and the role of the characteristics of banks, as well as macroeconomic conditions such as economic growth and inflation rates. The analytical method used is fixed effects through panel data in the period 2012-2019. This study uses 3 types of proxies to measure bank risk. The results of this study found that the impact of monetary policy and macroprudential policy significantly affects bank risk. So it can be concluded that the risk-taking channel exists in Indonesian banking."

"Kedudukan khusus yang dimiliki bank sebagai financial intermediary menjadikan bank sebagai suatu lembaga kepercayaan dan hubungan hukum antara bank dan nasabahnya dilandasi oleh asas kepercayaan (fiduciary relations). Dalam hubungan tersebut, bank menanggung risiko reputasi yang berasal dari publikasi negatif terkait kegiatan usaha bank atau persepsi negatif terhadap bank sehingga bank harus memiliki mekanisme pengaduan nasabah. Apabila pengaduan tidak dapat diselesaikan, hal tersebut dapat menimbulkan sengketa. Penelitian dalam skripsi ini akan membahas mengenai pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa antara bank dan nasabah sejak berdirinya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) serta bagaimana pelaksanaan penyelesaian sengketa tersebut berdasarkan Peraturan OJK. Berdasarkan peraturan tersebut terdapat mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa dalam tahap internal oleh bank dan tahap eksternal oleh OJK, Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Indonesia (LAPSPI), dan Pengadilan. Adapun ditemukan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa oleh LAPSPI belum efektif karena lembaga tersebut baru memiliki izin beroperasi pada tahun 2016. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian kepustakaan. Sumber penelitian yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Pengumpulan data digunakan dengan wawancara dengan pihak-pihak terkait yang kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif.

---

Bank as a financial intermediary create an exceptional position for bank as an institution of trust and the relationship between bank and its customers is based on the principle of trust (fiduciary relations). Therefore, bank bears the risk of reputational damage from negative publicity related to the business or negative perception of the bank so that bank shall have a mechanism for customer complaints. If the complaints could not be resolved, it will rise to disputes. This thesis will discuss the dispute resolution regulations between bank and its customers since the Financial Service Authority (FSA) is established as well as how the implementation of the dispute resolution based on the FSA Regulations. Based on those rules, there are stages of dispute resolution which are internal stage by the bank and external stage by FSA, Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution of Indonesian Banking (ADR Institution of Indonesian Banking), and Court. As it was found that the dispute resolution by ADR Institution of Indonesian Banking has not been effective because the institution just had its operating license in 2016. This research is a normative judicial research with literature approach. The research sources which are used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data collections used by interviews with related parties which analyzed by qualitative methods."

"This book gives insight on the dynamics and route of economic policies that have been taken and implemented since the point of institutional reforms in 1998 that is triggered from the context of financial crisis in 1997/​1998. The condition that brought different paradigm on the landscape of economic and development policies, especially on the case of monetary and financial structure, international trade sector, manufacturing sector, taxes administration policy, and the evolved context of decentralization and development of public sector policies in general.Given state of current economic development, this book offers suggestions to address economic issues that require improvements. This book is unique as: 1) it is about Indonesia, a country that mostly affected by 1997/​1998 financial crisis, which also lead to a change in regime, 2) It cover a broad range of thematic topics on sectors development and institutional changes from major policies that have been taken, 3) It posted both existing and future challenges on monetary and financial sectors, trade, manufacturing and competitiveness, as well as on development of decentralization policies"

"Otoritas Jasa Keuangan selaku lembaga pengawas sektor keuangan di Indonesia diberikan kewenangan untuk melakukan penyidikan tindak pidana di sektor jasa keuangan bersama pihak Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Namun, pada tanggal 12 Januari 2023 diterbitkan Undang- Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan (UU P2SK) yang menentukan bahwa penyidikan tindak pidana perbankan hanya dapat dilakukan oleh Penyidik OJK. Sementara itu, tidak lama dari penerbitan UU P2SK, pemerintah menerbitkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 5 Tahun 2023 tentang Penyidikan Sektor Jasa Keuangan (PP 5/2023) yang menentukan bahwa selain Penyidik OJK, terdapat Penyidik Kepolisian juga yang dapat melakukan penyidikan tindak pidana perbankan. Maka dari itu pada penelitian ini akan dibahas mengenai bagaimana pengaturan penyidikan tindak pidana perbankan di Indonesia setelah diterbitkannya UU P2SK serta bagaimana perbandingan ketentuan penyidikan tindak pidana perbankan serta wewenang penyidik lembaga pengawas jasa keuangan di Indonesia, Singapura, dan Thailand. Adapun dalam penelitian ini dilakukan penelitian dengan metode penelitian doktrinal yakni pengolahan serta pengujian substansi hukum dengan memakai doktrin-doktrin hukum dalam rangka menemukan, mengkonstruksi, atau merekonstruksi aturan atau prinsip. Lebih lanjut, proses analisis data dilakukan melalui suatu studi perbandingan (micro-comparison) yakni bentuk pendekatan yang digunakan terhadap suatu topik atau aspek tertentu, atau institusi hukum tertentu pada dua atau lebih sistem hukum yang dalam penelitian ini adalah negara Singapura dan Thailand. Dari penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa terdapat kontradiksi antara ketentuan PP 5/2023 dengan UU P2SK. Diketahui juga bahwa pada negara Singapura penyidikan tindak pidana perbankan diserahkan kepada lembaga kepolisian yaitu Commercial Affairs Department sedangkan pada negara Thailand, penyidikan tindak pidana perbankan dilakukan oleh pejabat Bank of Thailand atau pihak eksternal.

---

The Financial Services Authority (OJK) as the supervisory institution for the financial sector in Indonesia has the authority to conduct criminal investigations in the financial services sector together with the Indonesian National Police based on Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority. However, on January 12, 2023 the Indonesian Parliament issued Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (P2SK Law) which stipulates that investigations of banking crimes can only be carried out by OJK investigators. Meanwhile, not long after the issuance of the P2SK Law, the government issued Government Regulation Number 5 of 2023 concerning Investigations of the Financial Services Sector (PP 5/2023) which stipulates that apart from OJK Investigators, there are also Police Investigators who can conduct banking criminal investigations. Therefore, this research will discuss how is the regulation regarding investigation of banking crimes in Indonesia after the publication of the P2SK Law and how is the provisions comparison for investigating banking crimes and the authority of investigators from financial services supervisory institutions in Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand. As for this research, research was carried out using doctrinal research methods, namely processing and testing legal substances using legal doctrines in order to find, construct, or reconstruct rules or principles. Furthermore, the process of data analysis is carried out through a comparative study (micro-comparison), namely the form of approach used on a particular topic or aspect, or certain legal institutions in two or more legal systems, which in this study are Singapore and Thailand. From this research it was found that there is a contradiction between the provisions of PP 5/2023 and the P2SK Law. It is also known that in Singapore the investigation of banking crimes is handed over to the police agency, namely the Commercial Affairs Department. Meanwhile in Thailand, investigations into banking crimes are carried out by Bank of Thailand officials or external parties."