Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Ch. 1. Rationale for Mergers and AcquisitionsCh. 2. Structuring M&​A TransactionsCh. 3. Regulatory Framework, Securities Industry Council and the Takeover CodeCh. 4. Preparatory Work for M&​A TransactionsCh. 5. Conditions, Pre-conditions, Consideration, Terms and Offer Time-tableCh. 6. Deal Documentation and Informational RequirementsCh. 7. Restrictions on Dealings in Shares; Disclosure RequirementsCh. 8. Duties of Directors in Takeovers, Deal Protections and Takeover DefencesCh. 9. Mandatory OffersCh. 10. Duties of Professional Advisors in M&​A TransactionsCh. 11. Equality of Treatment and Special DealsCh. 12. Asset Valuations and Profit ForecastsCh. 13. Schemes of Arrangement and AmalgamationsCh. 14. Compulsory Acquisitions and Squeeze Out of Minority ShareholdersCh. 15. Financing Takeovers, Leveraged Buy-outs and Management Buy-outsCh. 16. Enforcement of the Takeover Code and Market Misconduct in the Course of Takeovers.Notes"Table of cases": pages xxi-xxxiii."Table of statutes": pages xxxv-xxxix."Table of subsidiary legislation": page xli."Table of foreign legislation": pages xliii-xliv."Table of foreign subsidiary legislation": page xlv."Table of codes and listing rules": pages xlvii-lvii.Includes bibliographical references and index.In English."

"Foreign trade representative including certain tax payer that is difficult to determine the net income. The number of foreign trade representative that reports tax according to the norm of net income calculation is small comparing to the listed number.The object of this thesis research is the measures should be taken so that the taxable income of foreign trade representative in Indonesia can be executed optimally through the same understanding by both the tax payers and tax apparatus.The research method conducted is base on the qualitative research method with the type of research of analytical descriptive and the data collecting method is through interview with the interlocked parties; they are tax officer, tax consultant, and tax payers that have status of foreign trade representative. This research was also conducted on the interlocked documents, they are law of income tax, tax treaties, judicial decision, books - scientific papers, and data of tax auditing.Tax is compulsory collection done by the government to the people in which contra interpretation of tax collection cannot be felt directly. In order to get support from people, thus collection should be based on the based on the base of tax collection according to the hope international tax society universally.Every country applies their own approach in the regulation that become guidance to tax collection. The different approach will cause jurisdiction conflict when it has something to do with tax collection on companies that run activities in one or more jurisdictions. This jurisdiction conflict brings about the imposition of double tax in order to eliminate international double tax is naturally overcome by making the agreement of the avoidance of double tax.In practice, there are always difficulties in calculating net income or tax on income for certain group of tax payers. In order to avoid the difficulties, deemed profit should be applied in the form of calculation norm to calculate the net income according to certain percentage from brut income instead of the true income. Foreign trade representative include certain tax payers whose net income is difficult to calculate.The result of the research finds the existence of conflict between fiscal officer and the tax payers in accordance with the application of provision of specific calculation of net income for foreign trade representative. That conflict in connection with tax subject and tax tariff. Indonesia can impose only tax on income toward foreign trade representative that completely run other business out of the excepted activities for taxable as the form of permanent establishment according to tax treaty. In practice, tax assessor always get difficulty to get the value of brut export to Indonesia done by foreign companies as the base of decision of tax income for foreign trade representative that meet the criteria of permanent establishment. If the value of brut export to Indonesia is not known from foreign trade representative that meet permanent establishment, actually other method can be used, that is cost plus method in order to decide net income.The conflict that comes up because of being no uncertainty in connection with tax subject and tax tariff. In order to apply the norm on net income calculation, DGT should prove earlier that the foreign trade representative have really run activities out of activities that bring about those foreign trade representative do not meet the criteria of permanent establishment. Specific norm of net income calculation for foreign trade representative is only applied for foreign trade representative that meet the criteria of permanent establishment according to The Law of Income Tax and tax treatiesThe write, propose suggestion in order to revise the ministerial decree of finance on specific norm of net income for foreign trade representative by emphasizing the definition of taxable income of foreign trade representative, that is the foreign trade representatives that meet the criteria permanent establishment and do not decide secluded tax tariff out of article I7 and article 26 section (4) The Law of Income Tax and tariff of branch profit tax according to tax treaty. The writer also suggests that the government conduct the research in order to specific norm on net income calculation according to cost plus method for foreign trade representatives that meet the criteria of permanent establishment in which it's only cost known that is passed in Indonesia."

"Giving the authority of law income tax to thegovernment for decided kind of service as income tax object article23, evoke extend income tax object article23, that is not only as a passive income but also as a business income.There is two analytical questions in this research, the first is how to implications of extend income tax object article 23 for the government, with holder and income tax receiver. The second, what the suitable of taxobject that can change to be a saw with holding income tax article 23 base on with holding income tax conception and international best practice.This research used qualitative approach with a descriptive researc htype to describe an objective with facts that revealed. The collecting data technique itself is done by a literature study from various sources like an article, book, internet and in¬depth interview with some informants whoa rerelated with this research.The result of this research shown that development income tax object article 23 has an implication to the government such as increase tax acceptance, decrease cost collection, and have opportunity cost. For with holder have burden. Moreover, for implication to income tax receiver is the cash flow tax receiver can be decrease, time of money lose, and increase compliance cost. Base donw it hholding income tax conception and international best practice, the suitable object as income tax object article 23 is inpassive income.This research recommended, the administration tax system in thegovernment need tobe fix, giving reward to with holder, apply proper income tariff that cannot disturbed the cashflow, clarify the object of income taxarticle 23 with giving definition and sample from theobject, streamline income tax article 25."