Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Ketika Snowden menyadari melalui awal yang tidak jelas bahwa pemerintah AS sedang memata-matai beberapa warga, ia memutuskan untuk melakukan investigasi atas masalah tersebut. Ia dipekerjakan oleh pemerintah, dengan maksud utama menemukan sumber informasi ini. Saat bekerja, ia mampu menemukan data yang dicatat dan disimpan. Informasi ini menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah sudah mengumpulkan informasi pada percakapan pribadi antara warga negara AS dan warga non AS. Ini adalah pelanggaran hak asasi manusia dan kebebasan. Snowden mengungkapkan informasi ini kepada publik, yang merupakan pelanggaran terhadap undang-undang negara. Hal itu tidak dapat diterima untuk mengungkapkan setiap rahasia pemerintah kepada publik. Ia dituduh mengungkapkan rahasia pemerintah kepada publik. Karena Snowden hanya membeberkan informasi umum tentang keburukan pemerintah, hal ini bukanlah kejahatan. Orang-orang mulai melawan pemerintah. Untuk alasan ini, pemerintah menyayangkan apa yang Snowden lakukan. Kita tidak bisa mengatakan bahwa yang Snowden lakukan buruk. Ia hanya ingin menolong rekan sebangsanya dengan membuat mereka sadar bahwa Pemerintah telah melanggar hak mereka dengan menginvestigasi tindakan pribadi mereka.

---

When Snowden realized through unknown initial means that the US government was spying on some citizens, he decided to conduct an investigation on the matter. He got employed by the government, with the major intention of discovering the real source of this information. While working in the office, he was able to find the data that had been recorded and stored. This information showed that the government had been collecting information on personal conversations between US citizens and non US citizens. This is a violation of human rights and freedoms. Snowden revealed this information to the public, which was a violation of the state laws. It was not acceptable at all to reveal any government secret to the public. He was accused of revealing government secrets to the public. Since Snowden only informed the public of the government ills, this was no crime. The people started fighting against the government. For this reason, the government is saddened by whatever Snowden did. We cannot say that Snowden did anything wrong. He only wanted to assist his fellow countrymen by making them realize that the government had violated their rights by investigating their private actions."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini membahas problem panoptisisme oleh pemerintah yang terjadi di dalam internet. Penulis menggunakan pendekatan Foucauldian dalam melihat kasus Edward Snowden yang membocorkan program panoptik dari NSA. Konsekuensi dari pengawasan ini adalah hilangnya privasi bagi pengguna internet dan mengakibatkan tidak adanya kebebasan untuk bisa menggunakan internet. Masyarakat telah masuk ke dalam sebuah penjara imajiner di mana mereka saling mengawasi dan saling ketakutan karena merasa diawasi.

---

ABSTRACTThis research is focused on problem of panopticism by the government in internet. Writer use a Foucauldian approach to examine the Edward Snowden case who leaked the NSA top secret document to the journalist. The consequences of this surveillance is the loss of personal privacy for the internet user and also there is no such thing as freedom in internet if we always been watched. The society now have step to imaginary prison, where they were watching each other and feel insecure by the constant surveillance. "

"Summary"Investigative reporter for The Guardian and bestselling author Glenn Greenwald, provides an in-depth look into the NSA scandal that has triggered a national debate over national security and information privacy. With further revelations from documents entrusted to Glenn Greenwald by Edward Snowden himself, this book explores the extraordinary cooperation between private industry and the NSA, and the far-reaching consequences of the government's surveillance program, both domestically and abroad" -- $c from publisher's Web site."

"Edward Snowden's leaks exposed fundamental differences in the ways Americans and Europeans approach the issues of privacy and intelligence gathering. Featuring commentary from leading commentators, scholars and practitioners from both sides of the Atlantic, the book documents and explains these differences, summarized in these terms: Europeans should 'grow up' and Americans should 'obey the law'. The book starts with a collection of chapters acknowledging that Snowden's revelations require us to rethink prevailing theories concerning privacy and intelligence gathering, explaining the differences and uncertainty regarding those aspects. An impressive range of experts reflect on the law and policy of the NSA-Affair, documenting its fundamentally transnational dimension, which is the real location of the transatlantic dialogue on privacy and intelligence gathering. The conclusive chapters explain the dramatic transatlantic differences that emerged from the NSA-Affair with a collection of comparative cultural commentary."