Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai tinjauan akta perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di Indonesia oleh notaris di Indonesia untuk perkawinan campuran beda kewarganegaraan antar Warga Negara Indonesia dengan Warga Negara Australia yang mana perkawinannya itu dilangsungkan di negara bagian New South Wales - Australia berdasarkan hukum perkawinan Australia. Maka timbul permasalahan mengenai kedudukan akta perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di Indonesia dalam hukum perkawinan di Australia. Apakah akta perjanjian perkawinan tersebut berlaku dan diakui kedudukannya sebagai perjanjian perkawinan di Australia atau tidak. Permasalahan ini diteliti dengan menggunakan pendekatan metode yuridis normatif dan deskripsi analitis, yaitu berupa kajian terhadap asas-asas dan norma hukum yang terdapat dalam ketentuan perundang-undangan Indonesia yang berkaitan dengan perjanjian perkawinan campuran beda kewarganegaraan dan dilihat dari teori-teori Hukum Perdata Internasional yang terkait dengan masalah perjanjian perkawinan yang bersifat internasional ini. Serta peraturan dan perundang-undangan Australia yang mengatur mengenai perkawinan, perjanjian perkawinan dan pengakuan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di luar Australia. Sebagai hasil dari penelitian ini, bahwa Australia hanya mengakui perjanjian perkawinan asing bilamana segala persyaratan tentang tata cara pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan Bindin Financial Agreement di Australia. Jadi dalam kasus tesis ini akta perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat oleh notaris di Indonesia tidak diakui dan secara hukum tidak mengikat. Perjanjian perkawinan tersebut hanya dipakai oleh hakim di Pengadilan Keluarga Australia sebagai bahan pertimbangan saja.

---

This thesis is the review of a prenuptial agreement deed that made in Indonesia by Indonesian Public Notary for a mixed marriage with different nationalities between an Indonesian nationality and an Australian nationality, where the wedding was held in New South Wales - Australia. Is the prenuptial deed above valid and recognise as prenuptial agreement in Australia. The above conflicts, has been reviewed and obsereved by the writer using a yuridis normative method and deskriptive analitic, law principles rules by Indonesian regulation related with mixed marriage prenuptial agreement subject, also using the principles by International Private Law, Australian Acts and regulation that rules international mixed marriage on how foreign prenuptual agreement is recognise in Australia. The result has come up that Australian only recognise foreign prenuptial agreement as long as it meet with all the requirements on how Australian make a binding financial agreement. So in this case, the prenuptial agreement deed made by Indonesian public notary in Indonesia does not recognise and does not binding in Australian. Its use for the judge in Family Court for a concideration only. "

"Perkawinan menurut KUHPerdata hanya dipandang dari segi keperdataannya saja. Berbeda dengan Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 yang memandang perkawinan dari ikatan lahir batin, yang tidak hanya mencakup ikatan secara fisik dan batiniyah, namun juga ikatan dalam harta benda. Terkait ikatan harta benda tersebut, Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 mengatur bahwa diperbolehkannya suami istri untuk membuat perjanjian perkawinan atas harta benda dalam perkawinan. Sehingga, apabila terjadi perceraian, maka perjanjian perkawinan yang telah dibuat akan berdampak pada perikatan yang timbul dari perjanjian tersebut mengenai pembagian harta benda perkawinan. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, tulisan dalam skripsi ini menunjukkan adanya prosedur pembuatan dan syarat-syarat sahnya suatu perjanjian perkawinan yang terlebih dahulu harus dilakukan oleh suami istri; dan implikasi terhadap perjanjian perkawinan terhadap harta benda perkawinan apabila terjadi perceraian adalah telah memiliki kedudukan hukum selama perjanjian tidak bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan, kesusilaan, dan ketertiban umum. Sebagai contoh, mereka dapat mengadakan pisah harta sama sekali, pisah harta secara terbatas, pemisahan aset-aset tertentu, percampuran harta bulat, campur hasil pendapatan, persatuan untung rugi.

---

Marriage in accordance with The Civil Code is only being regarded in terms of civilization. Unlike The Law No. 1 of 1974 that views the marriage of the spiritual and physical bond, that includes not only physical and spiritual bonds but also the prenuptial bonds. Related to the prenuptial bonds, The Law No. 1 of 1974 regulates that husband and wife are allowed to arrange a prenuptial agreement in their marriage. Thus, in the event of divorce appears in their marriage, the prenuptial agreement that has been made will give an implication to the prenuptial in the marriage. By using normative methods, this mini thesis study shows that there are several procedures and requirements that should be conducted to make a legal prenuptial agreement; and the implication of the prenuptial agreement in the event of divorce appears is the prenuptial agreement has its own legal position in the course of the agreement?s clause is not permissible if it is prohibited by the law, or if it violates good conduct, or public order. In example, they can arrange a completely separated of assets, separately limited of assets, separation of custom assets, completely interfusion of assets, interfusion of incomes, coalition of benefits and loss"

"Perjanjian perkawinan atau prenuptial agreement adalah perjanjian yang dibuat sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan dan mengikat kedua belah pihak calon mempelai yang akan menikah. Banyaknya angka perceraian yang berujung masalah, khususnya sesuatu yang menjadi akibat-akibat yang timbul karena adanya suatu perkawinan, contohnya adalah timbulnya harta gono-gini dirasakan perlu dibuatnya perjanjian perkawinan. Dengan dibuatnya perjanjian tersebut, maka aturan mengenai harta para pihak diatur dengan jelas di sana, baik mengenai harta bawaan maupun harta yang dihasilkan oleh para pihak selama masa perkawinan. Tentunya prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan haruslah dengan prosedur yang berlaku seperti perjanjian tersebut harus dibuat pada saat atau sebelum berlangsungnya perkawinan, dibuat dengan akta notaris, dan harus didaftarkan di Lembaga Pencatat Perkawinan. Begitu juga dengan masalah perubahan perjanjian perkawinan yang dilakukan setelah perkawinan berlangsung. Perubahan tersebut harus dilakukan sesuai dengan prosedur yang ada sehingga berkekuatan hukum tetap dan mengikat para pihaknya. Perjanjian perkawinan hendaknya dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak yang terkait di dalamnya. Penulis dalam penulisan skripsi ini mencoba menganalisa perlindungan hukum terhadap harta benda perkawinnan yang menggunakan perjanjian perkawinan, serta perlindungan hukum terhadap perjanjian perkawinan yang mengalami perubahan.

---

Prenuptial agreement is a written contract between two people who are about to marry that concerns about various financial issues. It covers the control and possession of property and other assets taken into the marriage and later obtained during the marriage either individually or jointly, as well as the couple's future earnings, and how such property or assets will be distributed in the event of divorce or death. These agreements are fairly common if either or both parties have substantial assets, children from a prior marriage, potential inheritances or earn high incomes. The writer of this thesis analyze the impact of law protection on prenuptial agreement against the financial issues in a marriage with prenuptial agreement and how the protection takes place on the prenuptial agreement which has been changed after the marriage. As a result of the recent high number of divorces which ended with problems, pre-nuptial agreement is expected to minimized those problems in advance. However, the procedure on creating the prenuptial agreement has to be made by law which would bound the two parties legally. Furthermore, any changes on the prenuptial agreement after the marriage has also be done by law to make it remain valid legally."

"Perkawinan berbeda kewarganegaraan menyebabkan persatuan harta dikemudian waktu. Banyak peraturan peraturan di negara ini, yang membedakan Warga Negara Asing dan Warga Negara Indonesia untuk sistem kepemilikan suatu harta benda, jika menikah tanpa Perjanjian Perkawinan, maka harta tersebut akan menjadi bulat, oleh karna itu dibuatlah Perjanjian Perkawinan, untuk melindungi masing masing pihak. Berlakukanya Perjanjian Perkawinan setelah dicatatkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan dan semenjak perkawinan berlangsung. Oleh karna itu, Perjanjian Perkawinan berlaku apabila Perkawinan yang dijalani oleh pasangan berbeda kewarganegaraan berjalan dengan sah, tetapi dalam analisa kasus ini pasangan yang menikah berbeda kewarganegaraan ini tidak menjalani beberapa aturan dan ada beberapa keterangan yang tidak diterangkan. Permasalahan yang timbul dalam penulisan ini adalah, Bagaimana Pengaturan pelaksanaan pencatatan Perjanjian Perkawinan yang dibuat di Indonesia oleh pasangan berbeda kewarganegaraan, permasalahan berikutnya, Bagaimana pengaturan Pencatatan Perkawinan yang dibuat oleh pasangan yang berbeda kewarganegaraan dengan yang perkawinannya tidak sesuai dengan undang undang yang berlaku di Indonesia, serta pencatatan perkawinan agar perjanjian perkawinan tersebut tercatat dan sah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalahanalisis data yang ada secara kualitatif. Metode yang menekankan pada peraturan perundang undangan teoritis. Dan bentuk penelitian adalah yuridis Normatif, penelitian yang menekankan pada penggunaan norma hukum secara tertulis.pengaturan dan pelaksanaan, pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan. Perkawinan yang dilaksanakan oleh Warga Negara Oleh Warga Negara Indonesia di luar negeri Harus mendapatkan surat bukti perkawinan warga negara Indonesia,untuk jadi alat bukti pencatatan. Pengaturan Pencatatan Perkawinan yang dibuat oleh pasangan yang berbeda kewarganegaraandalam penulisan ini melalui, konsorsium penetapan pencatatan perkawinan yang dikeluarkan oleh Kantor Catatan Sipil agar perjanjian perkawinan tersebut tercatat dengan sah dengan dasar Asas Lex Loci Celebrationis.

---

A different nationality marriage, cause of a unity property in the future. Many regulation in this country differentiate between an Indonesian and the foreign citizens in the system to ownthe property. If someone married without prenuptial agreement then the property between a marriage couple will be united, then it's better to make prenuptial agreement to protect each property.Prenuptial agreement is valid since its registered by marriage officers, and during the marriage. Therefore the prenuptial agreement is valid when the marriage different nationality do the procedure of regulation and legitimate. But in this case the both couple different nationality not did the procedure, and some identity is being hiden, the problem in this case is how the regulation and implementation to register the prenuptial agreement which is made in Indonesian, by the marriage different nationality in other country, next problem is how the regulation and implementation to register the prenuptial agreement which is made in Indonesia but the marriage against the regulation Indonesia, also how to make the prenuptial agreement register and legimate.

The method in this thesis is use analysis data by qualitative, and using the regulation theory, the form of the research yuridical normative, which is use regulation. Regulation and implementation of register Prenuptial agreement before marriage begin, marriage with different nationality in other country has been prove with letter to prove their marriage in other country for to as based to register marriage and prenuptial agreement. Register and implementation in this case by marriage different nationality, is using consortium is issued by Register Office Indonesia, also the prenuptial agreement is legimate based on Lex Loci Celebrationis."

"Umumnya suami-istri akan mempertahankan keberlakuan akta perjanjian perkawinan. Seiring hal tersebut, hingga kini belum ada pengaturan mengenai pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan. Dapat atau tidaknya pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan berlangsung; landasan hukum pertimbangan hakim; dan akibat-akibat hukumnya. Metodelogi penelitian adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan berlangsung tidak dapat dilakukan dengan cara apapun juga. Pasal 1338 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tidak sesuai diterapkan dalam kasus ini. Pasal 35 dan Pasal 36 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan diterapkan sejak dikabulkannya pembatalan. Setiap pihak tetap bertanggung jawab pribadi atas segala utangnya.

---

Generally husband and wife will retain the enforceability of the prenuptial agreement. As it is, until now there has been no regulation regarding cancellation of the prenuptial agreement. Whether or not cancellation of the prenuptial agreement after marriage; judges considered the legal basis; and the legal consequences. Normative research method and qualitative approach. Cancellation of the prenuptial agreement after marriage can't be done by any means. Article 1338 Civil Lawbook isn't applicable in this case. Article 35 and Article 36 Marriage Law applied since the granting of the annulment. Each party remain personally liable for any debts."

"[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung.

---

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

, Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

]"

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai permasalahan perjanjian kawin yang tidak didaftarkan. Yang menjadi permasalahan adalah apakah perjanjian kawin yang tidak didaftarkan berlaku efektif kepada pihak ketiga dan bagaimanakah kedudukan harta benda dalam perkawinan tersebut apabila perjanjian kawin yang dibuat tidak didaftarkan. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dalam penulisan ini. Perjanjian Perkawinan adalah perjanjian yang dibuat sebelum perkawinan dan mengikat kedua belah pihak dan calon mempelai yang akan menikah. Banyaknya angka perceraian yang berujung masalah dalam harta perkawinan dirasakan perlu dibuatnya perjanjian perkawinan. Tidak hanya harta perkawinan, hutang - hutang yang timbul sepanjang perkawinan juga sering dipermasalahkan apalagi jika perjanjian perkawinan mengikat pihak ketiga.Tentunya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan haruslah dengan prosedur yang berlaku seperti harus dibuat dengan akta notaris dan harus didaftarkan. Undang - Undang mengatur bahwa perjanjian perkawinan haruslah didaftarkan di Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri setempat. Penulis dalam penulisan ini mencoba menganalisa perjanjian kawin yang tidak didaftarkan apakah dapat melindungi kepentingan pihak ketiga atau dianggap tidak berlaku sama sekali untuk pihak ketiga serta kedudukan harta benda dalam perkawinan itu sendiri apakah berlaku harta bersama atau berlaku pemisahan harta seperti yang tercantum dalam Perjanjian Perkawinan. Pihak Ketiga akan dirugikan apabila tidak dilakukan pendaftaran, karena Perjanjian Perkawinan dianggap tidak berlaku kepada pihak ketiga apabila tidak diaftarkan. Harta Benda dalam perkawinan dianggap tidak ada pemisahan harta dalam perkawinan tersebut. Pendaftaran perjanjian perkawinan dianggap syarat mutlak sehingga notaris juga bertanggung jawab untuk menjelaskan kepada kedua belah pihak sebelum pembuatan perjanjian mengenai akibat - akibat yang akan timbul jika perjanjian perkawinan tidak didaftarkan. Penulis ini menyarankan agar notaris memberikan penyuluhan hukum terlebih dahulu kepada klien yang akan membuat perjanjian kawin.

---

This research talking about prenuptial agreements that not been registered. The problems are whether the unregistered prenuptial agreements can be effective to third party and how the marital property position in unregistered prenuptial agreements. Juridical normative approach was used as method in this research. Prenuptial agreements is a contract entered into prior to marriage by the people intending to marry or contract with each other. Many problems occurs in divorce events, especially about marital property and financial rights. That is why prenuptial agreements is needed, to establishes the property and financial rights of each spouse and also third party, in the event of divorce.Prenuptial agreements should be made with notary deed to be registered. According to laws, prenuptial agreements should be registered to local district court.In this research, writer want to analyze the absent of prenuptial agreements, whether it can protect the third party's interests and also determine how property is handled during marriage based on marital agreement.Third party will be disadvantaged if prenuptials agreement is not been registered because marital agreement considered not valid to third party. It also affect to marital property where it can be considered no separation of property in that marriage. Thus, prenuptial agreement is a must before marriage and notary has responsibility to explain to both parties, the result that can be happened if the prenuptial agreements not been registered."

"Dengan adanya pembatalan perkawinan menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai bagaimana kedudukan hukum perjanjian perkawinan terhadap pembatalan perkawinan di Indonesia serta akibat yang ditimbulkan terhadap para pihak dan pihak ketiga. Akibat pembatalan perkawinan yang mengakibatkan dibatalkannya perjanjian perkawinan di antara para pihak dalam perjanjian perkawinan pisah harta sama sekali adalah harta tetap menjadi milik masing-masing, dalam perjanjian perkawinan persekutuan untung dan rugi adalah pembagian untung dan rugi di antara para pihak berakhir, sedangkan dalam perjanjian perkawinan persekutuan hasil dan pendapatan adalah pembagian untung atau hasil dan pendapatan di antara para pihak berakhir. Apabila selama perkawinan dengan perjanjian perkawinan persekutuan untung dan rugi atau perjanjian perkawinan persekutuan hasil dan pendapatan terdapat harta yang dibuat atau dibeli atas nama bersama, maka pembagiannya dibagi dua di antara para pihak sesuai kesepakatan. Pihak ketiga tidak menanggung konsekuensi dari dibatalkannya perkawinan yang turut serta membatalkan perjanjian perkawinan di antara para pihak, sehingga perjanjian yang telah dibuat sebelumnya dengan pihak ketiga masih tetap berlaku. Terhadap harta yang dibeli atas nama bersama, setelah putusan pembatalan perkawinan dijatuhkan dengan alasan pembatalan perkawinan itu bukan karena masih ada perkawinan terdahulu (bukan karena suami melangsungkan perkawinan lagi dengan wanita lain tanpa adanya persetujuan istri atau istri-istri), sebaiknya para pihak atas kesepakatan bersama langsung menentukan siapa pihak yang akan bertanggung jawab atas harta tersebut (dijadikan harta atas nama salah satu pihak). Hal ini bertujuan untuk memberikan kepastian hukum kepada pihak ketiga terkait siapa pihak yang harus dimintakan pertanggungjawabannya berkenaan dengan status kepemilikan harta tersebut.

---

With the existence of marriage annulment, it raises questions about the legal position of the prenuptial agreement on the annulment of marriage in Indonesia along with the consequences it has on the spouses and third parties involved. Consequences of the marriage annulment which results in the cancellation of the prenuptial agreement: in a full separation of property, properties remains as the property of each spouse; in a profit and loss partnership, the profit and loss sharing between the parties ends; whereas in a result and income partnership, the distribution of profits or income between the parties ends. During a marriage which has a profit and loss partnership prenuptial agreement or an income and profit partnership agreement, if there are assets made or purchased in a joint name, then the distribution is divided between the parties according to the agreement. The third party does not bear the consequences of the annulment of the marriage which also involves canceling the prenuptial agreement between the parties, so that the previously made agreement with the third party are still valid. To assets purchased in a joint name, after the court decision to annul the marriage on the grounds that it was not because there was still a previous marriage (not because the husband had remarried with another woman without the consent of the wife or the wives), it is best if the parties have a mutual agreement in regard to directly determine the party responsible for the assets (made assets on behalf of one of the parties). This aims to provide legal security to third parties regarding who the party should be held accountable for regarding the ownership status of the property."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai kesepakatan bersama (perjanjian) pra perceraian. Perjanjian ini belum diatur didalam hukum perkawinan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksplanatoris dengan desain preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan Undang-undang Perkawinan Nomor: 1 Tahun 1974 perlu di amandemen karena sudah tidak mengakomodir kepentingan masyarakat; Perlunya dibuat sebuah Memory of Understanding (MoU) antara Pemerintah (diwakili oleh Kementrian Hukum dan HAM), Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, dan Mahkamah Agung sebagai peraturan pelaksana sementara, menunggu peraturan perundang-undangan dibuat; Perlu adanya kesepahaman di kalangan Notaris terkait dengan bentuk, jenis akta, moralitas dan etik bagi Notaris yang membuat kesepakatan bersama (perjanjian) pra perceraian ini.

---

The focus of this study is mutual consent (agreement) pre divorce. This agreement hasn't been regulate by Indonesian matrimonial regulation. This research is explanatory prescriptive. The researcher suggest that Indonesian matrimonial regulation Number: 1 year 1974 need to be amendment because it can't accommodate the citizen stipulation; Memory of Understanding between The Government (represent by Ministry of Law and Human Rights), Indonesian Notary Organization, and The Supreme Court is needed as a transitory regulation; There is need to be an understanding in the Indonesian Notary Community regarding the outline, the type of the agreement, morality and ethical conduct of the notary that construct mutual consent (agreement) pre divorce."

"Menurut ketentuan Pasal 29 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan diatur bahwa perjanjian perkawinan dibuat pada waktu atau sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan oleh pasangan calon suami isteri. Akan tetapi karena kurangnya pengetahuan masyarakat Indonesia mengenai pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan, maka banyak pasangan suami isteri yang membuat perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan dengan alasan permohonan perlindungan Hukum terhadap harta pribadi masing-masing terkait resiko tanggung jawab pekerjaan atau berakhirnya perkawinan karena suatu perceraian. Di dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan tipe penelitian analitis deskriptif. Data yang dipergunakan adalah data sekunder, yaitudata yang berupa studi kepustakaan dan studi terhadap penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor : 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan Hakim dalam menetapkan Penetapan Pengadilan tersebut, mengingat bahwa permohonan Penetapan perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan bertentangan dengan ketentuan pasal 29 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Dari hasil penelitian ini penulis mengambil kesimpulan bahwa Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 adalah satu-satunya peraturan yang berlaku di Indonesia yang mengatur mengenai pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan, namun atas dasar-dasar pertimbangan hukum Hakim yang penulis uraikan dalam penelitian ini maka Hakim mengabulkan permohonan pasangan suami isteri Junaida dan Kazuo Sawachi dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor : 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim.,dan setelah tanggal ditetapkannya maka penetapan Pengadilan tersebut dapat dijadikan sebagai dasar hukum dalam menjalankan pemisahan harta bersama di dalam perkawinan mereka

---

Under the terms of Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, it is stipulated that a prenuptial agreement shall be made on or before the performance of the marriage by the bride and groom. However, because of the lack of public knowledge regarding the creation of a prenuptial agreement, many married couples in Indonesia enter into a prenuptial agreement after the marriage takes place on the grounds of legal protection of each of their personal properties associated with occupational responsibility risks or the dissolution of a marriage by divorce. In this study, the author used the juridical normative research method with the descriptive analytical research type. The data used is secondary data, i.e. data in the form of literature studies and studies on the Court Order of the East Jakarta District Court No. 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim. This study was conducted to determine and analyze the basis of the judges' considerations in determining the aforementioned Court Oder, given that the petition of the Court Order to legitimize the prenuptial agreement after the officiation of the marriage was contrary to the provisions of Article 29, paragraph (1) of Law Number 01 Year 1974 on Marriage. From the result of this research, the author concludes that Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 is the only rule in Indonesia that regulates the creation of prenuptial agreements. Nevertheless, on the grounds of the legal considerations of the judge that the author describes in this research, the judge granted the request of the couple Junaida and Kazuo Sawachi through East Jakarta District Court Order Number 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim., and after the date of its enactment, the aforementioned court order may be used as a legal basis in the dividing of the joint property in their marriage."