Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Notaris sebagai salah satu Profesi Penunjang Pasar Modal, bertanggung jawab dalam pembuatan akta RUPS sehubungan dengan Penawaran Umum Terbatas saham. Tanggung jawab secara normatif terdapat dalam peraturan Pasar Modal, dan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, secara profesi terdapat dalam Undang-Undang Pasar Modal. Notaris juga ikut bertanggung jawab terhadap kepatuhan dan ketaatan emiten dalam rangka memenuhi ketentuan pasar modal yang berlaku. Penelitian ini mengenai pelanggaran yang dilakukan Notaris dalam hal memperhitungkan kuasa asing yang tidak disertai legalisasi Pejabat setempat dalam kuorum kehadiran RUPS. Metode yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian secara normatif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang mendasarinya, data lapangan sebagai pendukung. Pengolahan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif dan analisa mendalam. Dari penelitian disimpulkan bahwa Peran dan tanggung jawab notaris mempunyai akibat terhadap akta. Surat kuasa asing dalam RUPS harus disertai legalisasi Pejabat setempat dan KBRI setempat.

---

As a profession which supports capital market activities, a notary is expected to be responsible for the drafting of deed on the resolutions of the general meeting of shareholders. It is a responsibility which is contained in the Capital Market regulations, Law on Notary Profession and the Code of Ethics of Notary Profession. In addition, a notary is also responsible for the issuers? compliance with and observance of regulations on capital market and for providing directions so that issuers comply with the regulations. This research seeks to identify serious problems in connection with the role of notary as a profession which supports capital market in carrying out the rights issue and notary's responsibility for each notarial deed a notary draws up for that purpose. It seeks to see possible legal impacts on the deed he draws up in case he has made a mistake during the drafting. The research method is the normative research conducted on the underlying laws and regulations and the research also uses field data from companies to support it. The research was about violation which has done by notary on contemplating foreign deeds which has not authorized by local public officer in general meeting of share holders. From this research can be concluded that foreign deeds in general meeting of shareholders must be authorized by local public officer and Indonesian Embassy."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab masalah-masalahmengenai bagaimana dukungan peraturan perundang-undangan diIndonesia terhadap proses privatisasi PT Jasa Marga denganmenggunakan metode Inltial Public Offering.Penelitian inimenggunakan metode penelitian normatif yang didukung data dilapangan sebagai penunjang.Tap MPR Nomor IV/MPR/1999 tentangGBHN Tahun 1999 - 2004 yang menyatakan bahwa bagi BUMN yangusahanya tidak berkaitan dengan kepentingan umum didorong untukmelakukan privatisasi melalui pasar modal. Prosedur kebijakanprivatisasi BUMN kemudian diperkuat dan diatur dalam UndangundangNomor 25 Tahun 2000 Tentang P R O P E N A S Tahun 2000 - 2004,yang salah satu kegiatan pokoknya adalah kewajiban pemerintahuntuk meningkatkan pemanfaatan kepemilikan BUMN melalui prosesprivatisasi. Selain itu, kebijakan privatisasi BUMN diperkuatdengan Undang-undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 Tentang BUMN yangmenjadi dasar hukum dalam pengelolacin dan pengawasanBUMN.Temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah bahwa pemerintahIndonesia sudah memiliki dasar hukum dan peraturan-peraturanyang relatif lengkap dalam melakukan proses privatisasi PT JasaMarga dengan menggunakan metode Initial Public Offering, akantetapi metode Initial Public Offering (IPO) di pasar modal bisadikatakan dapat mendatangkan manfaat bagi pemerintah danmasyarakat Indonesia apabila setelah privatisasi tersebut, PTJasa Marga mampu bertahan hidup dan berkembang di masa depan,mampu menghasilkan keuntungan, dan juga dapat memberdayakankemampuan perusahaannya. Namun implementasi kebijakanprivatisasi PT Jasa Marga melalui penjualan saham di pasarmodal akan menemui kendala apabila, belum adanya komitmen yangtinggi di kalangan pemerintah untuk mengembangkan PT Jasa Margake arah yang lebih baik, belum tuntasnya sosialisasi mengenaiaspek hukum kebijakan privatisasi PT Jasa Marga, baik untukmanajemen, kalangan investor maupun masyarakat luas danlemahnya law enforcement di Indonesia yang bisa mengakibatkantingkat kepercayaan investor dalam dan luar negeri terhadapkebijakan privatisasi di Indonesia masih rendah. Dengandemikian, privatisasi PT Jasa Marga dengan menggunakan metodeInitial Public Offering (IPO) di pasar modal diharapkan mampumeningkatkan kinerja perusahaan, mampu menerapkan prinsipprinsipgood Corporate governance dalam pengelolaanperusahaannya, mampu meningkatkan akses ke pasar internasional,terjadinya transfer ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi danterjadinya perubahan budaya kerja.

---

ABSTRACTThis research has the objective to answer the problems subjecthow is the support of the regulation in Indonesia upon theprocess of PT. Jasa Marga privatization by using InitialPublic Offering Method. This research used the normativeresearch method that supported by the data from the jobsite asthe supporter. The decree of the MPR Number IV /MPR/1999subject GBHN Year of 1999 until 2004 states for the BUMNthat its efforts don't have any relations with publicinterest is pushed to conduct the privatization through thestock exchange. The procedure of SoE privatization policy isthen strsngthened and managed in the Regulation Number 25 Yearof 200 Subject PROPENAS Year of 2000 - 2004 that one of itsmain activity is the obligation of the government to increasethe beneficial of the ownership of the SoE through the processof privatization. Besides, the SoE privatization policy isstrengthened by the Regulation Number 19 Year of 2003 Subjectthe SoE becomes the fundamental legal in the management and thesupervising of the SoE. Finding in this research is that thegovernment of Indonesia has owned the fundamental legal and therelative complete regulations in conducting the process ofprivatization of PT Jasa Marga by using the Initial PublicOffering Method but the Initial Public Offering (IPO) methodin the stock exchange can be said that it may result thebenefit for the government and the people of Indonesia if afterthe privatization, PT Jasa Marga be able to survive and willdevelop in the future, able to yield the benefit and alsoable to empower the company ability. But the implementation ofthe PT. Jasa Marga privatization policy through the selling ofits shares in stock exchange will face the problem if itdoesn't have high commitment in the government lines to developPT. Jasa Marga to better direction; incompleteness of itssocialization, subject the legal aspect of PT. Jasa Margaprivatization policy, either for management, the investorsparties, and wide society and the weakness of the lawenforcement in Indonesia that may cause the level of the trustof domestic and foreign investors to the privatization policyin Indonesia is still low. By that reason PT. Jasa Margaprivatization by using the Initial Public Offering (IPO) inthe stock exchange is expected be able to increase theperformance of the company, able to apply the principles ofgood Corporate governance in the management of its company,able to increase the access to international markets, thehappening of the transferring of knowledge and technologyand the happening of the change of the work culture."