Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKIndonesia telah memberikan komitmen terbuka di sektor perbankan. Di kawasan ASEAN keterbukan sektor perbankan Indonesia menduduki nomor 2 tertinggi setelah Singapura. Terhadap kondisi yang telah terbuka tersebut, kecil kemungkinan untuk menarik komitmen perbankan Indonesia yang telah terdaftar dalam SoC liberalisasi sektor jasa keuangan di WTO. GATS memberikan ruang kepada negara anggota untuk menerapkan prudential measures. Annex on Financial Services merupakan aturan khusus yang mengatur mengenai liberalisasi sektor jasa keuangan yang tidak terpisahkan dari General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), dimana di dalamnya terdapat aturan yang mengijinkan negara untuk mengambil tindakan dengan alasan prudential termasuk untuk melindungi investor, depositor, pemegang saham atau orang yang menyerahkan fiduciary duty kepada pemasok jasa keuangan atau untuk menjamin integritas dan stabilitas dari sistem keuangan. Prudential measures mutlak diperlukan mengingat proses liberalisasi yang tidak disertai dengan sistem keuangan domestik yang kuat dapat menimbulkan efek negatif terhadap stabilitas sistem keuangan dan perekonomian Indonesia. Keterbukaan perbankan tersebut perlu direspon otoritas dengan bijak, melalui upaya persiapan dan peningkatan industri perbankan Indonesia menjadi industri perbankan yang sehat dan kuat sehingga memiliki daya saing dan ketahanan terhadap faktor pemicu resiko instabilitas.Tujuan dari penulisan tesis ini adalah untuk memahami penerapan GATS dalam liberalisasi jasa perbankan Indonesia dan penerapan prudential measures sebagai jaring pengaman stabilitas sistem keuangan dalam kaitan dengan kebijakan liberalisasi sektor jasa perbankan di Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACTIn term of financial services liberalization, Indonesian commitment on banking sector liberalization open largely. In the ASEAN, the openness of Indonesia's banking sector is the 2nd after Singapore. GATS provides space for member to implement prudential measures. Annex on Financial Services is a specific rules on the financial services liberalization and being an integral part of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), which included a rule allowing the state to take action on prudential reasons, including to protect investors, depositors, share holders or the person submitting the fiduciary duty to financial service suppliers or to ensure the integrity and stability of the financial system. Prudential measures are absolutely necessary, since the liberalization process that is not accompanied by a strong domestic financial system can have a negative impact on the financial stability system and the economy of Indonesia. The oppeness of banking sector need to be respond by authority wisely, preparing the sound and strong banking industry is a must. The sound and strong banking industry could increase banking competitiveness and resilience to risk factors triggering instability. The purpose of this thesis is to understand the GATS and its application on banking services liberalization in Indonesia as well as the application of prudential measures as a part of financial system safety net in terms of Indonesian policy in the banking services liberalization."

"[ABSTRAKPenulisan skripsi ini dilatarbelakangi oleh belum adanya payung hukum terhadap protokol manajemen krisis untuk mencegah dan menangani krisis perbankan yang terjadi di Indonesia. Krisis perbankan tersebut berdampak bukan hanya bagi kegiatan perekonomian negara, melainkan bagi keadaan politik yang begitu luas. Dalam penulisannya, metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, yaitu metode yang dilakukan dengan meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder.Tesis ini menyoroti sejarah krisis perbankan yang melanda Indonesia dan Inggris dan bagaimana mekanisme dan aplikasi Jaring Pengaman Sistem Keuangan yang ada pada masing-masing negara tersebut. Adapun pertimbangan yang melatarbelakangi penulis untuk mengakat tema ini adalah, kedua negara tersebut sama-sama terkena imbas krisis subprime mortgage dari US pada tahun 2008 dan keduanya sama-sama mengalami krisis perbankan akibat satu bank kecil yang berdampak sistemik. Namun, saat ini Inggris sudah memiliki Undang-Undang yang mengatur koordinasi antar lembaga/otoritas dalam mencegah krisis dan menjaga Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan negaranyaABSTRACTThe writing of this thesis motivated by the absence of legal protection against the crisis management protocol to prevent and deal with the banking crisis that occurred in Indonesia. The banking crisis has an impact not only for the economic activities of the country, but also for a broad political circumstances. Method used in this writing is juridical-normative writing, which is done by examining material library or a mere secondary data.This thesis highlights the history of banking crisis that hit Indonesia and the UK and how the mechanism and application of the Financial System Safety Net that exist in each of these countries. As for the considerations underlying the author, to the theme of this is that these two countries are equally affected by the subprime mortgage crisis on the US in 2008 and both are experiencing a banking crisis as a result of a small bank with systemic impact. However, this time the UK already has a law that regulates the coordination between agencies / authorities in preventing crises and maintaining financial system stability country;The writing of this thesis motivated by the absence of legal protection against the crisis management protocol to prevent and deal with the banking crisis that occurred in Indonesia. The banking crisis has an impact not only for the economic activities of the country, but also for a broad political circumstances. Method used in this writing is juridical-normative writing, which is done by examining material library or a mere secondary data.This thesis highlights the history of banking crisis that hit Indonesia and the UK and how the mechanism and application of the Financial System Safety Net that exist in each of these countries. As for the considerations underlying the author, to the theme of this is that these two countries are equally affected by the subprime mortgage crisis on the US in 2008 and both are experiencing a banking crisis as a result of a small bank with systemic impact. However, this time the UK already has a law that regulates the coordination between agencies / authorities in preventing crises and maintaining financial system stability country;The writing of this thesis motivated by the absence of legal protection against the crisis management protocol to prevent and deal with the banking crisis that occurred in Indonesia. The banking crisis has an impact not only for the economic activities of the country, but also for a broad political circumstances. Method used in this writing is juridical-normative writing, which is done by examining material library or a mere secondary data.This thesis highlights the history of banking crisis that hit Indonesia and the UK and how the mechanism and application of the Financial System Safety Net that exist in each of these countries. As for the considerations underlying the author, to the theme of this is that these two countries are equally affected by the subprime mortgage crisis on the US in 2008 and both are experiencing a banking crisis as a result of a small bank with systemic impact. However, this time the UK already has a law that regulates the coordination between agencies / authorities in preventing crises and maintaining financial system stability country;The writing of this thesis motivated by the absence of legal protection against the crisis management protocol to prevent and deal with the banking crisis that occurred in Indonesia. The banking crisis has an impact not only for the economic activities of the country, but also for a broad political circumstances. Method used in this writing is juridical-normative writing, which is done by examining material library or a mere secondary data.This thesis highlights the history of banking crisis that hit Indonesia and the UK and how the mechanism and application of the Financial System Safety Net that exist in each of these countries. As for the considerations underlying the author, to the theme of this is that these two countries are equally affected by the subprime mortgage crisis on the US in 2008 and both are experiencing a banking crisis as a result of a small bank with systemic impact. However, this time the UK already has a law that regulates the coordination between agencies / authorities in preventing crises and maintaining financial system stability country;The writing of this thesis motivated by the absence of legal protection against the crisis management protocol to prevent and deal with the banking crisis that occurred in Indonesia. The banking crisis has an impact not only for the economic activities of the country, but also for a broad political circumstances. Method used in this writing is juridical-normative writing, which is done by examining material library or a mere secondary data.This thesis highlights the history of banking crisis that hit Indonesia and the UK and how the mechanism and application of the Financial System Safety Net that exist in each of these countries. As for the considerations underlying the author, to the theme of this is that these two countries are equally affected by the subprime mortgage crisis on the US in 2008 and both are experiencing a banking crisis as a result of a small bank with systemic impact. However, this time the UK already has a law that regulates the coordination between agencies / authorities in preventing crises and maintaining financial system stability country;The writing of this thesis motivated by the absence of legal protection against the crisis management protocol to prevent and deal with the banking crisis that occurred in Indonesia. The banking crisis has an impact not only for the economic activities of the country, but also for a broad political circumstances. Method used in this writing is juridical-normative writing, which is done by examining material library or a mere secondary data.This thesis highlights the history of banking crisis that hit Indonesia and the UK and how the mechanism and application of the Financial System Safety Net that exist in each of these countries. As for the considerations underlying the author, to the theme of this is that these two countries are equally affected by the subprime mortgage crisis on the US in 2008 and both are experiencing a banking crisis as a result of a small bank with systemic impact. However, this time the UK already has a law that regulates the coordination between agencies / authorities in preventing crises and maintaining financial system stability country;The writing of this thesis motivated by the absence of legal protection against the crisis management protocol to prevent and deal with the banking crisis that occurred in Indonesia. The banking crisis has an impact not only for the economic activities of the country, but also for a broad political circumstances. Method used in this writing is juridical-normative writing, which is done by examining material library or a mere secondary data.This thesis highlights the history of banking crisis that hit Indonesia and the UK and how the mechanism and application of the Financial System Safety Net that exist in each of these countries. As for the considerations underlying the author, to the theme of this is that these two countries are equally affected by the subprime mortgage crisis on the US in 2008 and both are experiencing a banking crisis as a result of a small bank with systemic impact. However, this time the UK already has a law that regulates the coordination between agencies / authorities in preventing crises and maintaining financial system stability country, The writing of this thesis motivated by the absence of legal protection against the crisis management protocol to prevent and deal with the banking crisis that occurred in Indonesia. The banking crisis has an impact not only for the economic activities of the country, but also for a broad political circumstances. Method used in this writing is juridical-normative writing, which is done by examining material library or a mere secondary data.This thesis highlights the history of banking crisis that hit Indonesia and the UK and how the mechanism and application of the Financial System Safety Net that exist in each of these countries. As for the considerations underlying the author, to the theme of this is that these two countries are equally affected by the subprime mortgage crisis on the US in 2008 and both are experiencing a banking crisis as a result of a small bank with systemic impact. However, this time the UK already has a law that regulates the coordination between agencies / authorities in preventing crises and maintaining financial system stability country]"

"ABSTRAKPenulisan skripsi ini dilatarbelakangi oleh tidak terdapatnya sebuah protokol manajemen krisis pada perbankan yang terintegrasi dalam satu payung hukum untuk mencegah dan menangani situasi krisis perbankan. Dalam penulisannya, metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif, yaitu metode yang dilakukan dengan meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder. Skripsi ini membahas tentang urgensi dari Jaring Pengaman Sistem Keuangan sebagai protokol manajemen krisis pada perbankan, serta protokol manajemen krisis perbankan yang ada saat ini di Indonesia. Hasil dari penulisan ini menyatakan bahwa diperlukannya Jaring Pengaman Sistem Keuangan sebagai Protokol Manajemen Krisis Perbankan.

---

ABSTRACTThe writing of this thesis is motivated by the policy of crisis management protocol in order to prevent and to handle the crisis itself is not implemented yet. Methods used in this writing is the juridical-normative, the method is done by examining material library or a mere secondary material. This thesis is disscused about the urgency of Financial Safety Nets as a Banking Crisis Management Protocol as well as Indonesia Crisis Manajement Protocol that currently exist. The results of this thesis is suggest that the Financial Safety Nets as a Banking Crisis Management Protocol is urgent."

"Penyelamatan PT Bank Century Tbk oleh Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) yang menimbulkan konsekuensi hukum pengambilalihan kepemilikan Bank Century oleh LPS sebagaimana diatur Pasal 40 huruf a jo. Pasal 41 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2004 tentang Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (UU LPS), masih menyisakan berbagai permasalahan baik dari aspek politik maupun hukum. Dari aspek politik, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia telah menggunakan hak angket untuk melakukan penyelidikan terkait proses penyelamatan Bank Century yang menyimpulkan bahwa telah terjadi penyalahgunaan oleh berbagai otoritas yang terkait dengan proses penanganan Bank Century. Dari aspek hukum, proses penyelamatan Bank Century telah dipersoalkan oleh mantan pemegang saham Bank Century melalui forum arbitrase pada International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes sebagai perbuatan melawan hukum yang bertentangan dengan kewajiban Pemerintah Republik Indonesia mengenai expropriation sebagaimana diatur dalam Bilateral Investment Treaty antara Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Pemerintah Kerajaan Inggris.Bahwa penyelamatan Bank Century oleh LPS tidak dapat dilepaskan dari kerangka hukum pelaksanaan Jaring Pengaman Sistem Keuangan (JPSK) yang ditujukan untuk menjaga stabilitas sistem keuangan. Pelaksanaan JPSK, dengan resolusi bank sebagai salah satu pilarnya, merupakan instrumen penting dalam menjaga stabilitas sistem keuangan. Dalam perspektif JPSK, penyelamatan Bank Century merupakan bentuk pelaksanaan tugas resolusi bank yang dimandatkan oleh UU LPS, yaitu sebagai bentuk intervensi otoritas publik dalam mengatasi dampak sistemik yang disebabkan oleh permasalahan suatu bank guna meminimalisir dampak kerusakan yang dapat ditimbulkan terhadap stabilitas sistem keuangan dan perekonomian secara keseluruhan. Resolusi bank pada dasarnya merupakan mekanisme extra judicial yang khusus diberlakukan bagi penanganan bank bermasalah dengan pertimbangan untuk menjaga dan memelihara kepercayaan masyarakat penyimpan dana terhadap sistem perbankan secara keseluruhan. Mengingat karakteristik pelaksanaan tugas resolusi bank maka penyelamatan Bank Century oleh LPS tidak dapat dipersamakan dengan tindakan nasionalisasi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal maupun sebagai tindakan expropriation sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Bilateral Investment Treaty. Pemahaman akan pelaksanaan tugas resolusi bank menjadi penting artinya dalam memperkuat justifikasi dari aspek hukum terhadap tindakan penyelamatan terhadap Bank Century yang dilakukan oleh LPS.

---

The bailout of PT Bank Century Tbk by the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) which have caused the legal consequence of the ownership takeover of Bank Century by IDIC as regulated under Article 40 letter (a) jo. Article 41 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 24 of 2004 regarding Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC Law), still leaves numerous matters on both legal and political aspects. From the political aspect, the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR-RI) has used its right of inquiry to conduct an investigation on the Bank Century bailout process which concluded that there has been an abuse by authorities related to the Bank Century management process. From the legal aspect, the Bank Century bailout process has been questioned by Bank Century’s former shareholders through arbitration in the International Centre for Settlement Investment Disputes as a tort which is contrary to the obligation of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia regarding expropriation as stated in the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the Government of the Republic Indonesia and the English Royal Government.

The bailout of Bank Century by the IDIC can not be separated from the legal framework of the implementation of Financial System Safety Net (JPSK) intended to safeguard the financial system stability. The implementation of JPSK, with bank resolution as one of its pillars, is an important instrument in safeguarding the financial system stability. Under the perspective of JPSK, the bailout of Bank Century by IDIC through Temporary Capital Participation is a form of performance of bank resolution tasks mandated in the IDIC Law, as a form of public authority intervention in managing a systemic impact caused by problems of a bank to minimize the damage that may arise to the stability of the financial system and the economy comprehensively. In principle, bank resolution is an extra judicial mechanism specifically applied for the management of troubled banks in considerations to preserve and maintain the trust of depositing customers to the banking system comprehensively. Considering the characteristics of the implementation of bank resolution task, the bailout of Bank Century by the IDIC can not be equated with act of nationalization or expropriation of property rights referred to in the Law Number 25 of 2007 regarding Capital Investment nor as an act of expropriation as intended in the Bilateral Investment Treaty. The understanding of the implementation of bank resolution tasks become important in strengthening the justification of the legal aspects on the actions of the Bank Century bailout conducted by the IDIC."

"Prudential banking atau prinsip kehati-hatian merupakan upaya dalam menanggulangi berbagai resiko yang kerap kali terjadi didalam praktik perbankan. Transaksi perbankan memiliki kompleksitas dan resiko yang sangat tinggi dan memberikan dampak meluas disektor ekonomi makro..."

"Dalam keadaan atau situasi segenting apapun fungsi-fungsi negara/kekuasaan negara tidak boleh absen. Oleh sebab itu menjadi penting suatu negara mempunyai pengaturan yang bersifat antisipatif guna menghadapi keadaan tidak normal atau situasi darurat yang serba mendesak, terutama bagi pejabat publik yang menjadi bagian dari penyelenggara negara, untuk memberikan dasar atas tindakan-tindakan yang harus dilakukan dalam jabatannya guna menghadapi situasi genting atau darurat tersebut.Memasuki kuartal ke IV tahun 2008, Pemerintah memandang perekonomian Indonesia memasuki kondisi yang mengkhawatirkan. Mempertimbangkan kondisi makro ekonomi global dan domestik, dengan mengacu kepada Pasal 22 UUD 1945, maka Pemerintah menerbitkan 3 (tiga) Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perpu), salah satunya yaitu Perpu No. 4 Tahun 2008 tentang Jaring Pengaman Sistem Keuangan (JPSK), yang memperjelas Protokol Manajemen Krisis Sistem Keuangan Indonesia, mengingat belum selesainya penyusunan RUU JPSK. Dalam perjalanannya, Perpu dimaksud baru dicabut pada tanggal 6 Agustus 2015, melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pencabutan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2008 tentang JPSK.Pencabutan Perpu JPSK tersebut membawa implikasi terhadap pelaksanaan fungsi Bank Indonesia sebagai lender of last resort, yaitu mengakibatkan tidak adanya payung hukum yang mengatur mengenai jaring pengaman sistem keuangan, sehingga ada kekosongan hukum yang diperlukan untuk membentuk konstruksi yang sempurna bagi Bank Indonesia untuk melaksanakan fungsi lender of last resort. Dengan kondisi yang demikian, dalam hal terjadi krisis di sistem keuangan dan terdapat bank yang mengalami kesulitan likuiditas dan berdampak sistemik, Bank Indonesia tidak dapat menjalankan fungsi sebagai lender of last resort dengan baik.

---

In any circumstance or urgent situation the functions of national/state power cannot be absent. Therefore becomes important to a country having regulation to face the emergency situation, especially for public officials who are part of the state, to provide the foundation for the actions that must be performed in order to confront his critical situation or emergency.Entering the fourth quarter of 2008, the Government views the Indonesian economy entered a vulnerable phase. Considering the global and domestic macro economy, with reference to Article 22 UUD 1945, the Government issued three (3) of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (decree), one of the decree No. 4 Year 2008 on the Financial System Safety Net (FSSN), which clarifies the Financial System Crisis Management Protocol Indonesia, particularly related to the authorities concerned and regarding the rights and obligations of the arrangement, given the completion of the drafting of laws FSSN. Along the way, the decree was revoked on August 6, 2015, through Act No. 11 of 2015 concerning Revocation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 4 of 2008 on FSSN.Revocation of Exemption Law FSSN the implications of the implementation of Bank Indonesia function as a lender of last resort, which resulted in the absence of a legal framework governing the financial system safety net, so that there is a legal vacuum that needed to form a construction that is perfect for Bank Indonesia to perform the function of lender of last resort. With such conditions, in the event of a crisis in the financial system and some banks experiencing liquidity problems and systemic impact, Bank Indonesia cannot perform the function of lender of last resort as well."

"Bank Indonesia pada saat ini telah mengeluarkan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 9/1/PBI/2007 tentang Sistem Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Berdasarkan Prinsip Syariah yang mengatur sistem kesehatan pada perbankan syariah. Peraturan ini akan menilai tingkat kesehatan perbankan baik secara faktor finansial maupun faktor manajerial berdasarkan prinsip syariah. Pentingnya pengaturan suatu sistem penilaian kesehatan pada perbankan syariah disebabkan oleh perkembangan produk dan jasa pada bank syariah yang mengalami kenaikan eksposur risiko perbankan syariah dan kesehatan bank syariah merupakan kepentingan semua pihak yang terkait, baik pemilik dan pengelola bank, masyarakat pengguna jasa bank maupun BI selaku otoritas pengawasan bank. Pencapaian penilaian kesehatan yang baik pada perbankan syariah, setiap bank umum yang berdasarkan prinsip syariah harus melaksanakan pengaturan dan penerapan prinsip prudential banking dan prinsip Good Corporate Governance (GCG) dalam menjalankan kinerjanya. Masalah yang timbul adalah bagaimanakah konsep sistem penilaian tingkat kesehatan perbankan syariah tersebut, bagaimanakah konsep prudential banking dan aplikasinya dalam Peraturan Bank Indonesia, bagaimanakah konsep GCG dalam PBI dan bagaimanakah hubungan antara penerapan prinsip prudential banking dan prinsip GCG pada PBI dengan pencapaian penilaian tingkat kesehatan perbankan syariah. Penelitian atas permasalahan tersebut dilakukan dengan metode penelitian kepustakaan dan menggunakan data sekunder dengan alat pengumpulan data berupa studi dokumen dan wawancara. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif. Dengan penelitian ini diketahui tentang konsep penilaian kesehatan perbankan syariah, penerapan prinsip prudential banking dalam PBI yang baik pada faktor permodalan, aset, likuiditas, rentabilitas, dan sensitivitas risiko pasar yang akan mempengaruhi tingkat penilaian kesehatan perbankan syariah yang baik pula pada faktor finansialnya, dan penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance dalam PBI yang baik yang akan mempengaruhi tingkat kesehatan perbankan syariah yang baik pula pada faktor manajemen."

"Fokus pada skripsi ini adalah untuk memberikan penjelasan mengenai penerapan konsep cross-collateral dalam sistem perbankan Indonesia, khususnya dalam perjanjian kredit bank. Mengacu pada asas kebebasan berkontrak, konsep crosscollateral hadir untuk memenuhi kebutuhan debitur dan kreditor, serta untuk mengantisipasi kerugian yang mungkin timbul akibat dari kelalaian atau wanprestasi yang dapat merugikan kreditor atau pihak bank. Oleh karena itu, kehadiran klausul ini akan diterapkan pada debitur yang memiliki beberapa fasilitas kredit. Namun di sisi lain, fungsi klausul cross-collateral dalam perjanjian kredit bank masih menjadi pertanyaan apakah memang dapat benar-benar menciptakan keadilan dan konsistensi antara pihak bank sebagai kreditor dan nasabah sebagai debitur atau tidak. Hal ini karena masih belum ada undang-undang dan peraturan khusus yang mengatur mengenai konsep cross-collateral yang berdampak pada timbulnya kekeliruan atau kesalahan bagi kreditor dan debitur terutama dalam kaitannya dengan eksekusi jaminan. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini akan focus membahas seputar hukum dan peraturan pembuatan perjanjian kredit, menjelaskan tentang konsep dasar klausul cross-collateral dan pengembangannya, mencari tahu mengenai validitas cross-collateral, dan juga untuk menjelaskan apakah klausul cross-collateral di dalam perjanjian kredit bank diterapkan secara sama dan adil di antara para pihak. Penelitian ini menggunakan studi literatur (Library Research) yang bersifat normatif, yaitu penelitian yang menekankan pada penggunaan data sekunder atau bentuk norma hukum tertulis.

---

The focus on this undergraduate thesis is to give explanation regarding the application of cross-collateral concept in Indonesian banking system, especially within the bank credit agreement. Referring to the principle of freedom of contract, the concept of the cross-collateral clause is present to meet the needs of debtors and creditors, also to anticipate losses that may arise that caused of default or breach of contract that can harm the bank or the creditors. Hence, this clause will be applied to debtors who have several credit facilities. However, on the other side, the functions of cross-collateral clause in credit agreement is still being a question whether it is absolutely creating a justice and consistency between bank as a creditor and customers as a debtor or not. This is because there are still no specific laws and regulations that regulates the concept of cross-collateral that somehow it often leads to a blunder toward both creditor and debtor especially in relating to the execution of the collateral. Thus, this research mainly will discuss regarding the laws surrounding credit agreement making, to explain about the basic concept of the cross collateral clause and its development, to determine the validity of the cross collateral clause, and also to explain whether the cross-collateral clause of bank credit contract is evenly implemented between the parties. The research use study of literature (Library Research) which is normative, that is research that emphasizes the use of secondary data or the form of written legal norms."