Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"With the time available to surgeons-in-training ever dwindling, there is great emphasis placed on practical learning tools. Mirroring his earlier book on practical procedures in trauma surgery, Prof Giannoudis has produced a reference in more elective techniques. In most medical schools, most emphasis is placed on orthopaedic trauma surgery, with elective techniques often delayed until much later in a surgeon’s training."

"Achieve optimal outcomes for your patients with this new multimedia reference. Organized by tumor then by region, this resource details diagnostic and therapeutic options for primary and malignant spinal tumors. Over 25 key procedures--including minimally invasive surgery--are presented in a concise, stepwise fashion, putting the key information you need right at your fingertips"

"This manual of spine surgery has become necessary as a consequence of the rapid expansion of instrumented spine surgery using different minimally invasive and non-fusion techniques. To do justice to this development, the manual aims to present the different techniques to spinal surgeons (orthopaedic and neurosurgeons) in a clear and instructive way using detailed illustrations. The description of different open, less invasive or minimally invasive techniques will provide the spinal surgeon with useful guidelines for their use. The success of any spinal operation depends on good definition of the indications, consideration of the contraindications, technical and organisational factors, good operating technique and correct preoperative preparation and positioning of the patient. "

"Tujuan : untuk mengetahui kejadian VTE pada pasien Indonesia yang menjalani bedah ortopedi mayor dan tidak menerima tromboprofi laksis.Metode Uji klinik terbuka pada pasien Indonesia yang menjalani bedah ortopedi mayor, dilakukan di 3 senter di Jakarta. Venografi bilateral dilakukan antara 5 dan 8 hari pasca bedah untuk menemukan VTE yang asimptomatik dan memastikan VTE yang simptomatik. Pasien dievaluasi hingga 1 bulan pasca bedah.Hasil Telah diteliti 17 pasien dengan median usia 69 tahun dan 76,5% di antaranya perempuan. Enam belas dari 17 pasien (94,1%) menjalani bedah fraktur panggul. Median waktu antara fraktur dengan tindakan adalah 23 hari (antara 2 sampai 197 hari), median lamanya tindakan bedah 90 menit (antara 60 sampai 255 menit), dan median lamanya imobilisasi 3 hari (antara 1 sampai 44 hari). Tiga belas dari 17 pasien menjalani venografi kontras untuk mendeteksi VTE yang asimtomatik. VTE ditemukan pada 9 dari 13 pasien (69,2%) saat akan keluar dari rumah sakit (RS). VTE yang simtomatik ditemukan pada 3 pasien (23,1%), semuanya dengan tanda-tanda klinis DVT dan tidak seorangpun dengan tanda klinis embolisme paru (PE). Pasien tersebut diobati dengan heparin berat molekul rendah, dilanjutkan dengan antikoagulan oral warfarin. Tidak ada kematian mendadak sampai pasien keluar dari RS. Tidak ada kasus VTE simtomatik baru sejak keluar dari RS sampai 1 bulan kemudian. Tidak ditemukan kematian mendadak, komplikasi pendarahan, ataupun perawatan ulang di RS dalam studi ini.Kesimpulan Insidens VTE asimtomatik sebesar 69,2% dan simtomatik 23,1% setelah bedah ortopedi mayor tanpa tromboprofi laksis. Studi yang lebih besar dibutuhkan untuk memastikan insidens yang benar, dan yang lebih penting, untuk menggunakan tromboprofi laksis pada pasien-pasien ini.

---

Aim To estimate the incidence of VTE in Indonesian patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery and not receiving thromboprophylaxis.

Methods This was an open clinical study of consecutive Indonesian patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, conducted in 3 centers in Jakarta. Bilateral venography was performed between days 5 and 8 after surgery to detect the asymptomatic and to confi rm the symptomatic VTE. These patients were followed up to one month after surgery.

Results A total of 17 eligible patients were studied, which a median age of 69 years and 76.5% were females. Sixteen out of the 17 patients (94.1%) underwent hip fracture surgery (HFS). The median time from injury to surgery was 23 days (range 2 to 197 days), the median duration of surgery was 90 minutes (range 60 to 255 minutes), and the median duration of immobilization was 3 days (range 1 to 44 days). Thirteen out of the 17 patients were willing to undergo contrast venography. A symptomatic VTE was found in 9 patients (69.2%) at hospital discharge. Symptomatic VTE was found in 3 patients (23.1%), all corresponding to clinical signs of DVT and none with clinical sign of PE. These patients were treated initially with a low molecular weight heparin, followed by warfarin. Sudden death did not occur up to hospital discharge. From hospital discharge until 1-month follow-up, there were no additional cases of symptomatic VTE. No sudden death, bleeding complication, nor re-hospitalization was found in the present study.

Conclusion The incidence of asymptomatic (69.2%) and symptomatic (23.1%) VTE after major orthopedic surgery without thromboprophylaxis in Indonesian patients (SMART and AIDA), and still higher than the results of the Western studies. A larger study is required to establish the true incidence, and more importantly, that the use of thromboprophylaxis in these patients is warranted."

"This book reviews the biomaterials (metallic, non-metallic and bone allografts) used for orthopaedic applications and explains both the engineering and clinical aspects of their use and performance within the human body."

"[Latar Belakang: Posisi pasien selama tindakan anestesia spinal menentukan keberhasilan penempatan jarum spinal. Traditional sitting position (TSP) merupakan posisi standar untuk anestesia spinal, namun angka keberhasilannya masih cukup rendah. Crossed leg sitting position (CLSP) merupakan salah satu posisi alternatif dalam anestesia spinal yang memiliki kelebihan berupa derajat fleksi lumbal yang lebih besar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan CLSP dan TSP terhadap keberhasilan penempatan jarum spinal pada pasien bedah urologi. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah uji klinik acak tidak tersamar terhadap pasien yang menjalani anestesia spinal untuk prosedur urologi pada bulan Maret-April 2015 di RSUPN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. Setelah mendapatkan persetujuan izin etik dari Komite Etik Penelitian Kesehatan FKUI-RSCM, sebanyak 138 subjek dialokasikan ke dalam dua kelompok posisi penusukan jarum spinal yaitu kelompok CLSP dan TSP. Proporsi keberhasilan penempatan jarum spinal di rongga subarakhnoid, kemudahan perabaan landmark, dan jumlah needle-bone contact pada kedua kelompok kemudian dinilai.Hasil: Enam subjek masuk kriteria pengeluaran berupa kegagalan penempatan jarum spinal setelah lebih dari sembilan kali percobaan. Tersisa 132 subjek, 67 subjek pada kelompok CLSP dan 65 subjek pada kelompok TSP, yang berhasil menyelesaikan penelitian. Keberhasilan penempatan jarum spinal secara one shot pada kelompok CLSP dan TSP tidak berbeda bermakna (64.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.227). Kemudahan perabaan landmark pada kelompok CLSP berbeda bermakna dengan TSP (94% vs 75%, p=0.003). Jumlah needle-bone contact pada kedua kelompok tidak berbeda bermakna (p=0.337). Simpulan: Keberhasilan penempatan jarum spinal pada kelompok CLSP tidak berbeda bermakna dibandingkan dengan keberhasilan penempatan jarum spinal pada kelompok TSP pada pasien bedah urologi.;Background: Patient position during spinal anesthesia plays a major role in determining the success of spinal needle insertion to subarachnoid space. Traditional sitting position (TSP) is a standard position for spinal anesthesia, but the success rate for spinal anesthesia in TSP is still quite low. Crossed leg sitting position (CLSP) is one of the alternative positions in spinal anesthesia, which can increase the degree of lumbar flexion. This study aimed to compare CLSP and TSP to the successful insertion of spinal needle in urologic surgery patients.Methods: This study was a non-blinded randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for urologic procedures between March-April 2015 in RSUPN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. After obtaining approval from FKUI-RSCM Ethical Committee, 138 subjects were allocated into two groups, CLSP group and TSP group. The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion to the subarachnoid space, ease of landmark palpation, and the number of needle-bone contact in both groups were then analyzed and assessed.Result: Six subjects met dropout criteria, which was failure of obtaining successful spinal needle insertion after nine consecutive redirections. The remaining 132 subjects, 67 subjects in the CLSP group and 65 subjects in TSP group, successfully completed the study. The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion in a one-time shot, was not significantly different between CLSP and TSP group (64.2% vs. 53.8%, p = 0227). Ease of landmark palpation in CLSP group was significantly different with TSP group (94% vs. 75%, p = 0.003). The number of needle-bone contact in both groups was not significantly different (p = 0337).Conclusion: The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion in CLSP group was not significantly different compared to TSP group for urologic surgery patients.;Background: Patient position during spinal anesthesia plays a major role in determining the success of spinal needle insertion to subarachnoid space. Traditional sitting position (TSP) is a standard position for spinal anesthesia, but the success rate for spinal anesthesia in TSP is still quite low. Crossed leg sitting position (CLSP) is one of the alternative positions in spinal anesthesia, which can increase the degree of lumbar flexion. This study aimed to compare CLSP and TSP to the successful insertion of spinal needle in urologic surgery patients.Methods: This study was a non-blinded randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for urologic procedures between March-April 2015 in RSUPN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. After obtaining approval from FKUI-RSCM Ethical Committee, 138 subjects were allocated into two groups, CLSP group and TSP group. The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion to the subarachnoid space, ease of landmark palpation, and the number of needle-bone contact in both groups were then analyzed and assessed.Result: Six subjects met dropout criteria, which was failure of obtaining successful spinal needle insertion after nine consecutive redirections. The remaining 132 subjects, 67 subjects in the CLSP group and 65 subjects in TSP group, successfully completed the study. The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion in a one-time shot, was not significantly different between CLSP and TSP group (64.2% vs. 53.8%, p = 0227). Ease of landmark palpation in CLSP group was significantly different with TSP group (94% vs. 75%, p = 0.003). The number of needle-bone contact in both groups was not significantly different (p = 0337).Conclusion: The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion in CLSP group was not significantly different compared to TSP group for urologic surgery patients., Background: Patient position during spinal anesthesia plays a major role in determining the success of spinal needle insertion to subarachnoid space. Traditional sitting position (TSP) is a standard position for spinal anesthesia, but the success rate for spinal anesthesia in TSP is still quite low. Crossed leg sitting position (CLSP) is one of the alternative positions in spinal anesthesia, which can increase the degree of lumbar flexion. This study aimed to compare CLSP and TSP to the successful insertion of spinal needle in urologic surgery patients.Methods: This study was a non-blinded randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for urologic procedures between March-April 2015 in RSUPN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. After obtaining approval from FKUI-RSCM Ethical Committee, 138 subjects were allocated into two groups, CLSP group and TSP group. The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion to the subarachnoid space, ease of landmark palpation, and the number of needle-bone contact in both groups were then analyzed and assessed.Result: Six subjects met dropout criteria, which was failure of obtaining successful spinal needle insertion after nine consecutive redirections. The remaining 132 subjects, 67 subjects in the CLSP group and 65 subjects in TSP group, successfully completed the study. The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion in a one-time shot, was not significantly different between CLSP and TSP group (64.2% vs. 53.8%, p = 0227). Ease of landmark palpation in CLSP group was significantly different with TSP group (94% vs. 75%, p = 0.003). The number of needle-bone contact in both groups was not significantly different (p = 0337).Conclusion: The proportion of successful spinal needle insertion in CLSP group was not significantly different compared to TSP group for urologic surgery patients.]"

"Cedera servikal merupakan salah satu cedera tulang belakang terbanyak pada pasien trauma. Di Amerika Serikat tahun2008 dari 100.000 kasus cedera tulang belakang, sebanyak 67% merupakan kasus cedera servikal. Penilaian awaldilakukan berdasarkan American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score namun prognosis outcomesering tidak diperhatikan. Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisis nilai functional independence measure (FIM) pasiencedera servikal dengan manajemen konservatif dan korelasi dengan umur, jenis kelamin, jenis trauma, onset trauma,abnormalitas servikal, jenis lesi cervical spine, dan ASIA impairment score. Dilakukan studi kohor prospektif padasemua pasien cedera servikal yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi di bagian Bedah Saraf Rumah Sakit (RS) Dr. HasanSadikin Bandung. Subjek dikelompokkan berdasarkan umur, jenis kelamin, trauma tunggal/multipel, akut/kronik,abnormalitas servikal, lesi komplit/inkomplit dan ASIA impairment score. Pemeriksaan nilai FIM dilakukan diPoliklinik Bedah Saraf. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji t dan uji chi-kuadrat. Terdapat 17 pasien cedera servikal yangdirawat di bagian Bedah Saraf RS Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung periode April 2009?April 2010. Observasi kohorprospektif rata-rata nilai FIM pasien cedera servikal adalah 4±1,63. Analisis chi-kuadrat menyebutkan bahwa tidakterdapat hubungan umur, jenis kelamin, jenis trauma, onset trauma, abnormalitas servikal dengan besarnya nilai FIMpasien cedera servikal. Terdapat hubungan jenis lesi cervical spine, ASIA impairment score dengan besarnya nilai FIMpasien cedera servikal. Jenis lesi cervical spine dan ASIA impairment score memiliki hubungan bermakna denganbesarnya nilai FIM pasien 6 bulan pascacedera servikal.

Cervical spine injury is one of the most common spinal cord injuries in trauma patients. From 100,000

spinal cord injury cases reported in the United States of America (2008), sixty seven percent involve cervical spine

injury. American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score is used as an initial assessment but not

enough attention prognostic outcome of these patients was paid to. The objective of this study is to analyze the value of

functional independence measure (FIM) cervical spine injury patients with conservative management and its correlation

with age, sex, type of trauma, onset of trauma, cervical abnormalities, type of cervical spine lesion and ASIA

impairment score. A prospective cohort study was performed to all patients with cervical spine injury treated in

Neurosurgery Department of Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung that fullfiled the inclusion criteria. The subjects were

classified based on age, sex, single/multiple trauma, acute/chronic, cervical abnormalities, complete/incomplete lesion

and ASIA impairment score. The FIM examination was performed in Outpatient clinic of Neurosurgery. T-test and chisquare

test was done to analyze the data. There were 17 cervical spine injury patients treated in Neurosurgery

Department of Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital during April 2009?April 2010. The average FIM value of cervical spine

injury in those patients is 4+1.63 by cohort prospective study. There were no correlation between FIM value with age,

sex, type of trauma, onset of trauma and cervical abnormalities. Significant correlations were found between FIM value

with type of cervical spine lesion and ASIA impairment score in cervical spine patients. Type of cervical spine lesion

and ASIA impairment score have significant correlation with FIM value of patients in 6 months after cervical injury."