Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This book is about the role of lawyers in constructing a just society. Its central objective is to provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between lawyers? commercial aims and public aspirations. Drawing on interdisciplinary and comparative perspectives, it explores whether lawyers can transcend self-interest to meaningfully contribute to systems of political accountability, ethical advocacy and distributional fairness. Its contributors, some of the world?s leading scholars of the legal profession, offer evidence that although justice is possible, it is never complete. Ultimately, how much - and what type of - justice prevails depends on how lawyers respond to, and reshape, the political and economic conditions in which they practise. As the essays demonstrate, the possibility of justice is diminished as lawyers pursue self-regulation in the service of power; it is enhanced when lawyers mobilize - in the political arena, workplace and law school - to contest it."

"Illustrates the dilemma faced by the human rights community during peace negotiations, both in finding a place at the table and ensuring accountability for human rights violations. Those undertaking peace talks often argue that peace should come before justice. The many case studies in this book, from Sierra Leone to Colombia, not only confront this notion, but also challenge human rights advocates to recognize the difficulties in negotiating justice and protecting the rights of victims. the final chapter on the Colombian peace process in particular offers hope, showing the importance of including victims and civil society in these discussions."

"ABSTRAKPenelitianini berupaya menunjukkan kekurangan sistem hukum yurisprudensi analitik dan yurisprudensi historis yang mempengaruhi kehidupan bersosial masyarakatserta mengajukan Sociological Jurisprudence sebagai alternatifnya. Melalui metode analisis kritis terhadap cara kerja yurisprudensi tersebut dapat ditemukan pengaruhsosial terhadapkeadilan serta kepastian hukum di dalam konsep yurisprudensi. Yurisprudensi analitik memiliki konsep hukum yang lebih condong ke arahperkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, sehingga hukum dianggaplebih bertujuan objektif danterlepas dari realitas sosial yang dinamis melaluipenggunaan metode saintifiknya. Disisi lain,yurisprudensihistorismemberikan respon atas hal tersebut dengan mengembalikan hukum pada realitas yang berjalan. Hukum adalah hal yang hidup dan terjadi pada masyarakat. Ia bukanlahseperangkat analogi yang dibentuk untuk disesuaikan dengan realitas masyarakat. Dalam tegangan di antara kedua jenis yurisprudensi ini, penulis beranggapan bahwadibutuhkan adanya alternatif yurisprudensi yang terbarukan sehinggamampu menjawab kekurangan dari yurisprudensi analitik dan historis, yaitu sociological jurisprudence / yurisprudensi sosiologis.Sociological Jurisprudence merupakan pemikiran hukumyang menyatakanbahwa hukum harus stabilnamundisisi lain iaharusmampu menyesuaikan dirinya dengan perkembangan sosial yang dinamis.

---

ABSTRACTThis study seeks to show the lack of a legal system of analytic jurisprudence and historical jurisprudence that influences the social life of society and proposes Sociological Jurisprudence as an alternative. Through the method of critical analysis of the workings of jurisprudence can be found social influence on justice and legal certainty in the concept of jurisprudence. Analytic jurisprudence has a legal concept that is more inclined towards the development of science, so that the law is considered more objective and independent of dynamic social reality through the use of scientific methods. On the other hand, historical jurisprudence responds to this by returning the law to the reality that is running. Law is a real thing and happens to society. It is not a set of analogies that are formed to suit the reality of society. In the tension between the two types of jurisprudence, the author assumes that there is an alternative need for jurisprudence that is renewable so as to answer the shortcomings of analytical and historical jurisprudence, namely sociological jurisprudence. Sociological Jurisprudence is a legal thought which states that law must be stable but on the other hand it must be able to adapt itself to dynamic social development."