Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Realizing a basic human right's court is not as easy writing or speaking, but it needs a concrete policy that is the commitment of a country to implement basic human rights in the social and political life as the realization of respect to the humanity of human beings. Indonesia is one of the countries which has clear commitment toward the protection of basic human rights as stated in the Preambule of The 1945 Constitution. Such as a commitment has been followed up by a concrete policy in the form of AdHoc Basic Human Right;s Court by the enactment of No. 26/2000 Law which was enacted in May 2002. Considering that Indonesia has not yet ratified the Statuta of International Criminal Court it is hoped that Human Right's Court in Indonesia would be able and willing to bring various cases of heavy violations toward basic human right's occuring in Indonesia nowadays to trial independently and impartialy. In other words The Basic Human Right's Court in Indonesia could convince the world that Indonesian Government is willing and able to settle heavy violations toward Basic Human Rights that so far have occured in Indonesia based on the standard of International Law."

"This article discuss the concepts of gross human rights violation, individual resposibility in international crime, element of crime of human rights violation, the concept of command responsibility and the settlement mechanism of human rights violation. The writer ask us to take lesson learn form the experiences of Timor Timur and Tanjung Priok trial and "the stuck" in the investigataion process in Trisakti, semanggi I dan II and Mei cases in the hand of Attorney General. The realities show that so many weaknesses are needed to be handled immediately. For that reason, it is important to make amendement of UU No. 26/200 of Human Rights Court. The writer also discuses the hybrid tribunal in Cambodia, Timor Leste and Sierra Leone as an effort to give peference to the state to conduct its obligation and in other side also to guarantee that the court is conducted in mutual accord with international standard"

"The Human Rights Court established in Indonesia is the first in its kind. Various opinion emerge regarding the exixtence of court. In one hand, Indonesia is considered against the international desire to bring the perpetrator to eliminate the assumption that Indonesia is unable and unwilling to bring the perpetrator who convicted breach gross violation on human rights. This article based on the writer personal explain the legal and non-legal difficult in the Indonesia HUman Rights Court."

"Legal reform, law enforcement, and human rights protection in Indonesia; collection of articles."

"Since the end of World War II. international tow of human rights have a rapid and significant improvement so that Us become the primary source of law wte» state, international organization, and individual faces the human rights problems in all over the world. Efforts from the world community to improve the system of human rights protection achieve its culmination point when the UN diplomatic conference agreed the Rome Statute about International Criminal Court. Indonesia does not ratify that convention because Indonesia already has the law of human rights that is in the Law Number 26 Year 2000, This regulation applied to several cases of human rights violation in Indonesia such as Abilio Jose Osorio Soares case. Soedjarwo case, and G. M. Timbul Sitaen, In those cases, the definition of "a systematic and widespread attack" becomes the main discussion. The Rome Statute applies the principle of "non-retroactive" while the Indonesian human rights law applies the principle of "retroactive "."