Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tujuan: Untuk mengetahui bagaimana upaya diagnosis kanker prostat yang dilakukan oleh spesialis urologidi Indonesia. Metode: Dilakukan pembagian kuesioner yang dirancang sendiri kepada Spesialis Urologi di Indonesia. Kuesioner berisi 11 pertanyaan tentang jenis dan indikasi pemeriksaan yang dilakukan, serta fasilitas yang tersedia di tempat responden dalam penegakan diagnosis kanker prostat. Hasil: Sebanyak 65 (36%) dari 182 (saat penelitian ini dilakukan) spesialis urologi di Indonesia mengembalikan formulir kuesioner. Dari jenis RS primer tempat bekerja terbanyak berasal dari RS swasta (35%), disusul RS pendidikan utama Fakultas Kedokteran (32%). Seluruh responden menjadikan lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) sebagai indikasi untuk melakukan pemeriksaan colok dubur. Selain itu 83% responden juga menjawab, peningkatan PSA sebagai salah satu indikasi pemeriksaan colok dubur. Pemeriksaan PSA dilakukan oleh 72% responden pada penderita dengan kecurigaan kanker prostat tanpa melihat usia. Sebanyak 66% responden mengerjakan sendiri pemeriksaan transrectal ultrasonografi (TRUS) dan biopsi, 18% merujuk pada sejawat lain di propinsi yang sama dan 15% tidak memiliki fasilitas TRUS dan biopsi di propinsi tempat bekerja. Sebanyak 75% responden memiliki fasilitas bone scan di Rumah Sakit primer, atau tersedia di RS pada propinsi yang sama. Indikasi tersering melakukan biopsi prostat adalah pada PSA lebih dari 10 ng/ml tanpa melihat usia. Sebanyak 86% responden melakukan biopsi pada kecurigaan kanker prostat melalui colok dubur tanpa melihat usia. Sembilan puluh persen responden menggunakan antibiotik profilaksis golongan Kuinolon untuk biopsi prostat. Sebanyak 46% menggunakan analgesia oral atau suppositoria atau kombinasi keduanya sebagai analgesia dalam biopsi prostat. Kesimpulan: Dalam mendiagnosis kanker prostat, spesialis urologi di Indonesia melakukan pemeriksaan colok dubur, PSA dan TRUS biopsi prostat, namun masih terdapat perbedaan pendapat tentang indikasi dan waktu dilakukannya masing-masing pemeriksaan. Ketersediaan fasilitas diagnostik juga berpengaruh dalam diagnostik kanker prostat di Indonesia. Belum tersedianya guideline Nasional pada saat penelitian ini dilakukandiduga menyebabkan perbedaan pendapat tersebut.

---

Purpose: To get information on diagnosis of prostate cancer conducted by urologist in Indonesia.

Method: A self-constructed questionnare of 11 questions about the type and indication of the tests, as well as the available facilities at the place of the respondents to diagnose prostate cancer distributed to Indonesian Urologist.

Result: As much as 65 (36%) from 182 (when the survey was conducted) Indonesian Urologist returned the questionnare. Most of them worked in Private Hospital (35%), followed by Medical School Hospital (32%). All respondents performed DRE in patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). Elevated PSA was also indication for conducting DRE in 83% respondents. PSA level was tested by 72% respondents in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer regardless of age. As much as 66% respondents did Trans Rectal Ultrasound (TRUS) and prostate biopsy by themselves, 18% referred to other urologists in the same province and 15% didn?t have TRUS and prostate biopsy facilities in their province. Bone scan was available in the Primary Hospital or another hospital in the province of 75% respondents. Main indication to perform prostate biopsy was elevated PSA level above 10ng/ml regardless of the age. Meanwhile, 86% respondents did prostate biopsy in suspiciousness of prostate cancer by DRE regardless of age. Most respondents (90%) chose Quinolon as prophylaxis antibiotic in prostate biopsy and 46% respondents used oral analgesia or suppository or both in prostate biopsy.

Conclusions: In diagnosing prostate cancer, Indonesian Urologists performed DRE, PSA serum analysis and TRUS biopsy of the prostate. But the Indonesian Urologists still had different opinions about the indications and timing of the procedure. The availability of diagnostic equipment and unavailability of National Guideline of Prostate Cancer when this study was conducted played a role of how the prostate cancer diagnosed in Indonesia."

"Latar Belakang: Pemeriksaan dan diagnosis kanker prostat (PCa) diperlukan untuk memberikan manajemen optimal pada tahap awal. Meskipun telah dibahas dalam banyak pedoman, implementasi pemeriksaan dan diagnosis PCa di Indonesia masih belum diketahui. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pola pemeriksaan dan diagnosis PCa di antara urolog Indonesia serta kepatuhan mereka terhadap pedoman.Metode: Studi potong lintang ini dilakukan antara Februari dan Juli 2019. Responden adalah urolog Indonesia yang terdaftar sebagai anggota Perhimpunan Urologi Indonesia (IUA) dan telah berpraktik selama setidaknya enam bulan. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan kuesioner yang dibagikan dalam simposium urologi nasional dan secara elektronik melalui Google Form. Data disajikan secara deskriptif, dan semua data diproses menggunakan SPSS versi 23.Hasil: Dari 458 urolog, 195 (42,6%) memberikan respons lengkap. Sebagian besar responden, 181 (92,8%) urolog, menggunakan pedoman IUA. Di antara 103 (52,8%) responden yang melakukan pemeriksaan, hampir separuh (42,7%) setuju untuk memeriksa pasien yang berusia ≥ 50 tahun atau ≥ 45 tahun dengan riwayat keluarga PCa. Selain itu, 76,8% akan mengulang pemeriksaan setiap tahun, dan 35,6% akan menghentikannya ketika pasien berusia 70 tahun. Pemeriksaan rektal digital (DRE) sering dilakukan untuk pemeriksaan (74,5%), sementara tes antigen spesifik prostat (PSA) hanya dilakukan dalam 52,3% kasus. Tes PSA tersedia di 74,8% rumah sakit. Reseksi transuretral prostat (TURP) masih digunakan oleh 67,2% responden untuk diagnosis. Hanya 52,3% peserta yang menggunakan biopsi prostat transrektal untuk diagnosis, menggunakan anestesi (78,1%) selama prosedur, dan peningkatan kadar PSA (98%) sebagai indikasi. Namun, USG Transrektal (TRUS) hanya tersedia di 49% rumah sakit. Studi ini menemukan bahwa tingkat kepatuhan urolog Indonesia terhadap pedoman adalah 63,3% (9-100%).Kesimpulan: Pemeriksaan dan diagnosis PCa masih bervariasi di antara urolog Indonesia, yang mungkin disebabkan oleh ketersediaan modalitas diagnostik yang berbeda.

---

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening and diagnosis are mandatory to deliver optimal management in the early phase. Even though it has been discussed in many guidelines, the implementation of PCa screening and diagnosis in Indonesia remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the pattern of PCa screening and diagnosis among Indonesian urologists and their adherence to guidelines.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between February and July 2019. Respondents were Indonesian urologists registered as members of the Indonesian Urological Association (IUA) and had already practiced for at least six months. Data were collected using questionnaires, which were distributed at a national urology symposium and electronically via Google Form. Data were presented descriptively, and all data were processed using SPSS version 23.

Result: Of 458 urologists, 195 (42.6%) gave full responses. Most of the respondents, 181 (92.8%) urologists, used the IUA guidelines. Among the 103 (52.8%) respondents who performed screening, nearly half (42.7%) agreed to screen patients aged ≥ 50 years or ≥ 45 years with a family history of PCa. Moreover, 76.8% would repeat screening annually, and 35.6% would stop when the patient's age reached 70 years old. Digital rectal examination (DRE) was frequently performed for screening (74.5%), while prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests were only performed in 52.3% of cases. The PSA test was available in 74.8% of hospitals. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was still used by 67.2% of respondents for diagnosis. Only 52.3 % of participants used transrectal prostate biopsy for diagnosis, using anesthesia (78.1%) during the procedure, and increased PSA level (98%) as its indication. However, Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) was only available in 49% of hospitals. This study found that Indonesian urologist adherence level toward guidelines was 63.3% (9-100%).

Conclusion: PCa screening and diagnosis are still varied among Indonesian urologists, which might arise due to the different availability of diagnostic modalities."

"Kanker prostat adalah penyakit progresif yang menghasilkan moribiditas dan mortalitas yng tinggi. Penelitian ini berutujuan untuk menilai ketepatan dari Indonesian Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator IPCRC dalam memprediksi risiko kanker prostate. Data penelitian didapatkan secara retrospektif selama periode Agustus 2014 hingga Desember 2015 dari rekam medis pasien terduga kanker prostat. Pemeriksaan colok dubur, Prostate specific antigen PSA, dan volume prostat digunakan sebagai parameter prediktif dalam IPCRC. Biopsi prostat digunakan sebagai standar baku. Akurasi IPCRC divalidasi dengan menggunakan analisis ROC. Penelitian ini memiliki 127 subjek penelitian dengan median usia pasien BPH dan pasien kanker prostat adalah 66 52-85 dan 69.5 50-100 tahun. Pemeriksaan colok dubur yang tidak normal ditemukan pada 2 pasien 2. Median dari PSA dari pasien BPH dan kanker prostat dalah 10.2 1.6-203.1 dan 74.06 6.94-1412. Volume prostate pasien BPH memiliki median sebesar 47.9 13.774-108 dibandingkan 50.25 19.2-107 pada pasien kanker prostate. Area tersebesar dibawah kurva probabilitas kanker prostat adalah 0.907 95 CI 0.84-0.97. Jika probabilitas kanker prostate lebih dari 15 pada IPCRC, sensitivitas IPCRC mencapai 88.5 dan spesifitas IPCRC mencapai 81.8, dimana bila ditemukan probabilitas kanker prostate lebih dari 20 dengan menggunakan IPCRC, sensitivitasnya mencapai 80.8 dengan spesifitas sebesar 89.9. Dan bila probabilitas kanker prostate lebih dari 25 dalam IPCRC, sensitivitas sebesar 65.4 dan spesifisitas sebesar 89.9. Sehingga, dapat disimpulkan IPCRC merupakn perangkat yang akurat dalam prediksi kanker prosate pada populasi ini. Validasi lebih lanjut masih dibutuhkan pada populasi lain.

---

Prostate cancer is a progressive disease resulting in morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of Indonesian Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator IPCRC in predicting prostate cancer risk. Data were obtained retrospectively during August 2014 to December 2015 from medical records of suspected prostate cancer patients. Digital rectal examination, Prostate Specific Antigen PSA, and prostate volume PV were used as predictive parameters in IPCRC. Prostate biopsy was used as the diagnostic gold standard. The accuracy of IPCRC was validated using the ROC analysis. Our study included 127 subjects. Median age of BPH patients and prostate cancer patients were 66 52-85 and 69.5 50-100. The digital rectal examination was found abnormal in 2 patients 2. Median of PSA of BPH patients and prostate cancer patients were 10.2 1.6-203.1 and 74.06 6.94-1412 respectively. The prostate volume of BPH patients 47.9 13.74-108 median compared to prostate cancer patients 50.25 19.2-107 median. The largest area under the curve of the probability of prostate cancer using IPCRC is 0.907 95 CI 0.84-0.97. If the probability of prostate cancer more than 15 using IPCRC, the sensitivity is 88.5 and specificity is 81.8, besides, if the probability of prostate cancer more than 20 using IPCRC, the sensitivity is 80.8 and specificity is 89.9 and if the probability of prostate cancer more than 25 using IPCRC, the sensitivity is 65.4 and specificity is 89.9 IPCRC is accurate for predicting prostate cancer in our population. Further validation is needed in other population. "

"Latar belakang: Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) merupakan kanker prostat yang mempunyai kemungkinan progresi lokal, metastasis, rekurensi, dan kematian yang sedang hingga tinggi, serta tata laksana yang lebih agresif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membantu diagnosis antara csPCa dan bukan csPCa menggunakan rasio apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC) lesi prostat dengan urine. Metode: Penelitian dilakukan pada lesi prostat kategori 3-5 prostate imaging-reporting and data system yang telah dibiopsi prostat transperineal tertarget magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dengan ultrasound/MRI fusion software di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dokter Cipto Mangunkusumo pada Juni 2019 hingga Maret 2021. rADC lesi prostat dengan urine merupakan perbandingan rerata nilai apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) lesi prostat dan urine di vesica urinaria pada MRI prostat peta ADC potongan aksial multi-institusi. rADC lesi prostat dengan urine antara csPCa (adenokarsinoma asinar prostat dengan skor Gleason ≥7) dan bukan csPCa (jaringan prostat nonneoplastik atau adenokarsinoma asinar prostat dengan skor Gleason 6) dibandingkan dan ditentukan nilai titik potongnya menggunakan receiver operating curve. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan rADC lesi prostat dengan urine yang bermakna antara 19 lesi prostat yang merupakan csPCa dan 35 lesi prostat yang bukan merupakan csPCa, dengan nilai tengah rADC lesi prostat dengan urine pada csPCa 0,21 (0,11-0,33), nilai tengah rADC lesi prostat dengan urine pada bukan csPCa 0,43 (0,30-0,61), dan nilai p <0,001. Nilai titik potong rADC lesi prostat dengan urine dalam membedakan csPCa dan bukan csPCa adalah 0,30 dengan sensitivitas 94,73% dan spesifisitas 100%, area under curve 0,998 (IK95% 0,994-1,000), serta nilai p <0,001. Kesimpulan: rADC lesi prostat dengan urine dapat membantu diagnosis csPCa dan bukan csPCa pada lesi prostat sebelum biopsi prostat yang tidak invasif, mudah dikerjakan, serta tidak membutuhkan persiapan dan pemeriksaan tambahan.

---

Background: Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is prostate cancer with moderate to high probability of local progression, metastasis, recurrence, and death, as well as more aggressive management. This study aims to aid diagnose between csPCa and non-csPCa using apparent diffusion coefficient ratio (rADC) of prostate-lesion-to-urine. Methods: This study analyze prostate lesions with prostate imaging-reporting and data system category 3-5 that underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted transperineal prostate biopsy using ultrasound/MRI fusion software at Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dokter Cipto Mangunkusumo from June 2019 to March 2021. rADC of prostate-lesion-to-urine is defined as comparison between mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of prostate lesion and urine in urinary bladder from axial section of ADC map of multi-institutional prostate MRI. rADC of prostate-lesion-to-urine between csPCa (acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score ≥7) and non-csPCa (non-neoplastic prostate tissue or acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 6) is compared and the cutoff point is determined using receiver operating curve. Results: There is significance rADC of prostate-lesion-to-urine difference between 19 prostate lesions with csPCa and 35 prostate lesions with non-csPCa, with mean rADC of prostate-lesion-to-urine in csPCa is 0.21 (0.11-0.33), mean rADC of prostate-lesion-to-urine in non-csPCa is 0.43 (0.30-0.61), and p value is <0.001. The cut-off value of rADC of prostate-lesion-to-urine to differentiate between csPCa and non-csPCa is 0.30, with 94.73% sensitivity and 100% specificity, area under curve is 0.998 (CI95% 0.994-1.000), and p value is <0.001. Conclusion: rADC of prostate-lesion-to-urine may help diagnose between csPCa and non-csPCa in prostate lesions before prostate biopsy, which is non-invasive, easy to perform, does not require additional preparation and examination."

"Tujuan: Mengevaluasi tren tatalaksana kanker prostat stage T3 berdasarkan faktor faktor yang mempengaruhi. Material dan Metode: Studi retrospektif tatalaksana kanker prostat stage T3 di Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo dan Rumah Sakit Kanker Dharmais periode 1995 2013. Data tren pemilihan terapi antara radioterapi atau terapi hormonal dianalisis berdasarkan kelompok tahun terapi kadar PSA grade tumor dan kelompok usia. Hasil: Dari 50 subjek 25 50 23 46 and 2 4 subjek mendapatkan tatalaksana radioterapi terapi hormonal dan prostatektomi radikal secara berturutan. Perubahan tren pemilihan terapi berdasarkan tahun terapi secara statistik signifikan p 0 012 dengan mengeksklusikan kelompok periode terapi 1995 1999. Terapi hormonal lebih menjadi pilihan untuk kelompok tumor high grade 53 8 dan lebih sering dipilih seiring bertambahnya usia pasien Kadar PSA tidak mempengaruhi tren pemilihan terapi. Kesimpulan: Terdapat perubahan yang bermakna dalam pemilihan terapi kanker prostat stage T3 berdasarkan tahun terapi Terapi hormonal lebih menjadi pilihan pada kasus dengan tumor high grade dan kelompok usia yang semakin tua.

---

Objective: To evaluate treatment trend of stage T3 prostate cancer based on several factors.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was done on stage T3 prostate cancer patients from year 1995 2013 at two national referral hospitals in Indonesia. Treatment trends between hormonal therapy and radiotherapy based on year of treatment PSA level tumor grade and age groups were evaluated.

Results: On 50 patients subjects 25 50 23 46 and 2 4 subjects were treated by radiotherapy hormonal therapy and radical prostatectomy respectively. Year of treatment were significantly associated with treatment selection p 0 012 after excluding year of treatment 1995 1999 group. Hormonal therapy was preferred on high grade tumor group 53 8 and more applied for older patients. Treatment trend was not affected by PSA level.

Conclusion: Year of treatment were significantly associated with treatment selection of stage T3 prostate cancer Hormonal therapy was preferred on high grade tumor group and older age groups."

"[Tujuan: Untuk mengetahui pengaruh kepribadian tipe A terhadap kejadian kanker prostatMetode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian case control dengan subjek pasien kanker prostat dan kontrol. Dilakukan penelitian menggunakan kuisioner menggunakan Howard Glazer Personality Questionnaire (HGPQ) and Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS). SRRS dibagi dalam kejadian 2 tahun, 5 tahun, dan 10 tahun. Data dievaluasi dengan analisa stastistik Chi Quadrat dan Mann Whitney UHasil: Tidak terdapat hasil yang signifikan dalam hasil SRRS 2 tahun (P= 0,94), 5 tahun (p = 0,73) dan 10 tahun (p=0,47) antara pasien kanker prostat dan kontrol. Terdapat hasil yang signifikan dalam hasil HGPQ antara pasien kanker buli dan kontrol (p=0,007)Kesimpulan: Kepribadian tipe A sebagai kepribadian pemicu stres memberikan korelasi positif terhadap kejadian kanker prostat., Objective:To investigate the effect of type A personality as a stress personality type on prostate cancer incidence.Method:This was case control study with prostate cancer patient and control as subject of the study. Subject were asked some questionnaires about their personality using Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) and Howard Glazer Personality Questionnaire (HGPQ). Events in SRSS scale devided in 2 years ago, 5 years ago and 10 years ago. Data was evaluate with chi Quadrat and Mann Whitney U.Result:There were no significant difference in SRRS score between prostate cancer patien and control in 2 years events (p=0,94), 5 years events (p= 0,73) and 10 years (p=0,47). There were significant difference in HGPQ score between bladder cancer and control (p=0,007).Conclusion:Type A personality as a stress personality have a positive correlation in incidence of prostate cancer]"

"Pendahuluan: Kanker prostat adalah keganasan terbanyak pada pria, penyebab kematian kedua terbesar akibat keganasan. Colok dubur adalah pemeriksaan dasar dan deteksi dini untuk mendiagnosis kanker prostat. Saat ini pemeriksaan Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) dianggap sebagai tumor marker yang paling bermanfaat untuk mendeteksi kanker prostat. The American Cancer Society dan American Urologic Association merekomendasikan penyaringan kanker prostat setiap tahun dengan pemeriksaan colok dubur dan PSA. Tujuan: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan antara pemeriksaan colok dubur dan nilai PSA pada pasien kanker prostat di RSUP DR Sardjito Yogyakarta periode Januari 2011 sampai Desember 2011. Metode Penelitian: Penelitian ini adalah kasus kontrol. Data dikumpulkan secara retrospektif dari catatan medis RSUP DR Sardjito pada pasien dengan colok dubur yang abnormal atau colok dubur normal dengan nilai PSA ≥ 10 ng/dl selama periode Januari 2011 sampai Desember 2011. Hasil pemeriksaan colok dubur dan nilai PSA didapatkan pada saat kunjungan pertama pasien ke rumah sakit. Analisis data nominal menggunakan Chi Square dengan SPSS 18. Hasil: Terdapat 87 pasien yang berhasil dikumpulkan selama periode Januari 2011 sampai Desember 2011 yang memiliki hasil pemeriksaan colok dubur abnormal atau colok dubur normal dengan nilai PSA ≥ 10 ng/dl. Pasien memiliki usia rata-rata 70 tahun, nilai median PSA 10,9 ng/dl. Pada pasien ini ditemukan colok dubur abnormal 43 (49,4%), colok dubur normal 44 (50,6%), PSA ≥ 10 ng/dl 69 (79,3%) dan PSA < 10 ng/dl 18 (20,7%). Pemeriksaan colok dubur dan PSA dinilai signifikan secara statistik untuk mendeteksi kanker prostat, hasil secara berurutan 67,2% vs 32,8% (p < 0,001) and 71,9% vs 28,1% (p = 0,002. Semua pasien dengan colok dubur abnormal dan PSA ≥ 10 ng/dl terdiagnosis kanker prostat (p < 0,001). Simpulan: Pemeriksaan colok dubur dan Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) adalah prediktor terbaik untuk kanker prostat.

---

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the most frequent form of cancer in males, being also second cause of death by cancer. Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) is the basic examination and early diagnosis for prostate cancer. The Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) assay is currently considered the most useful tumor marker for detecting prostate cancer. Both the American Cancer Society and American Urologic Association recommended annual cancer screening with both Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) and PSA.

Objective: The objective of this study is to understand the correlation between DRE and PSA level in prostate cancer at Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta during januari 2011 until december 2011.

Research Method: This is a case control study. The data were retrospectively collected from medical record in sardjito general hospital who had abnormal DRE or normal DRE with PSA ≥ 10 ng/dl during januari 2011 until December 2011. The DRE and PSA value were examined in the first time they came to the hospital. A chi-square was performed to analyzed the nominal data with SPSS 18.

Result: There are 87 patients were collected during januari 2011 until December 2011 who had abnormal DRE or normal DRE with PSA ≥ 10 ng/dl. The median age was 70 years, median PSA level was 10,9 ng/dl. Of these patient, we found abnormal DRE in 43 (49,4%), normal DRE in 44 (50,6%), PSA ≥ 10 ng/dl was 69 (79,3%) and PSA < 10 ng/dl was 18 (20,7%). Digital Rectal Examination and PSA was statistically significant to detected prostate cancer, 67,2% vs 32,8% (p < 0,001) and 71,9% vs 28,1% (p = 0,002), respectively. All patient who had abnormal DRE and PSA ≥ 10 ng/dl were diagnosed with prostate cancer (p < 0,001).

Conclusion: Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) are the best predictor for prostate cancer. "

"[ABSTRAKTujuan: Insiden kanker prostat secara global terus meningkat. Meskipun dapat dilakukan deteksi dini kanker prostat, perlu dipahami bahwa progresivitas penyakit ? menjadi metastasis ? berbeda untuk setiap pasien. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengamati aspek-aspek yang mungkin berperan sebagai faktor prediktif metastasis pada kanker prostat tidak terpalpasi.Material dan Metode: Data dikumpulkan dari Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Cipto Mangunkusumo dan Rumah Sakit Pusat Kanker Nasional Dharmais sejak tahun 1995-2013. Pasien dengan kanker prostat tidak terpalpasi kemudian dibagi menjadi dua kelompok: dengan metastasis dan tanpa metastasis. Usia, volume prostat, nilai prostate-spesific antigen (PSA), Gleason score sum group, stadium tumor, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), kadar hemoglobin, dan kadar kreatinin serum merupakan faktor yang dianalisis dalam penelitian ini. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis bivariat dan uji regresi logistik. Hanya pasien dengan data lengkap yang dimasukkan dalam penelitian ini.Hasil: Didapatkan 91 pasien dengan data lengkap, 59 pasien (64,83%) tanpa metastasis dan 32 pasien (35,16%) dengan metastasis. Terdapat perbedaan statistik yang signifikan antara kelompok tanpa metastasis dan kelompok dengan metastasis, yakni untuk PSA (13.7ng / mL vs 71.5ng / mL; p = 0,001), kadar hemoglobin (13,60 g / dL vs 12,25 g / dL; p = 0,002), dan KPS (90 vs 90 ; p = 0,004). Perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik juga didapatkan pada kelompok GSS (35 dan 24 pada kelompok tanpa metastasis vs 12 dan 20 pada kelompok dengan metastasis; p = 0,047). Usia, volume prostat, stadium tumor, dan kadar kreatinin antara kedua kelompok tidak memiliki perbedaan signifikan secara statistik (p> 0,05). Nilai pretreatment PSA adalah satu-satunya faktor prediktif untuk metastasis dengan odds ratio 1.014 (95% CI, 1,005-1,022; p = 0,002).Kesimpulan: Sebagian besar pasien kanker prostat tidak terpalpasi terdeteksi pertama kali tanpa metastasis. Nilai pretreatment PSA yang diperoleh pada kunjungan awal pasien dapat digunakan sebagai faktor prediktif metastasis di masa depan.

---

ABSTRACTObjective: Prostate cancer incident is globally increasing. Despite early detection of prostate cancer, the progressivity of the disease itself toward metastatic disease remains different for each patient. The purpose of this study is to observe aspects that may have roles as predictive factors for metastasis in nonpalpable prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: Data was collected from National Hospital Cipto Mangunkusumo and Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital from 1995-2013. Patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer then divided into two groups: metastasis-free group and metastasis group. Age, prostate volume, pretreatment Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score sum group, tumor stadium, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), hemoglobin level, and serum creatinine level were factors that were analyzed in the study. The data was analyzed using bivariate analysis and logistic regression test. Only patients with complete data are included in the study.Results: There are 91 patients with complete data, 59 patients (64.83%) were patients without metastasis and 32 patients (35.16%) were with metastasis. There was significant statistical difference between no metastasis group with metastasis group for PSA (13.7ng/mL vs71.5ng/mL; p = 0.001), hemoglobin level (13.60 g/dL vs 12.25 g/dL; p = 0.002), and KPS (90vs90; p = 0.004). There was also significant statistical difference in GSS groups (35 and 24 in metastasis-free group vs 12 and 20 in metastasis group; p = 0.047). Age, prostate volume, tumor stadium, and creatinine level had no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Pretreatment PSA value was the only predictive factor for metastasis with odds ratio 1.014 (95% CI, 1.005 to 1.022; p = 0.002).Conclusion: Most nonpalpable prostate cancer patients are first detected without metastasis. Pretreatment PSA value that was obtained at their initial visit might be used as predictive factor for metastasis for them in the future.;Objective: Prostate cancer incident is globally increasing. Despite early detection of prostate cancer, the progressivity of the disease itself toward metastatic disease remains different for each patient. The purpose of this study is to observe aspects that may have roles as predictive factors for metastasis in nonpalpable prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: Data was collected from National Hospital Cipto Mangunkusumo and Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital from 1995-2013. Patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer then divided into two groups: metastasis-free group and metastasis group. Age, prostate volume, pretreatment Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score sum group, tumor stadium, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), hemoglobin level, and serum creatinine level were factors that were analyzed in the study. The data was analyzed using bivariate analysis and logistic regression test. Only patients with complete data are included in the study.Results: There are 91 patients with complete data, 59 patients (64.83%) were patients without metastasis and 32 patients (35.16%) were with metastasis. There was significant statistical difference between no metastasis group with metastasis group for PSA (13.7ng/mL vs71.5ng/mL; p = 0.001), hemoglobin level (13.60 g/dL vs 12.25 g/dL; p = 0.002), and KPS (90vs90; p = 0.004). There was also significant statistical difference in GSS groups (35 and 24 in metastasis-free group vs 12 and 20 in metastasis group; p = 0.047). Age, prostate volume, tumor stadium, and creatinine level had no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Pretreatment PSA value was the only predictive factor for metastasis with odds ratio 1.014 (95% CI, 1.005 to 1.022; p = 0.002).Conclusion: Most nonpalpable prostate cancer patients are first detected without metastasis. Pretreatment PSA value that was obtained at their initial visit might be used as predictive factor for metastasis for them in the future.;Objective: Prostate cancer incident is globally increasing. Despite early detection of prostate cancer, the progressivity of the disease itself toward metastatic disease remains different for each patient. The purpose of this study is to observe aspects that may have roles as predictive factors for metastasis in nonpalpable prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: Data was collected from National Hospital Cipto Mangunkusumo and Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital from 1995-2013. Patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer then divided into two groups: metastasis-free group and metastasis group. Age, prostate volume, pretreatment Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score sum group, tumor stadium, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), hemoglobin level, and serum creatinine level were factors that were analyzed in the study. The data was analyzed using bivariate analysis and logistic regression test. Only patients with complete data are included in the study.Results: There are 91 patients with complete data, 59 patients (64.83%) were patients without metastasis and 32 patients (35.16%) were with metastasis. There was significant statistical difference between no metastasis group with metastasis group for PSA (13.7ng/mL vs71.5ng/mL; p = 0.001), hemoglobin level (13.60 g/dL vs 12.25 g/dL; p = 0.002), and KPS (90vs90; p = 0.004). There was also significant statistical difference in GSS groups (35 and 24 in metastasis-free group vs 12 and 20 in metastasis group; p = 0.047). Age, prostate volume, tumor stadium, and creatinine level had no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Pretreatment PSA value was the only predictive factor for metastasis with odds ratio 1.014 (95% CI, 1.005 to 1.022; p = 0.002).Conclusion: Most nonpalpable prostate cancer patients are first detected without metastasis. Pretreatment PSA value that was obtained at their initial visit might be used as predictive factor for metastasis for them in the future.;Objective: Prostate cancer incident is globally increasing. Despite early detection of prostate cancer, the progressivity of the disease itself toward metastatic disease remains different for each patient. The purpose of this study is to observe aspects that may have roles as predictive factors for metastasis in nonpalpable prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: Data was collected from National Hospital Cipto Mangunkusumo and Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital from 1995-2013. Patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer then divided into two groups: metastasis-free group and metastasis group. Age, prostate volume, pretreatment Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score sum group, tumor stadium, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), hemoglobin level, and serum creatinine level were factors that were analyzed in the study. The data was analyzed using bivariate analysis and logistic regression test. Only patients with complete data are included in the study.Results: There are 91 patients with complete data, 59 patients (64.83%) were patients without metastasis and 32 patients (35.16%) were with metastasis. There was significant statistical difference between no metastasis group with metastasis group for PSA (13.7ng/mL vs71.5ng/mL; p = 0.001), hemoglobin level (13.60 g/dL vs 12.25 g/dL; p = 0.002), and KPS (90vs90; p = 0.004). There was also significant statistical difference in GSS groups (35 and 24 in metastasis-free group vs 12 and 20 in metastasis group; p = 0.047). Age, prostate volume, tumor stadium, and creatinine level had no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Pretreatment PSA value was the only predictive factor for metastasis with odds ratio 1.014 (95% CI, 1.005 to 1.022; p = 0.002).Conclusion: Most nonpalpable prostate cancer patients are first detected without metastasis. Pretreatment PSA value that was obtained at their initial visit might be used as predictive factor for metastasis for them in the future.;Objective: Prostate cancer incident is globally increasing. Despite early detection of prostate cancer, the progressivity of the disease itself toward metastatic disease remains different for each patient. The purpose of this study is to observe aspects that may have roles as predictive factors for metastasis in nonpalpable prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: Data was collected from National Hospital Cipto Mangunkusumo and Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital from 1995-2013. Patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer then divided into two groups: metastasis-free group and metastasis group. Age, prostate volume, pretreatment Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score sum group, tumor stadium, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), hemoglobin level, and serum creatinine level were factors that were analyzed in the study. The data was analyzed using bivariate analysis and logistic regression test. Only patients with complete data are included in the study.Results: There are 91 patients with complete data, 59 patients (64.83%) were patients without metastasis and 32 patients (35.16%) were with metastasis. There was significant statistical difference between no metastasis group with metastasis group for PSA (13.7ng/mL vs71.5ng/mL; p = 0.001), hemoglobin level (13.60 g/dL vs 12.25 g/dL; p = 0.002), and KPS (90vs90; p = 0.004). There was also significant statistical difference in GSS groups (35 and 24 in metastasis-free group vs 12 and 20 in metastasis group; p = 0.047). Age, prostate volume, tumor stadium, and creatinine level had no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Pretreatment PSA value was the only predictive factor for metastasis with odds ratio 1.014 (95% CI, 1.005 to 1.022; p = 0.002).Conclusion: Most nonpalpable prostate cancer patients are first detected without metastasis. Pretreatment PSA value that was obtained at their initial visit might be used as predictive factor for metastasis for them in the future., Objective: Prostate cancer incident is globally increasing. Despite early detection of prostate cancer, the progressivity of the disease itself toward metastatic disease remains different for each patient. The purpose of this study is to observe aspects that may have roles as predictive factors for metastasis in nonpalpable prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: Data was collected from National Hospital Cipto Mangunkusumo and Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital from 1995-2013. Patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer then divided into two groups: metastasis-free group and metastasis group. Age, prostate volume, pretreatment Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score sum group, tumor stadium, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), hemoglobin level, and serum creatinine level were factors that were analyzed in the study. The data was analyzed using bivariate analysis and logistic regression test. Only patients with complete data are included in the study.Results: There are 91 patients with complete data, 59 patients (64.83%) were patients without metastasis and 32 patients (35.16%) were with metastasis. There was significant statistical difference between no metastasis group with metastasis group for PSA (13.7ng/mL vs71.5ng/mL; p = 0.001), hemoglobin level (13.60 g/dL vs 12.25 g/dL; p = 0.002), and KPS (90vs90; p = 0.004). There was also significant statistical difference in GSS groups (35 and 24 in metastasis-free group vs 12 and 20 in metastasis group; p = 0.047). Age, prostate volume, tumor stadium, and creatinine level had no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Pretreatment PSA value was the only predictive factor for metastasis with odds ratio 1.014 (95% CI, 1.005 to 1.022; p = 0.002).Conclusion: Most nonpalpable prostate cancer patients are first detected without metastasis. Pretreatment PSA value that was obtained at their initial visit might be used as predictive factor for metastasis for them in the future.]"

"ABSTRAKTujuan: Mengetahui batasan nilai PSA untuk memprediksi adanya metastasis tulang pada pasien kanker prostat di RS Sardjito. Metode: Penelitian retrospektif, dengan mengumpulkan rekam medis pasien kanker prostat telah dilakukan bone scintigraphy di RS Sardjito tahun 2006 - 2011.Hasil: Dari 83 pasien kanker prostat yang telah dilakukan bone scintigraphy, terdapat 55 pasien (66%) mengalami metastasis tulang dan terdapat 28 pasien (34 %) yang tidak mengalami metastasis tulang. Dari 55 pasien yang mengalami metastasis tulang, terdapat 11 pasien (20 %) dengan PSA kurang dari 20 ng/ml dan terdapat 44 pasien (80 %) yang memiliki PSA lebih dari 20 ng/ml. Cut-off point PSA 17.65 ng/ml memiliki sensitivitas terbesar yaitu 85.5% dan spesifisitas 53.6%.Kesimpulan: Pemeriksaan bone scintigraphy dianjurkan pada pasien dengan PSA > 17.65 ng/ml, sedangkan pada pasien dengan PSA < 17.65 dianjurkan pada pasien dengan gejala klinis nyeri tulang.

---

ABSTRACTObjective: Prostate cancer shows a strong predilection to spread to the bones, with bone metastases identified at autopsy in up to 90 % of patients dying from prostate cancer. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration has been widely applied as a biomarker to diagnose and monitor prostate cancer. Technetium-99m methylene diphosphate (Tc—99m MDP) whole body bone scintigraphy is currently a well-accepted diagnostic procedure for bone metastasis in malignancy. The aim of this study was to establish a useful serum PSA cut-off value to predict the presence of bone metastasis in men with prostate cancer. Material and Methods: Consecutive male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. All of the subjects had received Tc-99m MDP whole body bone scintigraphy and had their serum PSA concentration measured at Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta. The proper cut-off value was established based on statistical analysis in order to predict the possibility of bone metastasis among prostate cancer patients.Results: In total, 83 consecutive male patients with prostate cancer were enrolled, and 55 patients (66 %) were confirmed by scintigraphic findings to have bone metastases. A serum PSA concentration of 17,65 ng/ml gave the best sensitivity (78,33 %) and specificity (65,21 %). The positive predictive value, negative predictive value were 85,45 % and 53,57 %, respectively (p<0,05).Conclusion: A cut-off value of 17,65 ng/ml appears to be an appropriate benchmark for stratifying metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients at Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, such that if a patient with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and without any skeletal symptoms has a serum PSA concentration of less than 17,65 ng/ml,we suggest that they would not need to undergo bone scintigraphy."

"Studi-studi sebelumnya menunjukkan adanya hubungan antara rasio neutrofil-limfosit(neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, NLR) dan rasio platelet-limfosit (platelet-to-lymphocyteratio, PLR) sebagai penanda respons inflamasi sistemik dalam mendiagnosis kankerprostat. Tujuan studi ini adalah menilai NLR dan PLR prebiopsi prostat untukmenentukan efektivitasnya dalam memprediksi kanker prostat. Studi ini menggunakandesain retrospektif. Penelitian ini mengikutsertakan seluruh pasien hiperplasia prostatbenigna (benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH) dan kanker prostat yang menjalani biopsi diRumah Sakit Adam Malik antara bulan Agustus 2011 sampai Agustus 2015. Batas PSAyang digunakan adalah 5 ng/dL sebagai kandidat biopsi. Hubungan antara variabelprebiopsi yang mempengaruhi persentase prostat dievaluasi termasuk usia, kadarprostate-specific antigen (PSA), dan estimasi volume prostat (estimated prostate volume,EPV). Nilai PLR dan NLR dihitung dari rasio hitung platelet dengan neutrofil absolutterhadap hitung limfosit absolut. Nilainya kemudian dianalisis dan dilihat apakah terdapathubungan dengan diagnosis BPH dan kanker prostat. Dari 298 pasien yang diikutsertakandalam studi ini, penelitian ini membagi dua grup menjadi 126 (42,3%) pasien BPH dan172 (57,7%) pasien kanker prostat. Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada PSA(19.28±27.11 ng/dL vs 40.19±49.39 ng/dL), EPV (49.39±23.51 cc vs 58.10±30.54 cc),PLR (160.27±98.96 vs 169.55±78.07), dan NLR (3.57±3.23 vs 4.22 ± 2.59) pada keduagrup (p<0,05). Analisis Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) dilakukan untuk PLRdan NLR dalam menganalisis nilainya dalam memprediksi kanker prostat. Area UnderCurve (AUC) PLR adalah 57,9% dengan sensitivitas 56,4% dan spesifisitas 55,6% padabatas cut-off 143 (p=0,02). Cut-off NLR 3,08 memberikan AUC 62,8% dengansensitivitas 64,5% dan spesifisitas 63,5%. AUC ini komparabel bila dibandingkan denganAUC PSA sendiri (68,5%). Penelitian ini lalu menjalani regresi logistik antara PSA, PLR,dan NLR dengan hasil eksklusi PLR bila dihitung seara konjungtif. DEngan demikian,NLR memiliki performa menjanjikan dalam memprediksi kanker prostat pada pasiendengan PSA di atas 4 ng/dL (RO=3,2; 95% CI: 1,96-5,11). Kami menemukan bahwasebanyak 80 (63,5%) pasien dengan biopsi jinak memiliki nilai NLR negatif dalam studiini. Dari penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa NLR memiliki potensi menjanjikan dalammemprediksi kanker prostat. Diperlukan penelitian lebih lanjut untuk memvalidasinyasebagai alat diagnostik.

---

Previous studies demonstrated promising value of platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) andneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as systemic inflammatory response in prostatecancer. This study was conducted to evaluate their pre-biopsy values in predictingprostate cancer. This is a diagnostic study with retrospective design. We included allbenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwentprostate biopsy in Adam Malik Hospital between August 2011 and August 2015. We usedPSA value above 4 ng/dL as the threshold for the biopsy candidates. The relationshipbetween pre-biopsy variables affecting the percentage of prostate cancer risk wereevaluated, including: age, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, and estimated prostatevolume (EPV). The PLR and NLR was calculated from the ratio of related platelets orabsolute neutrophil counts with their absolute lymphocyte counts. The values thenanalyzed to evaluate their associations with the diagnosis of BPH and PCa. Out of 298patients included in this study, we defined two groups consist of 126 (42.3%) BPH and172 PCa (57.7%) patients. Mean age for both groups are 66.36±7.53 and 67.99±7.48 yearsold (p=0.64), respectively. There are statistically significant differences noted from PSA(19.28±27.11 ng/dL vs 40.19±49.39 ng/dL), EPV (49.39±23.51 cc vs 58.10±30.54 cc),PLR (160.27±98.96 vs 169.55±78.07), and NLR (3.57±3.23 vs 4.22 ± 2.59) features ofboth groups (p<0.05). A Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis wasperformed for PLR and NLR in analyzing their value in predicting prostate cancer. TheArea Under Curve (AUC) of PLR is 57.9% with sensitivity of 56.4% and specificity of55.6% in the cut-off point of 143 (p=0.02). The NLR cut-off point of 3.08 gives 62.8%AUC with 64.5% sensitivity and 63.5% specificity. These AUCs were comparable withthe AUC of PSA alone (68.5%). We performed logistic regression between PSA, PLR,and NLR with result in the exclusion of PLR if calculated conjunctively. Therefore, NLRhas a promising performance in predicting PCa in patients with PSA above 4 ng/dL(OR=3.2; 95% CI: 1.96-5.11). We found as many as 80 (63.5%) patients with benignbiopsy results with negative NLR value in this study."