Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini membahas pengaruh kepemilikan keluarga dan corporate governance terhadap risiko idiosyncratic perusahaan dengan menggunakan total observasi sebanyak 183 atas perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI. Dengan menggunakan metode Pooled Least Square didapatkan hasil bahwa kepemilikan keluarga ternyata tidak berpengaruh terhadap risiko idiosyncratic. Kemudian penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa perusahaan dengan kualitas corporate governance yang tinggi akan memiliki risiko idiosyncratic yang rendah. Selain itu, peneliti juga menguji pengaruh moderasi corporate governance atas hubungan perusahaan keluarga dengan risiko idiosyncratic risk, dan menemukan bahwa variabel corporate governance tidak memiliki efek moderasi terhadap hubungan perusahaan keluarga dengan risiko idiosyncratic risk.

---

This thesis studied about the relationship of family firm and corporate governance on firm?s idiosyncratic risk, by using 183 observations data of manufacturing company which is listed in BEI. By using Pooled Least Square Method, this research found that family ownership did not have significant effect on idiosyncratic risk. Furthermore, this research also found that firm with high quality of corporate governance will have lower level of idiosyncratic risk. Besides, the authors also test the moderating role of corporate governance to the relationship of family firms with the idiosyncratic risk, and found that corporate governance do not have a moderating role on the effect family firms to the idiosyncratic risk."

"Salah satu aspek keberlanjutan terletak pada implementasi dari ESG yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan bisnis, serta bagaimana pengungkapan terkait informasi tersebut dilakukan. Indeks pasar yang fluktuatif dapat menciptakan ekosistem informasi yang buruk serta dapat meningkatkan risiko idiosyncratic. Ekosistem informasi yang baik tentu ditentukan oleh sistem dari tata kelola perusahaan. Hanya terdapat sedikit literatur penelitian terkait hal tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh pengungkapan aktivitas ESG dan karakteristik corporate governance terhadap idiosyncratic risk untuk perusahaan publik di Indonesia. Menggunakan data sekunder berupa perusahaan publik yang terdaftar di BEI sebagai sampel dan periode yang diambil dari tahun 2015 – 2021. Idiosyncratic risk diukur menggunakan Fama-French Three Factor Model. Pengungkapan ESG diukur menggunakan ESG score, diperoleh dari Thomson Reuter’s website. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah regresi berganda dengan data panel. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tidak terdapat pengaruh signifikan antara ESG Disclosure terhadap Idiosyncratic Risk. Terdapat pengaruh negatif signifikan Ukuran Dewan Komisaris terhadap Idiosyncratic Risk dan Terdapat pengaruh negatif signifikan Keberagaman Gender Dewan Komisaris terhadap Idiosyncratic Risk. Kemudian, tidak terdapat pengaruh signifikan variabel moderasi Busy Board (Kesibukan Dewan Komisaris) terhadap hubungan ESG Disclosure dengan Idiosyncratic Risk. Penelitian ini dapat memberikan kontribusi untuk para manajer dan investor, serta memberikan manfaat teoritis.

---

One of the aspect of sustainability lies in the implementation of ESG activities that is done by companies, as well as how they disclose this information to public. Market index that is fluctuative would create a poor information ecosystem and could increase idiosyncratic risk. A good information ecosystem is determined by the charactheristic of their corporate governance. There are only little amount of research regarding this subjects. This study aims to analyze the effect of disclosing ESG activities and the characteristics of corporate governance on idiosyncratic risks for public companies in Indonesia. The research used secondary data, consisting of public companies that are listed in IDX website from 2015 – 2021. Idiosyncratic risk is measured using the Fama-French Three Factor Model. ESG disclosure is measured using the ESG score, obtained from the Thomson Reuter website. The analytical method used is multiple regression with panel data. This study found that there was no significant effect of ESG disclosure on idiosyncratic risk. There is a significant negative effect of the size of the Board of Commissioners on idiosyncratic risk and there is a significant negative effect of Gender Diversity on idiosyncratic risk. Then, there is no significant effect of the busy board as a moderating variable on the relationship between ESG Disclosure and idiosyncratic risk. This research could contribute to managers and investors, as well as provide theoretical benefits."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaruh Corporate Governance, kepemilikan keluarga dan umur perusahaan terhadap Corporate Social Performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations. Penelitian ini juga ingin menguji pengaruh Financial Performance terhadap asosiasi Corporate Governance dengan Corporate Social Performance. Corporate Governance dinilai berdasarkan indeks yang dikeluarkan oleh Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship (IICD), sedangkan untuk Corporate Social Performance menggunakan kriteria pernilaian yang digunakan oleh Greening dan Turban (2000) dimana pengukuranny berdasarkan dimensi yang digunakan lembaga KLD (Kinder,Lydenberg and Domini). Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan model regresi logistik dan sampel sebanyak 239 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama tahun 2008. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa corporate governance memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations. Kepemilikan keluarga memiliki pengaruh positif walaupun lemah terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance dimensi product quality sedangkan umur perusahaan memiliki pengaruh positif walaupun lemah terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance dimensi environment dan dimensi product quality. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa financial performance tidak memperkuat hubungan corporate governance dengan probabilita sebuah perusahaan memiliki high corporate social performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations.

---

This research aims to determine whether corporate governance, family ownership, and firm age influence corporate social performance in environment dimension, product quality dimension, and community relations. In addition, this research also would like to know the effect of financial performance on the association between corporate governance and corporate social performance. Corporate governance viewed by an index issued by Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship (IICD), while corporate social performance is measured by KLD?s criteria that used by Greening and Turban (2000).

Hypothesis testing used logistic regression with sample of 239 companies that are listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008. These result indicate that companies with good corporate governance will have bigger probability getting high corporate social erformance in those dimensions. Family ownership has weak influence on corporate social performance in product quality dimension and firm age also has weak influence on corporate social performance in product quality dimension and community relations dimension. Yet, financial performance is proven that there is no influence of financial performance to the association between corporate governance and corporate social performance."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh peringkat corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan periode 2008-2012. Pengujian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode regresi data panel, dimana variabel dependen adalah kinerja keuangan yang diproksikan oleh earning per share, Return on Assets, dan Return on Equity sedangkan peringkat corporate governance sebagai variabel independen. Terdapat tiga model dalam penelitian ini, yaitu menggunakan nilai dari masing-masing variabel dependen. Hasil penelitian pada model pertama menunjukkan bahwa peringkat corporate governance tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Model kedua dan ketiga memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan.

---

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance, which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator, while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance.;The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on

firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,

which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,

while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three

models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results

of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not

have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models

indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance., The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on

firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,

which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,

while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three

models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results

of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not

have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models

indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh elemen-elemen corporate governance, seperti board structure, ownership structure, board procedure, disclosure, related party transaction, dan minority shareholder rights terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan menggunakan variabel kontrol berupa assets, leverage, growth, net income to assets, share turnover, ownership, earning before interests and taxes to assets, top auditor, dan CCGPI. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini bersumber dari laporan tahunan, laporan keuangan, serta laporan survei corporate governance perception index yang dikeluarkan oleh IICG tahun 2005-2011. Sampel tersebut diperoleh dengan metode purposive sampling. Metode pengujian hipotesis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode regresi linier berganda.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa board structure, institutional ownership, disclosure, related party transaction, ownership, dan earning before interests and taxes to assets memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan dengan arah yang positif, sedangkan leverage dan share turnover memiliki pengaruh yang negatif dan signifikan terhadap Tobin?s Q. Sementara itu, managerial ownership, board procedure, minority shareholder rights, assets, growth, net income to assets, top auditor, dan CCGPI tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap variabel Tobin's Q.

---

The research aims to analyze the effect of corporate governance elements, such as board structure, ownership structure, board procedure, disclosure, related party transactions, and minority shareholder rights to firm value using some of the control variables, such as assets, leverage, growth, net income to assets, share turnover, ownership, earning before interest and taxes to assets, top auditor, and CCGPI. The data used in this research derived from annual reports, financial statements, and report of corporate governance perception index survey released by IICG at years 2005 - 2011. The samples obtained by purposive sampling method. Hypothesis testing methods used in this research is the multiple linear regression method.The result of this study indicate that the board structure, institutional ownership, disclosure, related party transaction, ownership, and earning before interest and taxes to assets ratio have a significant effect in positive direction, while leverage and share turnover have a negative-significant effect to Tobin's Q. Meanwhile, managerial ownership, board procedure, minority shareholder rights, assets, growth, net income to assets, top auditor, and CCGPI have no significant effect to Tobin's Q."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi efek entrenchment dan alignment pemegang saham pengendali akhir terhadap kebijakan dividen kas serta efek moderasi kepemilikan keluarga dan mekanisme corporate governance (CG) terhadap pengaruh entrenchment effect pada kebijakan dividen kas. Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa perusahaan dengan pemisahan hak kendali dan hak arus kas yang besar menimbulkan adanya insentif ekspropriasi yang memicu entrenchment effect berupa konflik keagenan yang serius antara pemegang saham pengendali akhir dengan pemegang saham non pengendali sehingga berdampak pada pembagian dividen kas yang rendah. Sampel penelitian ini menggunakan perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2006 - 2008. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kenaikan rasio hak arus kas meningkatkan alignment effect yang mendorong perusahaan membagikan dividen kas yang lebih tinggi. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan efek entrenchment effect tidak berpengaruh terhadap kebijakan dividen kas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, kepemilikan keluarga memberikan pengaruh yang dapat memperlemah efek negatif entrenchment pada dividen kas, sedangkan mekanisme CG pada perusahaan ternyata belum dapat melindungi pemegang saham non pengendali dari tindakan ekspropriasi."

"Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Corporate governance performance index sebagai gambaran pelaksanaan Corporate governance dan Konsentrasi kepemilikan perusahaan terhadap efisiensi investasi. Sebagai proksi over-investment dan under-investment menggunakan tingkat kas dan hutang perusahaan, dimana perusahaan dengan kas yang besar berpeluang over-investment, jika perusahaan dengan hutang yang besar berpeluang untuk underinvestment.Dengan menggunakan data yang bersumber dari perusahaan ? perusahaan yang listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia serta hasil penelitian CGPI dalam kurun waktu 2007 ? 2010. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa corporate governance performance index tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap efisiensi investasi perusahaan, sedangkan struktur kepemilikan memiliki pengaruh terhadap efisiensi investasi.Untuk penelitian selanjutnya agar menilai corporate governance dari aspek lainnya seperti Transparency, Accountability, Responsibility, Disclosure serta aspek lainnya, agar terlihat aspek mana yang mempengaruhi pengambilan keputusan investasi.

---

This study aims to analyze the influence of corporate governance performance index as a picture of the implementation of corporate governance and corporate ownership concentration on investment efficiency. As a proxy for over-investment and under-investment using cash and debt levels of companies, where companies with large cash over-investment opportunity, if firms with large debt likely to underinvestment.

By using data sourced from listing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the CGPI research results in the period 2007 to 2010. The results showed that the corporate governance performance index has no influence on the efficiency of corporate investment, while the ownership structure has an influence on the efficiency of investment.

For further research to assess other aspects of corporate governance such as Transparency, Accountability, Responsibility, Disclosure, and other aspects, in order to see which aspects that influence the investment decision."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance dan karakteristik perusahaan terhadap probabilita diakuisisi. Mekanisme corporate governance yang diuji yaitu keberadaan komisaris independen dan ukuran (size) dewan komisaris dari sisi internal governance, serta auditor eksternal dan monitoring bank dari sisi external governance. Sementara karakteristik perusahaan yang diuji adalah profitabilitas dan ukuran (size) perusahaan. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan menggunakan model regresi logistik dengan sampel 90 observasi dari perusahaan diakuisisi dan tidak diakuisisi selama periode 2004 ? 2011 dan tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia.Hasil dari penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa monitoring bank yang diukur dari besarnya pinjaman bank yang diperoleh dari bank berkualitas monitoring baik, jumlah (size) dewan komisaris dan profitabilitas perusahaan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap menurunnya probabilita diakuisisi. Sedangkan komisaris independen,auditor eksternal dan ukuran perusahaan tidak berpengaruh terhadap probabilita diakuisisi.

---

ABSTRACT

The objective of this research is to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanism and firm characteristics on the probability of being acquired. Corporate governance mechanism that were examined are the role of independent commissioner and board size as internal governance mechanism, as well as external auditor and bank monitoring as external governance mechanism. Firm characteristic that were examined are profitability and firm? size. Hypotheses testing are conducted using logistic regression model with observations from 90 sample of acquired and non acquired publicly listed companies in Indonesia during the period 2004 - 2011.

The result of this study concluded that bank monitoring measured by the amount of bank loan from the bank with good monitoring quality, board size and firm profitability has significant effect on decreasing the probability being acquired. While independent commissioner, external auditor and firm? size has no significant impact on probability being acquired."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh praktik corporate governance dan struktur kepemilikan keluarga terhadap kebijakan dividen. Variabel-variabel utama yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah corporate governance index, kepemilikan keluarga, kepemilikan institusional, dan kepemilikan asing. Sampel di dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan publik yang terdaftar di BEI kecuali perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang keuangan untuk periode 2007-2011 yang berjumlah 420 perusahaan. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa kualitas corporate governance yang diukur dengan corporate governance index berpengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap kebijakan dividen. Kepemilikan keluarga mempunyai pengaruh signifikan positif terhadap kebijakan dividen. Kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan asing tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kebijakan dividen.

---

This study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance, family ownership, institusional ownership, and foreign ownership on dividend payout policy. The main variables in this study is corporate governance index, family ownership, institusional ownership, and foreign ownership. The samples of this study is public company listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange, except financial firms, for years 2007-2011 with a total 420 companies.

The results of this study show that the quality of corporate governance as measured by corporate governance index have a significant negative impact on dividend payout policy. Family ownership has a significant positive effect on dividend payout policy. Institusional ownership and foreign ownership has no significant effect on dividend payout policy."

"Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan good corporate governance dan struktur kepemilikan dapat mempengaruhi risiko aset dalam bank di Indonesia. Good corporate governance dinilai berdasarkan skor corporate governance berdasarkan kriteria yang ditetapkan oleh Bank Indonesia yang telah dibuat oleh penelitian sebelumnya yaitu penelitian Mahdan (2010), sedangkan untuk struktur kepemilikan dibedakan menjadi tiga, yaitu kepemilikan pemerintah, swasta, dan asing. Kepemilikan yang berbeda memungkinkan adanya perbedaan pengelolaan risiko pada masing-masing bank. Pengujian hipotesis dengan model regresi linear berganda yang menggunakan observasi sebanyak 223 observasi (firm year) yang terdaftar di Bank Indonesia selama tahun 2008 hingga 2011.Hasilnya penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa good corporate governance tidak berpengaruh terhadap asset risk bank yang diproksikan dalam standard deviasi return on asset dan non performing loan. Namun struktur kepemilikan swasta memiliki pengaruh negatif terhadap standard deviasi return on asset dan non performing loan, sedangkan untuk kepemilikan asing tidak berpengaruh terhadap standard deviasi return on asset dan non performing loan.

---

The study aims to determine the application of good corporate governance and ownership structures can affect the risk of bank assets in Indonesia. Good corporate governance were evaluated according to corporate governance based on the criteria stipulated by Bank Indonesia have been made by previous research studies Mahdan (2010), whereas for the ownership structure is divided into three, namely government ownership, private, and foreign. Different ownership allows for differences in risk management at each bank. Hypothesis testing with multiple linear regression model that uses as many as 223 observations (firm year) are listed in the Bank Indonesia during 2008 to 2011.

The result of this study suggest that good corporate governance does not affect the bank asset risk in standard deviation of return on assets and non performing loans. But private ownership structure has a negative effect on the standard deviation of return on assets and non performing loans, while foreign ownership does not affect standard deviation of return on assets and non performing loans."