Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Although there are many texts on the law of evidence, surprisingly few are devoted specifically to the comparative and international aspects of the subject. The traditional view that the law of evidence belongs within the common law tradition has obscured the reality that a genuinely cosmopolitan law of evidence is being developed in criminal cases across the common law and civil law traditions. By considering the extent to which a coherent body of common evidentiary standards is being developed in both domestic and international jurisprudence, John Jackson and Sarah Summers chart this development with particular reference to the jurisprudence on the right to a fair trial that has emerged from the European Court of Human Rights and to the attempts in the new international criminal tribunals to fashion agreed approaches towards the regulation of evidence."

"In this book, the authors examine selected issues that reflect a blending of, or choice between, civil law and common law models of procedure."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang pembekuan dan pembubaran organisasi kemasyarakatan sebagai upaya perlindungan, penghormatan, dan pemenuhan negara bagi hak asasi warga negara. Wacana pembubaran organisasi masyarakat ini muncul sebagai reaksi terhadap berbagai macam aksi kekerasan yang dilakukan oleh organisasi kemasyarakatan. Sejauh ini, pembekuan dan pembubaran organisasi kemasyarakatan di Indonesia diatur melalui Undang- Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1985 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 1986 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 1985, yang dinilai telah tidak sesuai lagi, karena dapat mengancam kebebasan berserikat dan tidak sesuai dengan prinsip negara hukum serta demokrasi. Oleh karena itu, pembekuan dan pembubaran organisasi kemasyarakatan tidak dilakukan oleh pemerintah, tetapi melalui proses peradilan. Proses peradilan yang dinilai berkompeten untuk memutuskan pembekuan dan pembubaran adalah Mahkamah Konstitusi, sesuai dengan fungsinya menafsirkan dan menjaga konstitusi.

---

This thesis discusses the deactivation and dissolution of civil society organizations as a means of protection, respect, and fulfillment of state for the rights of citizens. Discourse of the dissolution of this civil society organizations emerged as a reaction to the various acts of violence carried out by civil society organizations. So far, deactivation and dissolution of civil society organizations in Indonesia are regulated by Law Number 8/1985 on Civil Society Organizations and Government Regulation Number 18/1986 on the Implementation of Law Number 8/1985, which have been regarded as no longer appropriate, because it can threaten the freedom association and not in accordance with the rule of law and democracy. Therefore, deactivation and dissolution of civil society organizations is not done by the government, but through the judicial process. Judicial process is considered competent to decide on clotting and dissolution of the Constitutional Court, in accordance with its function to interpret and to guardian of the constitution."

"International Human Rights Protection, addressed to judges and lawyers, diplomats and civil servants, researchers and students, is based on the author's personal research and personal involvement with a wide range of subjects, such as the basic concepts of civil and social rights, discrimination and affirmative action, issues of procedure and jurisdiction and issues such as the death penalty and the protection of refugees, minorities and victims of armed conflicts. At the universal level, the book introduces the reader to the labyrinth of United Nations Charter-based and treaty-based procedures. As well as an overview of the Inter-American and African systems, it deals at the regional level particularly with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, and also looks at the national level at the case law of the US Supreme Court and the South African Constitutional Court. This book adopts a particularly critical approach to the so-called dynamic" interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights by the Court of Strasbourg. It is the author's feeling that judges in particular those belonging to courts specialising in human rights have a tendency to systematically support interpretations benefitting the applicants while overlooking too easily the far-reaching implications of judgments for society as a whole. He prefers a more balanced and more realistic approach taking into account the difficulties democratic governments face in coping with the challenges of our present time and with the pressing needs of the realities of today's world. Marc Bossuyt has not only a vast academic experience as Professor of International Law (at the University of Antwerp), as Visiting Professor in universities in Africa America and Asia and as a researcher in the field of International Human Rights Protection. He also has extensive administrative experience (as Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons) diplomatic experience (as Member and Chairperson of United Nations Commissions Committees and Conferences on Human Rights) and judicial experience (as a Judge and President of the Belgian Constitutional Court)."

"Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum/normatif. Penelitian ini membahas kasus Pilav v. Bosnia Herzegovina yang diadili di European Court of Human Rights. Dalam tesis ini dibahas kedudukan konstitusi negara sebagai bentuk pelaksanaan kedaulatan negara, yang dilindungi dari intervensi asing oleh hukum internasional. Dibahas pula perkembangan penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia yang berimbas pada pembatasan terhadap jurisdiksi domestik negara untuk menetapkan hukum bagi wilayah dan warga negaranya, termasuk adanya kewenangan pengadilan internasional untuk mengadili konstitusi negara yang bertentangan dengan norma hukum internasional tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Dalam hal pertentangan antara konstitusi negara dengan aturan hukum internasional tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, digunakan sudut pandang hukum internasional dan hukum nasional. Kedua sudut pandang ini digunakan untuk menganalisis putusan European Court of Human Rights dalam kasus Pilav v. Bosnia Herzegovina.

---

The purpose of this thesis is to present a case study of Pilav v. Bosnia Herzegovina before European Court of Human Rights. This thesis uses theoretical arguments and international law instruments to analyse the violation of international norms on human rights by state constitution. This thesis discusses the legal status of state constitution as a part of domaine r serv, which is protected from foreign intervention according to international law. It also discusses the development of international law on human rights, which leads to the limitation on domestic jurisdiction of a state including the emergence of international courts which have the jurisdiction to adjudicate violation of international norms on human rights by state constitution. In the conflict between international norms on human rights and state constitution, there are two perspectives that can be used international law and national law. These two perspectives are used in this thesis to examine ECtHR rsquo s jurisdiction on this case."

"Membandingkan Konvesi Roma mengenai ICC (International Criminal Court) dengan UU No. 26/2000 tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia merupakan sualu langkah awal yang harm dilakukan apabila ada niat pemerintah unluk meratifikasi Kovensi Roma. Sebagai syarat utama meratifikasi Konvensi Roma adalah menghindari adanya sualu ketidaksesuaian antara hukum nasional yang berlaku dengan Kovensi Roma Negara mempunyai tanggung jawab untuk melakukan penuntutan dan menyelaraskan hukum pidana dan hukum acara pidananya sesuai dengan konvensi. Konvensi Roma menyatakan "No reservations may be made to this Statute". Namun dalam UU No. 26/2000 penyelasaran yang dilakukan secara parsial telah menimbulkan suatu permasalahan dalam praktiknya, Komunilas hukum di Indonesia sangat mengerti kosekuensi dan meratifikasi Konvesi Roma seperti melakukan kerjasama dengan ICC dalam hal penyelidikan, penangkapan, dan pemindahan tersangka. Akan tetapi harusjuga dipikirkan foktor lain seperti dimungkinkannya ekstradiksi terhadap warga negara sendiri, menjamin berlakunya yurisdiksi universal. Dengan demikian beberapa hal yang perlu dipertimbangkan sebelum melakukan ratifikasi terhadap Konvesi Roma, agar tidak terjadi kesalahan dalam mengabil kebijakan."

"A critical discussion of EU and ECHR migration and refugee law, this book analyses the law on asylum and immigration of third country-nationals. It focuses on how the EU norms interact with ECHR human rights case law on migration, and the pitfalls of European human rights pluralism."