Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c adalah angsuran Pajak Penghasilan yang harus dilunasi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu (WP OPPT) setiap bulannya dihitung berdasarkan persentase tertentu dari peredaran bruto/omzet. Dalam pelaksanaan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 menggunakan prinsip self assessment system, dengan sistem ini Wajib Pajak (WP) diberikan kepercayaan penuh untuk menghitung kewajiban perpajakannya yang harus disetor dan dilaporkan ke Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) melalui Surat Pemberitahuan (SPT) Pajak Penghasilan. Maka skripsi ini membahas bagaimana implementasi pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c, bagaimana pendapat WP OPPT mengenai kebijakan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c, dan apakah hambatanhambatan yang dihadapi oleh KPP dan WP OPPT dalam melaksanakan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c di KPP Pratama Klaten. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif, dengan teknik pengumpulan data wawancara dan literatur.Hasil penelitian ini adalah kesadaran dan pemahaman WP dalam pelaksanaan kewajiban PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huurf c masih kurang, serta adanya penurunan kontribusi penerimaan PPh Pasal 25/29 OPPT di KPP Pratama Klaten. Sehingga kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa pelaksanaan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c bagi WP OPPT di KPP Pratama Klaten belum optimal dikarenakan kurang optimalnya komunikasi yang dilakukan fiskus dengan WP, sumber daya manusia dari segi kuantitas kurang proposional dengan jumlah Wajib Pajak, sikap patuh WP OPPT belum konsisten/masih kurang, pendapat yang diberikan WP OPPT terhadap kebijakan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c kurang baik., hambatan-hambatan yang dihadapi petugas pajak dalam melaksanakan kebijakan ini adalah masyarakat kurang antusias, WP pindah tempat usaha, sumber daya manusia (petugas pajak) tidak proposional dengan jumlah WP, belum adanya law inforcement yang tegas, sedangkan hambatan yang dihadapi WP merasa kesulitan dalam menghitung PPh terutang pada akhir tahun, WP merasa kesulitan dalam melakukan pengisian pada SSP dan SPT Tahunan, dan kemudahan pengadaan fomulir pajak (seperti: SSP).

---

Income Tax (VAT) of Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c is the income tax installment must be paid in individual taxpayer Specific Employers (WP OPPT) per month calculated on a percentage of gross income / turnover. Tax collection in the implementation of Article 25 uses the principle of self assessment system, with this system Taxpayer (WP) is given full trust for calculating taxation liabilities that must be paid and reported to the Tax Office through the Notice of Income Tax (SPT). So this paper discusses how the implementation of collection of Income Tax Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c, how do individual taxpayer Entrepreneur Specific policies regarding the collection of Income Tax Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c, and whether the barriers faced by the Office of Services Tax and Individual Tax Payer Specific Employers in executing the collection of Income Tax Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c in Klaten Tax Office. This study used a qualitative approach is descriptive, with interview data collection techniques and literature.

The results of this research is the awareness and understanding of Taxpayers Income Tax liability in the implementation of Article 25 paragraph (7) huurf c is still lacking, as well as a decrease in contribution receipts of Income Tax Article 25/29 of Certain Persons in Private Employers Tax Office Primary Klaten. So that the conclusions of this study is that for collection of income tax under Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c for individual taxpayer Certain Employers at the Tax Office Primary Klaten not optimal due to less optimal fiskus communications made by the taxpayer, in terms of human resources less quantity proportional to the number of taxpayers, the attitude of submissive individual taxpayer has not been consistent Specific Entrepreneur / still less, given the opinion that individual taxpayer Employers of Certain Income Tax collection policies of Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c is less good., barrier- obstacles encountered in implementing the tax policy is less enthusiastic public, taxpayer moved the place of business, human resources (the tax) is not proportional to the number of taxpayers, the lack of strict law inforcement, while the barriers faced by taxpayers find it difficult to calculating income tax payable at the end of the year, taxpayers find it difficult to perform charging at the Tax Payment (SSP) and the Notice of Income Tax (SPT) Annual, and ease of procurement fomulir taxes (such as: SSP)."

"Set of problems in this thesis are, how does strategy of increasing the obedience of personal tax payers to increase income tax revenues at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng, what does strategy that has been using at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng has reached target of tax revenues planning, what constraints that has been facing to increase personal tax payers to reach target of revenues planning at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng.Research in this thesis uses descriptive analysis method with qualitative approach on the study of policy. Technique on data collection is in the form of book and field study and through depth interview with related parties.The research results in a summary, which implies that according to increase personal income tax, KPP Jakarta Cengkareng uses to the front integration strategy, market penetration strategy, market development strategy, and product development strategy. To increase new tax payers, KPP Jakarta Cengkareng uses market development strategy, through extensification activities like canvassing, tax payers operation and information instrument data. To the front integration strategy involve increasing of supervision to tax payers so increase that tax revenues at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng. Along with the application of this strategy, KPP Jakarta Cengkareng uses supervision to tax payers, pressing a claim of tax, and law enforcement. Market penetration strategy is one of strategy that is concentrated various efforts to increase tax payers obedience to increase tax revenues at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng. Meanwhile the application of this strategy uses intensification strategy. Product development strategy aims to increase personal income tax revenues at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng through increase or modify products or services, like giving service and illumination to tax payers_ Based on data, personal income tax revenues planning that can be realized by KPP Jakarta Cengkareng has been succeed because realization of personal income tax revenue in 2005 about 97,6%. According to writer opinion, there are 6 (six) factors to increase personal income tax at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng among others are: revenues planning, tax service office (KPP), procedure, strategy, tax payers, and tax payers obedience. KPP Jakarta Cengkareng faces constraints to optimally personal income tax imposition, consist of number of human resources at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng is not proportional with the area of KPP Jakarta Cengkareng, lack of infrastructure at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng to support operational activities, lack of tax payers awareness and obedience to implement tax regulation, and lack of tax payers data collection.Preferably, KPP Jakarta Cengkareng gives suggestion to Directorate General of Taxation to increase number of human resources at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng with professionals and top human resources to support operation activities in KPP so maximize that revenues KPP Jakarta Cengkareng should be divided into some KPP because, area of KPP Jakarta Cengkareng so wide and KPP can maximize supervision and build to tax payers. Preferably to supervise all tax payers because, according to writer monitoring, KPP Jakarta Cengkareng only supervise to tax payers who has big contribution like determining STP to 100 tax payers and another 100 tax payers. Along with law enforcement, determining STP is conducted to tax payers who hasn't filled taxation obligation as tax regulation. To increase knowledge and comprehension of tax regulation for tax payers and fiscus at KPP Jakarta Cengkareng.To increase knowledge and comprehension in system and procedure of taxation, KPP Jakarta Cengkareng gives illumination to his employee through training, so increase better services to tax payers. Illumination to tax payers is going continue and consistent with direct and indirect methods. Direct method activities to tax payers hasn't reached target because, according to writer monitoring illumination method has been doing at beginning of fiscal year, in third month preferably illumination activities conduct every two months in a year and be conducted in potential public places like shopping center, malls, political district administrative by lurah. It's necessary to modernize all infrastructure that has been available in KPP are minus, like broken printers, out of orders computers, etc, that has hampered activities of fiscus to gives services to tax payers and reach revenues target that has given to KPP Jakarta Cengkareng."