Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACTThis article argues that MIKTA (Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey, and Australia) are middle, regional, and constructive powers that can serve as providers of global governance in the international system. it argues that in order for MIKTA countries to serve as middle, regional, and constructive powers, they need to consolidate the support of all relevant State and non-State actors in their countries, allowing MIKTA to become a relevant mechanism to promote and generate public goods in the international system, specially global governance. Mexico is the second largest economy in Latin America. Mexico is today an actor with global responsibility and obligatory reference. A country with that weight must play in new boards and MIKTA, constituting and innovative alliance with key non-traditional partners, is a strategic space to expand the scope of Mexican foreign policy."

"Fokus dari penulisan karya tulis ini adalah untuk memperlihatkan bagaimana pandangan tiga paradigma dalam studi ilmu hubungan internasional terhadap keputusan Amerika Serikat untuk bekerja sama dengan Meksiko dalam Merida Initiative. Melalui paradigma realisme menganalisis Merida Initiative sebagai kerangka rezim keamanan yang ingin dibentuk oleh Amerika Serikat., sedangkan paradigma neoliberalisme institusionalis melihat keuntungan yang diperoleh dari pembentukan institusi ini, sementara konstruktivisme lebih melihat kepada ide politisasi isu keamanan dan mengkonstruksi persepsi ancamanya kepada Amerika Serikat.

---

The focus of the writing of this paper is to show how three paradigms in the study of international relations sees the U.S. decision to cooperate with Mexico in the Merida Initiative. Realism perceive Merida Initiative as a framework to analyze the security regime to be formed by the United States., While neoliberal institutionalist paradigm notice the benefits of the establishment of this institution, while looking at the idea of ​​constructivism over the securitization of security issues in United States."

"ABSTRAKLogan 2014 adalah film superhero tentang perjalanan mutan, orang yang memiliki kemampuan khusus, dari El-Paso, Meksiko, ke North Dakota, Kanada. Film tersebut dapat ditafsirkan sebagai salah satu bentuk protes terhadap kebijakan imigrasi Donald Trump sekaligus merupakan representasi isu ras yang kompleks. Walaupun banyak akademisi yang menganalisis film-film mengenai perbatasan Meksiko-Amerika, jurnal ilmiah yang membahas film Logan 2017 tidaklah cukup. Artikel ilmiah ini menganalisis bagaimana film tersebut menyampaikan pesannya dengan menggunakan Borderland karya Gloria Anzaldua 1987 sebagai landasan teori melalui metode semiotik dan analisis tekstual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa film tersebut menggambarkan perbatasan, imigrasi, dan ras dalam perjalanan karaternya sebagai alegori yang efektif untuk menyampaikan kritik terhadap kebijakan imigrasi yang sedang hangat di Amerika.

---

ABSTRACTLogan 2014 is a superhero movie about the journey of gifted people called mutant from El Paso, Mexico to North Dakota, Canada. The movie could be read as a form of protest against Donald Trump rsquo s immigration policy as well as a complex representation of racial issues. Although many scholars have analyzed border movies, academic paper that mentions Logan 2017 is insufficient. This article analyzes how the movie delivers message by using Gloria Anzaldua rsquo s 1987 Borderland theoretical framework through semiotic method and textual analysis. Research findings show that the movie portrays the border, immigration, and race in the characters rsquo journey as an effective allegory for conveying critique against the recent immigration policy in America. "