Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Measures of personality and social psychological constructs assists researchers and practitioners by identifying and reviewing the best scales/measures for a variety of constructs. Each chapter discusses test validity, reliability, and utility. Authors have focused on the most often used and cited scales/measures, with a particular emphasis on those published in recent years. Each scale is identified and described, the sample on which it was developed is summarized, and reliability and validity data are presented, followed by presentation of the scale, in full or in part, where such permission has been obtained.Measures fall into five broad groups. The emotional disposition section reviews measures of general affective tendencies, and/or cognitive dispositions closely linked to emotion. These measures include hope and optimism, anger and hostility, life satisfaction, self-esteem, confidence, and affect dimensions. Emotion regulation scales go beyond general dispositions to measure factors that may contribute to understanding and managing emotions. These measures include alexithymia, empathy, resiliency, coping, sensation seeking, and ability and trait emotional intelligence. The interpersonal styles section introduces some traditional social?psychological themes in the context of personality assessment. These measures include adult attachment, concerns with public image and social evaluation, and forgiveness. The vices and virtues section reflects adherence to moral standards as an individual characteristic shaped by sociocultural influences and personality. These measures include values and moral personality, religiosity, dark personalities (Machiavellianism,narcissism, and subclinical psychopathy), and perfectionism. The sociocultural interaction and conflict section addresses relationships between different groups and associated attitudes. These measures include cross-cultural values, personality and beliefs, intergroup contact, stereotyping and prejudice, attitudes towards sexual orientation, and personality across cultures."

"Studi tetang pengambilan keputusan hakim memperlihatkan bahwa keputusan hakim dipengaruhi oleh faktor legal, ekstra legal, dan kontekstual.Teori integrated complexity yang dicetuskan oleh Suedfeld dan Tetlock (1992) menjelaskan pentingnya kemampuan kognisi, konseptual atau integrated complexity pada pengambilan keputusan yang panting , yang bersifat segera atau siaga. Integrated Complexity diukur dari dua variabel kognisi yakni variabel d fferensiation dan integration.Tingginya angka pemidanaan pada anak yang melanggar hukum pidana membuat peneliti berketetapan untuk menjadikan hakim anak sebagai subyek penelitian.Tesis ini berupaya menjelaskan bagaimana integrated complexity dan nilai yang dianut seorang hakim berperan dalam keputusan hakim pada perkara anak yang melanggar hukum pidana. Penelitian dilakukan terhadap delapan (8) hakim anak pada dua Pengadilan Negri (PN) di wilayah Jabotabek .HasiI wawancara kualitatif terhadap hakim diberikan skor dengan integrated complexity scoring system yang disusun oleh Brawn dan Ballard,dkk(1992) . Metode ini disebut sebagai mixed methode oleh Tashakori dan Ted ll ie (1989) atau tepatnya metode kualitatif yang dikuantifikasi. Kemudian, dilakukan perbandingan profit hakim antara kelompok hakim yang sangat direkomendasikan (SDR) dengan hakim yang direkomendasikan (DR).Penelitian ini membuktikan tesis bahwa hakim dengan integrated complexity yang tinggi mempertimbangkan nilai-nilai universalism khususnya keadilan sosial, sehingga menghasilkan keputusan berupa tindakan mengembalikan anak ke orang tua (AKOT), atau lembaga sosial, Sedangkan tesis kedua bahwa hakim dengan tingkat integrated complexity rendah mengacu pada nilai-nilai security, khususnya aturan hukum yang menciptakan stabilitas di dalam masyarakat atau orderliness, akan menghasilkan keputusan pemidanaan (berupa penempatan Anak di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan atau Hukuman Percobaan) juga dapat dibuktikan."