Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai prosedur, manfaat dan kendala PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk dalam mengimplementasikan kebijakan penurunan tarif pajak penghasilan badan berbentuk perseroan terbuka. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Hasil penelitian bahwa implementasi kebijakan ini dilakukan dengan self assessment, dimana laporan kepemilikan saham pada formulir X.H.I-6 dari Datindo Entrycom, dijadikan lampiran pada Surat Pemberitahuan Tahunan PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk dan penghitungan pajak penghasilan terutang tahun pajak 2011 mengunakan tarif 20%.Manfaat yang bisa diperoleh PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk adalah meningkatkan net income after tax dan tax saving. Kendala yang dihadapi PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk dalam mengimplementasikan kebijakan ini adalah tidak bisa langsung menerapkan penurunan tarif 5% lebih rendah dari tarif umum pajak penghasilan badan pada angsuran pajak penghasilan Pasal 25 tahun Pajak 2011.

---

This research discussed about the procedure, benefits, and constraints of PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, in implementing the policy of reducing corporate income tax in rate for go public corporate. This research used the qualitative research. Result of the research that the policy implementation was done by self assessment, where the shareholding report on a form X.H.I-6 from Datindo Entrycom that used as an attachment to the annual notification letter of PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk and the calculation of income tax payable in 2011 used tariff of 20%.

The benefits to be gained by PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk is to increase net income after tax and tax saving. The constraints was faced by PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk in implementing this policy is unable to directly applying the reduced rate of 5% lower than the general rate of corporate tax on income tax installment of article 25 in tax year 2011."

"Laporan magang ini membahas mengenai analisis rekonsiliasi fiskal PPh Badan PT Energy Management Indonesia untuk tahun pajak 2010. Hasil analisis menemukan beberapa koreksi fiskal yang kurang tepat diterapkan oleh perusahaan untuk akunakun Biaya Welfare, Biaya Meals & Drink, Biaya Komunikasi, Biaya Operasional Kendaraan, Biaya Pemeliharaan Kendaraan, dan Biaya Penyusutan

---

This internship report discusses the analysis of corporate income tax reconciliation PT Energy Management Indonesia for fiscal year 2010. The result of the internship program is that there was some lack of proper fiscal correction applied by the company to the accounts of Welfare Expenses, Meals & Drink, Communication Expenses, Vehicle Operating Expenses, Vehicle Maintenance Expenses, and Depreciation Expenses."

"Laporan ini menjelaskan perlakuan dan penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan pada ekspatriat Filipina sebagai Wajib Pajak Dalam Negeri Indonesia yang bekerja di Indonesia. Perlakuan dan penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan dijelaskan dengan menggunakan kasus dari berbagai macam kondisi ekspatriat. Praktik perlakuan dan penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan akan dibandingkan dengan peraturan perpajakan yang berlaku. Laporan ini juga menjelaskan dampak dari adanya penghasilan sehubungan dengan pekerjaan yang bersumber dari Singapura pada posisi pajak ekspatriat saat pelaporan SPT Tahunan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik perlakuan dan penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan telah sesuai dengan peraturan perpajakan yang berlaku.

---

This report explains the income tax treatment and calculation for Filipino expatriate as Indonesian tax resident who works in Indonesia. Income tax treatment and calculation are explained by using various cases of expatriate conditions. The practice of tax treatment and calculation will be compared to the tax regulations that have been determined. This report also explains about the impact of expatriate overseas employment income on expatriate tax position at the filing time of annual income tax return. The results from this report show that the practice of tax treatment and calculation in accordance with tax regulations that have been determined."

"Tax as one of revenue of the country has a strategic role in funding the government operation: whether routine or development funding. As for regulator it could be used 1w the government as an accelerator of economic development by giving a conclusive stimulus for effort field.

Tax as an obligation of citizen to the state, which could be forced by law generating, contain in the implementation. The contrary generated in the form of the effort that done by the taxpayer to keep minimizes the tax payment. The contrary of the taxpayer on the tax collection is caused by the nature of the tax that does not have direct impact to the party who spend the cost.

The tax planning is an initial stage of tax management that is integrated part of the strategic management of the entire company. Therefore that will be necessary if the tax planning conducted has the contribution to determine the success of strategic management made by the company.

Income tax-article 21 is one of direct taxes that the third party conducts the collection by deducting the obliged or paid amount. The employer shall account, deduct, and report the amount of the deducted tax.

In this thesis, writer discusses the planning of income tax article 21 that conducted by PT. XYZ. The planning of income tax article 21 conducted is to minimize the tax burden especially corporate income tax as minimum as possible.

The main problem of the research could be formulated as: How PT. XYZ conducting the planning of income tax article 21 so that the main objective of the planning which is to minimize tax burden could be obtained and to avoid the wasting of the company's resources optimally caused by administrative sanction in the form of fine, interests, or the tax increase and criminal sanction.

The objective of this thesis writing was to explain the terms of taxation law affected and to find out whether tax planning could minimize the amount of tax burden that should be paid by PT. XYZ.

Writing method of the thesis is descriptive analyze, which is, by description the existing data then analyzing them to resolve the main problem of the research.

At the end, conclusion and suggestion will be given. Conclusion contains whether the tax planning that conducted by PT. XYZ has already accord to the terms of affecting tax and reach the objective of the planning itself and the suggestions contains a thought contribution from writer for the implementation of tax planning in PT. XYZ to be better and more effective."

"The creation of uncollected loan allowance decided by subjective factors bases on condition of each bank client and projection of economic condition.Subjective things bases on level of risk management conservatism at each banks in giving credit. First, make a classification of credits, and current credits, special mention credits, non current credits, uncertain credits, and not running credits. Second, kind of collateral is deducted from credit point. Third, appraisal thatCollateral to take credit.Central Bank Directors Decree Number. 31/148/KEP/DIR datedNovember 12, 1998 mentioned a preparation for facing loss risk from fund investment determines performance of a bank. Preventing loss risk upon uncollected loan, a bank should create an uncollected loan allowance. For taxation determination, the creation of uncollected loan allowance is a deduction of taxable income so it can reduce income tax payment. The tax planning with choosing thebest from several alternatives in the creation of uncollected loan allowance is allowed by tax rules, and then it may reduce tax payment which means economizing on tax.The opportunity for maximizing the creation of uncollected loan allowance, is born from the creation of uncollected loan allowance that is asymmetrical. Thus according to Central Bank only certain guarantee which can become a base in creating an allowance and collateral appraisal is not bank duty. With high creditstandard and without collateral appraisal, taxpayer can maximize the creation of uncollected loan allowance expense and reduce tax payment."

"Penelitian ini membahas permasalahan mengenai pengenaan pajak penghasilan terhadap badan asing pada bentuk usaha tetap (BUT) melalui penerapan persetujuan penghindaran pajak berganda (P3B) di Indonesia. Undang-undang pajak penghasilan memberlakukan pembedaan tarif antara badan usaha asing berbentuk BUT dan badan usaha asing yang tidak berbentuk BUT. Pada umumnya kegiatan atau usaha yang dijalankan oleh subjek pajak luar negeri di Indonesia sering memicu terjadinya pengenaan pajak berganda oleh negara sumber maupun negara domisili subjek pajak luar negeri. Oleh karena itu penulis hendak menganalisis mengenai keberadaan BUT dalam peraturan perpajakan di Indonesia serta penerapan P3B di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif, yakni penelitian kepustakaan yang dilakukan terhadap aturan-aturan hukum tertulis maupun tidak tertulis dengan tipe penelitian deskriptif. Simpulan yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah pemajakan terhadap BUT menurut UU PPh bisa didasarkan pada tarif tertentu sebagaimana yang telah diatur dalam Keputusan Menteri Keuangan dan tarif umum Pasal 17 dan 23 UU PPh. Namun terhadap kegiatan usaha yang belum memenuhi syarat BUT maka pemajakannya mengacu kepada Pasal 26 UU PPh serta kewajiban perpajakannya menjadi tanggung jawab subjek pajak dalam negeri yang membayarkan penghasilan kepada subjek pajak luar negeri. Selanjutnya melalui keberadaan P3B bertujuan untuk memitigasi pajak berganda dengan menyelaraskan definisi pajak, menetapkan basis pajak, menetapkan hak pemajakan, dan mengatur mekanisme yang akan digunakan untuk menghilangkan pajak berganda dengan melalui metode unilateral dan multilateral. P3B yang disepakati mengacu pada aturan perjanjian yang berkembang didunia saat ini yakni UN Model dan OECD Model.

---

This research discusses issues regarding to the imposition of income tax on foreign entities in the permanent establishment (PE) through the application of the double taxation avoidance agreement (tax treaty). The law of tax income applies a tariff distinction between foreign business entities in the form of PE and foreign business entities that are not in the form of PE. In general, activities or businesses carried out by foreign tax subjects in Indonesia often trigger the occurrence of double taxation by the source country or the domicile country of the foreign tax subject. Therefore, the author wants to analyze the existence of PE in tax regulations in Indonesia and the application of tax treaty in Indonesia. This research uses a juridical-normative research method, named library research conducted on written and unwritten legal rules with descriptive research type. The conclusions obtained from this research are taxation of permanent establishment according to the Income Tax Law in Indonesia can be based on certain tariffs as stipulated in the Decree of the Minister of Finance and general tariffs Article 17 and 23 of the Income Tax Law. However, for business activities that do not meet the PE requirements, the taxation refers to Article 26 of the Income Tax Law and the tax obligations are the responsibility of domestic tax subjects who pay income to foreign tax subjects. Furthermore, the existence of the tax treaty aims to mitigate double taxation by harmonizing the tax definition, establishing a tax base, determining taxation rights, and regulating the mechanism that will be used to eliminate double taxation through unilateral and multilateral methods. The agreement of tax treaty refers to the agreement rules that are developing in the world today, namely the UN Model and OECD Model."

"Kebijakan Perubahan PTKP tahun 2015 dan 2016 yang dikeluarkan pada pertengahan tahun memberikan implikasi tambahan biaya kepatuhan bagi Wajib Pajak untuk melakukan pembetulan SPT PPh Pasal 21 secara per bulan, yaitu sejak masa Januari sampai dengan Juni tahun 2015 dan 2016. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pertimbangan kebijakan perubahan PTKP dikeluarkan pada pertengahan tahun 2015 dan 2016 dan menguraikan implikasi biaya kepatuhan atas penerapan kebijakan perubahan PTKP di pertengahan tahun studi kasus pada Gabungan Pengusaha Kelapa Sawit Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kulitatif. Kebijakan perubahan PTKP tahun 2015 dan 2016 dikeluarkan pada pertengahan tahun untuk mengatasi perlambatan ekonomi dan penyesuaian UMR. Implikasi biaya kepatuhan kebijakan perubahan PTKP ini membuat Wajib Pajak harus mengeluarkan biaya tambahan terkait pembetulan SPT dan dapat menimbulkan Wajib Pajak memilih untuk tidak mematuhi ketentuan pembetulan SPT terkait kebijakan tersebut.

---

Personal exemption policy for the year 2015 and 2016 issued in the middle of the year implies additional compliance costs for taxpayers which is to make a correction of Income Tax Article 21 Return per month, for the period January to June 2015 and 2016. This study aims to explain the determination of personal exemption adjustment policy issued in middle 2015 and 2016 and analyze the implication of compliance cost on personal exemption policy in the middle 2015 and 2016 Case Study in Indonesian Palm Oil Association.

This study uses qualitative approach. Personal exemption adjustment policy for the year 2015 and 2016 was issued in the middle of the year in order to overcome economic slowdown and regional minimum wage adjustment. The cost implications of this personal exemption policy cause taxpayer to incur additional compliance costs related to revision of Income Tax Return Article 21 and potentially cause the taxpayer to choose not to comply with the rule of Income Tax Return Article 21 Revision."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang pendapatan Pemberi Pinjaman pada Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi informasi (selanjutnya disebut sebagai “LPMUBTI”) yang beroperasi di Indonesia yang kini mulai menjamur dijadikan lahan investasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Tentunya, hasil dari investasi tersebut berkontribusi pada penambahan kemampuan ekonomis Pemberi Pinjaman sehingga dapat dijadikan objek pajak penghasilan. Akan tetapi, mengingat umur kegiatan usaha LPMUBTI yang masih muda, maka peraturan perundang-undangan yang meregulasi model bisnis tersebut masih sangat minim termasuk pada sektor perpajakan. Hal ini mengakibatkan banyaknya pendapatan Pemberi Pinjaman tersebut yang luput dari pemungutan pajak dan akan terus berlanjut sampai ada tindakan konkret tertentu. Oleh karena itu, perlu diadakan kerjasama antara OJK dan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak dan/atau Peraturan Pemerintah yang mengatur tentang pajak penghasilan pendapatan investasi Pemberi Pinjaman pada LPMUBTI agar penghasilan tersebut tidak lagi luput dari pemungutan pajak.

---

The focus of this study is to analyze the Lenders’ Income on peer-to-peer lending operating in Indonesia which is currently used as a place of investment. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method. As it has always been, the acquired income from such investment contributes to the Lenders’ economic capabilities and hence it can be subjected to income tax. However, considering the age of peer-to-peer lending business is juvenile, there are only limited law and regulations subject to peer-to-peer lending including in taxation sector. This results to the amount of Lenders’ income that escapes tax collection and will continue to happen unless certain concrete action are taken. Therefore, it is necessary to establish cooperation between FSA and Directorate General of Taxes and/or law in the form of Government Regulations regarding the income tax on investment income of Lenders at peer-to-peer lending so that those income is no longer escaped from tax collection."

"Ketentuan baru dalam Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pajak Penghasilan, sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang-undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2000 menyebutkan adanya perhitungan besarnya angsuran pajak bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu dalam Pasal 25 ayat (7) yang perhitungannya diatur lebih lanjut dengan Keputusan Menteri Keuangan, terakhir dengan Nomor 8/KMK/03./2002 tanggal 8 Maret 2002 jo. Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor 171/PJ/2002 tanggal 28 Maret 2002. Dalam ketentuan terakhir tersebut diatur mengenai klasifikasi yang tergolong Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu, tarif pajak yang berlaku, perlakuan atas pembayaran PPh Pasal 25, perlakuan kompensasi kerugian dan tindakan pengawasannya.Tesis ini disusun berdasarkan penelitian dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif analisis. Penelitian dilakukan pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Jakarta Kelapa Gading. Pengumpulan data untuk keperluan analisis diperoleh melalui penelitian dokumen meliputi studi kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan yang meliputi wawancara dengan pejabat di lingkungan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak yaitu Kepala Seksi PPh Orang Pribadi KPP Jakarta Kelapa Gading, Kepala Seksi PPh Orang Pribadi I Direktorat Pajak Penghasilan Kantor Pusat Direktorat Jenderal Pajak serta kuisioner bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu.Kerangka teori yang digunakan adalah azas-azas dalam pemungutan pajak, prinsip keadilan horizontal dan vertikal dalam perpajakan dan global taxation. Dari penelitian ini diperoleh data yaitu terdapat kendala dalam menetapkan klasifikasi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu, tingkat kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu yang masih rendah, kontribusi penerimaannya yang masih rendah, tindakan pengawasan yang masih menghadapi kendala karena kurangnya koordinasi, dan bagi Wajib Pajak ketentuan ini tidak mencerminkan keadilan karena adanya pengecualian jenis usaha, besarnya tarif, perlakuan pembayaran PPh Pasal 25 sebagai pelunasan.Analisis terhadap data-data tersebut di atas menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa ada ketidakadilan horizontal maupun vertikal dalam ketentuan mengenai Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu. Pembedaan jenis usaha dalam klasif kasi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu tidak sesuai dengan azas globality. Pengenaan tarif sebesar 2 % dan peredaran bruto sebagai dasar pengenaan pajak tidak sesuai dengan prinsip progression dan net income. Perlakuan pembayaran PPh Pasal 25 sebagai pelunasan tidak sesuai dengan prinsip dasar yang terkandung dalam Pasal 25 UU Pajak Penghasilan yaitu sebagai angsuran pajak. Untuk itu, diharapkan agar ketentuan mengenai Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 25 Bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu dapat ditinjau kembali. Klasifikasi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu hendaknya tidak membedakan suatu jenis usaha tertentu, perlakuan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) sebagai pelunasan hendaknya ditiadakan. Perlu diterbitkan aturan pelaksanaan yang lebih jelas dan tugas berkaitan dengan definisi "Penghasilan Lain" dalam pasal perlakuan pembayaran PPh Pasal 25 dan prosedur dalam tindakan pengawasan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak.

---

One of the new provisions in The Law Number 7 of 1983 concerning Income Tax, as been amended finally to Law Number 17 of 2000 namely concerning calculation of tax installment for any Particular Individual Entrepreneur in Article 25 paragraph (7) whose calculations is further regulated through The Decree of The Minister of Finance, finally into Number: 8/KMK/03. /2002 dated March 8, 2002 in conjunction with The Decree of Director General of Tax number: 171/PJ/2002 dated March 28. 2002. In such final provision, it is regulated on classification of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer, the prevailing tax tariff, application on payment of income tax Article 25, loss compensation application and its control action.This thesis is drawn up pursuant to research by using policy research with analyzes descriptive method. The Research was made at Kelapa Gading Jakarta Tax Service Office. Data collection for the purpose of analyzes was obtained through document evaluation comprising bibliography study and site research that shall cover interview with officials in vicinity of Directorate General of Tax and questioner distributed to Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer.Theoretical reference applied is the principles in tax collection, horizontal and vertical justice principle within general taxation and global taxation. In this research, data obtained comprises hindrance in stipulating classification of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer, compliance rate of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer which is still low, control action still face hindrances due to poor coordination, and for Taxpayer, this provision does not reflects justice aspects due to exception of business type, rate, application of Article 25 Income Tax payment as the settlement.Analyzes against such aforementioned data has resulted in conclusion that there is vertical and horizontal injustice in provision concerning Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer. Unequal treatment of business type of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer Classifications is not in accordance with global principles, rate of 2% and gross circulation as the base of tax impose is not in accordance with the principle of unequal treatment for the unequal and net income. Payment treatment of Tax Income Article 25 as the settlement is not conforming to basic principles set forth in Article 25 Law of Income Tax namely as the tax installment. Therefore it is advisable that provision on Tax Income Article 25 for Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer is to be re-evaluated. Classifications of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer shall not treat unequally on the particular type of business, application of Income Tax Article 25 paragraph (7) as the settlement shall be revoked, more transparent and confirmed implemental regulation is to be applied concerning other income definition in treatment of Article 25 Income Tax payment and procedure in controlling the compliance aspect of Tax Payer."