Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The Backlash against Investment Arbitration : Perceptions and Reality /​ Michael Waibel ... [et al.]Disregarding the Corporate Veil and Denial of Benefits Clauses : Testing Treaty Language and the Concept of "Investor" /​ Rachel Thorn &​ Jennifer DoucleffPrivate Enforcement of International Investment Law : Why We Need Investor Standing in BIT Dispute Settlement /​ Stephan W. SchillDrawing the Limits of Free Transfer Provisions /​ Alejandro Turyn &​ Facundo Perez AznarA Comparison of ICSID and UNCITRAL Arbitration : Areas of Divergence and Concern /​ Stephen Jagusch &​ Jeffrey SullivanThe Issues Raised by Parallel Proceedings and Possible Solutions /​ August ReinischParallel Proceedings : A Practitioner's Perspective /​ Richard KreindlerAnnulment and its Role in the Context of Conflicting Awards /​ Christina KnahrCompensation for Non-expropriatory Investment Treaty Breaches in the Argentine Gas Sector Cases : Issues and Implications /​ Kathryn KhamsiArbitrator Integrity /​ William ParkAmicus Curiae : A Panacea for Legitimacy in Investment Arbitration? /​ Nigel Blackaby &​ Caroline RichardParticipation of Non-governmental Organizations in Investment Arbitration as Amici Curiae /​ Amokura KawahruLegality of Investments under ICSID Jurisprudence /​ Gabriel BottiniInvoking State Defenses in Investment Treaty Arbitration /​ A MartinezBacklash to Investment Arbitration : Three Causes /​ Louis T. Wells"

"Tesis ini membahas perbandingan pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia dan Singapura. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach). Tesis ini juga menganalisa beberapa kasus pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia dan Singapura yang menjadi pembahasan dalam tesis serta menganalisa upaya hukum terhadap putusan pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional. Saran Penulis dalam tesis ini adalah UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 perlu mengatur secara tegas mengenai pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional, termasuk di dalamnya mengenai syarat-syarat pembatalan. Salah satu cara yang dapat ditempuh Indonesia untuk memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap penyelesaian sengketa melalui arbitrase serta melengkapi UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 perlu dibuatkan suatu revisi terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 1999, mengenai pasal yang mengatur tentang syarat pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional dengan mengadopsi ketentuan yang diatur dalam UNCITRAL Model law on International Commercial Arbitration secara komprehensif khususnya dalam konteks pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia. Pengadilan Indonesia dan Singapura diharapkan tetap bersikap tegas dalam memeriksa dan menangani permohonan pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku mengenai arbitrase internasional. Putusan pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia tidak dapat upaya hukum menurut UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 dan upaya hukum di Singapura terhadap putusan pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional dapat diajukan kasasi dengan syarat ketat terkait dengan adanya pelanggaran terhadap prinsip Natural Justice.

---

This thesis discusses the comparison of the setting aside of International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia and Singapore. The method used in writing for thesis is normative with comparative approach. This thesis analyzes several cases of setting aside of the International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia and Singapore which are discussed and analyzed the legal remedy against the decision to annul the International Arbitration Awards. The author's suggestion on the problem is Law No. 30 of 1999 need to strictly regulate for the setting aside of the International Arbitration Awards, including the terms of the setting aside. Indonesia can take to provide legal certainty to the settlement of disputes through arbitration and also complent for Law No. 30 of 1999 should be made a revision of Law No. 30 of 1999 regarding the provisions of the setting aside of the International Arbitration Awards by adopting the provisions set forth in the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration comprehensively in particular in the context of the setting aside of the International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia. Indonesian and Singapore Courts are expected to remain firm in examining and handling requests for the setting aside of the International Arbitration Awards in accordance with the applicable provisions of international arbitration. The verdict of the setting aside of the International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia shall not be a legal remedy under Law No. 30 of 1999 and legal remedy in Singapore against the setting aside of verdict of the International Arbitration Awards may be filed with a strict covenant relating to breach of the principle of Natural Justice."