Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Theory of international law to the pattern of international relations in the seventeenth-century era of absolute monarchies and how' inapplicable his theory was to the facts of international society of today. Dr. Grob shows how inapplicable to those facts are the philosophical and natural-law definitions of war. More­ over, “ war in the legal sense” or “ war in the sense of international law,” if capable of definition, cannot be defined with assurance we can’t define international law and ascertain its.This book is one of law and of the science of law generally. It is not confined to international law, but analytical jurisprudence too."

"This collection of essays by Professor Michael N. Schmitt of Durham University draws together those of his articles published over the past two decades that have explored particular fault lines in the law of armed conflict. They examine the complex interplay between warfare and law, seeking to identify where the law and warfare appear to diverge, and where such apparent divergence can be accommodated through contextual interpretation of the law. Each essay examines a particular issue in either the jus ad bellum (the law governing resort to force) or jus in bello (international humanitarian law) that has proven contentious in terms of applying extant norms to the evolving face of armed conflict. Among the topics addressed are counter-terrorism, cyber operations, asymmetrical warfare, assassination, environmental warfare and the participation of civilians in hostilities."

"Skripsi ini membahas penerapan blokade sebagai metode perang kontemporer dalam hukum internasional. Permasalahan hukum internasional yang dibahas adalah pertama, blokade dalam pengertian tradisional, yang dilihat dari perjanjian internasional dan prinsip-prinsip blokade. Kedua, penerapan blokade dalam pengertian kontemporer, yang berisikan prinsip-prinsip blokade, fungsi dan peran blokade, perlindungan warga sipil, penerapan blokade di laut, darat, dan udara, serta kasus-kasus, dan ketiga, adalah analisis perbedaan penerapan blokade dalam pengertian kontemporer dengan blokade dalam pengertian tradisional, yang ditinjau dari prinsip-prinsip blokade, fungsi dan peran blokade, perlindungan warga sipil, penerapan blokade di laut, darat, dan udara, serta teknologi senjata yang digunakan dalam blokade.

---

The focus of this study is the application of blockade as contemporary method of war in international law. International legal issues discussed are first, blockade in traditional meaning, as seen from international treaties and principles of blockade. Second, application of blockade in contemporary meaning, which contains principles of blockade, function and role of blockade, protection of civilians, application of blockade at sea, land and air, and cases, and the third is analysis of differences between application of blockade in contemporary meaning and blockade in traditional meaning, viewed from principles of blockade, function and role of blockade, protection of civilians, application of blockade at sea, land and air, and weapons technology used in blockade."

"The Handbook covers key conceptual topics drawn from across the three areas of jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum.Publisher Synopsis'A most important and timely collection of essays that places the established international rules in their modern and challenging of context.' - Philippe Sands QC, University College London, UK 'Events of the past fifteen years have sharpened the focus on well-known issues in international conflict and security law. What responses to international terrorism are permissible? Can humanitarian intervention be justified under international law? The Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law addresses these and other debates across the areas of conflict prevention, use of force and post-conflict reconstruction, with the critical insight for which the contributors are known.' - James Crawford, University of Cambridge"