Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui karakteristik literatur yang disitir dalam skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik Fakultas Illmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (FISIP) Universitas Hasanuddin (UNHAS) dan Universitas Indonesia (UI).Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui (i) proporsi penggunaan literatur dalam skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UNHAS dan UI berdasarkan jenis, bahasa, dan usia literatur, (ii) apakah penggunaan literatur dalam skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UNHAS berbeda dengan UI berdasarkan jenis, bahasa, dan usia literatur, (iii) paro-hidup literatur yang digunakan dalam skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UNHAS dan UI, (iv) literatur yang dominan disitir dalam skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UNHAS dan UI.Subjek penelitian adalah skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UNHAS dan UI yang diterbitkan antara tahun 1991-1995 yang terdapat di Perpustakaan UNHAS dan Perpustakaan FISIP-UT. Sampel yang digunakan adalah 117 judul, terdiri dari 43 judul skripsi dari UNHAS dan 74 judul dari M. Data penelitian diambil dari semua bibliografi yang terdapat pada setiap skripsi.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa buku merupakan jenis literatur yang paling sering digunakan dalam skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UNHAS, selanjutnya berturut-turut jenis lain, majalah, dan surat kabar. Dalam skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UI, dijumpai bahwa buku juga merupakan jenis literatur yang paling sering digunakan, selanjutnya berturut-turut majalah, surat kabar, dan jenis literatur lain. Uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan literatur dalam skripsi UNHAS berbeda nyata dengan UI berdasarkan jeaisnya, kecuali untuk jenis literatur lain.Dan segi bahasa, dalam skripsi UNHAS, literatur yang diterbitkan dalam bahasa Indonesia lebih banyak disitir daripada yang diterbitkan dalam bahasa Inggris. Buku berbahasa Indonesia merupakan jenis literatur yang paling dominan disitir. Dalam skripsi UI, literatur yang diterbitkan dalam bahasa Inggris lebih banyak disitir daripada yang diterbitkan dalam bahasa Indonesia, Buku dan majalah berbahasa Inggris merupakan jenis literatur yang paling dominan disitir. Uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan literatur dalam skripsi UNHAS berbeda nyata dengan UI berdasarkan bahasanya, kecuali dalam bahasa Indonesia.Rata-rata usia literatur yang disitir dalam skripsi UNHAS adalah 5.8 tahun, dan dalam skripsi UI adalah 8.8 tahun. Masa keterpakaian literatur dalam skripsi UNHAS lebih singkat daripada dalam skripsi UI. Tetapi, paro-hidup literatur yang disitir dalam kedua skripsi sama, yaitu 7 tahun. Di samping itu, pola penggunaan literatur dalam skripsi UNHAS berdasarkan usianya sama dengan dalam skripsi UI, yaitu semakin tua usia literatur, semakin sedikit literatur tersebut digunakan.Penelitian menemukan judul judul buku yang sering disitir dalam skripsi UNHAS yang dapat disarankan untuk pengembangan koleksi bagi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UNHAS. Penelitian tidak dapat menemukan judul judul buku yang sering disitir dalam skripsi UI karena frekuensi sitiran yang diperoleh masing-masing judul sangat sedikit. Meskipun demikian, penelitian berhasil menyusun judul judul majalah yang memiliki frekuensi sitiran yang tinggi yang dapat dianjurkan untuk pengembangan koleksi bagi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UI. Asian Survey merupakan judul majalah yang memiliki frekuensi sitiran paling tinggi dalam skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Politik di UI.

---

ABSTRACTThe Characteristics of Literature Cited In Skripsi of Politics Department of Social Science and Politics Faculty At University of Hasanuddin and University of Indonesia Between 1991-1995. The aim of the research is to identify characteristics of literature cited in skripsi of Politics Department of Social Science and Politics Faculty (FISIP) at University of Hasanuddin(UNHAS) and University of Indonesia (UI).The objectives of the research are to identify (i) the' proportion of literature usage in skripsi of Politics Department at UNHAS and UI based on the kind, language, and age of literature, (ii) whether the usage of literature in skripsi of Politics Department at UNHAS differs from UI based on the kind, language, and age of literature, (iii) half-life of literature used in skripsi of Politics Department at UNHAS and UI, and (iv)the dominant literature cited in skripsi of Politics Department at UNHAS and UI.The subject of the research is the skripsi of Politics Department at UNHAS and UI published between 1991-1995 available in the Library of UNHAS and Library of FISIP-UI. The samples used in the research are 117 titles, consist of 43 titles of skripsi from UNHAS and 74 titles from UI. The research data taken from all of bibliography available in each of the skripsi.The result showed that books were the kind of literature used the most frequently in skripsi of Politics Department at UNHAS, then other kinds of literature, magazines, and newspaper, respectively. In skripsi of Politics Department at UI, found that books were also the kind of literature used the most frequently, then magazines, newspaper, and other kinds of literature, respectively. The statistical tests showed that the literature usage in skripsi of UNHAS significantly differed from UI based on its kind, except other kinds of literature.In the view of language, in skripsi of UNHAS, literature published in bahasa Indonesia cited more than in English. Books in Bahasa Indonesia were the most dominant kind of literature cited. In skripsi of UI1 literature published in English cited more than in bahasa Indonesia. Books and magazines in English were the most dominant kinds of literature cited. The statistical tests showed that the literature usage in skripsi of UNHAS significantly differed from UI based on its language, except in bahasa Indonesia.The average of literature age cited in skripsi of UNHAS was 5.8 years old, and in skripsi of UI was 8.8 years old. The usage period of literature in skripsi of UNHAS shorter than in skripsi of UI. However, the literature half-life cited in both skripsi were equal, i.e. 7 years old. Furthermore, the pattern of literature usage in skripsi of UNHAS based on its age was the same as in skripsi of i.e. the older the literature age, the less the literature used.The research found some book titles frequently cited in skripsi of UNHAS that could be suggested to the collection development for the politics department at UNHAS. The research, unfortunately, could not find the most frequently cited books in skripsi of UI because citations frequency obtained by each title was only a few. Nevertheless, the research could list some magazine titles dominantly cited that could be suggested to the collection development for Politics Department at UI. Asian Survey was the most frequently title cited in skripsi of Politics Department at UI."

"ABSTRAKTujuan Penelitian deskriptif ini adalah untuk mengetahui sikap dosen Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (FISIP) Universitas Airlangga (Unair) terhadap koleksi, layanan dan fasilitas Perpustakaan Unair. Hasil penelitian diharapkan dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai salah satu pertimbnagan dalam penentuan kebijakan perpustakaan.Variabel-variabel yang diteliti adalah sikap dosen sebagai cariable utama serta latar belakang pendidikan dosen dan lama mengajar dosen yang diukur dalam satuan tahun sebagai variabel moderator. Populasi adalah Dosen FISIP Unair. Seluruh populasi diambil sebagai responden dengan pertimbnagan ukuran populasi cukup kecil, yaitu 55 orang. Pengumpulan data utama adalah kuesioner yang disususn berdasarkan skala sikap Likert. Sebelum digunakan, kuesioner diuji kesahihan dan kehandalan Spearman-Brown. Di sampint itu, dilakukan pula wawancara terhadap sampel dan pustakawan Unair untuk memperoleh data penunjang.SKor Sikap sampel kemudian ditafsirkan dan dikonversikan menjadi data deskriptif kuantitatif. Berdasarkan penafsiran tersebut, sampel dikelompokkan ke dalam 6 kategori untuk mendapatkan data berskala nominal. Kategori tersebut adalah sangat negatif, negatif, cenderung negatif, cenderung positif, positif dan sangat positif. Agar dapat disebarkan ke dalam tabel sialng dua arah, sampel pada setiap kategori dibagi lagi menjadi dua kelompok menurut 1) latar belakang pendidikan, 2) lama mengajar, dibawah 7,69 tahun dan diatas 7,69 tahun.Penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa pada umumnya sampel mempunyai sikap posistif terhadap hampir semua aspek koleksi, layanan, dan fasilitas perpustakaan Unair, sedangkan terhadap beberapa aspek lainnya, sampel mempunyai sikap negatif. Hasil analisis sebaran sampel dalam tabel silang memperlihatkan adanya perbedaan yang cukup kecil antarkelompok latar belakang pendidikan dan antarkelompok lama mengajar. Akan tetapi setelah diuji lebih lanjut dengan Uji Kai Kuadrat, perbedaan itu tidak signifikan pada a=0,05. Implikasinya adalah tidak adanya hubungan yang signifikan antar variabel utama dan variabel moderator.Sikap dosen yang negatif terhadap beberapa aspek dari koleksi, layanan dan fasilitas perpustakaan Unair perlu diminimalkan dengan beberapa pendekatan, antara lain melakukan evaluasi ulang koleksi, layanan, dan fasilitas perpustakaan; menyususn kebijakan barus sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan sikap pemakai; dan merancang program promosi yang komunikatif.

---

ABSTRACTThis descriptive research was performed to investigate lecttures of Faculty of Social and Political Science of Airlangga University's Library toward collection, services and facilities of library. The research findings hopefully can be used as one consideration in Airlangga University Library policy making process.Variables been studied were lectures attitude as main variable and lectures vacational backgrounds and lectures teaching periods as moderator variable. Fifty-Five Lectures were choosen as samples using total sampling method. When questionaire disegned, Likert attitude scale was used. Validity and realibility were tested with Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Test and Spearman-Brown's Realibility Coefficient. Samples and Airlangga University Library's librarian were also interviewed to gather main data supplement.Samples's attitude scores were interpreted and converted into quantitative descriptive elaboration. Based on such interpretation, samples were divide into six categories for setting up nominal scale of measurement. The category are extreme negative, negative, tend to negative, tend to positive, positive, anda extreme postive. Since two-way statistic tabulation was used, samples inm each category were divided again into two group according to 1) their educational backgrounds, 2) their teaching experience periods, below 7,69 years and above 7,69 years.The research reveals that, in general, samples have positive attitudes toward most all aspects of collections, services, and facilities of library. But they still have negative attitudes toward the rest aspects. In spite of the samples's attitude scores between group seem to be rather diffferent in tabular samples distribution analysis, but statistically with Chi-Square test, the difference are not significant. Those imply no significant relationship betweeen main variables and moderator variables.Lecture's negative attitude toward some aspect of collections, services, and facilities of Airlangga University Library can be minimized by many approaches, such as revaluating library's collections, services and facilities; developing new policy which is suitable to user need; and designing more communicative promotions program."

"This research is based on appearance of various change, generally in the society and specially in college. Faculty Social Science and Politics University Indonesia ( FISIP-UI) represent one of the faculty which under UI BRIAN ( Legal Body Public of Ownership) is not quit of these problems. To stay at emulation which progressively tighten, FISIP-UI is not only claimed to be able to give best service but it is also claimed to make a change up better continually. Some expert suggest in order can live in emulation era which progressively tighten require to master learning organization. In this bearing, Senge (1994:21) told that organization learning is organization which continually develop its ability to create better future. Later; than transform become organization learning. Senge, 1994 and Senge, et, al 1996 6) said organization must having five discipline, those are Personal Mastery, Mental Model, Shared Vision, Team Learning, System Thinking. This research is done to answer two questions of research, that is : First, How far the Non Academic Staff of organization either State servant or Non State Servant doing the learning organization in FISIP-UI ? Second; What obstacles influence the Non Academic either State servant or Non State Servant on learning organization in FISIP-UIThis research represents descriptive research, using the quantitative and qualitative data. The population is non academic staff whether having state servant status or non state servant. According to the ability of researcher, this research is not include the staffs ruder non regular programs, but concentrate to the staffs of Dean/ faculty, which are the servants who are recruited by and get the salary from the faculty. This Research is done during the month of January, 2004 up to April month. 2004. The amount of population is 131 consists of 71 people of state servant and 60 of non state servant. Research use the sensus methods; therefore all of population is taken as sample of this research; using questionnaires as the tools in collecting quantitative data. From 71 of questionnaires we have distributed to all of non academic staff, we could gather 65 back only. Later, than for non state servant, from 60 questionnaires we have distributed, 57 peoples gave back and the rest, 3 did not give back them. For qualitative data, is done by the un structured interview method to 8 respondent which is assumed having competence or representative to non academic staff of FISIP-UT. After gathering quantitative data later; than processed them using computer by SPSS 10.00 program. Test appliance used the tables of frequency and cross tabulation.Based on analysis and data interpretation, obtained the result that just a few part of whether the state servant and non state servant of non academic staff is having high grade of learning. The factors of mastering the organization learning are : habit of waiting the order from superior staff or manager, self satisfaction sense, surrender with situation, poor of ability to accurate and investigate. Later; than the less of superior or manager support , in getting news ideas which appear bottom-up ; and also less opportunity to do wrongness in order have ability to develop and run new ideas. Formulation of mission and vision which is not be on down warded and socialized better. Besides, the non academic staff of FISIP-UI is also still less to attend the dialogue, discussion, seminar, meeting etc."