Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Many children and adults experience significant breakdown in the use of language. The resulting pragmatic disorders present a considerable barrier to effective communication. This book is the first critical examination of the current state of our knowledge of pragmatic disorders and provides a comprehensive overview of the main concepts and theories in pragmatics. It examines the full range of pragmatic disorders that occur in children and adults and discusses how they are assessed and treated by clinicians. Louise Cummings attempts to integrate the fields of pragmatics, language pathology and cognitive science by examining the ways in which pragmatics can make a useful contribution to debates about cognitive theories of autism. The reader is encouraged to think in a critical fashion about how clinicians, experimentalists and theorists deal with pragmatic issues."

"Communication Sciences and Disorders: From Science to Clinical Practice is included in the 2015 edition of the essential collection of Doody’s Core Titles. Communication Sciences and Disorders: From Science to Clinical Practice is an excellent introductory text for undergraduate students enrolled in their first course in communication sciences and disorders. Written by experts in the field, this text contains basic information about speech disorders that are related to impairments in articulation, voice, and fluency; language disorders in children and adults; and hearing disorders that cause conductive and sensorineural hearing losses. It includes basic information on the speech, language, and hearing sciences and practical information about assessment and intervention practices. Unlike some other introductory text books, this book also includes chapters on multicultural issues, deafness, dysarthria, and dysphagia."

"This is a clear, comprehensive introduction to communication sciences and disorders, with an evidence-based, lifespan perspective. This edition continues the evidence-based, lifespan perspective. It reviews and explains the most recent research evidence pertaining to the assessment and treatment of communication disorders from birth through the end of life in a clear, comprehensible fashion. Each chapter is concise, yet provides comprehensive information appropriate for an introductory-level text. Students gain a basic foundation in the areas of anatomy and physiology of the speech and hearing mechanisms, and an overview of the various disorders that affect voice, fluency, articulation, language, cognition, swallowing, and hearing, along with detailed descriptions of the varying etiologies that cause these impairments"

"Latar Belakang: Keterlambatan bicara adalah salah satu bentuk keterlambatan perkembangan pada anak. Untuk meminimalisir dampak negatif keterlambatan bicara, faktor risiko dibutuhkan untuk membantu mendiagnosis pasien, agar intervensi dini dapat dimulai.Tujuan: Identifikasi asosiasi antara jenis kelamin, usia kehamilan, berat lahir, lingkar kepala, penutupan anterior fontanel, perkembangan motorik kasar, periode ASI eksklusif, pengasuh sehari-hari, jumlah saudara kandung, paparan media, interaksi sosial dengan pasien, dan keterlambatan bicara pada anak usia 1 sampai 2 tahun.Metode: Penelitian kasus kontrol pada anak usia 1 sampai 2 tahun di Rumah Sakit Pusat Nasional (RSUPN) Cipto Mangunkusumo dan Klinik Anakku, Pondok Pinang di Jakarta, Indonesia, dari Januari 2018 sampai Maret 2018. Data dikumpulkan dari wawancara orang tua. Data yang diperoleh diolah dengan SPSS Statistics for Mac, dengan uji Chi-Square dan metode logistic regression. Hasil: Jumlah subjek pada studi ini adalah 126 anak, dengan 63 anak dengan keterlambatan bicara, dan 63 anak lainnya dengan perkembangan bicara yang normal. Pada uji multivariat, variabel yang signifikan adalah keterlambatan perkembangan motorik kasar (p < 0.001; OR = 9.607; 95% CI = 3.403-27.122), periode ASI eksklusif kurang dari 6 bulan (p = 0.016; OR = 3.278; 95% CI = 1.244-8.637), dan paparan gadget dan televisi selama lebih dari 2 jam sehari (p < 0.001; OR = 8.286; 95% CI = 2.555-26.871). Kontak sosial yang buruk (p = 0.998) adalah confounding factor pada studi ini.Kesimpulan: Keterlambatan perkembangan motorik kasar, periode ASI eksklusif kurang dari 6 bulan, paparan media selama lebih dari 2 jam, dan kontak yang buruk adalah faktor risiko keterlambatan bicara pada anak.

---

Background: Speech delay is one of the most common developmental delay in children. To minimize the negative outcomes of speech delay, risk factors should be explored to help in patient diagnosis, so an early intervention can be initiated. Aim: Identify the association between gender, age, birth weight, asphyxia during birth, head circumference, closure of anterior fontanel, gross motor development, period of

breastfeeding, caregiver, number of siblings, media exposure, social interaction with subject and delayed speech in children between 1 to 2 years old. Method: A case-control study for children between 1 to 2 years old in Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional (RSUPN) Cipto Mangunkusumo and Klinik Anakku, Pondok Pinang in Jakarta, Indonesia, from January 2018 to March 2018. Data was collected from parent interviews. The data obtained was processed with SPSS Statistics for Mac, with Chi-Square test and logistic regression method.

Result: The total number of subjects in this study was 126, with 63 children with speech delay and 63 children with normal speech development. In the multivariate analysis, the significant risk factors were delayed gross motor development (p < 0.001; OR = 9.607; 95% CI = 3.403-27.122), period of exclusive breastfeeding of less than 6 months (p = 0.016; OR = 3.278; 95% CI = 1.244-8.637), and exposure to gadgets and television for more than 2 hours (p < 0.001; OR = 8.286; 95% CI = 2.555-26.871). Poor social interaction (p = 0.998) was found to be the confounding factor. Conclusion: Delayed gross motor development, period of exclusive breastfeeding of less than 6 months, media exposure for more than 2 hours, and poor are risk factors of

delayed speech development in children."

"Latar Belakang: Angka prevalensi GSA semakin meningkat dan kekhawatiran orang tua tentang kondisi anaknya, mendorong dilakukannya skrining deteksi dini GSA. Beberapa tanda untuk deteksi dini GSA yaitu 1) respon terhadap godaan, 2) respon ketika dipanggil dan 3) respon terhadap penghambatan. Terdapat tanda lain yang dapat digunakan sebagai deteksi dini GSA, yaitu respon colek. Tujuan: Mengetahui seberapa besar nilai diagnostik respon colek dalam mendeteksi GSA pada anak usia 18 bulan - 4 tahun dengan keterlambatan bicara. Metode:Studi potong lintang dilakukan terhadap subyek berusia 18 bulan - 4 tahun dengan keterlambatan bicara. Pada subyek diberikan rangsangan colek, godaan saat bermain, dipanggil namanya saat bermain dan penghambatan saat bermain (dengan tangan) kemudian dinilai respon subyek terhadap pemberi respon. Subyek kemudian dikelompokkan menjadi 2 kelompok, GSA dan bukan GSA berdasarkan kriteria DSM-5. Hasil:Dibandingkan ketiga respon lain, respon colek memiliki spesifitas paling tinggi (93%) dengan sensitivitas 75% dalam mendeteksi GSA. Bila ke 4 pemeriksaan uji diagnostik digabungkan, dengan hasil tes negatif menandakan tidak adanya respon terhadap pemeriksaan, maka akan didapatkan nilai spesifisitas sangat tinggi (100%) dengan sensitivitas 42%. Simpulan: Dibandingkan ketiga pemeriksaan yang sudah ada, respon colek memiliki spesifisitas paling tinggi dalam menyingkirkan GSA pada anak dengan keterlambatan bicara.Background: ASD prevalence are increasing and parents' concerns about their child's condition, encourage early detection by screening of ASD. Several signs for early detection of ASD: 1) teasing response, 2) calling response, 3) blocking response. There are other signs can be used as early detection of ASD, which is a poke response. Objective:To know the diagnostic value of poke response in detecting ASD in children aged 18 months - 4 years with speech delay. Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted on subjects aged 18 months - 4 years with speech delay. The subjects given poke stimulation, teasing when playing, called by name and inhibition when playing then assessed the subject's responses. The subjects were grouped into 2 groups, ASD and not ASD based on DSM-5. Results:Compared to the other 3 responses, poke response had the highest specificity (93%) with 75% sensitivity in detecting ASD. If all 4 diagnostic test examinations are combined, with a negative test result indicating no response to the examination, a very high specificity (100%) with a sensitivity of 42% will be obtained. Conclusion:Compared the others, the poke response has the highest specificity to rule out ASD in children with speech delay."