Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan persepsi kualitas audit yang dihasilkan KAP Big 4 dan KAP Non Big 4. Persepsi kualitas audit diukur dengan kecenderungan auditor dalam menerbitkan opini going concern, manajemen laba yang dilakukan manajemen, dan ex ante cost of equity capital. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa perbedaan persepsi kualitas audit antara KAP Big 4 dan KAP Non Big 4 yaitu pada manajemen laba yang dilakukan perusahaan dan ex ante cost of equity capital. Tidak terbukti terdapat perbedaan dalam kecenderungan auditor menerbitkan opini going concern.

---

This research aims to analyze the difference in the perceived audit quality between Big 4 Audit Firm and Non Big 4 Audit Firm. Perceived audit quality is measured by the tendency of auditors to issue going concern opinion, earnings management made by the company, and the ex ante cost of equity capital.

The results showed that there were differences in the perceived audit quality between Big 4 Audit Firm and Non Big 4 Audit Firm on the earnings management by the company and the ex ante cost of equity capital. There is no difference in the tendency of auditors issued a going concern opinion."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti ada tidaknya perbedaan pengaruh abnormal audit fees terhadap kualitas audit, antara KAP Big 4 dengan non-Big 4, yang diukur melalui nilai akrual diskresioner dan kecenderungan pemberian opini going concern bagi perusahaan yang mengalami masalah keuangan. Sampel merupakan 109 perusahaan non-keuangan di Indonesia yang melaporkan biaya audit selama periode 2013-2015, diperoleh menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa abnormal audit fees signifikan mempengaruhi akrual diskresioner secara negatif, dengan penggunaan auditor Big 4 memperlemah pengaruh tersebut, namun penggunaan auditor non-Big 4 tidak berpengaruh. Hasil lainnya menunjukkan bahwa abnormal audit fees secara signifikan negatif mempengaruhi probabilitas pemberian opini going concern bagi perusahaan yang mengalami masalah keuangan, dengan penggunaan auditor Big 4 memperlemah pengaruh tersebut, namun penggunaan auditor non-Big 4 tidak berpengaruh. Kedua hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan pengaruh dari abnormal audit fees pada KAP Big 4 dengan non-Big 4, terhadap kualitas audit.

---

This study aims to examine whether there is a difference in the effect of abnormal audit fees on audit quality, between Big 4 and non Big 4 audit firms, as measured by discretionary accrual and going concern opinion for companies experiencing financial problems. The sample is 109 non financial companies in Indonesia that report audit fees during 2013 2015, obtained using purposive sampling method.

The results show that abnormal audit fees significantly influence discretionary accruals negatively, with the use of big4 auditors undermine those influences. Other results indicate that abnormal audit fees have negative significant effect on the probability of going concern opinion for firms with financial difficulties, with the use of big4 auditors undermine those influences. Both results indicate that there is a difference in the effect of abnormal audit fees on audit quality between Big 4 and non Big 4 audit firms. "

"Penelitian ini berhubungan dengan minat audit staff untuk melanjutkan karir sebagai partner. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh bukti empiris mengenai faktor-faktor yang secara signifikan mempengaruhi minat audit staff yang bekerja di KAP untuk melanjutkan karir sebagai partner, pengaruh hal tersebut terhadap perkembangan KAP, dan peran formal requirement dan bentuk partnership dalam memoderasi hubungan antara minat audit staff yang bekerja di KAP untuk melanjutkan karir sebagai partner dan perkembangan KAP pada tiap kelompok KAP yaitu KAP Big 4, menengah, dan kecil di Jakarta. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah berasal dari kuesioner sebanyak 240 orang. Pengujian dilakukan dengan menggunakan Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Lisrel dan SPSS. Hasil pengujian menggunakan SEM LISREL diperoleh bahwa variabel yang secara signifikan mempengaruhi minat audit staff dalam melanjutkan karir menjadi partner adalah formal requirement, uang, dan reputasi, serta minat audit staff berpengaruh signifikan terhadap perkembangan karir, formal requirement tidak terbukti signifikan dalam memoderasi minat audit staff melanjutkan karir sebagai partner dan perkembangan KAP, dan bentuk Partnership terbukti secara signifikan dalam memoderasi minat audit staff melanjutkan karir sebagai partner dan perkembangan KAP. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa minat audit dapat mempengaruhi Perkembangan KAP dan Bentuk Partnership berperan sebagai moderator murni dalam model penelitian ini. Penelitian ini berguna bagi para regulator, hendaknya segera mempercepat rencana jalur percepatan karir di bidang audit bagi para lulusan sarjana ekonomi (S1)agar minat lulusan terhadap profesi tersebut dan berkarir di bidang tersebut meningkat, tidak hanya sebagai batu loncatan.

---

This research related to the interest of audit staff to continue career as a partner. This study aims to obtain empirical evidence on the factors that significantly affect the interests of the audit staff who work at the public accounting firm to continue career as a partner, that effect to the development of the public accounting firm, and the role of formal requirements and partnership form in moderating the relationship between audit staff interests who work at the public accounting firm to continue career as a partner and the development in each group of public accounting firm, which are KAP Big 4, Second Tier, and Small in Jakarta. Data source in this study is from the questionnaire as many as 240 people. Testing conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Lisrel and SPSS. Test results using SEM LISREL shows that the variables that significantly affect the interests of the audit staff to continue career as a partner are formal requirement, money, and reputation, as well as audit staff interests significantly influence career development in public accounting firm, formal requirement does not proved significantly in moderating the audit staff interests to continue career as a partner and the development of the firm, and partnership form proved to be significantly in moderating the audit staff interests to continue career as a partner and the development of the firm. It can be concluded that the audit interests may affect the development of the public accounting firm and partnership is pure moderator for this research model. This research is useful for the regulators, who should immediately accelerate the acceleration pathways plans in audit career for economics graduate (S1) that could increase the interest of graduates to the profession and a career in this field, not only as a stepping stone."

"Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh pengungkapan imbal jasa audit dan besaran imbal jasa audit abnormal terhadap kualitas audit yang diproksikan oleh akrual diskresioner. Penelitian ini juga meneliti apakah ukuran KAP memoderasi pengaruh tersebut. Sampel yang digunakan adalah perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2012 - 2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pengungkapan imbal jasa audit tidak terbukti berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit. Imbal jasa audit abnormal baik positif maupun negatif terbukti menurunkan kualitas audit yang berarti pembayaran jasa audit yang tidak wajar menyebabkan penurunan kualitas audit. Pengujian ukuran KAP sebagai variabel pemoderasi menunjukkan pengaruh negatif imbal jasa audit abnormal terhadap kualitas audit hanya terjadi pada KAP Non BIG 4. Pada KAP BIG 4, baik pengungkapan imbal jasa audit maupun imbal jasa audit abnormal tidak berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit.

---

This study investigates the effect of audit fee disclosure and abnormal audit fee on audit quality proxied by discretionary accruals. This study also investigates the effect of audit firm size as moderating variable. This study used sample of listed non financial companies in BEI using data from 2012 - 2014.

The results of this study shows that disclosure audit fee is not associated with audit quality. Abnormal audit fee whether it?s signed positive or negative, impair audit quality. Unusually audit fees can lead to decreased audit quality. Therefore, the effect of abnormal audit fee on audit quality only happened in Non BIG 4 audit firm. The effect of disclosure audit fee and abnormal audit fee isn?t associated in BIG 4 Audit Firm."

"Information technology (IT) has been developing rapidly throughout the last decade. Many organizations have been using computerized information system in their operations and preparing the financial statement. Hence, in the computerized information system environment, the quality of information is being questioned since accurate and reliable information is crucial. in view of that, people then seek professional assurance towards information that is provided by a computerized system. In order to provide such assurance, accounting firms such as KAP XYZ provide the information system (IS) audit. The IS audit is conducted as part of the financial audit and it is crucial for financial audit since its outcome provides an assurance that the computerized information system has been designed and operated to produce reliable data. Thus, the employment of IS audit increases the level of assurance in the financial audit. The employment of IS audit influences the financial audit process. However, the influence is significant only in the financial audit engagement involving client with complex IT environment. In such case, IS audit procedures influence the financial audit procedures and cause a change in the flow of financial audit process. This thesis tries to link the role of financial and IS auditors in the audit engagement involving client with complex IT environment. The link is illustrated into process flowcharts which are derived from several sources such as from literature as well as from practitioner, that is, KAP XYZ, one of the big four accounting firms in Indonesia."

"Laporan karya akhir ini membahas tentang pengaruh rotasi kantor akuntan publik terhadap kualitas audit dan biaya audit. Proksi untuk kualitas audit adalah manajemen laba yang diukur dengan akrual abnormal. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 619 perusahaan nonkeuangan yang terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia dalam periode 2013 - 2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rotasi kantor akuntan publik tidak berpengaruh kualitas audit. Hal ini dikarenakan kualitas audit lebih dipengaruhi oleh independensi auditor dan kompetensi auditor. Rotasi kantor akuntan publik juga tidak berpengaruh terhadap biaya audit baik normal maupun abnormal karena biaya audit yang dibebankan kantor akuntan publik pada setiap perusahaan pada dasarnya sama. Kata Kunci: Rotasi Kantor Akuntan Publik, Kualitas Audit, Biaya Audit, Manajemen Laba.

---

This research discusses the effect of audit firm rotation on audit quality and audit fees. The proxy for audit quality is earnings management as measured by abnormal accruals. The sample of this research is 619 nonfinancial companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2013 2016. The results show that the audit firm rotation does not affect the quality of audit. This is because audit quality is more influenced by auditor independence and auditor competence. The audit firm rotation also has no effect on the normal or abnormal audit cost because the audit fees charged by the audit firm on each company are essentially the same."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh tenure audit dan rotasi auditor terhadap kualitas audit, pengaruh ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) terhadap kualitas audit, serta pengaruh moderasi ukuran KAP terhadap hubungan tenure audit dan kualitas audit. Tenure audit dibedakan menjadi tenure KAP dan tenure audit partner (AP). Rotasi auditor dibedakan menjadi rotasi KAP dan rotasi audit partner (AP). Sampel penelitian adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada periode 2004 hingga 2011, kecuali perusahaan yang bergerak di industri keuangan. Kualitas audit dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan kualitas laba dengan menggunakan tingkat akrual diskresioner (Kasznik, 1999). Tenure KAP dan rotasi KAP terbukti tidak berpengaruh kuadratik terhadap kualitas audit. Tenure AP dan rotasi AP juga tidak terbukti memiliki hubungan kuadratik dengan kualitas audit. Ukuran KAP terbukti berpengaruh positif secara langsung terhadap kualitas audit. Ditemukan pula bahwa pengaruh ukuran KAP memoderasi hubungan antara tenure AP dan kualitas audit. Akan tetapi, tidak ditemukan adanya pengaruh ukuran KAP dalam memoderasi hubungan antara tenure KAP dan kualitas audit. Hasil penelitian ini mengindikasikan perlunya pengkajian lebih lanjut terkait efektivitas peraturan yang membatasi tenure audit.

---

This research aims to examine the effect of audit tenure and auditor rotation on audit quality, the effect of audit firm size on audit quality, and the moderating effect of audit firm size on the relationship between audit tenure and audit quality. Audit tenure refers to audit firm tenure and audit partner tenure. Auditor rotation refers to audit firm rotation and audit partner rotation. The research samples are public companies that are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2004-2011 periods exclude the companies in financial industry. Audit quality?s proxy is earnings quality which is measured by the level of discretionary accrual (Kasznik, 1999). This research finds that audit firm tenure and audit firm rotation have no effect on audit quality. Audit partner tenure and audit partner rotation also have no effect on audit quality. There is a positive of audit firm size on audit quality. But, the evidences that support the moderating effect of audit firm size on the relationship between audit firm tenure and audit quality are insufficient. In the other hand, moderating effect of audit firm size on the relationship between audit partner tenure and audit quality shows that the engagement with Big X auditor will give a positive impact on audit quality. The results of this research show that the regulation that limits the audit tenure is a subject of further evaluation."

"Tesis ini membahas pengaruh ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) dan penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Mutu (SPM) terhadap kualitas audit. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif analitis, dengan melakukan survei menggunakan kuesioner dan wawancara untuk mengumpulkan data dan informasi dari responden. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah : 1) ukuran KAP dan penerapan SPM memiliki hubungan yang positif dan signifikan; 2) ukuran K.AP berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas audit; 3) penerapan SPM berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas audit; dan 4) ukuran KAP dan penerapan SPM secara simultan berhubungan signifikan terhadap kualitas audit.

---

The focus of this study is public accounting firm size and implementation of quality control system. and how they affect audit quality. This is an analytical descriptive research, by survey method using questionnaires to collect prime data and information from respondents. The result of hypothesis test shows that 1) public accounting firm size positively and significantly related to implementation of quality control system; 2) public accounting firm size influences the audit quality significantly; 3) implementation of quality control system influences the audit quality significantly; 4) public accounting firm together with implementation of quality control system as a whole has a significant influence to audit quality.

"

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah fee discounting terjadi diIndonesia dan bagaimana pengaruh praktik tersebut terhadap kualitas audit. Sampelyang digunakan pada penelitian kali ini adalah perusahaan non keuangan yangterdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2010-2014. Hasil penelitian inimenemukan bahwa terdapat fee discounting pada awal perikatan audit saat terjadiperubahan kantor akuntan publik, namun tidak terdapat fee discounting saat terjadiperubahan signing partner. Sedangkan untuk pengaruh terhadap kualitas audit,terjadinya fee discounting tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan pada kualitasaudit.

---

ABSTRACTThis study aims to examine whether the practice of lowballing cost occursin Indonesia and how the influence of these practices on the audit quality. Thesample used in this study are non financial companies listed on the Indonesia StockExchange in 2010 2014. This study finds that there is a fee discounting at initial ofaudit engagement when audit firms changes, but there is no fee discounting whensigning partner changes. As the effect on audit quality, the fee discounting does nothave a significant effect on the quality of the audit."

"Tesis ini meneliti pengaruh ukuran audit daerah dan implementasi tindak lanjut hasil audit terhadap kualitas audit di Indonesia. Audit di Indonesia dibagi menjadi dua jenis: eksternal dan internal audit. Eksternal dan internal audit didasarkan pada pertanggungjawaban audit dimana internal audit berada dalam lingkup pemerintahan sedangkan eksternal audit independen dari subyek audit. Tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan adalah rekomendasi audit dari audit eksternal untuk memperbaiki laporan keuangan subyek audit. Audit eksternal akan memberikan rekomendasi audit kepada internal audit untuk mengatasi temuan audit eksternal.Tesis ini menganalisa panel data 33 provinsi dari tahun 2009 sampai tahun 2013 yang didapat dari Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (LHP BPK) dan Daerah Dalam Angka Bada Pusat Statistik (DDA BPS) menggunakan model OLS, TSLS, FEM dam REM. Ada dua jenis variabel dependen yaitu jumlah temuan audit dan nominal temuan audit.Tesis ini menemukan bahwa tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan dan ukuran audit berpengaruh signifikan terhadap temuan audit dan internal audit yang didasarkan pada jumlah internal auditor, jumlah unit subyek audit, dan jumlah pegawai provinsi juga berpengaruh signifikan terhadap jumlah temuan audit. Jumlah tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan di tahun sebelumnya mempengaruhi jumlah dan nominal temuan di tahun berjalan tetapi nominal tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan audit di tahun berjalan tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap temuan audit di tahun berjalan. Ini menunjukkan tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan mempengaruhi temuan audit secara keseluruhan jumlah audit tanpa dipengaruhi nominal temuan audit.

---

This study examines the effect of local audit size and the audit feedback implementation to audit quality in Indonesia. Indonesian government has two audit institutions: external and internal audit. The external and internal audits are based on the bureaucratic responsibility of each audit where the internal audit is supervised by an audit subject itself while the external audit is independent from the audit subject. The audit feedback is a recommendation from the external audit to correct the audit subject?s financial report. The external audit gives audit feedback to the internal audit to solve financial issues in the audit findings.

This study analyzes panel data of 33 provinces from 2009 to 2013 from Audit Report Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) and Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), using OLS, TSLS, FEM, and REM models. There are two dependent variables: the number of audit findings and the amount of audit findings.

The study finds that audit feedback and audit size are statistically significant to influence the audit findings and the internal audit size based on auditor's number, the number of auditor?s subject unit, and number of provincial employees is statistically significant to the number of audit findings as well. The number of feedback in the previous year affect to both amount and number of audit finding in the current year. The amount of audit feedback in the previous year, however, does not significantly affect the amount of audit finding in the current year. It implies that the audit feedback implementation affects the audit findings as a whole without being disturbed by the nominal amount of audit findings."