Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 86001 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Ratna Wardhani
"ABSTRAK
This study examines the differencCorporate Governance mechanisms are believed to have strong impact on the companies' performance. The implementation of Corporate Governance in one company might be different to the implementation of Corporate Governance in other company due to the characteristics of the company. This study examines the difference of Corporate Governance mechanisms in financially distressed firms
and non financially distressedfirms. Corporate Governance mechanisms examined in this study are board size, independency of board, institutional ownership and director ownership. The result of this study shows that board size has a significant negative impact on the probability of firm experienced financial distressed after controlling for firms asset and leverage. This result is also confirmed by test using lag one year. This study fails to document the evidence of the relationship of board independency and ownership structure with the probability of firm experienced financial distressed."
[Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia;Fakultas Ekonomi UI, Fakultas Ekonomi UI], 2007
J-pdf
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Fandi Musjafir
"Isu mengenai Good Corporare Governance (GCG) mulai ramai dibahas dan dirasakan sangat penting setelah negara-negara di Asia Timur mengalami krisis ekonomi yang dimulai pada pertengahan lahun 1997. Di Indonesia krisis tersebut mengakibatkan fluktuasi yang luar biasa pada nilai tukar rupiah terhadap mata uang asing. Kondisi tersebut berdampak terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi, Tahun 1998 pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia mencapai titik terendah sejak era Soeharto yakni minus 13 %.
Berdasarkan survey yang dilakukan oleh Asian Development Bank (ADB) 5 (lima) negara di kawasan Asia, ditemukan bebera faktor yang mpnyebabkan krisis ekonomi itu terjadi, yaitu : lemahnya enforcement hukum, lemahnya pasar modal, Kosentrasi tinggi dalam kepemilikan perusahaan pada sekelompok/pihak tertentu, dan lemahnya persaingan.
Pendapat lain menyatakan bahwa terjadinya krisis ekonomi juga disebabkan lemahnya penerapan Good Corporale Governance di dalam perusahaan yang meliputi keadilan, keterbukaan, akuntabilitas, dan tanggungjawab (Nasution, 2006). Oleh karena itu, Good Corporate Governanace menjadi salah satu bahasan penting dalam rangka mendukung pemulihan ekonomi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi yang stabil di masa yang akan datang.
Keberadaan teori agency (agency theory) sangat melatarbelakangi isu corporate governance dimana agency problem muncul ketika kepengurusan suatu perusahaan terpisah dari pemiliknya. Dengan adanya pemisahan tersebut seringkali terjadi konflik konflik kepentingan di dalam perusahaan antara kedua pihak tersebut. Dimana kemungkinan besar konflik tersebut dapat membawa bencana terhadap perusahaan (kebangkrutan). Konflik tersebut dapat diminimalkan dengan suatu mekanisme yang mampu mensejajarkan kepentingan pemegang saham selaku pemilik dengan kepentingan manajemen (dewan direksi dan komisaris). Mekanisme tersebut dikenal dengan istilah Good Corporate Governance atau tata kelola perusahaan yang baik dalam menjalankan bisnisnya.
Sampai saat ini banyak pendapat pro dan kontra mengenai hubungan mekanisme Good Corporare Governance (GCG) dengan kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Oleh karena itu belum ada bahasa yang universal mengenai ini. Perusahaan - perusahaan di Indonesia masih mencari bentuk yang pas untuk melaksanakan konsep GCG ini. Dengan demikian implementasi GCG di satu perusahaan mungkin akan berbeda dengan perusahaan lain tergantung karakteristik perusahaannya dan industrinya. Penelitian ini akan melihat mekanisme GCG pada perusahaan manufaktur yang mengalami kesulitan keuangan pada periode 2005 - 2006. Mekanisme GCG yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah ukuran dewan direksi, dewan komisaris, komitc audit, komisaris independen, dan persentase kepemilikan institusional.
Berdasarkan analisa yang dilakukan ditemukan hasil bahwa ukuran dewan direksi, dewan komisaris, komite audit, komisaris independen, dan persentase kepemilikan institusional tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap besamya kemungkinan perusahaan mengalami kesulitan keuangan. Dengan kata lain perusahaan yang mengalami kesulitan keuangan pada periode 2005 - 2006 lebih disebabkan oleh faktor lain diluar penelitian ini.

The issue about Good Corporate Governance was begin to talked and felt very important after many country in East Asia go down into economic crisis which was started in the middle year 1997. ln Indonesian, that crisis causes a dramatic fluctuation of Rupiah exchange rate to foreign exchange rate. That condition effect to economic growth. Economic growth of Indonesian gets to lowest rate since era Suharto which is minus 13% in the year 1998.
Based on survey which is done by Asian Development Bank (ADB), 5 (live) countries in regional Asia, was founded few factor that caused economic crisis happened, there are: poor law enforcement, poor capital market, high concentration ownership by individual or group, and poor competition.
Other opinion said that economic crisis was also caused by poor implementation Good Corporate Governance in the corporate which including fairness, openness, accountability, and responsibility. Because of that, Good Corporate Governance is one of important topic in order to support economic recovery and stability economic growth in the future.
Existence of agency theory give a background about Good Corporate Governance issue absolutely which agency problem emerges when management in a company is separated from its owner or shareholder. With that existence of dissociation always make a conflict of interest inside company between both parties. That conflict might be give a big problem for company (be bankcruptcy). That conflict can be decreased with a mechanism that can make two interest into the same level. That mechanism was known as good corporate governance in running business.
There is many pro and contra opinion about Good Corporate Governance mechanism with financial performance until this time. Companies in Indonesian still search fit shape to doing this GCG concept. Therefore this implementation in one company might be different in other company due the Company and industry characteristic. This study examined the difference of Corporate Governance mechanism in financially distressed firm and non financially distress limt. Corporate Governance mechanism eaxamined in this study are size of board, independency of board, audit committee, and institutional ownership.
The result of this study showed that board or director, board of commissioner, audit committee, board independency, and institutional ownership has no impact of experienced financial distressed firms. ln other word, there is other factor that caused financial distress firm in period 2005 - 2006."
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2008
T23908
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Sherly Marselistiana
"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap cash holdings dan firm value. Penelitian ini menggunakan uji analisis Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Variabel independen pada penelitian ini adalah ukuran dewan direksi, komisaris independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial, sedangkan variabel dependennya adalah cash holdings yang diproksikan dengan logaritma natural dari total kas pada penutupan akhir tahun dan firm value yang diproksikan dengan perhitungan Tobin's Q. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel sejumlah 1314 observasi dari sampel perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2007-2012.
Hasil peneltian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ukuran dewan direksi memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (2) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (3) ukuran dewan direksi tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value, (4) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value.

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on cash holdings and firm value. This research is analyze with Fixed Effect Model (FEM). The Independence variables in this research are the board size, board independence, and insider ownership, for the dependent variables are cash holdings that proxied by log of year end total cash and firm value that proxied by Tobin's Q. This study use a panel data sample of 1314 observations listed non financial firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the periode 2007-2012.
The results showed that: (1) board size have significant effect on cash holdings, (2) board independence and insider ownership doesn't have significant effect on cash holdings, (3) board size doesn't have significant effect on firm value, (4) board independence and insider ownership have significant effect on firm value.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2014
S54517
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Rizkitio lmam Pradana
"Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang termasuk daam indeks kompas100. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel 40 perusahaan menggunakan akuntansi dan data pasar yang tersedia untuk tahun 2008-2012. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan saham oleh CEO memiliki hubungan negatif terhadap ROA, sedangkan hubungan positif terhadap Return Saham. Presentase keemilikan komisaris independen memiliki hubungan negatif dengan kinerja keuangan baik ROA ataupun Return Saham, tetapi tidak signifikan terhadap ROA dan Return Saham. Board Structure cenderung memiliki hubungan negatif dengan kinerja perusahaan kecuali pada susunan komisaris dengan ROA dan jumlah ukuran dewan terhadap Return Saham, tetapi tidak signifikan terhadap ROA dan Return Saham. Variabel Economic Determinant memiliki hubungan positif dengan kinerja keuangan perusahaan namun nilai market to book ratio menunjukkan hubungan negatif terhadap Return Saham dan Sales memilikihubungan positif signifikan terhadap ROA.
The primary objective of this study was to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the performance of companies included in the index Kompas100. This study used a sample of 200 companies using accounting and market data are available for the years 2008-2012. The results show that CEO stock ownership has a negative relationship to ROA, while a positive relationship to Return Shares. Percentage ownership of independent directors has a negative relationship with financial performance either ROA or Return Shares, but no significant effect on ROA and Stock Return. Board Structure tends to have a negative relationship with firm performance unless the commissioner arrangement with ROA and the number of board size on Stock Return, but no significant effect on ROA and Stock Return. Economic Determinant variables have a positive relationship with the financial performance of the company but the value of the market to book ratio showed a negative relationship to the Stock Return and Sales has a significant positive relationship to ROA."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia, 2014
S53889
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Banyu Kuncoro Jakti
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) selama periode 2009 hingga 2013. Variabel independen dalam penelitian ini adalah corporate governance. Variabel dependen yang digunakan adalah kinerja perusahaan. Corporate governance diukur dengan menggunakan ukuran dewan komisaris, proporsi dewan komisaris indpenden, dan ukuran komite audit. Untuk mengukur kinerja perusahaan, dalam penelitian ini menggunakan dua ukuran pengukuran; Return On Equity (ROE) dan Net Profit Margin (NPM). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan uji regresi data panel. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa ukuran dewan komisaris memiliki pengaruh yang tidak signifikan terhadap ROE sedangkan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap NPM, proporsi komisaris independen memiliki pengaruh yang tidak signifikan baik terhadap ROE maupun NPM, ukuran komite audit memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap ROE maupun NPM.

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of corporate governance on the corporate performance of industrial firm listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2009-2013. Independent and dependent variables of this research is corporate governance and corporate performance. For measuring corporate governance, in this research used three measurement: size of board commissioners, proportion of independent board commissioners, and size of board committee. For measuring corporate performance used two measurement: Return On Equity (ROE) and Net Profit Margin (NPM). Hypotheses are tested using the estimation method of panel data. The results of this study find that size of board commissioners has insignificant on ROE and has significant on NPM, proportion of non executive board commissioners has insignificant on ROE and NPM, size of board committee has significant on ROE and NPM.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia, 2015
S58526
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Muhammad Fauzi Aliansyah
"Skripsi ini menganalisis pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance yang meliputi mekanisme pemantauan kepemilikan dan pemantauan pengendalian internal terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang diproksikan pada ROA. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan 10 Sampel perusahaan asuransi diambil berdasarkan purposive sampling. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah metode regresi linear berganda.
Hasil penelitian ini adalah mekanisme corporate governance memiliki pengaruh terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang diproksikan pada ROA. Untuk meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan, diharapkan tidak hanya memperhatikan banyaknya jumlah direksi, dewan komisaris dan komisaris independen tetapi juga memperhatikan kompetensi yang dimiliki yang berhubungan dengan profesionalitas.
This study analyzes the influence of corporate governance mechanisms include the ownership mechanisms monitoring and internal control monitoring to company performance which reflected on ROA. This research is quantitative explanative research with 10 samples the insurance company taken by purposive sampling. The analytical method used is multiple linear regression method.
The results of this research is corporate governance mechanisms has effects on company performance which reflected on ROA. To improve the company performance, not glued to the large number of the board of directors, commissioners and independent commissioners, but also pay attention to their competence related of professionalism.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2012
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Desti Maharani
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance yang diproksi dengan persentase kepemilikan saham terbesar, ukuran dewan komisaris, dan efektivitas komite audit terhadap pemilihan auditor eksternal pada perusahaan non jasa keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan klasifikasi auditor Top 10 dan non Top 10 sebagai proksi dari kualitas audit yang akan dipilih perusahaan. Penelitian menggunakan 434 observasi selama periode 2009-2010. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pengaruh positif signifikan antara persentase kepemilikan saham terbesar, ukuran dewan komisaris, dan efektivitas komite audit terhadap pemilihan auditor eksternal oleh perusahaan.

This study aimed to analyze the impact of corporate governance mechanism, proxied by largest shareholder, board size, and audit committee's effectiveness on external auditor choice in non financial service companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study used Top 10 and non Top 10 auditor classification as a proxy of audit quality that will be chosen by the company. This study used 434 observations over the period 2009-2010. The results showed that there are significant positive effects of largest shareholder, board size, and audit committee's effectiveness on external auditor choice by the company."
Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2012
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Rosemarine Rahmawati Suriadinata
"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh peringkat corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan periode 2008-2012. Pengujian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode regresi data panel, dimana variabel dependen adalah kinerja keuangan yang diproksikan oleh earning per share, Return on Assets, dan Return on Equity sedangkan peringkat corporate governance sebagai variabel independen. Terdapat tiga model dalam penelitian ini, yaitu menggunakan nilai dari masing-masing variabel dependen. Hasil penelitian pada model pertama menunjukkan bahwa peringkat corporate governance tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Model kedua dan ketiga memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan.

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation
method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance, which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator, while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm
performance.;The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on
firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation
method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,
which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,
while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three
models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results
of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not
have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models
indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm
performance., The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on
firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation
method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,
which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,
while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three
models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results
of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not
have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models
indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm
performance.]
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2015
S60728
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Hairatih
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur modal dan corporate governance terhadap leverage ratios pada perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2008-2012. Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga definisi leverage ratios untuk melihat perbedaan signifikansi dan arah hubungan pada tiap model penelitian. Variabel independen dalam penelitian ini berupa struktur modal (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership, sedangkan variabel dependennya adalah tiga definisi leverage ratios (debt to equity ratio, long-term debt to equity ratio, dan debt to asset ratio).
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada model 1 (DER) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size dan board independence) terhadap leverage ratios; pada model 2 (LDR) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size dan asset tangibility) terhadap leverage ratios; pada model 3 (DR) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership) terhadap leverage-ratios.

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of capital structure and corporate governance on leverage ratios of non financial companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2012. This research uses three proxies of leverage ratios to see significance difference and relation signs in each model. The independence variables of this research are capital structure (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership), while the dependence variables are the three proxies of leverage ratios (debt to equity ratio, long-term debt to equity ratio, debt to asset ratio).
The result shows that there is significant effect of capital structure (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence) toward leverage ratios in the first model (DER), while the second model (LDR) shows significant effect of capital structure (size dan asset tangibility) towards leverage ratios, and there is significant effect of capital structure (size, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership) toward leverage ratios in the third model (DR).
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia, 2014
S54584
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Wulan Ningrum Kusuma
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal terhadap agency cost pada perusahaan sektor non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2008 2012 Corporate governance diproksikan dengan board of commissioner size dan proporsi dewan komisaris Struktur kepemilikan diproksikan dengan kepemilikan manajerial dan kepemilikan institusional Sedangkan struktur modal diproksikan dengan debt to asset ratio Agency cost pada penelitian ini diproksikan dengan asset utilisation ratio Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan regresi data panel dengan uji analisis Random Effect Model REM
Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa secara simultan corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap agency cost Selanjutnya secara parsial hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa board of commissioner size kepemilikan manajerial kepemilikan institusional dan debt to asset ratio memiliki pengaruh yang negatif signifikan terhadap agency cost Kata Kunci Agency cost corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal.

This study aims to analyze the effect of corporate governance, ownership structure, and capital structure on agency cost of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2012. Corporate governance is proxied by board of commissioner size and proportion of independent commissioners. Ownership structure is proxied by managerial ownership and institutional ownership. Whereas, capital structure is proxied by debt-to-asset ratio. In this study, agency cost is measured by asset utilisation ratio. This research is a quantitative research by using panel data regression. This research is analyzed with Random Effect Model (REM).
The result shows that corporate governance, ownership structure, and capital structure simultaneously have significant effect on agency cost. Furthermore, board of commissioner size, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and debt-to-asset ratio significantly affect agency cost and have negative correlation with agency cost.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia, 2014
S54779
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>