Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Amerika Serikat kini tengah menghadapi masalah penghindaran dan pengemplangan pajak yang dilakukan oleh warganegaranya. Cara yang lazim dilakukan untuk melakukan penghindaran pajak adalah dengan membuat rekening bank di luar yurisdiksi Amerika Serikat. Menanggapi masalah ini kemudian pemerintah Amerika Serikat membuat sebuah kebijakan yang dikenal dengan nama Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). Aturan ini dibuat agar institusi keuangan asing untuk melaporkan rekening yang terindikasi milik warganegara Amerika Serikat kepada Internal Revenue Service secara langsung. Implikasi dari aturan ini yaitu adanya kemungkinan tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan rahasia bank yang ada di negara lain. Di Indonesia, hal ini tidak dimungkinkan mengingat adanya ketentuan dalam pasal 41 Undang-Undang Perbankan. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, FATCA juga menyediakan instrumen yang disebut Intergovernmental Agreement. Instrumen ini kemudian diterapkan melalui pasal persetujuan nasabah yang terdapat dalam pasal 44. Akan tetapi masalah yang timbul adalah adanya dorongan untuk merevisi pengecualian ketentuan rahasia bank untuk kepentingan perpajakan. Hal ini baik adanya, mengingat peran dan fungsi pajak, akan tetapi melihat situasi yang berkembang belakangan terkait dengan kasus pemerasan dan korupsi yang dilakukan pegawai pajak berkitan dengan jabatannya, maka revisi ini tidak mungkin dilakukan mengingat bank sebagai lembaga keuangan yang membutuhkan kepercayaan dari nasabahnya. Bisa dibayangkan jika data tersebut bisa diakses langsung maka nasabah tidak akan percaya kepada bank dan akhirnya bisa mempengaruhi perekonomian negara kita.

---

United States of America faces problems regarding the tax evasion and tax avoidance that have been done by their citizens and persons who enjoy a United States source income. Making a bank account or investting outside United States jurisdiction is the methods of United States citizen to have tax evasions and tax avoidance. They use the bank outside the U.S Jurisdiction and also the bank that does not have any relation with United States. In order to combat this problems, United States enacts the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. This act is aiming to get an information about the account that has any relation with United States, be it data and the fmancial condition of the customers. This act is applied on the United States account that exists in the financial institution outside the U.S jurisdiction. All of those data must be reported directly to the Internal Revenue Service. The problem is that the framework of the act is against the principle of bank secrecy for the interest of taxation in Indonesia as stipulated on article 41 of Banking Law. In order to be implemented, FATCA provides the Intergovernmental Agreement. Through the Intergovernmental Agreement, the applicability of FATCA Framework can be implemented through the provisions of customer consent on Banking Law. Though it could be applied through this framework, there is national interest that may raised later on regarding the amendment of the bank secrecy provisions for taxation interest. Eventhough tax is considered as a state main income, but the recent situation shows that our tax authority has an integrity problem such as a corruption and bribery related to their job. The amendment could bring impact to the bank industry relating the customers data where data would not be safe anymore and people are not willing to save their money in the bank."

"Kesepakatan hubungan pemerintahan antara Indonesia dengan Amerika Serikat dalam menerapkan FATCA Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act yang merupakan peraturan unilateral yang diciptakan oleh pemerintah Amerika Serikat, dan telah menjadi isu internasional karena dalam penerapannya akan berdampak terhadap berbagai institusi keuangan di dunia dimana terdapat warga negara Amerika Serikat yang memiliki investasi di luar negara Amerika Serikat. Dalam tulisan ini dirumuskan permasalahan yaitu akibat hukum apa yang muncul sehubungan dengan penerapan FATCA, khususnya dikaji dari aspek yuridis yaitu kerahasiaan bank di Indonesia dan bagaimana implikasi yuridis penerapan FATCA di Indonesia. Pembahasan mencakup akibat hukum yang muncul sehubungan dengan penerapan FATCA khususnya di Indonesia. FATCA dibuat pada 18 Maret 2010 dan berlaku efektif pada 1 Juli 2014, sebagai langkah dalam upaya merespon kasus-kasus penghindaran pajak yang dilakukan oleh warga negara Amerika Serikat. FATCA mewajibkan institusi keuangan asing untuk melaporkan data-data dan transaksi keuangan nasabah asal AS kepada Internal Revenue Service otoritas pajak Amerika Serikat. Indonesia merespon aturan tersebut dengan menjalin kerjasama berupa Intergovernmental Agreement dengan Amerika Serikat. Langkah tersebut diambil Indonesia setelah mempertimbangkan internal setting berupa pentingnya menjaga komitmen kemitraan dengan Amerika Serikat; menghindarkan sanksi withholding tax 30 yang mengancam sustainabilitas lembaga keuangan Indonesia; dan peluang untuk melacak warga negara Indonesia yang melakukan praktik penghindaran pajak serupa atau yurisdiksi mitra secara resiprokal. Serta external setting berupa dukungan negara dalam forum G-20 dan OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development terhadap FATCA, dan menggunakannya sebagai momentum untuk membangun transparansi dalam sektor perpajakan.Adanya komitmen internasional tersebut, memaksa Indonesia mengambil langkah kooperatif karena tidak ingin mendapat resiko terisolasi dari lingkungan internasional, khususnya dalam hal perdagangan dan investasi.

---

A cooperation between Indonesia and United States in the implementation of FATCA Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act . FATCA is a unilateral rules created by the US government, but it became an international issue because the implementation would have an impact to the financial institutions around the world where there is a US citizen has investments. The FATCA framework is intended to reduce the degree of foreignunderreporting, underpayment and non filing that gave rise to the offshoreportion of the federal tax gap. It aims to achieve this by requiring foreignfinancial conduits to establish tiered reporting and payment systems that trace for the IRS US source cross border portfolio income remittances to individual offshore financial accounts directly or beneficially held by US persons. In this paper, the problem of legal issues that arise in relation to the implementation FATCA , especially examined from the juridical aspect of bank secrecy in Indonesia and how how the juridical implications of FATCA implementation in Indonesia. The discussion covers the legal issues that arise in connection with the application of FATCA especially in Indonesia.The tax act created on March 18, 2010 and became effective on July 1, 2014, as a step in the effort to respond to cases of tax evasion committed by US citizens. FATCA requires the foreign financial institutions to report personal data and financial transactions of customers from the US to the Internal Revenue Service US tax authorities. The move was taken after considering the internal settings the importance of maintaining a commitment to a comprehensive partnership with the US avoid the 30 withholding tax penalty that threaten the sustainability of financial institutions in Indonesia and the opportunity to investigate the Indonesian citizens who use offshore banks to avoid tax or reciprocal partner jurisdictions. As well as external setting considerations the support of countries in the G 20 and the OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development on FATCA, and use it as momentum to build transparency in the taxation sector. That international commitments, forcing Indonesia to take steps cooperatively as a preventive action to avoid the risk of being isolated from the international environment, particularly in terms of trade and investment."

"Tesis ini membahas prinsip kehati-hatian dalam penerapan Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) pada Bank X. Pada tahun 2010 pemerintah Amerika Serikat mengeluarkan suatu ketentuan perpajakan yang dinamakan Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act atau disingkat dengan FATCA, yang merujuk pada ketentuan dalam Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act. Tujuan utama dari dibentuknya FATCA adalah untuk menanggulangi penghindaran pajak (tax avoidance) oleh warga negara Amerika Serikat yang melakukan investasi langsung (direct investment) melalui lembaga keuangan di luar negeri ataupun investasi tidak langsung (indirect investment) melalui kepemilikan perusahaan di luar negeri. FATCA mengatur kewajiban yang mengharuskan 2 (dua) entitas luar negeri, yaitu Lembaga Keuangan Asing (Foreign Financial Institution atau FFI) dan Lembaga non-keuangan (Non-Financial Foreign Entities atau NFFE) di luar wilayah Amerika Serikat untuk membuat sebuah perjanjian dan memberikan laporan keuangan kepada badan pemerintah Amerika Serikat yang menangani perpajakan, yaitu US Internal Revenue Service (IRS), mengenai akun atau rekening finansial milik warga Amerika Serikat yang berada pada 2 (dua) entitas tersebut. Kewajiban dalam FATCA tersebut tentunya berpotensi menyinggung peraturan yang berlaku di Indonesia, khususnya di bidang perbankan terkait dengan rahasia bank, karenanya Penulis melalukan penelitian pada salah satu bank Syariah di Indonesia, yaitu Bank X untuk mengetahui bagaimana penerapan FATCA serta kendala-kendala yang dihadapi oleh Bank X serta bagaimana analisa yuridis terhadap prinsip kehati-hatian yang dilakukan Bank X agar tidak melanggar ketentuan terkait rahasia bank dalam pelaksanaan kewajibankewajiban oleh Bank X yang tunduk dalam FATCA. Dalam penulisan ini, Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian normatif sebagai metode yang dipergunakan dalam melakukan penelitian dan penelitiannya bersifat deskriptif dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang menggunakan jenis data sekunder. Dari hasil penelitian yang digunakan, diketahui dalam penerapan FATCA oleh Bank X memang terdapat kendala-kendala yang dihadapi, namun Bank X telah mengupayakan untuk menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian agar dalam penerapan FATCA tersebut Bank X tidak melakukan pelanggaran terkait dengan kewajibannya sebagai bank, khususnya terkait dengan rahasia bank.

---

This thesis discusses the prudential principle in the implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) in Bank X. In 2010 the US government issued a tax provision called the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or abbreviated with FATCA, which refers to the provisions of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act. The main objective of the establishment of FATCA is to tackle tax evasion (tax avoidance) by citizens of the United States who perform direct investment through financial institutions abroad or investing indirectly through ownership of overseas companies. FATCA obligations set requires 2 (two) foreign entities, namely the Foreign Financial Institutions (FFI) and non-Financial Institutions (NFFE) outside the United States to make an agreement and provide reports to finance the US government agency that handles taxation, namely the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the financial accounts or accounts belonging to US citizens who are in the 2 (two) entities. Obligations under FATCA is certainly potentially offensive regulations in Indonesia, particularly in the banking sector related to bank secrecy, hence the author put through research in one of the Islamic banks in Indonesia, Bank X to find out how the application of FATCA and constraints faced by the Bank X as well as how the juridical analysis of the prudential principle by Bank X in order to not violate the relevant provisions of bank secrecy in the implementation of the obligations by the Bank X which is subject to FATCA. In this paper, the author uses the normative research methods as the methods used in conducting research and descriptive research using library research method that uses secondary data types. The research results are used, known in the application of FATCA by Bank X is contained constraints faced, but the Bank X has sought to apply the prudential principle so that the application of the FATCA Bank X does not violate its obligations as related to the bank, particularly related with bank secrecy."

"[ABSTRAKRahasia bank penting untuk diteliti lebih lanjut karena rahasia bank merupakan unsur terpenting dalam sektor perbankan di sisi lain pembatasan rahasia bank ternyata telah menjadi suatu kebutuhan dari perkembangan masyarakat saat ini Secara formal hukum yang berlaku yang mengatur rahasia bank adalah UU Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 sebagaimana diubah dengan UU No 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan yang mana pengaturan rahasia bank menganut teori bahwa rahasia bank bersifat nisbi yaitu bahwa bank diperbolehkan membuka rahasia nasabahnya jika ada suatu kepentingan kepentingan umum yang memaksa Salah satu pengecualian dari kerahasiaan bank di Indonesia adalah untuk kepentingan perpajakan namun hal tersebut saat ini dipermasalahkan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pajak DJP karena dianggap telah menghalangi usaha maksimal aparat pajak dalam pemungutan pajak sebab rumusan membuka kerahasiaan bank untuk kepentingan perpajakan terbatas pada pemeriksaan penyidikan pidana dan penagihan pajak Itulah sebabnya DJP meminta untuk diberikan kewenangan akses langsung data nasabah perbankan direct access sebagai pembanding melalui Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act FATCA Internal Revenue Service memiliki akses langsung terhadap data nasabah bank Bahkan FATCA diberlakukan di Indonesia per Juli Tahun 2014 oleh Pemerintah Amerika Serikat Tujuan khusus dari penulisan tesis ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah memberikan akses langsung bagi DJP untuk membuka kerahasiaan bank apakah dimungkinkan menurut hukum Indonesia dan apakah FATCA dapat diterapkan di Indonesia Hasil penulisan tesis dapat digunakan sebagai bahan masukan bagi pembentuk undang undang untuk melakukan perbaikan bagi peraturan perundang undangan yang sudah ada Tujuan umum dari penulisan tesis ini adalah untuk mengembangkan dan memperkaya kajian ilmu hukum perbankan.

---

ABSTRACTBank secrecy important to further research because the bank secrecy is animportant element in the banking sector, on the other hand restrictions of banksecrecy has become a necessity of development of today's society. Formally theapplicable laws governing the bank secrecy is Law No. 7 of 1992 as Amendmentby Law No. 10 of 1998 on Banking, which is setting bank secrecy subscribe to thetheory that the Bank Secrecy is relative, that the bank is authorized to disclosetheir clients if there is an interest in the public interest that force to do so. Oneexception of bank secrecy in Indonesia is for tax purposes, but it is currentlydisputed by the Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) because they have beenblocking the maximum effort in the tax authorities of tax collection, because theformulation of opening of bank secrecy for tax purposes is limited to theexamination, criminal investigation, and forced tax billing. That is why the DGTrequested to be authorized direct access to the customer data bank (direct access),as a comparison with the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) TheInternal Revenue Service has direct access to the data bank customers. FATCAeven applied in Indonesia as of July 2014 by the United States Government. Thespecific objective of this thesis is to determine whether providing direct access tothe DGT to open bank secrecy is possible under Indonesian law and whetherFATCA can be applied in Indonesia? Results thesis can be used as inputs to thelegislators to make improvements to the legislation that already exists. Thegeneral objective of this thesis is to develop and enrich the study of the science ofbanking law., Bank secrecy important to further research because the bank secrecy is animportant element in the banking sector, on the other hand restrictions of banksecrecy has become a necessity of development of today's society. Formally theapplicable laws governing the bank secrecy is Law No. 7 of 1992 as Amendmentby Law No. 10 of 1998 on Banking, which is setting bank secrecy subscribe to thetheory that the Bank Secrecy is relative, that the bank is authorized to disclosetheir clients if there is an interest in the public interest that force to do so. Oneexception of bank secrecy in Indonesia is for tax purposes, but it is currentlydisputed by the Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) because they have beenblocking the maximum effort in the tax authorities of tax collection, because theformulation of opening of bank secrecy for tax purposes is limited to theexamination, criminal investigation, and forced tax billing. That is why the DGTrequested to be authorized direct access to the customer data bank (direct access),as a comparison with the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) TheInternal Revenue Service has direct access to the data bank customers. FATCAeven applied in Indonesia as of July 2014 by the United States Government. Thespecific objective of this thesis is to determine whether providing direct access tothe DGT to open bank secrecy is possible under Indonesian law and whetherFATCA can be applied in Indonesia? Results thesis can be used as inputs to thelegislators to make improvements to the legislation that already exists. Thegeneral objective of this thesis is to develop and enrich the study of the science ofbanking law.]"

"ABSTRAKPemerintah memberikan lampu hijau terhadap keterbukaan informasi bank, pelaksanaan penerapan prinsip keterbukaan informasi ini tidaklah tanpa hambatan. Implementasi FATCA dan AEOI dipandang penting untuk segera dilaksanakan mengingat keikutsertaan Indonesia dalam penandatanganan perjanjian. Namun demikian, Indonesia tidak akan serta merta ikut dalam pelaksanaan keterbukaan informasi di seluruh dunia apabila persyaratan yang diminta belum terpenuhi. Salah satu hal mendasar yang paling penting untuk dipenuhi adalah pemenuhan perangkat hukum dalam negeri terutama dalam ketidakselarasan peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang perpajakan dan perbankan. Hasil Penelitian didapat adalah untuk Implementasi pemberlakuan Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act FATCA adalah Indonesia menerapkan FATCA berdasarkan Intergovernmental Agreement IGA , meskipun demikian penerapan FATCA tidak boleh bertentangan dengan hukum nasional Indonesia di bidang perbankan dan perpajakan, kaitannya dalam kerjasama luar negeri. Karena penerapan FATCA bersifat lintas sektor, maka dalam penerapannya di Indonesia melibatkan dua otoritas yang berbeda yaitu Menteri Keuangan dan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak DJP pada bidang perpajakannya dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan OJK pada bidang perbankannya. Sedangkan Implementasi Automatic Exchange of Information adalah Indonesia bergabung dalam Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purpose pada September 2009. Untuk menerapkan dengan perangkat hukum di Indonesia, dengan meratifikasi, Karena penerapan Automatic Exchange of Information AEoI bersifat multilateral, maka dalam penerapannya terhadap nasabah khusus Warga Negara Asing WNA serta juga berlaku terhadap Warga Negara Indonesia WNI .

---

ABSTRACTThe government gives the green light to bank disclosure, the implementation of the principle of information disclosure is not without obstacles. The implementation of FATCA and AEOI is considered important for immediate implementation considering Indonesia 39 s participation in the signing of the agreement. However, Indonesia will not necessarily participate in the implementation of information disclosure worldwide if the requirements requested have not been met. One of the most important fundamental issues to be fulfilled is the fulfillment of domestic legal instruments, especially in the unconformity of laws and regulations in the field of taxation and banking. The result of the research is to implement the implementation of Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act FATCA is that Indonesia applies FATCA based on Intergovernmental Agreement IGA , although FATCA implementation should not conflict with Indonesian national law in banking and taxation, its relation in foreign cooperation. Because FATCA 39 s application is cross sectoral, in its implementation in Indonesia it involves two different authorities namely the Minister of Finance and the Directorate General of Taxation DJP on the field of taxation and the Financial Services Authority OJK in its banking field. While the implementation of Automatic Exchange of Information is Indonesia joined in the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purpose in September 2009. To apply with the law in Indonesia, by ratifying, Because the implementation of Automatic Exchange of Information is multilateral, then in its application to customers Special Foreign Citizens Foreign Citizens as well as applicable to Indonesian Citizens WNI . "

"Pemberlakuan Automatic Exchange of Information AEoI dan Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act FATCA di Indonesia bertujuan meningkatkan pemasukan pajak bagi Indonesia dan negara mitranya dengan menggunakan informasi keuangan milik masyarakat. Karena diberlakukan secara bersamaan, harus dipahami persamaan dan perbedaan antara AEoI dan FATCA. Selain itu harus diamati bagaimana AEoI dan FATCA akan berdampak pada kegiatan perbankan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan suatu penelitian yuridis normatif dengan metode pengumpulan data berupa studi pustaka dari bahan hukumprimer, sekunder dan tersier. Dikembangkan dari basis yang sama, yakni Intergovernmental Agreement Model 1 FATCA IGA Model 1 , menjadikan AEoI dan FATCA memiliki beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan. Persamaan tersebut diantaranya latar belakang dan tujuan pembentukan, media serta sifat pemberlakuan, klasifikasi lembaga jasa keuangan yang terlibat serta informasi yang wajib dilaporkan. Adapun perbedaannya antara lain, subjek yang terlibat, objek yang wajib dilaporkan, prosedur pemberlakuan, peran dan keterlibatan negara, sanksi dan kondisi penerapan di Indonesia. AEoI dan FATCA memberikan dampak pada kegiatan dalam industri perbankan Indonesia. Adanya kewajiban untuk melaporkan informasi keuangan nasabah membuat berubahnya ketentuan mengenai akses rahasia bank untuk kepentingan perpajakan. Perubahan ini membuat Direktorat Jenderal Pajak memiliki akses rahasia bank secara langsung. Perubahan ketentuan rahasia bank ini dapat pula mengganggu fungsi intermediasi dalam perbankan. Nasabah yang tidak nyaman dengan ketentuan ini berkemungkinan melakukan capital flight atau terjadi banking panic yang dapat mengganggu kesehatan perbankan. Penerapan AEoI dan FATCA harus menjadi perhatian bagi stakeholder di bidang perbankan. Bank juga harus mempersiapkan solusi untuk mempertahankan kepercayaan masyarakat seiring dengan perubahan ketentuan akses rahasia bank untuk kepentingan perpajakan.

---

The enactment of the Automatic Exchange of Information AEoI and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act FATCA in Indonesia aims to increase tax revenue for Indonesia and its partner countries by using publicly owned financial information. Because it is applied simultaneously, we must understand the similarities and differences between AEoI and FATCA. In addition it should be observed how AEoI and FATCA will impact on banking activities in Indonesia. This research is a normative juridical research with data collection method in the form of literature study from primary, secondary and tertiary law materials. Developed from the same base, namely Intergovernmental Agreement Model 1 FATCA IGA Model 1 , making AEoI and FATCA have several similarities and differences. These equations include the background and objectives of the formation, the media as well as the nature of enforcement, the classification of the financial services institutions involved and the information that must be reported. The differences are among others involved subjects, objects that must be reported, enforcement procedures, roles and state involvement, sanctions and conditions of application in Indonesia. AEoI and FATCA have an impact on activities in the Indonesian banking industry. The existence of an obligation to report the financial information of the customer makes changes to the provisions concerning the secret access of the bank for tax purposes. This change makes the Directorate General of Taxes have direct access to bank secrets. Changes to the bank 39 s confidentiality provisions may also interfere with the intermediation function in the banking sector. Customers who are not comfortable with this provision are likely to make a capital flight or a banking panic that may disrupt banking health. The application of AEoI and FATCA should be of concern to stakeholders in banking. Banks should also prepare solutions to maintain public trust in line with changes in bank secrecy provisions for tax purposes."

"Pertukaran informasi terkait dengan perpajakan antar negara merupakan salah satu upaya yang dilakukan oleh berbagai negara untuk mencegah dan mengatasi berbagai bentuk penghindaran dan penggelapan pajak, salah satunya adalah berdasarkan ketentuan Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters (AEOI) yang akan segera berlaku mulai tahun 2017 mendatang. Penerapan ketentuan AEOI tersebut di Indonesia berkaitan dengan aturan yang mengatur mengenai kerahasiaan bank yang berlaku bagi bank di Indonesia dimana informasi keuangan nasabah dilindungi sebagai rahasia bank. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas permasalahan yang terkait dengan hal tersebut yaitu Pertama, menganalisis akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan dari penerapan ketentuan AEOI di Indonesia terkait dengan ketentuan mengenai rahasia bank berdasarkan UU Perbankan yang berlaku di Indonesia dan Kedua, menganalisis mengenai akibat penerapan ketentuan AEOI bagi Bank Umum di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan penulis adalah pendekatan Yuridis Normatif, penelitian yang dilakukan dengan mendasar kepada kepustakaan atau data sekunder dengan menganalisis akibat hukum dari penerapan ketentuan AEOI berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia terkait dengan kerahasiaan bank. Metode penelitian dengan tahap pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan dan wawancara. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah normatif kualitatif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah, Pertama, ketentuan yang mengatur mengenai rahasia bank di Indonesia tidak dapat dikesampingkan dengan diberlakukannya ketentuan pertukaran informasi perpajakan antar negara berdasarkan ketentuan AEOI. Pembukaan rahasia bank untuk kepentingan penerapan AEOI harus berdasarkan persetujuan dari nasabah. Kedua, akibat dari penerapan ketentuan AEOI di Indonesia bagi bank umum adalah bank umum memiliki kewajiban untuk melakukan pelaporan kepada otoritas pajak di Indonesia atas nasabahnya yang tunduk pada ketentuan AEOI dengan melakukan uji tuntas untuk menentukan nasabahnya yang termasuk dalam kategori nasabah yang wajib untuk dilaporkan.

---

Exchange of information related to taxation between nations is an effort taken by countries to prevent and to overcome tax avoidance and tax evasion schemes, one of them based by provisions set out in Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters (AEOI) which will come into force as of 2017. The implementation of AEOI in Indonesia will be closely related to banking secrecy regulations which binding for banks in Indonesia whereas consumer privacy is safeguarded as bank secrecy.

This study aims to discuss issues related to the implementation, First, to analyze the legal consequences arising from the implementation of AEOI in Indonesia in relation with banking secrecy regulations based on Banking Law in Indonesia, and Second, to analyze the consequences of the implementation of AEOI for commercial bank in Indonesia.

The study method is judicial normative approach, based on research conducted by the library or secondary data by analyzing the legal consequences of the implementation of AEOI subject to law and regulations prevailing in Indonesia related to bank secrecy. The research method with data collection phase used is literature study and interviews. Data analysis method used in this study is normative qualitative.

This study concluded that, First, the implementation of AEOI in Indonesia shall not set aside regulations concerning bank secrecy as regulated in Banking Law. Lifting of bank secrecy due to exchange of information based on AEOI shall required customer consent. Second, as a result of the implementation of AEOI in Indonesia for commercial have an obligation to do the reporting to the tax authorities in Indonesia for customer subject to the provisions of AEOI by conducting due diligence to determine its customers which are included in the category of accounts that are required to be reported."

"Penerimaan yang optimal harus di dukung kemampuan otoritas pajak menghimpun berbagai data dan informasi yang digunakan sebagai alat pengawasan kepatuhan pajak. Di Indonesia, dalam melaksanakan pemungutan pajaknya menggunakan self assessment system, sehingga membutuhkan data dan informasi wajib pajak melalui lembaga keuangan, salah satunya perbankan. Sebelum adanya kebijakan keterbukaan, kondisi Indonesia adalah kepatuhan pajak yang rendah, penerimaan pajak yang belum mencapai target, serta tax ratio yang rendah. Oleh karena itu peneliti mengambil tema ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana implementasi kebijakan keterbukaan akses informasi keuangan membuat perbankan berkewajiban untuk melaporkan data nasabahnya kepada otoritas pajak. Peneliti menggunakan pendekatan post-positivis melalui wawancara dan data sekunder.Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah implementasi kebijakan keterbukaan akses data perbankan dalam meningkatkan tax complaince di Indonesia adalah (i) Kesediaan kelompok sasaran mematuhi output kebijakan, dalam hal ini pelaporan data nasabah oleh perbankan kepada DJP. Perbankan di Indonesia dinilai sebagian besar telah compliance. Kebijakan keterbukaan akses data perbankan ini juga tidak menghambat atau menurunkan jumlah rekening dan simpanan di bank. Perbankan dinilai menunjukkan sikap kooperatif terhadap kebijakan, namun masih terdapat kekhawatiran karena terbenturnya kepentingan antara melaksanakan kebijakan pemerintah dengan tugasnya untuk merahasiakan data nasabah. Kebijakan keterbukaan data perbankan menjadi salah satu faktor peningkatan kepatuhan pajak dan penerimaan pajak di tahun 2018 di Indonesia. (ii) Dalam pelaksanaanya terdapat faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi yaitu adanya teknis kesulitan yang dialami oleh DJP dan Perbankan sendiri di tahun pertama juga tinggi, terkait pelaporan itu sendiri. Selain faktor teknis, DJP juga masih perlu untuk mensosialisasikan dan mengidentifikasi keberadaan lembaga keuangan lainnya termasuk BPR, KSP, dll.Selain implementasi, juga terdapat faktor yang mendukung dan menghambat kebijakan ini adalah (i) Faktor yang mendukung adalah dukungan dari berbagai kalangan dan adanya legal basis yang mengatur. (ii) Faktor penghambat adalah faktor IT. Selain itu, solusi atau saran yang diberikan atas implementasi kebijakan ini adalah (i) Dalam implementasi kebijakan ini membutuhkan faktor konsistensi, (ii) Faktor SDM sangatlah penting, sehingga DJP seharusnya melakukan perbaikan kualitas SDM dibidang IT dan juga sistem teknologi informasi yang mendukung. (iii) DJP seharusnya segera mengolah data tersebut dengan cepat dan menganalisis data sehingga hasil dari kebijakan ini dapat dimanfaatkan oleh KPP untuk mengidentifikasi kepatuhan pajak (iv) perlu dibangunnya trust antara wajib pajak dan fiskus, agar saling mempercayai dalam melaksanakan hak dan kewajiban pajaknya.

---

Optimal receipts must be supported by the ability of the tax authority to collect data and information that are used as tax compliance monitoring tools. In Indonesia, in carrying out tax collection using the self assessment system, so that it requires taxpayer data and information through financial institutions, one of which is banking. Before the openness policy, Indonesia's condition was low tax compliance, tax revenues that had not yet reached the target, and a low tax ratio. Therefore the researcher took this theme to find out how the implementation of the policy of open access to financial information made banks obliged to report their customer data to the tax authority. The researcher used the post-positivist approach through interviews and secondary data.The results of this study are the implementation of banking data access disclosure policies in increasing tax complaints in Indonesia are (i) Willingness of the target groups to comply with policy output, in this case the customer data reporting by banks to the DGT. Most banks in Indonesia are considered to have compliance. This policy of open access to banking data also does not hamper or reduce the number of accounts and deposits in banks. Banking is considered to show a cooperative attitude towards policy, but there are still concerns because of the lack of interest between implementing government policy and its duty to keep customer data confidential. The banking data disclosure policy is one factor in increasing tax compliance and tax revenue in 2018 in Indonesia. (ii) In its implementation there are influencing factors, namely the existence of technical difficulties experienced by DGT and Banking itself in the first year is also high, related to the reporting itself. In addition to technical factors, DGT also needs to socialize and identify the existence of other financial institutions including BPR, KSP, etc.In addition to implementation, there are also factors that support and hinder this policy are (i) Supporting factors are support from various groups and legal basis which governs. (ii) The inhibiting factor is the IT factor. In addition, the solutions or suggestions given for implementing this policy are (i) In implementing this policy requires a consistency factor, (ii) HR factors are very important, so the DGT should improve the quality of human resources in the IT sector and supporting information technology systems. (iii) DGT should immediately process the data quickly and analyze the data so that the results of this policy can be utilized by KPP to identify tax compliance (iv) the need for trusts between taxpayers and tax authorities, to mutual trust in carrying out their tax rights and obligations."

"[Implementasi kebijakan kerahasiaan bank untuk tujuan perpajakan merupakan salah satu elemen penting dalam rangka peningkatan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak.Penelitian yang menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi pustaka dan wawancara mendalam ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan implementasi akses informasi perbankan untuk tujuan perpajakan di Indonesia dan Singapura, serta menguraikan berbagai permasalahan yang dihadapi di dalam implementasinya di Indonesia. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkanbahwa implementasi kebijakan kerahasiaan bank untuk tujuan perpajakan di Indonesia sebagaimana tidak sepenuhnya sesuai dengan tujuan diterapkannya kedua undang-undang tersebut, namun demikian, hal serupa tidak terjadi di Singapura. Hal ini karena dalam implementasinya di Indonesia masih terdapat hambatan terkait dengan (i) ketidakselarasan dan perbedaan intrepretasi dasar hukum (legal basis) yang mengatur; (ii) belum adanya Standar OperasionalProsedur (SOP) terkait akses informasi perbankan untuk tujuan perpajakan yang dibuat secara detail; (iii) belum adanya jaminan terhadap perlindungan hak-hak Wajib Pajak; dan (iv) tingkat ego-sektoral lembaga yang masih tinggi., Implementation of the policy of bank secrecy for tax purposes is one of the important elements in order to increase tax compliance. The research used a qualitative approach to data collection techniques such as literature and in-depth interviews aimed to explain the implementation of access to bank information for tax purposes in Indonesia and Singapore, as well as outlining the various problems encountered in the implementation in Indonesia. The results of thisresearch shows that the implementation of the policy of bank secrecy for tax purposes in Indonesia as it is not fully in accordance with the purpose of the implementation of the statutes, however, the same thing does not happen in Singapore. This is because there are obstacles associated with (i) inconsistencies and differences in interpretation of the legal basis were set up; (ii) the absence of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) regarding access to bank information for tax purposes are made in detail; (iii) the absence of a guarantee of protection of the rights of Taxpayers; and (iv) the high level of ego-sectoral due to the implementation in Indonesia]"

"This writing is aimed to describe how is the role of Account Representative (AR) in increasing tax servicing and the Taxpayer compliance after the implementation of Modem Taxation Administration System (SAPM). In this research is explained background/basic thinking of SAPM implementation at Foreign Investment Tax Office Four, for realizing the highest level of voluntary compliance, the conviction level against high taxation administration and high productivity of taxation agency. The implementation of Modem Taxation Administration System was started with the change of organization structure and taxation information system technology. Organization structure was designed based on the functions of covering servicing, inspection, supervision, collecting, objection functions, based on tax type as determined before. The most prominent change element is the establishment of Account Representative position (AR) who is responsible for servicing and supervising Taxpayer compliance. AR becomes connector between tax office and Taxpayer who is responsible for submitting taxation information effectively and professionally.

In this thesis writing is used descriptive method with qualitative and quantitative approaches, a method to uncover conditions and factual problem happened in this time. Based on said method, the research in this writing would be focused to analyze the role of AR in increasing servicing and Taxpayer compliance at Foreign Investment Tax Office Four after SAPM implementation.

The research result indicated that the role of AR in SAPM implementation at Foreign Investment Tax Office Four is very dominant and influence servicing to Taxpayer. With the existence of AR as Liaison Officer between Tax Office and Taxpayer in creating servicing and inspection functions against tax compliance becoming more effective. Even though there is some settlement of Taxpayer application out of time, but based on research, the said delay is largely caused by the lack of Taxpayer understanding level concerning the order, procedure and formal completeness which should be provided when requesting application to Foreign Investment Tax Office Four.

The role of AR in increasing Taxpayer compliance in submitting annual SPT 2004 with SPT electronic application is not optimal yet. Based on this research, many obstacles were faced by AR in executing socialization and e-SPT training against Taxpayer causing the level of Taxpayer to use e-SPT application is still low.

In order that SAPM can be done optimally for increasing tax servicing and Taxpayer compliance in submitting annual SPT at Foreign Investment Tax Office Four, can be done various efforts, with increasing the role of Account Representative (AR) in inspecting and giving taxation information to Taxpayer, maximizing the application of Sl-DJP with conducting the completing of the available system in this time, as well reconstruction and increase Human Resources quality in Foreign Investment Tax Office Four followed by the increase of moral quality in the event of developing awareness for increasing servicing to Taxpayer. With awarding good servicing to Taxpayer is expected can increase also the voluntary Taxpayer compliance, so that Foreign Investment Tax Office Four can maximize duties in the event of state income from tax sector."