Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPembinaan dan pengawasan terhadap penyelenggaraan usaha pertambangan panas bumi diperlukan dalam rangka mewujudkan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang baik good corporate governance dalam pengusahaan pertambangan panas bumi dan untuk menghindari terjadinya penyalahgunaan wewenang abuse of power Undang Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2003 tentang Panas Bumi telah membagi kewenangan pengusahaan panas bumi dan penerbitan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Panas Bumi telah diserahkan kepada Pemerintah Pusat Pemerintah Provinsi dan Pemerintah Kabupaten Kota sesuai dengan kewenangannya yang disesuaikan dengan wilayah administrasi dimana potensi panas bumi tersebut berada Meskipun kewenangan pengusahaan panas bumi telah dibagi sampai dengan Pemerintah Daerah namun perlu diingat bahwa dimilikinya kewenangan dalam pengusahaan panas bumi juga mewajibkan Pemerintah Daerah untuk melaksanakan pengawasan langsung dan bertanggung jawab terhadap pelaksanaan usaha pertambangan yang diterbitkannya tersebut Undang Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah mengatur bahwa Gubernur dalam kedudukannya sebagai wakil Pemerintah Pusat memiliki tugas dan wewenang pula untuk melakukan pembinaan dan pengawasan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah kabupaten kota Undang Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2003 telah memberikan pula kewenangan kepada Menteri untuk melakukan pembinaan dan pengawasan terhadap penyelenggaraan usaha pertambangan panas bumi yang dilakukan oleh Gubernur Bupati dan Walikota Namun sayangnya pembagian kewenangan tersebut tidak diikuti dengan pengaturan mengenai sanksi bagi pemerintah daerah yang tidak menjalankan kewenangannya sesuai peraturan perundang undangan Hal yang demikian kiranya yang melatarbelakangi permasalahan terkait dengan pelaksanaan kewenangan pengelolaan sumber daya alam pada umumnya dan pengelolaan panas bumi pada khususnya kepada Pemerintah Daerah Kata kunci kewenangan panas bumi pembinaan dan pengawasan

---

ABSTRACTGuidance and supervision of the implementation of the geothermal mining is necessary in order to realize good governance corporate governance in geothermal exploitation and to avoid abuse of power abuse of power Law No 27 Year 2003 on Geothermal has divided authority and publishing exploitation of geothermal Geothermal Mining Permit has been submitted to the Central Government Provincial Government and Regency City in accordance with the authority which is adapted to the administrative area where the geothermal potential located Although geothermal concession authority has been divided up by the regional government but keep in mind that it has the authority in geothermal exploitation also requires local governments to carry out direct supervision and is responsible for the implementation of the issuance of the mining business Law No 32 Year 2004 on Regional Government provides that the Governor in his capacity as representative of the Central Government also has the duty and authority to provide guidance and oversight for the regional administration of the district city Law No 27 of 2003 has also authorizes the Minister to direct and supervise the operation of the geothermal mining is done by the Governor the Regent and the Mayor But unfortunately the division of powers is not followed by sanctions for the regulation of local governments that do not run the appropriate authority legislation It is thus presumably the underlying problems associated with the implementation of natural resources management authority in general and in particular the management of geothermal energy to local government Keywords authority geothermal guidance and supervision"

"Skripsi berikut membahas tentang energi dan sumber daya yaitu mineral dan pertambangan batubara yang merupakan sumber daya alam yang tak terbarukan dan membutuhkan pengelolaan yang baik. Dasar pengelolaan sumber daya alam diamanatkan pasal 33 ayat 3 UUD 1945 yang menyebutkan bahwa hak menguasasi Negara dan bertujuan ldquo;manfaat terbesar untuk sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat. Dengan didasari asas otonomi daerah tersebut maka adanya pembagian atas urusan pemerintahan yang menjadi kewenangan antara Pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah. Pasca pemerintah mengeluarkan Undang-undang 23 Tahun 2014 terjadi pengalihan kewenangan yang sebelumnya pengelolaann sumber daya alam pada Pemerintah daerah kabupaten/kota menjadi kewenangan Pemerintah Pusat dan provinsi sedangkan Undang-undang 4 Tahun 2009 masih memberikan kewenangan pemberian izin pada pemerintah kabupaten/kota. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa terjadi disharmonisasi antar undang-undang yang mengatur kewenangan pengelolaan sumber daya daya pertambangan mineral dan batubara khususnya dalam kewenangan penerbitan Izin Usaha Pertambangan. Untuk itu, Pemerintah disarankan untuk mempercepat penyelesaian pembahasan RUU Minerba dan segera menindaklanjuti kelembagaan yang berubah setelah beralihnya kewenangan ke Pemerintah Provinsi.

---

The following thesis is discussing about energy and natural resources especially mineral and coal mining sector are the non renewable energy and requiring attention to managing. Basic managing the natural resources basis which is mandated by Article 33 paragraph 3 of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution which are the state control ldquo hak menguasai Negara rdquo and the goal of ldquo The largest benefit for the peoples prosperity. In term of the management by central government authority distributed the management of mineral and coal based on the principles of local autonomy. Based on the principle autonomy with the area hence the Division Government Affairs who became the authority between the central government and local government. Since government issuing Law Number 23 Year 2014 concerning Regional Government there has been a transfer of authority to grant Mining Business Permit from the district city government to the provincial government while Law Number 4 Year 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal still gives the authority to grant Mining Business Authority to the district city government. This situation shows that there is horizontal disharmony between the governing legislation in the licensing mining authority. Thus, government should to accelerate the completion coal and mineral bill immediately follow up the institutional changes after the transfer of authority to central government. "

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai dua pokok permasalahan seperti pengaturan terkait kewenangan di bidang mineral dan batubara khususnya dalam penerbitan Izin Usaha Pertambangan serta pengaruh sentralisasi kewenangan penerbitan Izin Usaha Pertambangan setelah berlakunya UU No. 3/2020. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis-normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penarikan kembali kewenangan penerbitan Izin Usaha Pertambangan dari Pemerintah Daerah ke Pemerintah Pusat menyebabkan tata laksana pengelolaan dan pengawasan pertambangan mineral dan batubara di Pemerintah Pusat kurang terkendali. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan adanya pembagian kewenangan dalam tata laksana pengelolaan dan pengawasan pertambangan mineral dan batubara antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah serta pengaturan dalam peraturan pelaksana UU No. 3/2020 agar permasalahan dalam pelaksanaan pengelolaan dan pengawasan terhadap pertambangan mineral dan batubara dapat teratasi.

---

This thesis discusses two main issues such as the regulations related to mineral and coal mining, especially in the issuance of mining business permit, and the impact of the centralization of mining business permit issuance authority after the Law No. 3/2020. The research method used is juridical-normative method. The result of this research indicates that the withdrawal of the authority to issue mining business permit from the regional government to the central government causes a disorder to the management of mineral and coal mining. Therefore, the authority to control and supervise the management of mineral and coal mining needs to be divided between central government and regional government and to be regulated in the regulation regarding the implementation of the Law No. 3/2020 in order to overcome the mineral and coal mining management problems."

"[Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 merupakan undang-undang yang dapat dikatakan cukup kontroversial bagi pertambangan mineral logam, karena merubah alur industri pertambangan logam tanah air menjadi tidak hanya mencakup kegiatan pertambangan semata, akan tetapi juga diwajibkan untuk perusahaan-perusahaan pertambangan melakukan kegiatan pengolahan dan pemurnian di dalam negeri dalam kurun waktu hanya 5 (lima) tahun saja. Keterbatasan infrastruktur di daerah-daerah, ketidaktersediaan listrik, serta kompleksnya birokrasi yang melingkupi perluasan bidang usaha lintas sektor antara pertambangan (hulu) dengan pemurnian (hilir) membuat hal tersebut menjadi terlalu sulit diwujudkan, ditambah lagi dengan inkonsistensi Pemerintah yang menetapkan kewajiban divestasi saham bagi Perusahaan Pertambangan Penanaman Modal Asing, dari 20% (dua puluh persen) di tahun 2010, menjadi 51% (lima puluh satu persen) di tahun 2012. Selain kedua hal tersebut, pada tahun ketiga sejak Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 diberlakukan, Pemerintah telah melarang kegiatan ekspor mineral mentah, akan tetapi mencabutnya kembali dan menetapkan ketentuan ekspor dengan tambahan birokrasi yang semakin panjang, sehingga menyebabkan investor pertambangan penanaman modal asing kehilangan waktu dan sulit dalam merealisasikan amanah Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tersebut. Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk menampilkan fakta kesulitan-kesulitan yang dialami oleh PT. X selaku perusahaan penanaman modal asing dalam bidang pertambangan mineral nikel oleh karena kebijakan pertambangan yang tidak cukup berimbang.

---

Law Number 4 Year 2009 could be considered as a controversy for the metal mineral mining businesses, since it has changed the scheme of domestic metal mineral mining industry to not only contains mining but also obliged the mining companies to conduct mineral smelting and processing domestically within period of only 5 (five) years. The limitation of infrastructure facilities within the counties, unavailability of electrical source, and the complexity of bureaucracies that facilitates such cross borders industrial sectors between the mining (mainstream industries) , and the smelting and processing (downstream industries) has caused such policy too unreasonable to be accomplished, moreover the inconsistency of the Government whom has stipulated the divestment terms for the foreign investing mining company, from 20% (twenty percent) in 2010, and re-stipulated it to became 51% (fifty one) percent within 2012. Apart from those two main issues herein, by the third year since the enactment of Law Number 4 Year 2009, the Government has banned the raw mineral export activities, however revoked such laws and enacted a new regulation of raw mineral export policies with additional/ longer bureaucracy’s mechanism process, therefore it has put the foreign mining investors within difficult circumstances to actualize the mandate of the laws itself. This Thesis intends to display the problematic facts that experienced by PT. X as a foreign investing mining company in nickel mining by the insufficient fairness of mining policies.;Law Number 4 Year 2009 could be considered as a controversy for the metal mineral mining businesses, since it has changed the scheme of domestic metal mineral mining industry to not only contains mining but also obliged the mining companies to conduct mineral smelting and processing domestically within period of only 5 (five) years. The limitation of infrastructure facilities within the counties, unavailability of electrical source, and the complexity of bureaucracies that facilitates such cross borders industrial sectors between the mining (mainstream industries) , and the smelting and processing (downstream industries) has caused such policy too unreasonable to be accomplished, moreover the inconsistency of the Government whom has stipulated the divestment terms for the foreign investing mining company, from 20% (twenty percent) in 2010, and re-stipulated it to became 51% (fifty one) percent within 2012. Apart from those two main issues herein, by the third year since the enactment of Law Number 4 Year 2009, the Government has banned the raw mineral export activities, however revoked such laws and enacted a new regulation of raw mineral export policies with additional/ longer bureaucracy’s mechanism process, therefore it has put the foreign mining investors within difficult circumstances to actualize the mandate of the laws itself. This Thesis intends to display the problematic facts that experienced by PT. X as a foreign investing mining company in nickel mining by the insufficient fairness of mining policies.;Law Number 4 Year 2009 could be considered as a controversy for the metal mineral mining businesses, since it has changed the scheme of domestic metal mineral mining industry to not only contains mining but also obliged the mining companies to conduct mineral smelting and processing domestically within period of only 5 (five) years. The limitation of infrastructure facilities within the counties, unavailability of electrical source, and the complexity of bureaucracies that facilitates such cross borders industrial sectors between the mining (mainstream industries) , and the smelting and processing (downstream industries) has caused such policy too unreasonable to be accomplished, moreover the inconsistency of the Government whom has stipulated the divestment terms for the foreign investing mining company, from 20% (twenty percent) in 2010, and re-stipulated it to became 51% (fifty one) percent within 2012. Apart from those two main issues herein, by the third year since the enactment of Law Number 4 Year 2009, the Government has banned the raw mineral export activities, however revoked such laws and enacted a new regulation of raw mineral export policies with additional/ longer bureaucracy’s mechanism process, therefore it has put the foreign mining investors within difficult circumstances to actualize the mandate of the laws itself. This Thesis intends to display the problematic facts that experienced by PT. X as a foreign investing mining company in nickel mining by the insufficient fairness of mining policies., Law Number 4 Year 2009 could be considered as a controversy for the metal mineral mining businesses, since it has changed the scheme of domestic metal mineral mining industry to not only contains mining but also obliged the mining companies to conduct mineral smelting and processing domestically within period of only 5 (five) years. The limitation of infrastructure facilities within the counties, unavailability of electrical source, and the complexity of bureaucracies that facilitates such cross borders industrial sectors between the mining (mainstream industries) , and the smelting and processing (downstream industries) has caused such policy too unreasonable to be accomplished, moreover the inconsistency of the Government whom has stipulated the divestment terms for the foreign investing mining company, from 20% (twenty percent) in 2010, and re-stipulated it to became 51% (fifty one) percent within 2012. Apart from those two main issues herein, by the third year since the enactment of Law Number 4 Year 2009, the Government has banned the raw mineral export activities, however revoked such laws and enacted a new regulation of raw mineral export policies with additional/ longer bureaucracy’s mechanism process, therefore it has put the foreign mining investors within difficult circumstances to actualize the mandate of the laws itself. This Thesis intends to display the problematic facts that experienced by PT. X as a foreign investing mining company in nickel mining by the insufficient fairness of mining policies.]"

"Implikasi lahirnya Undang Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah menyebabkan perubahan kewenangan pemerintah dalam menyelenggarakan urusan pemerintahan di bidang pertambangan. Adanya perubahan kewenangan tersebut menimbulkan suatu kemungkinan terjadinya kesalahan dari pejabat pemerintah dalam melakukan kegiatan pengaturan dan pengurusan di sector pertambangan. Oleh karenanya, penulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana kewenangan gubernur dalam hal pencabutan izin usaha pertambangan (IUP) setelah berlakunya Undang Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan menganalisis keabsahan dari pencabutan IUP PT Sebuku Batubai Coal (PT Sebuku) oleh Gubernur Kalimantan Selatan. Hasil dari penelitian penulis menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan gubernur dalam hal pencabutan IUP setelah berlakunya Undang Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah telah mengalami perluasan. Gubernur memiliki wewenang untuk mencabut IUP yang wilayah pertambangannya berada di 1 (satu) daerah provinsi termasuk juga terhadap IUP yang telah diterbitkan oleh bupati/walikota Selain itu, pencabutan IUP PT Sebuku telah tidak sah karena mengandung cacat prosedur dan cacat substansi. Untuk mencegah timbulnya kesewenang wenangan pemerintah dalam mencabut IUP dikemudian hari, diperlukan adanya peningkatan pengawasan dari pemerintah pusat terhadap penyelenggaraan pengelolaan usaha pertambangan yang dilaksankan oleh pemerintah provinsi. Disamping itu, diperlukan juga adanya sanksi bagi bupati/walikota apabila melalaikan kewajibannya untuk menyerahkan dokumen IUP dalam rangka melakukan evaluasi dalam Peraturan Menteri ESDM Nomor 43 Tahun 2015. Metode penelitian dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif, dan menggunakan bahan bahan kepustakaan seperti bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier.

---

The implications of Law 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government led to changes in government authority in carrying out government affairs in the mining sector. The change in authority has created a possibility of errors from government officials in conducting regulatory and management activities in the mining sector. Therefore, this thesis aims to analyze how the governors authority in terms of revoking a mining permits (MP) after the enactment of Law 23/2014 and analyzing the validity of the revocation of PT Sebuku Batubai Coal (PT Sebuku) MP by South Kalimantan Governor. The results of the authors research indicate that the governors authority in terms of revocation of MP after the enactment of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government has undergone expansion. The Governor has the authority to revoke the MP whose mining area is in 1 (one) provincial area including the MP that has been issued by the regent or mayor. In addition, revocation of PT Sebukus MP has been invalid because it contains procedural and substance defects. To prevent the arising of arbitrariness of the government in revoking MPs in the future, it is necessary to increase supervision from the central government on the implementation of mining business management carried out by the provincial government. Besides that, there is also a need for sanctions for regents or mayors if they neglect their obligation to submit MP documents in order to evaluate the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation Number 43 of 2015. The research method in writing this thesis is juridicalnormative research, and uses library materials such as primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pola pengusahaan panas bumi berdasarkan peraturan perundangan sebelum tahun 2003, UU No. 27 Tahun 2003 dan UU No. 21 Tahun 2014. Analisis dalam skripsi ini berfokus pada pembagian kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah dalam pemanfaatan tidak langsung panas bumi menurut kedua undang-undang tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa desentralisasi urusan di bidang panas bumi menjadi salah satu penghambat optimalisasi pemanfaatan panas bumi sebagai sumber energi listrik. Oleh sebab itu, pengaturan bahwa pengelolaan panas bumi kembali dilakukan oleh pemerintah pusat berdasarkan UU No. 21 Tahun 2014 adalah suatu langkah yang tepat.

---

This thesis discussing about geothermal resources management under the regulation before 2003, under the Law Number 27 of 2003 and the Law Number 21 of 2014. The focus of the analysis is the division of authority between the central government and local governments related to the utilization of geothermal in indirect use. The result of this analyisis shows that the decentralization of geothermal resources management to the local goverments has become one of the obstacles of its optimalization. Therefore, it will be better if the central government hold the authorithy of geothermal management, as already regulated by the Law Number 21 of 2014."

"ABSTRAKKegiatan usaha pertambangan mineral dan batubara mempunyai peranan penting dalammemberikan nilai tambah secara nyata kepada pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional danpembangunan daerah secara berkelanjutan. Mengingat hal tersebut, pengaturan danpengawasan pemerintah sangat diperlukan khususnya pengaturan kerjasama usaha jasapertambangan agar ada pembatasan dalam pengelolaan dan pengusahaan sumber dayaalam di Indonesia oleh suatu pelaku usaha sehingga tidak merugikan kepentingannegara dan masyarakat luas. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk melihat bagaimana pengaturanPemerintah dalam membatasi kerjasama dalam pelaksanaan usaha jasa pertambangan.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridisnormatif yang menginventarisasi, mengkaji dan meneliti peraturan perundang-undangandan data sekunder lainnya yang berkaitan dengan materi penelitian. Sifat Penelitian tesisini, bersifat deskriptif analitis. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah dengan metodeanalisis kualitatif. Pengaturan pemerintah dalam pembatasan kerjasama kegiatan usahajasa pertambangan khususnya dalam pengaturan pelaksanaan kegiatan penambangandan keikutsertaan anak perusahaan dan/atau afiliasinya sangat penting dilakukan untukmenghindari adanya transfer of profit, akan tetapi pemerintah sebaiknya perlumemperhatikan adanya perbedaan penjabaran ketentuan dalam UU Minerba danperaturan pelaksananya, serta peningkatan pengawasan di lapangan, sehingga dapattercapai kemandirian dan efektifitas pengusahaan di bidang pertambangan, sertamemberi nilai tambah bagi perekonomian nasional guna mencapai kemakmuran sertakesejahteraan rakyat

---

ABSTRACTBusiness activities of mineral and coal mining significantly has an important role inproviding value-added to national economic growth and development in a sustainabledistrict. Given this, government regulation and supervision is indispensable especiallyfor mining services business partnership arrangements that exist in the organization andundertaking limitation of natural resources in Indonesia by business actor effort to notharm the national interest and the wider community. The purpose of this research is tosee how the arrangement limits the government in the implementation of jointcooperation in mining services business. Research methods used in this study isnormative juridical research, study and analyze the legislation and other secondary datarelated to study materials. The nature of this thesis research is descriptive analytics. Themethod used to analize data in this research is qualitative analysis. Limitation ofgovernment regulation in mining services business activities of cooperation in particularin the implementation of regulation of mining activities and participation subsidiariesand/or affiliates is very important to avoid any such transfer of profit, but thegovernment should have notice a discrepancy explanation of the provisions in the ActMinerba and its implementing regulations, and increased supervision on the field, so asto achieve independence and effectiveness of the undertaking in the field of mining, aswell as added value to national economy and achieve prosperity and welfare of thepeople"

"Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 seolah mereduksi kewenangan pemerintah daerah. Sebanyak 19 pasal yang telah direvisi yang bertalian dengan kewenangan pemerintah daerah hampir seluruh kewenangan pemerintah daerah ditarik menjadi kewenangan pusat, di dalam penelitian ini akan menyajikan persoalan mengenai ketengan pemerintah daerah pada urusan mineral batubara kepada pemerintah pusat. kewenangan pemerintah daerah provinsi maupun kabupaten/kota pada urusan pertambangan, merupakan urusan yang bersifat concurrent yang dalam penanganannya melibatkan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah, menarik sebagian besar kewenangan dan tidak melibatkan pemerintah daerah tentu berpotensi berimplikasi negatif dalam hal penyelenggaraan urusan pertambangan mineral dan batubara, misalnya, mencakup dana bagi hasil, tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan, resistensi masyarakat setempat akibat kurang jelasnya mekanisme keberatan atau penolakan mereka terhadap kehadiran penambangan di daerahnya, lemahnya isu pengawasan dan pembinaan dalam mengurangi tingkat risiko sosial dan lingkungan, dan lebih penting memangkas jarak antara pemerintah dan masyarakat. .....The revision of Law Number 4 of 2009 to Law Number 3 of 2020 revised 135 articles from the 217 articles contained in Law Number. 4 of 2009, in detail there are 73 articles that have been added, 51 articles have been amended, and 11 articles have been deleted. As many as 19 revised articles relating to the authority of local governments, almost all local government authorities have been withdrawn to the central authority, leaving room for delegation of part of the authority of the Central Government to provincial local governments for the issuance of IPR and SIPB, in this study will present the implications of regional city district governments. no longer have space of authority in coal mineral mining affairs. the authority of the provincial and district / city governments in mining affairs, is a concurrent affair which in its handling involves the central government and regional governments, withdrawing most of the authority and does not involve local governments, of course, has the potential to have negative implications in terms of carrying out mineral and coal mining affairs. for example, it includes profit-sharing funds, corporate social responsibility, local community resistance due to unclear mechanisms for their objection or resistance to the presence of mining in their area, weak issues of supervision and guidance in reducing the level of social and environmental risk, and more importantly reducing the distance between the government and Public. 

"

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pemenuhan ketentuan-ketentuan yang telah diatur dalam pasal 39 Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif.Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa IUP Eksplorasi Timah milik PT. Bumi Palong dan IUP Operasi Produksi Batubara milik PT. Mitra Tambang Barito tidak memenuhi ketentuan pasal 39 Undang-Undang Mineral dan Batubara. Kondisi tersebut dapat mengakibatkan izin tersebut menjadi tidak sah atau dibatalkan oleh pengadilan tata usaha negara. Penelitian ini menyarankan agar pemerintah segera membuat peraturan pelaksana dalam penyusunan Izin Usaha Pertambangan.

---

The following thesis is discussing about compliance with the terms and conditions regulated in the article 39 Law No. 4 of 2009 regarding Mineral and Coal Mining against Mining Exploration License and Production Operation. The thesis used juridical norms method as research implementation method.

The result of this thesis found that tin mining exploration license owned by PT. Bumi Palong and coal mining production operation owned by PT. Mitra Tambang Tambang Barito is not comply the article 39 law regarding mineral and coal mining. The consequence of that condition is the licenses would be void by administration court. This thesis recommends the Government too soon issuing the Government Regulation as the reference in formulating Mining Business License."